When will Obama-haters say specifically what they dislike about him?

OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVEN'T BEEN READING POSTS.

He is a liar...he is not an American... he is willing to give away the USA!!!

Could it be because he is a black man who is sitting in the "White House?" That would be my guess

He is imperious, even with the Supreme Court but especially with Congress. He expects to tell them what their budget has to be. Every resubmittal is basically the same thing and goes nowhere. Who, with any objectivity, can trust him?

Could it be the 20 million illegal aliens mainly from Mexico that he keeps promising citizenship to,and the 7 million jobs they hold that US citizens could be doing,or the free education,free medical,and social services that US tax payers are paying for,or the fact he refuses to secure our borders with Troops?

ill go ahead and tell you...his morales suck

he is a communist SOB that should be thrown out on his ASS..,. his Blame America first attitude is disgraceful

He's black.

Its only been being said for the last three years in many very specific posts, where have you been?

I'm trying to decide if this question is serious or a joke. Name one thing this man has done to help America. In three year and a half years he hasn't come up with a budget. No plan on how to pay the money back other than to pass laws to steal it from men who earned it.

Oh there are many things to hate about him. But, the most abhorrent is his vocal opposition to the Infant Born Alive Protection Act.
The act would have mandated life saving medical treatment for babies that were born as a result of a botched abortion. I don't care what side of the abortion issue you are on. But, when a baby is no longer tethered to it's mother, it's a US citizen just like the rest of us. And they are entitled to medical treatment the same as all of us.
Obama opposed it because it would have been too inconvenient to the mother. Imagine how inconvenient it would be to the baby.

Let me ask you. who chooses this. the mothers (some might be republican) or the politicians?

Chooses what? To deny life saving medical treatment to accidentally born children?

Hate is a strong word.

But to start off if people don't understand the difference between state and federal levels of government then I can't help you. And that has everything to do with the draconian healthcare law.

what difference is there between millions in a state and millions in a nation? Are there differences?

Oh my god yes. Absolutely.

The reason the USA is made up of 50 states is to promote the most liberty possible. Each state is its own government with the Constitutionally protected authority to handle most issues as it sees fit. This way like minded people in one area can adopt certain laws while people in another can adopt different laws. So people in Texas and California can be happy because both don't have to live by the others way of life. It allows different cultures, different political sets to thrive on their own.

So with Romney you have a state that clearly wanted the bill they have. Maybe its not completely in Romneys political philosophy, but its something those people wanted. So it got passed. But people in other states may not want that model. They may want different variations or no healthcare law at all. Thats the beauty of the United States. Decentralized power. Maybe a different plan would work better in Vermont of Oregon.

At the end of the day the 10th Amendment protects issues not specifically outlined to the Federal Government for the states to handle individually. More and more people are forgetting the United States part of America by trying to use the federal government to centralize more power. This is causing a lot of our problems.

I dislike his socialist agenda and blatant lack of respect for the limitations placed upon him by the Constitution.

I've been saying this for years, but the 0bamunists just call me a racist and refuse to discuss it.

Okay but what specifically. What socialist agenda has he advocated? Specifics are important.

Wealth redistribution, socialized medicine, corporate bailouts, countless regulations on businesses, funneling taxpayer money to his friends via guaranteed loans thru shell companies like Solyndra.

Let me know if you want more.

when you say socialized medicine, how is that true since there is no change to how medicine is advanced. We don't have govt control over medicine (the h/c companies still run everything). It's not universal h/c like euros have. What wealth distribution are you talking about? The taxes on wealthier americans were far higher in previous years: today they are a fraction of what they were even under Reagan. Solyndra was a Bush project (didn't you know that?)

For example:

I'm honestly not sure if they know why.

That he has failed everything he promised his voters to do.

Okay I'm listening. Like what?
He wanted to close GITMO. Which he would have except states said no to taking the men (even tho some of them had zero escapees) What should he have done then? Drop them in the ocean? What would YOU have done?

I hope you aren't one of those who claim he promised unemployment wouldn't go beyond 8%. That's a lie. He never promised that. Every campaign claim he had came BEFORE the meltdown was announced.

I predict: NEVER