Where will you have them put yours?
|
|
|||||
|
2 votes
|
|
6% | ||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | ||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | ||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | ||
|
2 votes
|
|
6% | ||
|
19 votes
|
|
58% | ||
|
10 votes
|
|
30% | |||
Every American To Be Microchipped In 2013 Per Obamacare
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
A
major news story broke on AOL and countless other mainstream news media
outlets, this past week, that the Obama Health Care Bill will require
all U.S. citizens and babies to receive a microchip or Medchip by March
23, 2013. Whether or not the microchip requirement in the bill is
implemented by 2013, remains to be seen.
In 2010, my book “Are You Ready for the Microchip?” was released, and
I asked the question, “Is the microchip implant hidden in the
Healthcare Bill? Are newborn children starting in 2013 going to receive a
microchip shortly after birth?” Then in the book, I wrote, “ In the
massive US HEALTHCARE BILL, which your elected representatives voted for
without reading, there is a section titled: Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521 –
National Medical Device Registry which states:Continued below.
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in
this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis
of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or
has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or
‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable.”
Top Opinion
-
The Black Dagger 2012/07/26 13:40:14
Don't you righties get tired of all your BS that you spew out every day? Geez................
Better run and hide cause the boogie man's gonna get you next..
Each Individual and Parent must give written approval about all information on the chip.
It must be un-alterable except via additional personal permission.
The entire process must be monitored by citizens who do NOT work for Government, who must have full knowledge of the entire technology, of course.
It must be removed upon demand.
Myself, expecting that such protections will never be part of the Rulers plan, I REFUSE!
UGHHHH.... not THIS bogus BS again!!!
NOT HAPPPENING! Do you believe EVERY conspirocy theory that comes down the pike?
Case law settled in 1905 in Jacobson V Mass. The Court ruled that when the state deems it necessary to protect teh entirity of the public health ONLY then can the 14th Amd be compermised.
“Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity,” ruled the Court, “a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members.” Although the 14th Amendment of the Constitution mandates that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” the Court ruled that a person’s rights are not absolute. Rather, “persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state,” wrote the Court. According to the Court, “the good and welfare of the commonwealth, of which the legislature is primarily the judge, is the basis on which the police power rests in Massachusetts.”
tagging everyone with a micro chip is not such a matter. the microchip...
Case law settled in 1905 in Jacobson V Mass. The Court ruled that when the state deems it necessary to protect teh entirity of the public health ONLY then can the 14th Amd be compermised.
“Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity,” ruled the Court, “a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members.” Although the 14th Amendment of the Constitution mandates that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” the Court ruled that a person’s rights are not absolute. Rather, “persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state,” wrote the Court. According to the Court, “the good and welfare of the commonwealth, of which the legislature is primarily the judge, is the basis on which the police power rests in Massachusetts.”
tagging everyone with a micro chip is not such a matter. the microchip will not stop any pandemic or spread of illnesses thus it doesn't fall within the relm of this ruling. And if such an action is taken we will see the Court take up this decision again. Already we know the Courts have ruled taht people do have the right to opt out of vaccinations and medical procedures and any doctor or care provider who forced procedures will be guilty of assult in the 2nd degree (at the very least), with the only condition being IF an illness sweeps though a state those NOt vaccinated must remain quraintinned.