Quantcast

When liberals begin gun confiscation, should Americans join Mexican drug cartels for weaponry?

FanOreilly 2012/12/23 20:49:18
You!
Add Photos & Videos

In a radio interview on Thursday with Albany’s WGDJ-AM, New York governor Andrew Cuomo said that he plans to work with state legislators next month to submit a proposal for new gun-control laws; in particular, Cuomo said, “our focus is assault weapons,” because current state laws regulating the weapons “have more holes that Swiss cheese.”

“I don’t think legitimate sportsmen are going to say, ‘I need an assault weapon to go hunting,’” he said.

Cuomo continued, “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

When liberals begin gun confiscation  should Americans join Mexican drug cartels for weaponry

Read More: http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/22/confiscation...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • FanOreilly 2012/12/23 20:50:09
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    FanOreilly
    +11
    This is a direct, clear violation of the US constitution.

    Cuomo continued, “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

    Cuomo should be impeached.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Mike 2012/12/31 01:37:39
    Yes join a Mexican drug cartel
    Mike
    they may well be the only ones who will have guns then!
  • us 2012/12/25 01:53:12
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    us
    No, we the people need to protect our constitution.
  • Stop Hillary 2016 2012/12/24 18:20:37
    Yes join a Mexican drug cartel
    Stop Hillary 2016
  • ruralntex 2012/12/24 15:27:32
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    ruralntex
    Oddly, Mexican gun laws are much more restrictive than ours here in the states. Gun control doesn't work.
  • Andrew 2012/12/24 12:09:19
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Andrew
    +1
    From what I hear, the drug cartels have alot of weapons, thanks to the Obama Administration! I'll just hold onto the weapons I already have! Don't need anymore and the Federal Government is going to have a long fight on their hands to take them away! They forget that I am a free individual and am not owned by the government! I am not a slave. I do NOT answer to the government when it comes to my right to bear arms. THEY answer to the Constitution and cannot usurp its power without abolishing the Amendment. THAT must be ratified by a Super Majority of States! Fat chance of that happening!
  • S and S 2012/12/24 11:42:44
  • jimmy S and S 2012/12/24 13:29:30
    jimmy
    +1
    you got that right
  • CHUCK FARLEY 2012/12/24 09:07:42
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    CHUCK FARLEY
    +1
    The government makes it easier for a criminal to get guns than its own citizens.. I.E. fast and furious
  • Dwight 2012/12/24 08:34:34
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Dwight
    I wonder why Lib/Dems never mention the legal, Constitutional method of simply Amending the U.S. Constitition and those of the Several States.

    Could it be that they already know it would fail miserably? Otherwise I think they would forget the penny pockett lawsuits and City wide gun bans they have to rely on.
  • wysiwis 2012/12/24 08:23:00
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    wysiwis
    Fire them, fire upon them. Either one works, but the latter would be cheaper in the long run.
  • jakep51 2012/12/24 06:55:37
    Yes join a Mexican drug cartel
    jakep51
    Of course you should! Thanks to the Justice Department, by joining the Mexican Drug Cartels, you will be able to get the best guns America has to offer!
  • joefj2 2012/12/24 05:34:03
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    joefj2
    Just dig up all your unregistered guns. buried guns buried guns
  • Kat ♪ ~BTO-t-BCRA-F~ ♪ 2012/12/24 05:33:49
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Kat ♪ ~BTO-t-BCRA-F~ ♪
    Fire all the damned traitors.
  • AL 2012/12/24 05:05:59 (edited)
    Yes join a Mexican drug cartel
    AL
    Hey why not, since A.G. holder will have finished giving them all of ours by then anyway!
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/12/24 04:41:18
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    We might have to battle it out ourselves with those drug cartels. I recall them killing a newlywed on his honeymoon...
  • marcuss....PHART 2012/12/24 04:39:42
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    marcuss....PHART
    +1
    LWNJs have one mission and one mission only.......To turn this country into a communist country where their political suicide bombers they elect can rule the country the way radical Islamic countries are run.
  • jimmy marcuss... 2012/12/24 13:31:36
    jimmy
    +1
    totally agree
  • Rick 2012/12/24 04:29:37
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Rick
    Better yet lets start tar and feathering them!
  • Patrick Moser 2012/12/24 03:15:37
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Patrick Moser
    Hear we go gain do conservatives Not understand how a poll works?

    To write questions that lead the respondent to a particular answer. I don't need to tell you this means you're collecting unreliable survey data. But conservatives don't want reliable data they want to feel good .Example Past election Fox, Rove and Morris, either were lying or only looking at polls that fit there narrative.

    -A Survey questions shouldn't work like that. There should never be a right and wrong answer.
    -A survey should not have two chooses that are obviously only work to reinforce your belief system.

    Example this question is like 90% on this web sight the conservatives don't want actual data, they just want a poll to fit there narrative.
    So I just check the ancwer the poster was looking for because he gave two chooses both ridiculous why not a third "none of the above"???

    This way Romany was so upset when he lost he was told by Fox and Rove he was going to win in a landslide due to fact there polls were taken in the same fashion this and 90% on this sight do.

    I wonder the moderators of sights like this got list of tics rules for posing. Why not have one that address this ridiculous and childlike way of gathering ??? Probably this sight is owned by a right wing entity that does not want discuss...













    Hear we go gain do conservatives Not understand how a poll works?

    To write questions that lead the respondent to a particular answer. I don't need to tell you this means you're collecting unreliable survey data. But conservatives don't want reliable data they want to feel good .Example Past election Fox, Rove and Morris, either were lying or only looking at polls that fit there narrative.

    -A Survey questions shouldn't work like that. There should never be a right and wrong answer.
    -A survey should not have two chooses that are obviously only work to reinforce your belief system.

    Example this question is like 90% on this web sight the conservatives don't want actual data, they just want a poll to fit there narrative.
    So I just check the ancwer the poster was looking for because he gave two chooses both ridiculous why not a third "none of the above"???

    This way Romany was so upset when he lost he was told by Fox and Rove he was going to win in a landslide due to fact there polls were taken in the same fashion this and 90% on this sight do.

    I wonder the moderators of sights like this got list of tics rules for posing. Why not have one that address this ridiculous and childlike way of gathering ??? Probably this sight is owned by a right wing entity that does not want discussion, but reinforcement of there current beliefs. no one say change your believes- free country, but do you just like bogus data as long as it fits a narrative?

    One more thing why do the moderators allow ridiculous lies I don't care if it conservative or liberal or in-between voice I was raised a lie by any other name is still a lie. It is time to challenge lies but with FACTS
    Opinion is not Fact and Fact in not opinion both are fine- free country, but hear is how to differentiate.

    To transfer a leading question into an unbiased question you just need to remove the leading words or phrases. These are the ones that make a judgment or imply stupidity, or a socialist,or , ur not freedom loving etc etc if you disagree.

    I “think” Obama a socialist –this is an opinion because there is no evidence to support it just paranoid delusions and in a free country no law again delusions. There is no evidence needed with this statement because the person put the words “I Think”
    Obama “Is” a Socialist this is a statement of fact but with no credible we references to back up that did not come from a partisans source (Fox Beck Limburger the drunk Irish guy Palin (Palin is a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic ) all partisans that never offer a facts)

    Example: 49% of GOP voters nationally say they think that ACORN stole the election for President Obama. We found that 52% of Republicans thought that ACORN stole the 2008 election for Obama, so this is a modest decline, but perhaps smaller than might have been expected given that ACORN doesn't exist anymore!!!!!!

    Conservatives just make sh*t up because reality doesn't support their views. Because they gave up Reality-Based Thinking. Their logic these days is "If I WANT to believe it, and I SAY it, that MAKES it true." It's much easier that way. When you consider the fact that the media, by and large, ONLY report what people SAY, and don't fact-check, they get away with simply saying whatever they want. All news anymore does not call People on there Lies. A couple out there do but most like David Gregory is the worst he just lets conservatives lie so much, he should move over the Fox Fantasy Channel he would be more at home.

    It is worth reading the right’s propaganda now and then, just to find out how it is that so many of our conservative fellow citizens can have been so deceived.
    (more)
  • CUDDLY ... Patrick... 2012/12/24 03:58:01
    CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY
    +2
    It's "sites", not "sights".
  • marcuss... Patrick... 2012/12/24 04:41:12
    marcuss....PHART
    +1
    Reminds you of a CHE poll HUH?
  • goatman112003 2012/12/24 02:42:24
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    goatman112003
    +2
    I am totally amazed by the left as gun control doesn't work and hasn't worked. The only result is crime goes up and no incidents are prevented but escalated.
  • I NEED A HORSE 2012/12/24 01:32:49
  • FanOreilly I NEED ... 2012/12/24 02:29:46
    FanOreilly
    Your prose needs work.

    Are you a victim of the government schools, boy?
  • Cat 2012/12/24 00:56:31
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Cat
    +1
    I'm confused by this question. Who would fire whom and from what job?
  • Picasso's Cat 2012/12/24 00:46:03
    Yes join a Mexican drug cartel
    Picasso's Cat
    +1
    Maybe so if that's your logic.
    Good luck getting those guns across the border.
    Or better yet just stay in mexico!
  • FanOreilly Picasso... 2012/12/24 02:30:30
    FanOreilly
    +2
    They get across the border all the time and in both directions.
  • Picasso... FanOreilly 2012/12/24 03:34:18
    Picasso's Cat
    Ok then, your set.
  • santa6642 2012/12/24 00:42:18
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    santa6642
    +3
    You mean fire on , don't you.
  • SK-pro impeachment 2012/12/24 00:27:51
    Yes join a Mexican drug cartel
    SK-pro impeachment
    +3
    That would be one way of getting our guns back obozo ran down there. We need to figure out how to treat the liberal mental illness of these gun grabbers. Firing would be a perfect start.
  • Surly Curmudgen 2012/12/23 23:21:42
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Surly Curmudgen
    +2
    NO just shoot liberals who violate the constitution. It does no good to fire them, they just keep coming back over and over.
  • AdWhois 2012/12/23 22:45:35
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    AdWhois
    +4
    Hahaha. The fact that they think they could confiscate any guns is laughable. Anyone that owns a gun will not relinquish it to a tyrant.
  • mal 2012/12/23 22:44:31 (edited)
    Yes join a Mexican drug cartel
    mal
    +5
    The voting has'nt worked. The elected officials are corrupted from the start or their families threatoned, We are up agains the most evil group of scoundrels this nation has ever dealt with and a totally naive population of texting fools and completely uninformed lntellectually shorted morons etc. The drug gangs know their enemies and not so bright americans re-elect them.
  • COCO mal 2012/12/24 08:59:09
    COCO
    Excellent comment.
  • Maria 2012/12/23 22:37:08
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    Maria
    +1
    Simple fire Liberals who violate the second amendment period!
  • realist 2012/12/23 22:19:29 (edited)
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    realist
    +1
    It will end up happening though lets be honest.
  • templer003 2012/12/23 22:13:43
    No just fire liberals who violate the second amendment
    templer003
    +2
    When you have these kind of people doing the knee jerk reaction and placing the blame on the tool rather than on the person or persons who did the crime you have a clear cut example of WHY our founders wanted a limited government with very strict and limited powers..
    To attempt to disarm the people of the United States is at the least treason and should be called what it is....
    they can have my gun
  • democoach templer003 2012/12/23 22:54:28
    democoach
    +2
    these people who insists its the gun that kills people are hypocrite, when was th last time they put the gun on trial?????? if its the gun that killed the person, logically it should be the gun put on trial
  • templer003 democoach 2012/12/24 02:22:52
    templer003
    +2
    One would think so but there is no reasoning with in a liberal/progressive mind..
  • democoach templer003 2012/12/24 21:22:29
    democoach
    +1
    just had a conversation with someone on facebook about the gun control and such, they are quite ignorant.
    they think they are so smart, and then when it comes to backing up with evidence? all they com eup with is "i don't need to prove anything to you"
    and im like thats what i thought, they are completely clueless!

    you are 100% right, there is no reasoning with them! they think they are right, but they have zero evidence to back up their arguments.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/11/24 08:20:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals