Where is the ACLU on this religious separation of church and state for Islamic Law? I guess they only attack Christians.

by Adam Posted 2012/06/04 00:41:28

Related Topics: Sharia, ACLU, Separation Of Church And State, Religious, Christian, Court, Finances, Islamic Law, Church And State, Separation, Church, Money, 2012

Read More

21 votes
Read all 30 opinions
View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	They only attack christians.	14 votes	67%
	Other	7 votes	33%

Here is an article that connects the use of bailout money by executive order to AIG that was used on sharia compliant finances conferences.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/court-marine-cant-challenge-shariah/

Add a comment above

Red Branch 2012/06/04 02:30:08

They only attack christians.

+4
The ACLU and the Islamites both seek the destruction of the US.
>> See Replies

More polls by Adam

ScottyG - Faqueue 2012/06/08 22:08:01

They only attack christians.

Just like NOW we should just ignore them and they will go away.

reply
Yo'Adrienne..AFCL 2012/06/05 00:13:11 (edited)

They only attack christians.

+1
They explained that the federal TARP funds given to AIG were exempt from such challenges because the authorizing legislation didn’t consider giving money to aid religious outreaches such as AIG’s Shariah programs, and that the money was directed there by “executive” decisions.
AND WE ALL KNOW......WHAT 'EXECUTIVE' MADE THE 'DECISION"
and left the taxpayers footing the bill.

The appeals judges affirmed an earlier decision from a trial court judge who concluded the $153 million of U.S. taxpayer money spent supporting Islamic Shariah really isn’t anything worth mentioning. [IMAGINE THAT?????? only 153 MILLION DOLLARS....
THERE'S MORE WHERE THAT CAME FROM HUH!?

reply
gocar 2012/06/04 20:42:14

Other

That is not true and you know it. I can only think you want to cause trouble by saying such things. The ACLU completely supports the right for you to practice any religion you want to even those kooks that like to get bitten by snakes. They do not support laws being passed that cater to any religous belief.

reply
Yo'Adri... to gocar 2012/06/05 00:19:58

OH .EXCUSE US....so it was just a "loop hole"...???

reply
American☆Atheist 2012/06/04 08:58:52

Other

+1
get real

reply
SK-LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY 2012/06/04 05:58:11

They only attack christians.

+3
If it weren't for double standards they'd have no standards at all.

reply
Yo'Adri... to SK-LIBE... 2012/06/05 00:20:42

BOOM....a terriffic comment!!!!! Love it!

reply
Zuggi 2012/06/04 02:47:31
teigan 2012/06/04 02:45:35

Other

+1
"The appeals judges affirmed an earlier decision from a trial court judge who concluded the $153 million of U.S. taxpayer money spent supporting Islamic Shariah really isn’t anything worth mentioning."

Really? Don't these judges have any knowledge of the "Constitution" or what their jobs are?

reply
Red Branch 2012/06/04 02:30:08

They only attack christians.

+4
The ACLU and the Islamites both seek the destruction of the US.

reply
Catch224u 2012/06/04 01:54:13

They only attack christians.

+2
This was meant to not have a state religion as it was in England.

reply
jackolantyrn356 2012/06/04 01:04:19

They only attack christians.

+4
OBAMNA IS A mUSLIM. fOR THEM IOT;S oK TO LIE ABOUT BEING A cHRISTIAN AS LONG AS IT VADVANCES iSLAM

reply
Rusty Shackleford 2012/06/04 00:55:29

They only attack christians.

+3
They are anti-Christian, end of story.

reply
America... to Rusty S... 2012/06/04 08:59:24

proof?

reply
Rusty S... to America... 2012/06/04 10:17:38

Sure, their actions.

reply
America... to Rusty S... 2012/06/04 10:53:52

like.?

reply
Adam to America... 2012/06/04 14:33:10

How about the one listed as part of this post.

reply
RED DAWN to America... 2012/06/05 16:00:26

You need proof get eye surgery so you can see the proof for yourself.

reply
KarenInKenoshaWisconsin 2012/06/04 00:48:53

Other

+3
Their record shows they support the rights of people representing various religions. Their actual record supports that.

Instead, you drew more spurious equations. Because you wanted to.

reply
Red Branch to KarenIn... 2012/06/04 02:32:21

+1
There were no spurious equations in the narrative.

What you said about their support is true. However, they have not objected to anything that furthers the Islamization of the US.

reply
Zuggi to Red Branch 2012/06/04 02:46:09

+1
Mostly because there is no Islamization of the US.

reply
Adam to Zuggi 2012/06/04 02:47:27

+1
Clearly you have never heard of Dearborn Michigan.

reply
Zuggi to Adam 2012/06/04 02:48:05

+2
Yes, I have. And?

reply
Red Branch to Zuggi 2012/06/04 02:57:40

Pay Attention.

reply
KarenIn... to Red Branch 2012/06/04 03:32:40

The conclusion, based on this or similar cases, means that the ACLU only attacks Christians is a spurious equation.

The ACLU has spoken about the "Islamization" of the U.S., clearly. http://www.aclu.org/religion-...

reply
Red Branch to KarenIn... 2012/06/04 16:13:55

I haven't heard of any suits against the funding of madrassas.

reply
KarenIn... to Red Branch 2012/06/04 17:36:12

Did you read and fully comprehend the material given? Do you understand why not all cases have legal standing, regardless of any sentiments and fears you hold regarding Islam and/or Sharia anything?

reply
Red Branch to KarenIn... 2012/06/04 19:01:12

Tax payer monies funding a private religious school is wrong and should not be happening.

reply
KarenIn... to Red Branch 2012/06/04 19:13:20

The given material indicates that any argument like this has to satisfy legal criteria but that this case didn't.

reply
WhereIsAmerica? ~PWCM~JLA 2012/06/04 00:42:36

Other

It certainly seems biased.

reply