Group Question :: Electoral Reform

What party of these holds a platform that you more closely agree with in the federal elections?

Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E December 02, 2008 01:09:50

Ignore candidates and focus on the party platform.
Democratic Party

Democratic Party

0%

0 votes

Republican Party

Republican Party

0%

0 votes

Constitution Party

Constitution Party

47%

7 votes

Green Party

Green Party

0%

0 votes

Independent Party

Independent Party

13%

2 votes

Objectivist Party

Objectivist Party

0%

0 votes

Boston Tea Party

Boston Tea Party

13%

2 votes

Socialist Party USA

Socialist Party USA

0%

0 votes

Libertarian Party

Libertarian Party

27%

4 votes

Prohibition Party

Prohibition Party

0%

0 votes

You must be a member of the group Electoral Reform to vote on this poll.

Top Comment
  • +4 jayc32~just me~ December 02, 2008 22:56:29 (edited)
    jayc32~just me~

    Boston Tea Party

    That one suits me best ;-) but the Constitution party...or Libertarian are good!!
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • +1
    ace771 April 04, 2009 20:18:28
    ace771

    Independent Party

    independent party
  • +1
    S.Sif:* December 05, 2008 17:51:40
    S.Sif:*

    Libertarian Party

    I don't know what their "platform" is , could you inform me in short ? ;\
  • Suffere... S.Sif:* December 06, 2008 18:35:35
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    National Platform of the Libertarian Party
    Adopted in Convention, May 2008, Denver, Colorado

    Preamble
    As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others.

    We believe that respect for individual rights is the essential precondition for a free and prosperous world, that force and fraud must be banished from human relationships, and that only through freedom can peace and prosperity be realized.

    Consequently, we defend each person's right to engage in any activity that is peaceful and honest, and welcome the diversity that freedom brings. The world we seek to build is one where individuals are free to follow their own dreams in their own ways, without interference from government or any authoritarian power.

    In the following pages we have set forth our basic principles and enumerated various policy stands derived from those principles.

    These specific policies are not our goal, however. Our goal is nothing more nor less than a world set free in our lifetime, and it is to this end that we take these stands.

    Statement of Principles
    We, the members of the Libertarian Party, challenge the cult of the omnipotent state and defend the rig...'""'""'''
    National Platform of the Libertarian Party
    Adopted in Convention, May 2008, Denver, Colorado

    Preamble
    As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others.

    We believe that respect for individual rights is the essential precondition for a free and prosperous world, that force and fraud must be banished from human relationships, and that only through freedom can peace and prosperity be realized.

    Consequently, we defend each person's right to engage in any activity that is peaceful and honest, and welcome the diversity that freedom brings. The world we seek to build is one where individuals are free to follow their own dreams in their own ways, without interference from government or any authoritarian power.

    In the following pages we have set forth our basic principles and enumerated various policy stands derived from those principles.

    These specific policies are not our goal, however. Our goal is nothing more nor less than a world set free in our lifetime, and it is to this end that we take these stands.

    Statement of Principles
    We, the members of the Libertarian Party, challenge the cult of the omnipotent state and defend the rights of the individual.

    We hold that all individuals have the right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose.

    Governments throughout history have regularly operated on the opposite principle, that the State has the right to dispose of the lives of individuals and the fruits of their labor. Even within the United States, all political parties other than our own grant to government the right to regulate the lives of individuals and seize the fruits of their labor without their consent.

    We, on the contrary, deny the right of any government to do these things, and hold that where governments exist, they must not violate the rights of any individual: namely, (1) the right to life -- accordingly we support the prohibition of the initiation of physical force against others; (2) the right to liberty of speech and action -- accordingly we oppose all attempts by government to abridge the freedom of speech and press, as well as government censorship in any form; and (3) the right to property -- accordingly we oppose all government interference with private property, such as confiscation, nationalization, and eminent domain, and support the prohibition of robbery, trespass, fraud, and misrepresentation.

    Since governments, when instituted, must not violate individual rights, we oppose all interference by government in the areas of voluntary and contractual relations among individuals. People should not be forced to sacrifice their lives and property for the benefit of others. They should be left free by government to deal with one another as free traders; and the resultant economic system, the only one compatible with the protection of individual rights, is the free market.

    1.0 Personal Liberty

    Individuals should be free to make choices for themselves and to accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. No individual, group, or government may initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. Our support of an individual's right to make choices in life does not mean that we necessarily approve or disapprove of those choices.

    1.1 Expression and Communication

    We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

    1.2 Personal Privacy

    We support the protections provided by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating "crimes" without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.

    1.3 Personal Relationships

    Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the rights of individuals by government, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships.

    1.4 Abortion

    Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.

    1.5 Crime and Justice

    Government exists to protect the rights of every individual including life, liberty and property. Criminal laws should be limited to violation of the rights of others through force or fraud, or deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Individuals retain the right to voluntarily assume risk of harm to themselves. We support restitution of the victim to the fullest degree possible at the expense of the criminal or the negligent wrongdoer. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must not be denied. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law.

    1.6 Self-Defense

    The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the right to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense. We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition.

    2.0 Economic Liberty

    A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.


    2.1 Property and Contract

    Property rights are entitled to the same protection as all other human rights. The owners of property have the full right to control, use, dispose of, or in any manner enjoy, their property without interference, until and unless the exercise of their control infringes the valid rights of others. We oppose all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, production, and interest rates. We advocate the repeal of all laws banning or restricting the advertising of prices, products, or services. We oppose all violations of the right to private property, liberty of contract, and freedom of trade. The right to trade includes the right not to trade — for any reasons whatsoever. Where property, including land, has been taken from its rightful owners by the government or private action in violation of individual rights, we favor restitution to the rightful owners.

    2.2 Environment

    We support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. We realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.

    2.3 Energy and Resources

    While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.

    2.4 Government Finance and Spending

    All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

    2.5 Money and Financial Markets

    We favor free-market banking, with unrestricted competition among banks and depository institutions of all types. Individuals engaged in voluntary exchange should be free to use as money any mutually agreeable commodity or item. We support a halt to inflationary monetary policies, the repeal of legal tender laws and compulsory governmental units of account.


    2.6 Monopolies and Corporations

    We defend the right of individuals to form corporations, cooperatives and other types of companies based on voluntary association. We seek to divest government of all functions that can be provided by non-governmental organizations or private individuals. We oppose government subsidies to business, labor, or any other special interest. Industries should be governed by free markets.

    2.7 Labor Markets

    We support repeal of all laws which impede the ability of any person to find employment. We oppose government-fostered forced retirement. We support the right of free persons to associate or not associate in labor unions, and an employer should have the right to recognize or refuse to recognize a union. We oppose government interference in bargaining, such as compulsory arbitration or imposing an obligation to bargain.

    2.8 Education

    Education, like any other service, is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Schools should be managed locally to achieve greater accountability and parental involvement. Recognizing that the education of children is inextricably linked to moral values, we would return authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. In particular, parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.


    2.9 Health Care

    We favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want, the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions.


    2.10 Retirement and Income Security

    Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. We favor replacing the current government-sponsored Social Security system with a private voluntary system. The proper source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals.

    3.0 Securing Liberty

    The protection of individual rights is the only proper purpose of government. Government is constitutionally limited so as to prevent the infringement of individual rights by the government itself. The principle of non-initiation of force should guide the relationships between governments.

    3.1 National Defense

    We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world and avoid entangling alliances. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.


    3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights

    The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Bill of Rights provides no exceptions for a time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government's use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law.

    3.3 International Affairs

    American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world and its defense against attack from abroad. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

    3.4 Free Trade and Migration

    We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders. However, we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a threat to security, health or property.


    3.5 Rights and Discrimination

    We condemn bigotry as irrational and repugnant. Government should not deny or abridge any individual's rights based on sex, wealth, race, color, creed, age, national origin, personal habits, political preference or sexual orientation. Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs.

    3.6 Representative Government

    We support electoral systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state and local levels. As private voluntary groups, political parties should be allowed to establish their own rules for nomination procedures, primaries and conventions. We call for an end to any tax-financed subsidies to candidates or parties and the repeal of all laws which restrict voluntary financing of election campaigns. We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives.


    3.7 Self-Determination

    Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty.

    4.0 Omissions

    Our silence about any other particular government law, regulation, ordinance, directive, edict, control, regulatory agency, activity, or machination should not be construed to imply approval.
    (Thought I may as well let everyone see it.)
    (more)
  • +1
    S.Sif:* Suffere... December 06, 2008 22:41:44
    S.Sif:*
    I meant I don't know about the "platform" of any party and this was not short :P ;$ I just chose Libertian because there was no "Undecided" or "None of the above" and because it's name is Libertian ..
  • Suffere... S.Sif:* December 06, 2008 23:02:52
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    Oh, okay, hold on.

    http://www.prohibitionists.or...

    http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/

    http://www.gp.org/platform/2004/

    http://www.facebook.com/topic...
    http://www.objectivistparty.u...

    http://socialistparty-usa.org...

    http://www.democrats.org/a/pa...

    http://www.usiap.org/Beliefs/...

    http://www.bostontea.us/platform
    (!!! I expected better.)

    http://www.lp.org/platform

    http://www.constitutionparty....
    (Even if I wasn't a Christian, I'd pick these guys. Never agreed with abortion for anything other than to directly protect the mother's life, not her lifestyle, because it's scientifically alive. Admittedly, I was afraid for a bit that they were like Alan Keyes, trying to get marriage defined in the Constitution, but I was wrong, they don't. You probably picked your party right though despite not knowing the platform.)
    Oh, okay, hold on.

    http://www.prohibitionists.or...

    http://www.gop.com/2008Platform/

    http://www.gp.org/platform/2004/

    http://www.facebook.com/topic...
    http://www.objectivistparty.u...

    http://socialistparty-usa.org...

    http://www.democrats.org/a/pa...

    http://www.usiap.org/Beliefs/...

    http://www.bostontea.us/platform
    (!!! I expected better.)

    http://www.lp.org/platform

    http://www.constitutionparty....
    (Even if I wasn't a Christian, I'd pick these guys. Never agreed with abortion for anything other than to directly protect the mother's life, not her lifestyle, because it's scientifically alive. Admittedly, I was afraid for a bit that they were like Alan Keyes, trying to get marriage defined in the Constitution, but I was wrong, they don't. You probably picked your party right though despite not knowing the platform.)
    (more)
  • +1
    S.Sif:* Suffere... December 07, 2008 01:27:00
    S.Sif:*
    Ok , thank you :) but can you reply to me again so I can look at this, I don't have time now ;$
  • Suffere... S.Sif:* December 07, 2008 01:35:50
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    Np, hope you find someone you like. ;)
  • +1
    racemonkey (oag) December 04, 2008 00:39:59
    racemonkey (oag)

    Constitution Party

    I'm not familiar with some of these parties but I like what I know about the Constitution and Libertarian Parties. I'm an independent but mostly that means Republican/Democrat because they are usually the only candidates to chose from. The big two aren't afraid of people not belonging just in people having other choices. Sad to say I think we're already too late to stop our own downfall.
  • +1
    Flash Gordon December 03, 2008 02:42:51
    Flash Gordon

    Independent Party

    I wish I could say that one of these parties was good for me, but their not. What do you think would happen if or representatives just worked for the people they represented. Not their party, not big business, not special interest, not for himself. Just represented what was best for the people that voted form them? I think that would be a nice...change!
  • +4
    jayc32~just me~ December 02, 2008 22:56:29 (edited)
    jayc32~just me~

    Boston Tea Party

    That one suits me best ;-) but the Constitution party...or Libertarian are good!!
  • +3
    Ihr Hase ~ Radix Libertas December 02, 2008 04:19:36
    Ihr Hase ~ Radix Libertas

    Boston Tea Party

    I think I will make a poll about them...

    They seem pretty on point so far LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • +2
    Suffere... Ihr Has... December 02, 2008 12:12:17
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    Please do. Information about any third-party candidate is hard to come buy. Hope it's a long poll. ;)
  • +2
    Ihr Has... Suffere... December 02, 2008 13:46:59
    Ihr Hase ~ Radix Libertas
    I mailed them last night....

    I will check when I get home if they got a hold of me....
  • +1
    Suffere... Ihr Has... December 07, 2008 01:49:38
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    Any word yet?
  • +1
    Ihr Has... Suffere... December 08, 2008 04:39:05
    Ihr Hase ~ Radix Libertas
    Nopers
  • +4
    Magzilla ~is a new momma~ December 02, 2008 01:34:01
    Magzilla ~is a new momma~

    Constitution Party

    Constitution party, libertarian party
  • +2
    Suffere... Magzill... December 02, 2008 02:55:35
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    That's what most are putting. What happened to all those people of the major two? I thought at least a few would be in here.
  • +2
    Magzill... Suffere... December 02, 2008 02:56:56
    Magzilla ~is a new momma~
    They're realizing it isn't working out too well for them being part of those parties?
  • +1
    American Rhetoric Review December 02, 2008 01:16:42
    American Rhetoric Review

    Constitution Party

    I want Religion out of government!!!!
  • +1
    Suffere... America... December 02, 2008 01:26:08
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    Next to impossible, but everyone can dream.
  • +2
    Brian S America... December 02, 2008 04:16:34
    Brian S
    Might want to check out the Constitution and Libertarian web platform web sites. I, too don't believe that religion should be legislated. The Constitution Party leans more toward religious legislation than the Libertarian Party. I voted Libertarian this year and agree with you. I am a Christian, but in this Nation, people should be free to follow their own religion and not have the Legislature say what is or is not approved according to the Bible. If religion was used to make laws, who is to say which religion would be the basis for the law?

    Check out these 2 links.
    Libertarian Party
    http://www.lp.org/platform

    Constitution Party
    http://www.constitutionparty....
  • +1
    Suffere... Brian S December 02, 2008 11:56:10
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    Even though the platform of the Constitution Party speaks of God a lot and the Libertarian Party doesn't, they both have similiar candidates. Bob Barr was so close to Alan Keyes, a very vocal Catholic, that it was a hard decision in the polls on here. The Constitution Party revolves more closely around the Constitution, but still gives respect to God, which is why I like them. If you really want a party that is possibly better than the two of those by not trying create religious laws at the federal level, then maybe the Boston Tea Party is your group. Charles Jay was their candidate this year.
  • +2
    Brian S Suffere... December 02, 2008 23:11:33 (edited)
    Brian S
    I will check them out. I've never really considered myself a member of any particular party, more along the Independent person. I'd never heard of the Boston Tea Party (as a political group) until it was posted on this question.

    I appreciate the input.
  • Suffere... Brian S December 06, 2008 22:38:11
  • +1
    Snicker... Brian S December 03, 2008 03:57:58
    Snickerty_loon
    Thanx for posting the links :)
  • +1
    ruby America... December 02, 2008 16:33:00
    ruby
    Maybe you should look at the platform, I really like them myself and plan on looking into this more.

    1. We affirm the God-given legal personhood of all unborn human beings, without exception. As to matters of rape and incest, it is unconscionable to take the life of an innocent child for the crimes of his father.
    2. The law of our Creator defines marriage as the union between one man and one woman.
    3. We commend Former Chief Justice Roy Moore of the Alabama Supreme Court for his defense of the display of the Ten Commandments, and condemn those who persecuted him and removed him from office for his morally and legally just stand.
  • +2
    Brian S ruby December 02, 2008 23:30:31
    Brian S
    Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to talk against them at all. I'm definitely going to do more research on them both.
  • +2
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E December 02, 2008 01:11:56
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E

    Constitution Party

    Though I think I'll take a look more at the BTP.
  • Suffere... Suffere... December 06, 2008 18:37:56
    Sufferer ♏ⒶRGⒶR☝†E
    Also, it would be nice to have a party that would be a Constitutionalist (meaning there is no need to be liberal, conservatives or libertarian, just that they follow the intentions of the U.S. Constitution), but then are a conservative at the state level. So have a national platform and a state platform.
  • +2
    diaverde08-MolecularGastron... December 02, 2008 01:11:36
    diaverde08-MolecularGastronomer

    Libertarian Party

    Libertarian or Constitution.
or
Cancel