Which do you think is true: creationism or evolution?
Mopeder
2012/01/22 02:27:46
|
|
|||||
|
65 votes
|
|
19% | |||
|
173 votes
|
|
52% | |||
|
65 votes
|
|
19% | |||
|
13 votes
|
|
4% | |||
|
18 votes
|
|
5% | |||
Read More: http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/barack-obama...
Top Opinion
-
kbrown2225 2012/01/22 02:35:04Evolution
+20Everyone knows that the world was created when the giant cow began licking the ice and uncovered Ymir the frost giant whose body makes up the earth. What Norse mythology not good enough for you but Judaic mythology is?
To all people who deny this please remove your head from your ass .
If god made man in his own image, why have i got nipples, do men brest feed their babies,there is no evolution but men have nipples!
In fact, much like his failed family experiments, his own "Theory of Evolution', which was based on 'survival of the fittest', is contradictory within itself..
We do KNOW that mutations and retardation's in the real world rarely if ever survive in natural conditions, i.e. albino animals are born without their natural camouflage and rarely survive natural lifespans...so the theory that evolution is solely born from mutations in itself is contradictory to the 'survival of the fittest' since these 'mutations' would have had to occurred in significant numbers and then survived long enough to breed in order to propagate the 'mutation'...or 'evolution'. While there is to some extent significant evidence that this has occurred over millennia in individual species, the suggestion that ALL species propagated from these mutations is as ...
In fact, much like his failed family experiments, his own "Theory of Evolution', which was based on 'survival of the fittest', is contradictory within itself..
We do KNOW that mutations and retardation's in the real world rarely if ever survive in natural conditions, i.e. albino animals are born without their natural camouflage and rarely survive natural lifespans...so the theory that evolution is solely born from mutations in itself is contradictory to the 'survival of the fittest' since these 'mutations' would have had to occurred in significant numbers and then survived long enough to breed in order to propagate the 'mutation'...or 'evolution'. While there is to some extent significant evidence that this has occurred over millennia in individual species, the suggestion that ALL species propagated from these mutations is as questionable as ANY theory or faith.
What is not at all surprising is that an unsubstantiated 'theory' (much like global warming) has become a 'scientific fact' perpetuated by ruling 'highly educated' elites, who believed THEY had ALL the answers and could actually control genetics through population control and inbreeding...
So you keep the faith in YOUR beliefs and I'll keep the faith in my beliefs, and when we get to the other side....the winner buys the beer.
What appears right can be proved wrong in time.
A mutation is a freak of nature, the develompent was quick, something that has gone through the laborious path of evolution will survive, or something comes along that they cant adapt to, in the given timescale of that event.
Sharks do not have to carry on down the path of evolution, they were perfected millions of years ago.
Has you said you have your views i have mine, and thats all i have to say.
The bible itself does not "preclude" a belief in evolution, unless one attempts to "interpret" the scriptures literally. Unfortunately, a literal interpretation presents many other problems as well.
I will go with the research of thousands of scientists using corroborating evidence from "different" disciplines, rather than with a small, but "very" vocal group of zealots with an religious "agenda".
To bad so many decide to deny you as you will them in the end.
1. Everything which has a beginning has a cause.
2. The universe has a beginning.
3. Therefore the universe has a cause.
God, unlike the universe, had no beginning, so doesn't need a cause. In addition, Einstein's general relativity, which has much experimental support, shows that time is linked to matter and space. So time itself would have begun along with matter and space.
Since God, by definition, is the creator of the whole universe, he is the creator of time. Therefore He is not limited by the time dimension He created, so has no beginning in time God is the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity (Isaiah 57:15). Therefore He doesn't have a cause.
In contrast, there is good evidence that the universe had a beginning. This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most fundamental laws of the physical sciences.
1st Law: The total amount of mass-energy in the universe is constant.
2nd Law: The amount of energy available for work is running out, or entropy is increasing to a maximum.
If the total amount of mass-energy is limited, and the amount of usable energy is decreasing, then the universe cannot have existed forever, otherwise it would already have exhauste...
1. Everything which has a beginning has a cause.
2. The universe has a beginning.
3. Therefore the universe has a cause.
God, unlike the universe, had no beginning, so doesn't need a cause. In addition, Einstein's general relativity, which has much experimental support, shows that time is linked to matter and space. So time itself would have begun along with matter and space.
Since God, by definition, is the creator of the whole universe, he is the creator of time. Therefore He is not limited by the time dimension He created, so has no beginning in time God is the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity (Isaiah 57:15). Therefore He doesn't have a cause.
In contrast, there is good evidence that the universe had a beginning. This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most fundamental laws of the physical sciences.
1st Law: The total amount of mass-energy in the universe is constant.
2nd Law: The amount of energy available for work is running out, or entropy is increasing to a maximum.
If the total amount of mass-energy is limited, and the amount of usable energy is decreasing, then the universe cannot have existed forever, otherwise it would already have exhausted all usable energy the heat death of the universe. For example, all radioactive atoms would have decayed, every part of the universe would be the same temperature, and no further work would be possible.
So the obvious corollary is that the universe began a finite time ago with a lot of usable energy, and is now running down.
Now, if one can accept that the universe had a beginning, but not that it needs a cause, it is self-evident that things that begin have a cause no-one really denies it in his heart. All science and history would collapse if this law of cause and effect were denied. So would all law enforcement, if the police didn't think they needed to find a cause for a stabbed body or a burgled house.
Also, the universe cannot be self-caused nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, which is a logical absurdity.
~Christian Answers
Like your strength in your faith even though there is no god.
I don't know why people, who must believe in a creator, can't see everything happening as the most incredible and epic process a God could undertake. A Master Crafting of sorts of a race becoming his image through Eons of hard learning. Why would a God take only 7 days of OUR time to make all he wanted?
Scientist actually creating life in the lab has been a goal for a very long time and it would surely be global headline news that "everyone" would have heard about by now if it had been accomplished. It has not.
Take care!
It's amazing the new discoveries they are finding almost daily! It's a very exciting (and frightening) time to be alive if you love science! Sadly for those who don't, or who are can't handle paradigm shifts in thought, it is a ONLY a very frightening time!