Quantcast

What would happen if Republicans had a SUPER-MAJORITY??!!

BlueRepublican 2012/06/16 17:04:26
Constitutional checks and balances. But what happens when one group has complete control of the governing process?

We briefly saw what a Democratically-controlled Super-Majority looked like.
We saw the legislation that was passed. We saw the hyper-partisanship and breakdown of communication with the opposition. Now we see the results of these actions.

Which begs the question: What would happen if Republicans had a SUPER-MAJORITY??!! That's right. A GOP controlled House, Senate and Republican President.

What do you think would happen? What kind of legislation would pass? Would the opposition have a chance? Where does that leave 3rd parties like the Libertarians? What direction would the country go in? What about the people?

I wanna know what you think. Leave me a comment, share with everyone you know, and don't forget to RAVE!!!!!!

What would happen if Republicans had a SUPER-MAJORITY??!!


goplibertarian party
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • luvguins Lady Wh... 2012/06/17 14:19:35
    luvguins
    +1
    Romney sure was hawking during the primaries, and McCain and the GOP would have him into Syria and Iran in a New York minute
  • Lady Wh... luvguins 2012/06/17 14:38:31
  • redhorse29 2012/06/16 21:34:47
    redhorse29
    +2
    Surprising very little. Under Reagan was a near majority and congressional paralysis was common. Congress is screwed up organization of self-serving rich lawyers and businessmen looking to make more money on the taxpayers back.
  • ProudPr... redhorse29 2012/06/18 01:52:36
    ProudProgressive
    +1
    Hardly. The number of filibusters under Reagan was consistent with historical averages. The paralysis that began when the Democrats won a majority at the end of 2006 is unprecedented by a large margin.

    dgdfgdgdfgdfgdfg
  • Ishmael 2012/06/16 21:33:06
    Ishmael
    +4
    All I can do is look at the track record from the previous times Republicans held power in the 80s and 00s.

    1. The federal courts will be stacked with so-called "Strict Constructionists" who will use any law to overturn every anti-corporate, labor, environmental and regulatory precedent in the last 100 years to permanently enshrine supreme power with governmental/corporate authority. Just like they used an obscure 1876 property decision, Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific Railroad, to enshrine fictitious entities with full citizenship rights.

    2. :"Austerity" will reign supreme. Shock Doctrine economic policies will be imposed. Social Services budgets will be cut to the bone while defense budgets will increase for the coming war with Iran. Governmental properties will be sold off at fire sale prices to multinationals to cover increasing local and state deficits. Police and fire services will be cut or privatized to mercenary corporations with the deployment of surveillance and attack drones over US cities. As ciizens' lives deteriorate, those drones will be integrated with the DHS/NSA surveillance system to identify and eliminate anyone who tries to organize any counter to the corporate agenda. They will be labeled as "Domestic Terrorists".

    3. Republicans will use the spu...



    All I can do is look at the track record from the previous times Republicans held power in the 80s and 00s.

    1. The federal courts will be stacked with so-called "Strict Constructionists" who will use any law to overturn every anti-corporate, labor, environmental and regulatory precedent in the last 100 years to permanently enshrine supreme power with governmental/corporate authority. Just like they used an obscure 1876 property decision, Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific Railroad, to enshrine fictitious entities with full citizenship rights.

    2. :"Austerity" will reign supreme. Shock Doctrine economic policies will be imposed. Social Services budgets will be cut to the bone while defense budgets will increase for the coming war with Iran. Governmental properties will be sold off at fire sale prices to multinationals to cover increasing local and state deficits. Police and fire services will be cut or privatized to mercenary corporations with the deployment of surveillance and attack drones over US cities. As ciizens' lives deteriorate, those drones will be integrated with the DHS/NSA surveillance system to identify and eliminate anyone who tries to organize any counter to the corporate agenda. They will be labeled as "Domestic Terrorists".

    3. Republicans will use the spurious threat of "voter Fraud to disenfranchise as many Democratic voters as possible to ensure their goal of a one-Party Republican State. The simultaneous conversion to an easily-manipulated and hacked all-touch screen, corporate-controlled voting system will ensure that majority regardless of the actual choice of the electorate. Voting participation will fall further as more become disenchanted with the futility of the electoral process, also furthering the corporate agenda.

    4.War will come with Iran, fomented by a nuclear-weapons-armed Israel to destroy Iran's nuclear program. Media will beat the War drums. Dissent will be stifled completely as unpatriotic and traitorous with DHS providing facilities to house the most vocal in the burgeoning privatized Prison Gulag. As Casualties mount, calls for a nuclear strike will increase wirh China and Russia joining Iran at the nuclear brink.

    5.The governments and corporate elite will retreat into their secure bunkers to wait out the carnage as 7/8s of the global population of "useless eaters" is exterminated and will eventually emerge to reclaim the world.
    (more)
  • TheTailor Ishmael 2012/06/17 00:09:13
  • Lee TheTailor 2012/06/17 01:43:12
    Lee
    That's the smartest thing I've ever heard you say.
  • TheTailor Lee 2012/06/17 04:42:28
    TheTailor
    +1
    Yawning isn't saying anything.
  • Lee TheTailor 2012/06/17 15:53:26
    Lee
    +1
    But in your case, saying nothing is so much wiser than the alternative.
  • TheTailor Lee 2012/06/17 18:04:52
    TheTailor
    To that boring drivel it's preferable.
  • Ishmael TheTailor 2012/06/17 03:12:55
    Ishmael
    +1
    I'm merely extrapolating current trends in the Conservative movement to their logical and philosophical end-points. I didn't even address the role of religious conservatives in the oppression of women since that would fill a whole chapter all by itself,
  • TheTailor Ishmael 2012/06/17 04:46:56
    TheTailor
    +4
    Well no, you aren't. You're making up false scenarios and coming to false conclusions with no logic or real thought put forth. It's likely glaringly clear to junior high students, keep up the good work, they'll learn who and what "progressives" are ... dishonest.
  • ProudPr... TheTailor 2012/06/18 01:56:03
    ProudProgressive
    +1
    What's false? All of the things he listed are things the Republicans make no secret of wanting.
  • Ishmael TheTailor 2012/06/18 14:09:53 (edited)
    Ishmael
    False scenarios, eh, bub? Let's take a look at the Republican agenda over the past 30 years shall we?

    1. Savings & Loan deregulation directly leading to the collapse of the entire industry. Witness the Lincoln savings & loan debacle.

    2 Assault on the labor movement beginning with the PATCO strike leading to a shrinkage of union membership over the past 30 years and a corresponding flattening of ALL worker's pay during the same period.

    3. Illegal, off-the-books wars fought without Congressional authorization leading to the second Constitutional Crisis over Iran/Contra. The rise of the Imperial Presidency and continuation of the same lie-based wars through the Bush admin.

    4. Erosion of individual liberties as exemplified by passage of the Patriot Act of 2001, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and culminaring in the NDAA of 2012 that authorizes murder of US citizens by the Executive.

    5. The explosion of the national debt through the pernicious combination of Tax cuts for the wealthy, two unfunded wars halfway around the globe and an abject failure to create conditions on the ground for a stable peace in EITHER area leading to decline in US power and influence on a global scale.

    6. The increasing militarization of the police force and the rise and influence of the "Pr...



    False scenarios, eh, bub? Let's take a look at the Republican agenda over the past 30 years shall we?

    1. Savings & Loan deregulation directly leading to the collapse of the entire industry. Witness the Lincoln savings & loan debacle.

    2 Assault on the labor movement beginning with the PATCO strike leading to a shrinkage of union membership over the past 30 years and a corresponding flattening of ALL worker's pay during the same period.

    3. Illegal, off-the-books wars fought without Congressional authorization leading to the second Constitutional Crisis over Iran/Contra. The rise of the Imperial Presidency and continuation of the same lie-based wars through the Bush admin.

    4. Erosion of individual liberties as exemplified by passage of the Patriot Act of 2001, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and culminaring in the NDAA of 2012 that authorizes murder of US citizens by the Executive.

    5. The explosion of the national debt through the pernicious combination of Tax cuts for the wealthy, two unfunded wars halfway around the globe and an abject failure to create conditions on the ground for a stable peace in EITHER area leading to decline in US power and influence on a global scale.

    6. The increasing militarization of the police force and the rise and influence of the "Privatized" Prison Industry Gulag that has a vested interest in INCREASING what is already a larger prison population than China. The deployment of Drones over US territory to increase the power of the surveillance/police state.

    7. The wholesale erosion of civil liberties and privacy through the NSA mandate of Total Information Awareness as exemplified by the continuing Domestic Surveilance regime implemented by the NSA that is STILL ongoing. A program that was expressly FORBIDDEN by the NSA's OWN mandate.

    8. the stacking of the court system by political operatives leading to the pernicious Citizens United V FEC SCOTUS decison that opened the floodgates of corporate money to influence and buy elections, giving corporations bit domestic AND foreign as well as sovereign wealth funds undue influence over the electoral process. So how do you LIKE Chinese intelligence determining who we elect?
    (more)
  • TheTailor Ishmael 2012/06/18 18:04:49
    TheTailor
    Yes, "bub", lets ... point by point.

    1. Savings and Loans didn't collapse, whatever wrongdoing was found was prosecuted.

    2. Unions sink or swim as to their effectiveness in representing their members, that's the sole reason they are at their lowest membership levels in 30 years.

    3. There wasn't a "constitutional crisis" involving Iran/Contra, and CONGRESS declares or authorizes war actions, ALL actions have been bi-partisan.

    4. Both parties support the Patriot Act of 2001, the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and culminaring in the NDAA of 2012 that authorizes murder of US citizens by the Obama.

    5. Absurd, since the Democrats and self proclaimed "progressives" took the congress in Nov 2006 they have added $7 TRILLION to the national debt and have not passed a budget in well over 1000 days.

    6. Drones are only used over the border and under the watch of the Obama.

    7. I guess you forgot that the Obama is in charge of that.

    8. The Citizens United ruling was 5-4, there was no stacking of the court. Further, judges are impartial, not politically motivated. Oh, and Citizens United was a good ruling, both sides can now spend all the money they want, it leveld the playing field.

    There ya go, "bub".
  • William Ishmael 2012/06/17 07:48:02
    William
    "Strict Constitutionalists"?? First off, when was there a strict constitutionalist appointed to the supreme court. All of the current line-up see the Constitution as a "living document". Meaning, it has no meaning. Or are you going back to Taft?

    "austerity"?? Again, not since Taft. And since Republican candidates have the same Keynesian economics view, it's likely that the policies won't change much. ... Unless, of course we can find another president who enjoys interns and cigars more than paperwork.
  • ProudPr... William 2012/06/18 01:59:22
    ProudProgressive
    +1
    You overlooked these "strict constructionists":

    john roberts
    antonin scalia
    samuel alito
    clarence thomas clown

    And let's not forget the honored memory of the man responsible for throwing out the 2000 election and appointing George W. Bush President:

    william rehnquist
  • William ProudPr... 2012/06/18 03:14:20
    William
    Then why is the Constitution being used as toilet paper?
  • ProudPr... William 2012/06/18 03:20:10
    ProudProgressive
    +1
    Because these men's idea of "strict construction" is "anything I need it to say to make the decision on the case come down the way that's most advantageous to my personal political views." We both know that not only does the Constitution nowhere say that corporations are entitled to the same rights as human beings, but that the very idea of it would have been abhorrent to the Founding Fathers.
  • Lee William 2012/06/23 16:36:02 (edited)
    Lee
    +1
    Yes, why do Right Wing Nut Jobs treat the Constitution like sh*t?

    They completely ignore it.
  • William Lee 2012/06/25 20:27:29
    William
    Both sides do.
  • Ishmael William 2012/06/18 14:13:53
    Ishmael
    So, what you're saying is that Republican SCOTUS appointees are merely REPUBLICAN Judicial Activists? As for what I mean by "Austerity", THIS is what I mean here:


  • Lady Wh... Ishmael 2012/06/17 12:43:52
    Lady Whitewolf
    well said
  • ProudPr... Ishmael 2012/06/18 01:55:23
    ProudProgressive
    By far the most comprehensive and accurate response on this entire thread!

    obama applause gif
  • John "By God" American 2012/06/16 21:17:49
    John "By God" American
    They wouldn't do anything...
  • Theresa 2012/06/16 20:11:20
    Theresa
    +6
    It depends on which republicans were in leadership positions. If it was Rand Paul and Jim DeMint in the senate and Ron Paul as President and Jim Flake and Steve King in the House. I think the removal of all the Progressive Tyranny would happen in light speed. The removal of whole depts of the federal government. The removal of the 16th and 17th amendments would be started. Laws enforcing Fraud would be strengthened. The destruction of the Federal reserve would happen. THe appointment of strict constitutionalist to the Supreme Court would happen. Agenda 21 would be outlawed The UN would be removed from American Soil. There would be a new opportunity for jobs and growth with all those regulations removed. The NLRB would be disbanded! The Unions for civil workers would be banned.
  • TheTailor Theresa 2012/06/17 00:12:20
    TheTailor
    +4
    There are no laws that enforce fraud. Agenda 21 IS outlawed.
  • Theresa TheTailor 2012/06/17 00:46:48
    Theresa
    +5
    Thanks for the catch. I missed it. No only one state which is AL has outlawed Agenda 21. The present administration is busy setting up NGO to implement it.
  • ProudPr... TheTailor 2012/06/18 02:01:24
    ProudProgressive
    +1
    Agenda 21 is an advisory recommendation by the U.N. that was approved by 178 countries INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES (Thank you, George H.W. Bush for that one!). It has absolutely no legal effect on any state or local government, and Alabama showed the same ignorance in passing a law that bans something that not only does not exist but that they have no power to ban if it did as Oklahoma did in trying to pass an "anti-Sharia" law that violated the First Amendment.
  • TheTailor ProudPr... 2012/06/18 02:20:05
  • Starman 2012/06/16 20:00:44
    Starman
    +2
    If that happens, the country (99% of us anyway) should just bend over and grab our ankles.
  • JP Starman 2012/06/16 20:44:35
    JP
    +5
    Yeah, cause we're doing so well after the Obama super majority.
  • Starman JP 2012/06/16 22:29:09
    Starman
    +1
    Sadly the Democrats don't have a super majority. The minority party in the Senate is intentionally causing complete deadlock.
  • JP Starman 2012/06/17 00:36:10
    JP
    +3
    But they did have a super majority, and the extreme left course they took this country on got them pink slipped in an extremely one sided election in 2010.

    Harry Reid is the obstructionist, and he is in the majority in the Senate. It is too bad for all Americans such a partisan hack is in control of anything.
  • Lee JP 2012/06/17 01:46:26 (edited)
    Lee
    +4
    The Democrats only had a supermajority for about four months, and they made good use of it by passing the Affordable Health Care and Patient Protecton Act.

    But then, unfortunately, Ted Kennedy died, and there went the supermajority.

    Since then, those nasty, traitorous, nitwitted, regressive Tea Party thugs have been able to obstruct all progress.
  • Lady Wh... Lee 2012/06/17 12:45:14
  • ProudPr... Lee 2012/06/18 02:05:20
    ProudProgressive
    +1
    Actually, the Democrats never had a supermajority. Joe Lieberman betrayed the Democrats who he had pledged to support in order to try to further water down the Health Care Reform Law. That's why it had to be passed by reconciliation.

    However, you're correct that during that period the historic passage of the Health Care Reform Law alone accomplished more than Bush did in eight years. And don't forget that during that period they also managed to pass a stimulus that, while too small, averted a second Great Depression and added over 4 million American jobs. They also managed to save the American automobile industry, which Republicans like Mitt Romney wanted to see go out of business entirely.
  • Lee ProudPr... 2012/06/18 04:25:13 (edited)
    Lee
    The Dems did have enough votes in the Senate to block Republican fillibusters, but that window of opportunity lasted only four months . . . from the time Al Franken was finally allowed to take his Senate Seat until the time Ted Kennedy died.

    http://538refugees.wordpress....

    That's the only time the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act could have been passed.
  • JP Lee 2012/06/19 17:52:52
    JP
    And they still held a sizable majority. 16 trillion in debt, credit down grades and the highest costs of living in decades.

    Epic fail!
  • ProudPr... JP 2012/06/18 02:02:39
    ProudProgressive
    +1
    President Obama never had a supermajority. As soon as the Democrats gained a majority of the Senate in 2006 the Republicans changed the rules to require 60 votes to do anything. The Democrats never had 60 votes.

News & Politics

2013/05/21 23:21:19

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals