Quantcast

WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF MUSLIMS PROTESTED IN YOUR CITY/TOWN?

Old Salt 2012/09/16 00:19:35
I WOULD SHOW THEM MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
I WOULD JOIN THEM AND BURN THE AMERICAN FLAG TOO!
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos


What IF a group of Muslim Americans showed up in your home town demanding punishment for the director of that film and demanding an apology to ISLAM?

Personally, I would DEMAND my local authorities JAIL them and DEPORT them back to the Middle East for violation of our American LAW!


Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • HOMBRE 2012/09/16 00:31:12 (edited)
    I WOULD SHOW THEM MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
    HOMBRE
    +18
    I show how much charity I could gather up making them a bacon sandwich
    large bacon sandwich

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Phyl *In God i Trust* 2012/09/24 20:42:58
    I WOULD SHOW THEM MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
    Phyl *In God i Trust*
    They have protested 45 min. drive from where I live .They protested the death of a falling Soldier muslim women they said the men was near bye.They had Americans very made but was able to stop the protest.
  • iamthemob ~ the 444th Guru ~ 2012/09/24 20:22:08
    Undecided
    iamthemob ~ the 444th Guru ~
    "Personally, I would DEMAND my local authorities JAIL them and DEPORT them back to the Middle East for violation of our American LAW!"

    Uhm...then you'd actually be the one violating their freedom of speech. They don't break any law by protesting and making the demands that you describe.

    Further, you're assuming that they'd be immigrants rather than born citizens. Bad form.
  • Drug Free 2012/09/23 06:14:39
    Undecided
    Drug Free
    I would let the Police and the Authorities take care of them if they got out of hand.
    No special privilages of course but no harrassement of them and their right to protest either.
    Just watch and see what developes.
    I think if you gave them some "hashish" they would go back home.
  • star 2012/09/22 05:01:05
    I WOULD SHOW THEM MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
    star
    +1
    I'd tell them they had better think again. I have a gun too.
  • DefendnProtect 2012/09/20 21:46:17
    Undecided
    DefendnProtect
    +1
    They can protest whatever they want. It's a free country.

    john pike spraying grandmom
  • Old Salt Defendn... 2012/09/21 02:06:43
    Old Salt
    +1
    And LONG may WE remain that way! Thanks for your taking the time to post your opinion! :)
  • star Defendn... 2012/09/22 05:03:06
    star
    +1
    . I wonder what you would say if they grabbed one of your family Members and kill them.
  • Defendn... star 2012/09/22 08:48:59
    DefendnProtect
    What would you say if they inflicted more than 1.000.000 deaths to our people?

    continued bombing in 6 states, propped up their corrupt police state dictators in 4 states, occupied 2 states (one with mercenaries)?

    Perhaps our people who killed the foreign ambassador would be seen as 'freedom fighters'?
  • Old Salt Defendn... 2012/09/23 02:22:58
    Old Salt
    +2
    WHO inflected 1,000,000 deaths? Where are you getting your information? War was war! And in ALL ocassions, muslims started it! They even started messing around with America when she was a first born... and we ended up KICKING THEIR ASS!

    "OUR PEOPLE" that killed the ambassador... Freedom fighters!" Just WHAT THE HELL ARE, a muslim? :(
  • Defendn... Old Salt 2012/09/23 09:32:38
    DefendnProtect
    911 is a Mossad job to get us fighting against Muslims for Zionist hegemony in the Middle East.

    Israel false flag attacks against Americans:
    Lavon affair - admitted
    USS Liberty - admitted
    911 - not admitted yet. Top US military and intelligence knows. More people do.

    Follow the money and research the evidence.
    911 Israel



    Research it for yourself.
  • star Defendn... 2012/09/23 04:49:43
    star
    +1
    Our people did not kill any one. Obama and the democrats know that. That stupid movie had nothing to do with it. Keep dreaming.
  • Defendn... star 2012/09/23 09:36:15
    DefendnProtect
    'Just' our sanctions on Iraq caused many many deaths.

    Some call it even genocidal
    iraq sanctions death toll

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
  • star Defendn... 2012/09/24 00:39:11
    star
    +1
    I don't like war any more than you do but they are not going to walk all over me either. They went into Iraq to get Hussein. They were there to help those who needed help.
  • Defendn... star 2012/09/25 17:23:37
    DefendnProtect
    Of course our troops wanted to help.

    Not the politicians and interests that send them though.
    Watch @ 3.40
  • rightside 2012/09/19 20:47:42
    I WOULD SHOW THEM MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
    rightside
    +4
    I would allow them to protest legally and if they threatened my home or family, I would take LEGAL actions also!
  • Old Salt rightside 2012/09/21 02:07:49
    Old Salt
    +3
    They threaten my family... they're DEAD! :) I say that with a big SMILE!:)

    BIG SMILE
  • rightside Old Salt 2012/09/21 04:19:48
    rightside
    +1
    Pig smile! Love it!
  • Old Salt rightside 2012/09/22 04:51:36
    Old Salt
    +3
    I would far rather kiss a pig than I would subject my daughter to the rules and laws of Islam and the willingness of our Liberals to allow that to happen! :(
  • rightside Old Salt 2012/09/22 14:59:12
    rightside
    +1
    Pigs are actually nice animals. They do make great pets. Although their poop really stinks. But they really are smart.
  • Old Salt rightside 2012/09/23 02:24:04
    Old Salt
    +1
    True!!! :)
  • David 2012/09/18 17:41:57
    Undecided
    David
    +2
    "Personally, I would DEMAND my local authorities JAIL them and DEPORT them back to the Middle East for violation of our American LAW!"

    What American law would have been violated in your scenario?
  • Old Salt David 2012/09/21 02:11:28
    Old Salt
    +2
    The LAW that they, as newly American citizens VOWED to take when they took the OATH to become a Citizen! :)

    "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

    That includes to "RENOUNCE" the Nation of Islam! :)
  • David Old Salt 2012/09/21 04:13:10 (edited)
    David
    "IN PRACTICE, IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT IF ANY TRUE LEGAL SIGNIFICIANCE THIS STATEMENT HAS ANY MORE. The US does not require a new citizen to take any formal steps to renounce his old citizenship before officials of the "old country"; and when the other country continues to claim a naturalized US citizen as one of its own, current US policy recognizes that such a person may have to use a passport from the other country in order to visit there, and such an action does not put the person's US citizenship in jeopardy.

    At one time, the US took the position that anyone who wished to renounce his prior citizenship in connection with US naturalization had an inherent, unquestionable right to do so. Well into the 19th century, many countries had no provisions at all for renouncing citizenship and did not even acknowledge that their citizens or subjects had any such right. This is, no doubt, why the renunciatory clause in the US naturalization oath is not linked to any additional requirement to give up one's old citizenship in accordance with another country's laws; as far as the US was concerned, the renunciatory statement in its own naturalization oath was sufficient, and all other countries had an obligation to respect it. In recent years, the State Department has apparently decided to tak...

    "IN PRACTICE, IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT IF ANY TRUE LEGAL SIGNIFICIANCE THIS STATEMENT HAS ANY MORE. The US does not require a new citizen to take any formal steps to renounce his old citizenship before officials of the "old country"; and when the other country continues to claim a naturalized US citizen as one of its own, current US policy recognizes that such a person may have to use a passport from the other country in order to visit there, and such an action does not put the person's US citizenship in jeopardy.

    At one time, the US took the position that anyone who wished to renounce his prior citizenship in connection with US naturalization had an inherent, unquestionable right to do so. Well into the 19th century, many countries had no provisions at all for renouncing citizenship and did not even acknowledge that their citizens or subjects had any such right. This is, no doubt, why the renunciatory clause in the US naturalization oath is not linked to any additional requirement to give up one's old citizenship in accordance with another country's laws; as far as the US was concerned, the renunciatory statement in its own naturalization oath was sufficient, and all other countries had an obligation to respect it. In recent years, the State Department has apparently decided to take a more pragmatic and realistic stance on this issue.

    Some efforts have been made in Congress, in recent years, to criminalize dual citizenship by making it a felony for a naturalized US citizen to acknowledge or exercise his/her old citizenship. So far, however, no such legislation has been enacted into law."
    (more)
  • Leslie Hope 2012/09/18 05:06:09
    Undecided
    Leslie Hope
    +3
    Ah.... I see the rest of your post now. Let's see... nope not worth answering.
  • Old Salt Leslie ... 2012/09/21 02:13:12
    Old Salt
    POS, why polute my blog with your idle and childish words? Be OFF with you! No wonder you're a LEVEL 9! :(
  • Leslie ... Old Salt 2012/09/21 03:43:06
    Leslie Hope
    Well trolled, sir! With much pleasure, I leave you to it!
  • Old Salt Leslie ... 2012/09/22 04:54:50
    Old Salt
    +1
    And MILLIONS like me! It is the ONLY reason America and Canada are not taken over by muslims!
  • La 2012/09/18 03:21:39
    Undecided
    La
    +4
    Ummmm.....if it's a peaceful protest, they can do what they want. You're a very bad American if you want to lock people up for peaceful protest. Where is THEIR freedom of speech?
  • David La 2012/09/18 17:43:36
    David
    +3
    An excellent comment!
  • Old Salt David 2012/09/21 02:16:44
    Old Salt
    No it wasn't! He/she did not think first before opening its mouth! :(
  • La Old Salt 2012/09/21 05:30:27
    La
    +1
    Excuse me? My gender is listed.
  • Old Salt La 2012/09/22 04:57:43
    Old Salt
    IF their "Freedom of Speech" is to deny others THEIR Freedom of Speech... it is wrong! And that is what they are pushing for!

    Sorry for the error in you sex! You avatar did give me the opinion of a "unisex" I.D.!
  • Old Salt La 2012/09/21 02:16:12
    Old Salt
    +1
    IF they are protesting the Freedom of Speech are they not protesting AGAINST our Constitution? Think about it! They took an OATH to defend it against ALL ENEMIES! Even the enemy of the Nation of Islam!
  • La Old Salt 2012/09/21 05:31:24
    La
    But Islamic Americans are Americans too >.> So they enjoy American rights. That includes their freedom of speech. They have the freedom of speech to say "We don't think you should freedom of speech". That's what a right is.
  • Old Salt La 2012/09/22 05:00:23
    Old Salt
    +1
    Such a call for denial of OTHERS freedoms comes from the Islamic instructions, NOT from our constitution! Why is that so difficult for you to understand? Is not Austrailia pushing to remove Muslims from your country?
  • La Old Salt 2012/09/22 05:37:07
    La
    God I hate when people can't even be bothered spelling my country properly. No, Australia is not "pushing to remove Muslims". Do you know /anything/ about Australia's immigration issues? The recent development to move offshore processing to Nauru? The split opinion on whether that will effectively discourage people attempting dangerous boat trips to get here? But no, cool, inform me that Australia is trying to remove all the Muslims. You must know better than me because old men are always right about everything.
  • Old Salt La 2012/09/23 02:28:37
    Old Salt
    I thought they had... or were trying to pass laws for muslim women to remove their face mask?
  • La Old Salt 2012/09/23 03:06:33
    La
    A very small proportion of Muslim women wear a hijab that covers their entire face. The issue was about them not being able to wear it in certain situations involving the police. Mug shots, testifying as witnesses, etc. Times when it is important that they are able to be properly identified. It's common sense really. It is a far cry from "removing all Muslims from the country".
  • Old Salt La 2012/09/23 03:16:30
    Old Salt
    Hmmmm.... not what I read.... but you go ahead and let them stay there! Just be very, very watchful to what happens when they take over a certain area by more than 32% of its population!
  • us 2012/09/17 21:43:11
    Undecided
    us
    +2
    I do believe in Freedom of speech, I don't think you should punish the director unless,
    was made to stir up and cause trouble.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 18:29:32

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals