What will Happen if Gay Marriage issue goes to Supreme Court and they find it legal under the Constitution??
Space Invader
2012/05/12 17:48:13
|
|
|||||
|
2 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
11% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
18 votes
|
|
67% | |||
|
4 votes
|
|
15% | |||

















(yea!! like having total control of your ex/husband( children's father) right of his ' possession...denying them of .moral and secured lives..)
If the court does it will cease to become a political issue and many gays who vote dem will start voting repub since they will be worried about protecting that wealth.
personally I would conserider the issue over and figure the country can handle other issues. God would be left to judge those who allowed it to be law.
If these posters on Soda Head and the politicians spouting that we have bigger things to worry about, then why not just let it happen and get to the issues they want resolved.
I see them as the biggest opponents to really solving problems the ones who claim it's not an issue, yet fight it and make it into a bigger one.
Personally I would dance at a gay mans wedding before I see amnesty for illegals. There are more issues, but my christian faith will not allow me to endorse gay marriage.
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of su...
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
what i dont get is why liberals love the 14th amendment so much yet think the second is expendable?