Quantcast

WHAT? IS ELECTING, THE FIRST MORMON PRESIDENT NOT HISTORICAL??!!

damnyoumaggot 2012/07/11 18:40:44
It is not Historical..."A block of people won't vote for a Mormon"...
It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is historical...he more popular than lindsey lohan!!!
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Wouldn't it be great to moveon from the hatred of the past and show the world that America has moved past it's Mormon intolerance.....I mean after all what other Religion has been targeted by Executive Order.

Missouri Governor Lilburn Boggs' Missouri Executive Order Number 44, read as follows:

Headquarters of the Militia, City of Jefferson, Oct. 27, 1838.

Gen. John B. Clark:

Sir: Since the order of this morning to you, directing you to cause four hundred mounted men to be raised within your division, I have received by Amos Reese, Esq., of Ray county, and Wiley C. Williams, Esq., one of my aids , information of the most appalling character, which entirely changes the face of things, and places the Mormons in the attitude of an open and avowed defiance of the laws, and of having made war upon the people of this state. Your orders are, therefore, to hasten your operation with all possible speed. The Mormons must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the state if necessary for the public peace--their outrages are beyond all description. If you can increase your force, you are authorized to do so to any extent you may consider necessary. I have just issued orders to Maj. Gen. Willock, of Marion county, to raise five hundred men, and to march them to the northern part of Daviess, and there unite with Gen. Doniphan, of Clay, who has been ordered with five hundred men to proceed to the same point for the purpose of intercepting the retreat of the Mormons to the north. They have been directed to communicate with you by express, you can also communicate with them if you find it necessary. Instead therefore of proceeding as at first directed to reinstate the citizens of Daviess in their homes, you will proceed immediately to Richmond and then operate against the Mormons. Brig. Gen. Parks of Ray, has been ordered to have four hundred of his brigade in readiness to join you at Richmond. The whole force will be placed under your command.

I am very respectfully, yr obt st [your obedient servant],

L. W. Boggs, Commander-in-Chief.

Read More: http://www.youtube.com/user/damnyoumaggot

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Aqua Surf 2012/07/13 03:00:31
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    Aqua Surf
    +2
    ABO! Mormons over Marxists!
  • goblue1968 2012/07/12 22:09:14
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    goblue1968
    +1
    Of course it would be historical. That cannot be denied by anybody. But that is a really stupid reason to vote for any candidate. Would the Lefties push a homosexual candidate just because it would be historical to elect the first homo President?
  • damnyou... goblue1968 2012/07/13 17:13:26
    damnyoumaggot
    +2
    In time, they will.....
  • seadog6... goblue1968 2012/07/17 08:05:42
  • goblue1968 seadog6... 2012/07/25 02:03:05 (edited)
    goblue1968
    +1
    Thanks for the reference. My memory is very old, but that name rings some sort of familiar bell. I will have to look it up. I am so old that I was going to school at the University of Michigan when there was a guy named Tom Hayden giving speeches on the "Diag" protesting the VietNam War.
  • Guru Casper BN-ZERO 2012/07/12 18:48:54
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    Guru Casper BN-ZERO
  • Red 2012/07/12 18:37:55
  • mwg0735 2012/07/12 10:23:28
  • Ambassador II 2012/07/12 07:35:00
    It is not Historical..."A block of people won't vote for a Mormon"...
    Ambassador II
    +1
    What I look forward to is the Republican Party making polygamy legal as another "right" the "Founding Fathers" wanted to guarantee under the "pursuit of happiness" doctrines. If having multiple wives is considered happiness by some isn't it important that such be guaranteed by law? If marrying your football coach or ballet teacher is "guaranteed", then surely this modest step of enjoining six or ten women in your bed must be equally vital to a democracy of free people.
  • AL 2012/07/12 06:47:06 (edited)
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    AL
    +3
    Well since we have already had are first bi racial Marxist loser as President-why Not Try a Mormon successful Business man now for a change?
  • Bob, the reasonable one 2012/07/12 03:18:07
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    Bob, the reasonable one
    +3
    about time!!
  • DemonChild 2012/07/12 02:06:44
    It is not Historical..."A block of people won't vote for a Mormon"...
    DemonChild
    +1
    Oops I meant historical.
  • Glfer65 2012/07/12 01:59:17
    It is not Historical..."A block of people won't vote for a Mormon"...
    Glfer65
    +1
    When people become tolerant of ALL religions than I would vote for a Mormon. Why not someone who is Muslim, Jewish, Buddhism, Pagan? If we were truly tolerant of other faiths it would not matter for office of president.
  • Dolly 2012/07/12 01:35:30
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    Dolly
  • AL Dolly 2012/07/12 06:48:40
    AL
    +3
    LOL! Thats been tried and failed once already!
  • seadog6... Dolly 2012/07/25 03:02:48
  • marcuss LIBERALS ARE IDIOTS 2012/07/12 01:26:44
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    marcuss LIBERALS ARE IDIOTS
    +3
    After the FAILURE of the last 3 1/2 years a businessman is the only rational choice. He happens to be Mormon, his religion is not a issue unless you are a rabid LWNJ that has the same political ideology as the Islamist extremist..
  • Glfer65 marcuss... 2012/07/12 02:02:19
    Glfer65
    There you go you just pointed out that you are a hypocrite. You say religion is supposed to be a non issue and yet you paint the left as being islamic and therefore not capable of running a country.

    If this were true why are all people saying we need a good christian person to run this country? Why is it they preach tolerance and yet fail to follow it.
  • marcuss... Glfer65 2012/07/12 20:24:05
    marcuss LIBERALS ARE IDIOTS
    +2
    Mormons did not slam airplanes into buildings.

    You prefer a Islamist extremist as president?
  • Glfer65 marcuss... 2012/07/12 22:29:02
    Glfer65
    This is my point NOT all Islamic are terrorist and NOT all are extremist. You have fallen for the same crap that everyone else has. Just because these terrorist are Muslims does not mean the whole Islamic religion is.

    Are you going to say that all Irish Catholics are terrorist as IRA has bombed and killed people? Are you going to say all Christians are terrorist for they have slain and killed people?

    And the same for our president not being a Muslim which he is not and not a terrorist either. The same goes for those who call him Hitler when Hitler killed over 6 million Jews.

    Just saying and people need to put more thought into what they say then chirping the same rhetoric and lies they have heard from others. We have lost our reasonable thought process thanks to technology.
  • marcuss... Glfer65 2012/07/12 23:41:00
    marcuss LIBERALS ARE IDIOTS
    +2
    Im agnostic and I think in this country the LIBERALS are the radical extremists that best identify with the hardcore Islamic political ideology.
  • Glfer65 marcuss... 2012/07/13 02:45:23
    Glfer65
    I have no problem with your beliefs just the way you and others don't live by their teachings of tolerance of others and their beliefs. Besides aren't we supposed to be the land of free of religious restraints?

    And to equate the liberals with Islamic is way off the mark in all areas of your logic. And for being an agnostic why do you care about others beliefs as long as they leave yours alone?

    I hope that one day you don't have to fight for your rights to keep your beliefs.
  • marcuss... Glfer65 2012/07/13 21:36:25
    marcuss LIBERALS ARE IDIOTS
    +2
    Liberalism/Socialism is so frigging grat it has to be FORCED on people.

    Same MO as Islamic government.
  • Glfer65 marcuss... 2012/07/14 02:52:12
    Glfer65
    We have been a social government for more than 100 years so what has changed? Nothing and to make it sound SOOOOOO bad. This country was to be based on helping people of the US in times of need and we should still do this.

    I have said all along weed out the lifers and gamers of these systems and we can have solvent programs that work for those in need. WE are the problem not just a select group of people YOU, ME and the rest are the problem.

    Don't want to admit it fine don't bitch at me for our countries woes.
  • damnyou... Glfer65 2012/07/14 22:46:43
    damnyoumaggot
    +2
    Actually this Country was founded upon the belief that Man could Govern Himself...without the encroachment of Government Tyranny upon one's Liberties. Religous and economic freedom secured by LIMITED Government. You are on the wrong side of History.
  • Glfer65 damnyou... 2012/07/15 01:40:16
    Glfer65
    +1
    That is true however when I hear people claiming the fathers wanted us to be a christian nation I cringe that they need to look it up again. You are correct they were getting away from tyranny and the government telling them when they can wipe their ass.
  • Roger 2012/07/12 01:16:44
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    Roger
    +4
    I don't care.... just fix OBAMA'S mess and I will be happy
  • DoxieDad 2012/07/12 01:05:39
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    DoxieDad
    +5
    I don't care if he is a Kosher Mississippian. Something needs to be done to get the economy of this nation back to work and for somebody who can work at getting our fiscal house in order. The current administration has shown to be woefully inept at doing something about the current situation except to spend more money we don't have.
  • Devonly 2012/07/12 00:54:48
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    Devonly
    Obama was not the first black president.

    warren harding

    Warren Harding is at the top of the list of US presidents who have been categorized as black. This line of thought goes back to the obsession that many 19th and early 20th century Americans had with "blood lines" during what is a time when the "one drop rule" was used to define race. Segregationists and Social Darwinists found it important to be able to define race and so argued that any person with a black ancestor was black. In today's world, overt racism is frowned upon in the public sphere, people can self-select from a range of ethnicities and races on the census, and intellectuals discuss race as a social construction.
  • John Hall 2012/07/12 00:52:49
    It is not Historical..."A block of people won't vote for a Mormon"...
    John Hall
    +1
    Until a woman gets elected Obama has it hands down .
  • den 2012/07/12 00:45:40
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    den
    +1
    it will show howtupid american voters jhave become but he is better than an islamic from kenya
  • Glfer65 den 2012/07/12 02:03:36
    Glfer65
    +1
    Wow another post from someone believing the stories of lies and myths. So much for being tolerant.
  • DJL 2012/07/12 00:43:57
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    DJL
    +2
    It is voting for firsts that got us the ineligible idiot we have now. We need to vote on qualifications not firsts.
  • texasred 2012/07/11 23:52:04
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    texasred
    +2
    Actually, electing a Mormon won't be as historical as kicking our first part Black president out after one term.
  • Cal 2012/07/11 21:58:31
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    Cal
    +2
    He's the first. How is it not historical?
  • JL 2012/07/11 20:44:57
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    JL
    +3
    THEY VOTED FOR A MORON...THEY PROVED THEY WERE MORONS.....YOU DON''T HAVE TO BECOME A MORMON TO VOTE FOR ONE...VOTE ROMNEY!
  • marylou5 2012/07/11 20:23:23
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    marylou5
    +4
    Religion has no place in politics....at least that's what Obama and his liberal minions claimed when his "Muslimism" was addressed...remember that!!?

    How come the liberals now are trying to destroy MORMON ROMNEY for his religion?
    Lying hypocrites!

    Much better a Mormon who loves his country than a Muslim intent on destroying our country to institute Sharia Law and Islam, World Wide!
  • Nimitz 2012/07/11 20:14:15
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    Nimitz
    ROFLOL!

    On the question of whether it's historical to elect a Mormon, let's see if he gets elected first and THEN we'll have this debate.
  • debrarae 2012/07/11 19:54:37
    damnyoumaggot!!!how dare you swipe the langauge of the left!!!only Obama is h...
    debrarae
    +4
    Sorry I clicked the wrong button. But you were talking about this election being historical. I believe that if Obama wins, it will be historical.

    Obama will at last have the 'flexibility' he craves. And we can kiss the freedoms as guaranteed in the constitution Good bye.

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/p...
  • Southern Man 2012/07/11 19:46:40
    It is Historical. Mormons before morons!!!
    Southern Man
    +6
    Mitt is way better than 0bama could ever be we all know this I have changed my mind and will be voting for Mitt not because he a Mormon it is because he's not 0bama

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/21 11:16:30

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals