Quantcast

When did political dissent become racism?

Marie/M2M2K™-#1ConservativeGuru 2011/08/31 09:10:47
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Throughout history, there has been political dissent by the people toward a sitting president. Until Barack 0bama assumed the Oval Office, it was always called a difference in ideology.

Political dissent, in my opinion, is one thing that has always made this nation great. But now it seems I and others have to defend myself/ourselves when I/we disagree with Barack 0bama. I support many other candidates (and have voted that way as well) who are not white/Caucasian, (including a black presidential candidate several years ago in a primary.)

The way I see it is that because my differing views with 0bama have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with racism (and I'm far from being alone in this,) my conclusion is that the ones who accuse me and others of racism are actually projecting their own racism onto others because there are so many of us who disagree with him and race is something that never even enters our minds. The same cannot be said for those who falsely accuse people of racism where there is no racism to be found.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Don 2011/08/31 10:16:08
    My comment related to this matter:
    Don
    +24
    When Empty Suit ran for President.
    Don't you remember Hillary shrieking about how it was "patriotic" to dissent from Bush's policies?
    Democraps are FRAUDS.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Kirino 2011/08/31 18:21:07 (edited)
    My comment related to this matter:
    Kirino
    +1
    Maybe you shouldn't make racist comments if you don't want to be called racist.

    *edit*

    You are seriously paranoid, I wasn't directed here by anyone.
  • babaji5... Kirino 2011/08/31 18:29:04
    babaji5150~solo
    +1
    Esplain, Lucy.
  • Marie/M... Kirino 2011/08/31 18:56:57
    Marie/M2M2K™-#1ConservativeGuru
    +4
    You know what? I know who has been sending you to my posts. I ignored you on the others but I've had about enough of your and your "master's" b.s.
  • Eastexn25 Marie/M... 2011/08/31 19:41:35
    Eastexn25
    +2
    Nice block Marie...
    block marie nice block

    Sometimes you just have no alternative!!
  • Marie/M... Eastexn25 2011/08/31 20:00:52 (edited)
    Marie/M2M2K™-#1ConservativeGuru
    +1
    Just gets a little old.

    BTW that WAS one hell of a block!
  • Buck Simon 2011/08/31 18:06:02
  • Tinka123 2011/08/31 18:05:02 (edited)
    My comment related to this matter:
    Tinka123
    +10
    When the establishment elite decided to indulge proletariat class warfare as a means of advancing their radical anti-individualist agenda. It really has nothing to do with race - that's just a ruse to keep us divided. They have to have a unified bad-guy. The grouping together of the public - whether by race, religion, political parties - it's just another subversive method of seducing people into inadvertently accepting the premise of collectivism and thus the collectivist agenda - by eliminating the concept of individuals. This is how all the notorious collectivist regimes seized power.

    Now they stir the pot - waiting patiently for the "have nots" (who've nothing because the govt. has encouraged and enabled their failure by punishing all, even moderate success) to declare war on the "haves" (the successful).

    As Hayek so eloquently stated:
    "A claim for equality of material position can be met ONLY by a government with Totalitarian powers."

    People better wake up. Progressivism IS the Collectivist agenda to eliminate Individualism in ALL forms in exchange for govt. subservience. That is ELIMINATING the Inalienable Rights the US Govt. was founded to PROTECT. It's wrong whether it's one infringing on one's rights - whether it's many infringing on a minority's rights - or whether it's...



    When the establishment elite decided to indulge proletariat class warfare as a means of advancing their radical anti-individualist agenda. It really has nothing to do with race - that's just a ruse to keep us divided. They have to have a unified bad-guy. The grouping together of the public - whether by race, religion, political parties - it's just another subversive method of seducing people into inadvertently accepting the premise of collectivism and thus the collectivist agenda - by eliminating the concept of individuals. This is how all the notorious collectivist regimes seized power.

    Now they stir the pot - waiting patiently for the "have nots" (who've nothing because the govt. has encouraged and enabled their failure by punishing all, even moderate success) to declare war on the "haves" (the successful).

    As Hayek so eloquently stated:
    "A claim for equality of material position can be met ONLY by a government with Totalitarian powers."

    People better wake up. Progressivism IS the Collectivist agenda to eliminate Individualism in ALL forms in exchange for govt. subservience. That is ELIMINATING the Inalienable Rights the US Govt. was founded to PROTECT. It's wrong whether it's one infringing on one's rights - whether it's many infringing on a minority's rights - or whether it's elects with imaginative, nonexistent authorities doing it to the entire population.

    Govt. officials have NO RIGHTS or authorities that we do not have ourselves. They've no authority to infringe on Individual Rights of citizens. PERIOD. That simple.

    And nothing will change until the American people open their eyes and fully accept that the progressive agenda - which resides in BOTH parties - is based in every principle our founders despised and is eliminating our right to BE individuals. Only then will people - irrespective of party - unite together to end the destruction of Self-Ownership and Individualism.
    (more)
  • JL Tinka123 2011/08/31 18:54:08
    JL
    +3
    TOTALLY FREAKIN' EXCELLENT!!
  • Marie/M... Tinka123 2011/08/31 19:34:57
    Marie/M2M2K™-#1ConservativeGuru
    +3
    GREAT post, Tinka!
  • rightside 2011/08/31 18:03:35
    My comment related to this matter:
    rightside
    +6
    The powers that be knew that putting a black candidate up would be easy as long as they could use the race card to buffer against attacks.
    "Don't touch our black pres because if you do you're racist" has seemed to work. Every one is using that tactic.
  • *Mahoga... rightside 2011/08/31 18:32:40
    *Mahogany Goddess of P.H.A.E.T
    +4
    Even Al Gore aka Man Bear LOL
  • ZippyTheWonderMonkey 2011/08/31 18:03:22
    My comment related to this matter:
    ZippyTheWonderMonkey
    +8
    When the DIMocrats decided to project their history of Jim Crowe, KKK, Poll Taxes, and Poll Tests onto the opposition to avoid it.

    They realized they can't say things like THIS anymore unless they deflect the anger:

    "I'll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years."
    -- Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One

    "You f*cking Jew b@stard." -- Hillary Clinton to political operative Paul Fray

    "He's married to a white woman. He wants to be white. He wants a colorless society. He has no ethnic pride. He doesn't want to be black."
    -- California State Senator Diane Watson's on Ward Connerly's interracial marriage

    Mahatma Gandhi "ran a gas station down in Saint Louis."
    --Senator Hillary Clinton

    http://www.freerepublic.com/f...
  • Buck Simon ZippyTh... 2011/08/31 18:10:03
  • JT 2011/08/31 17:58:56
    My comment related to this matter:
    JT
  • Marie/M... JT 2011/08/31 19:35:36
    Marie/M2M2K™-#1ConservativeGuru
    +4
    Ha! I love that!
  • JT Marie/M... 2011/08/31 19:36:36
    JT
    +4
    Thank you.
  • Barefoo... JT 2011/08/31 19:50:05
    Barefooted Nana ∞ijm♥∞AFCL
    +4
    Good one! :)
  • Old Salt Barefoo... 2011/08/31 20:18:05
    Old Salt
    +3
    Yes it was! Short, Sweet and to the Point! :)
  • Barefoo... Old Salt 2011/08/31 20:33:09
    Barefooted Nana ∞ijm♥∞AFCL
    +3
    It certainly was! :)
  • Jon 2011/08/31 17:57:50
    My comment related to this matter:
    Jon
    +5
    good blog Marie/M2M2K™ the truth is that it is the destructive policies Americans oppose
  • Marie/M... Jon 2011/08/31 19:35:46
    Marie/M2M2K™-#1ConservativeGuru
    +3
    Thank you!
  • lulzifer 2011/08/31 17:51:59
  • Buck Simon lulzifer 2011/08/31 18:12:53
  • JT Buck Simon 2011/08/31 18:16:50
    JT
    +8
    Liberal/progressive/communist wannabes are too easy......LOL.

    liberalprogressivecommunist wannabes lol protests to kill bush

    liberalprogressivecommunist wannabes lol protests to kill bush

    liberalprogressivecommunist wannabes lol protests to kill bush
  • Buck Simon JT 2011/08/31 18:24:30
  • JT Buck Simon 2011/08/31 18:25:59
    JT
    +4
    You are welcome.
  • zbacku JT 2011/08/31 19:28:49
    zbacku
    +8
    The Democrats ALWAYS seem to FORGET the 8 years of hate and name calling they dished out.
  • JT zbacku 2011/08/31 19:31:20
    JT
    +7
    Thin skinned little children that need someone to take care of them, (mostly government), while they revise history.
  • Eastexn25 zbacku 2011/08/31 19:52:37
    Eastexn25
    +6
    And it wasn't so long ago...
    sarah palin hanging
  • lalouis... Buck Simon 2011/08/31 20:39:46
    lalouisiane
    +3
    That's what I remember as well.

    But who hope to reason with someone who is so immature?
  • Buck Simon lalouis... 2011/09/01 12:15:12
  • Marie/M... lulzifer 2011/08/31 18:53:11
    Marie/M2M2K™-#1ConservativeGuru
    +6
    Figures that some foul-mouth liberal would show up. I'm making a screen shot of your post for when you WHINE about being blocked to show this is not a difference of opinion. It is because of your sewer mouth.
  • lalouis... Marie/M... 2011/09/02 14:15:07
    lalouisiane
    Thanks Marie, the truth is, he and his opinion are about as important as a June bug in July.

    When a person cannot communicate their thoughts without ugliness, then their thoughts should be ignored.
  • Tinka123 lulzifer 2011/08/31 19:25:42 (edited)
    Tinka123
    +6
    It was also deemed appropriate by the left to burn effigies of the potus - while hanging from a noose - in the streets under Bush.

    Would that be considered an appropriate demonstration under the current potus? I'm sure if Tea Partiers held demonstrations like this under Obama...


    Oh look - what is this? Redneck Bush protestor - uh oh, they're white and wearing cowboy hats - careful, they MUST be racists! I don't see any black people there - yep, definitely racists. lol

    This was from a liberal rally in San Fransisco in 2004






    Totally acceptable for Tea Partiers to hold such demonstrations under Obama? Of course not - it would be considered historic! Liberals would declare that never had such madness taken place in America! Oops - there's that pesky double standard Progs love so much.
    It was also deemed appropriate by the left to burn effigies of the potus - while hanging from a noose - in the streets under Bush.

    Would that be considered an appropriate demonstration under the current potus? I'm sure if Tea Partiers held demonstrations like this under Obama...
    oops pesky leftist double standard tea partiers demonstrations obama
    oops pesky leftist double standard tea partiers demonstrations obama
    Oh look - what is this? Redneck Bush protestor - uh oh, they're white and wearing cowboy hats - careful, they MUST be racists! I don't see any black people there - yep, definitely racists. lol

    This was from a liberal rally in San Fransisco in 2004
    people yep racists lol liberal rally san fransisco 2004
    people yep racists lol liberal rally san fransisco 2004
    people yep racists lol liberal rally san fransisco 2004
    people yep racists lol liberal rally san fransisco 2004
    people yep racists lol liberal rally san fransisco 2004

    Totally acceptable for Tea Partiers to hold such demonstrations under Obama? Of course not - it would be considered historic! Liberals would declare that never had such madness taken place in America! Oops - there's that pesky double standard Progs love so much.
    (more)
  • zbacku lulzifer 2011/08/31 19:31:00
  • Soundstorm zbacku 2011/09/03 06:26:36
    Soundstorm
    +1
    And they say we made this all up.
  • Randice lulzifer 2011/08/31 19:42:37
    Randice
    +2
    Such as?
  • Soundstorm Randice 2011/09/03 20:55:09
    Soundstorm
    Such as what you can see up in zbacku's post.
  • Randice Soundstorm 2011/09/03 21:09:51
    Randice
    My response was to lulzifer. I'm not sure what this is in response to.
  • Old Salt lulzifer 2011/08/31 20:12:35
    Old Salt
    +4
    I do indeed understand that you Liberals have a difficult time identifying sexes, with all those "changes" you seem to approve of, like "transectomies!" However, conservatives feel warm, comfortable and fine in their own skin and sex! The female you are referring to in your vulgar comment has had no "addadictomy" procedure like you, moron! Don't think you should be commenting on the sexual parts SHE certainly does not have! But then you're like most liberals, it is a natural for commenting without verifying!

    You owe my friend an apology, expect you to be "man" or "it" enough to do so!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 03:25:43

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals