Which is worse, Obama's incompetence or Obama's ideology?

Ideology? Please. He's another corporatist politician like the rest of them. He offers stimulus spending when a GOP would be offering tax cuts, yet both of them are some form of government welfare offered to those who shouldn't need it while those without capital have to play by a different set of rules (unless they're dirt poor, in which they'd get entitlements from either party.) Yes, he and Romney have differences in tone and rhetoric but ultimately, both love big government.

Yet most of you in this post are gladly handing Obama this election because of your fanaticism. Remember the story of the boy who cried wolf? Yep. First he was going to take all the guns away when he got elected so gun sales skyrocketed, yet nothing happened. Then he was a Indo-Kenyan Muslim who was going to institute Sharia law. It hasn't and won't happen because he's an American Christian. Then he's some socialist that's going to overtake the American economic system. Last I checked, he hasn't stood up to Wall Street the way the OWS folks would have hoped and the rich haven't faced a tax increase since taking office, so once again, nothing has changed. That's why his incompetence is worse: Despite promises to the contrary, nothing has changed.

People are still supporting Obama because none of them want to be you or identify with you. This isn't because they don't value the principles on which America was founded or hope to get something for nothing (let's face it, if you can accuse Liberals for wanting something for nothing in the terms of government handouts, then you can accuse Conservatives for wanting something for nothing in terms of receiving government services without paying taxes for it.) It's because this entire time, not once has anyone truly highlighted how Romney can do a better job without infringing on anyone else's civil liberties or how he can do a better job without placing the tax burden on the middle class. Instead, most posts feature something to the effect of "Who do you any posts that even slightly question what Romney could do better are encountered with a string of insults and ad hominem attacks that do nothing to convince anyone of anything other than the fact that the Romney supporter is a fanatic who embraces a "you're either with us or against us" mentality. And any time someone mentions their support for Gary Johnson (the guy who won me over back in the Republican Primaries), they face the same thug tactics that liberals used whenever dissenting leftists voiced their support for Ralph Nader or David Cobb in 2000 or 2004 respectively.

Do you really want Romney to win this election or do you want another 4 years of complaining about how the Man's got you down? If you want the former, than for the love of God please clarify why we should support Romney without resorting to attack methods. Not everyone's life was better 4-6 years ago (for some, their lives have actually improved) and some people are hesitant to hand the keys back to the party that they feel initiated this mess so the financial elite wouldn't have to live shoulder-to-shoulder with other members of the middle class who were doing better after the Clinton years. If you can do this with logic and reason, thank you. If you do this with either insults or arguments like "Mitt Romney is a Christian-valued family man who ran businesses and Barack Hussien NObama is a socialist commie scum who's out to destroy America", then the only person you stand to convince is yourself.