Hi Gracie. Good question. To me, murder is murder. Life begins at conception and most all scientists back me on that belief.
http://www.princeton.edu/~pro...
http://www.epm.org/resources/...
http://www.freerepublic.com/f...
Now, back to the question at hand. The recent controversy about aborting because your baby may not be the sex you desire. Abortion because your baby would be Gay is the next logical step. ALL of it deplorable!
What if scientists found a "gay gene"...
Gracie - Proud Conservative
2012/06/11 00:27:49
and the mother could tell that her unborn baby would in fact be gay, would aborting that baby be moral? It seems that anyone that is pro-choice is indifferent to the reasons for abortion and defend it under any circumstances. I find eugenics inherently evil and amoral.
This isn't about gay bashing, this is a moral question.
This isn't about gay bashing, this is a moral question.
Top Opinion
-
Rodney 2012/06/11 01:22:30
~ Blessings!
Male Homosexuality Study: Gay Men Have Evolutionary Benefit For Their Families, New Research Suggests
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
I think it's a great question! I like the genesis of it, too.
A fetus is not a baby till it is born.
Every aspect of the baies genetic definition of who she is for now and always - - the color of her eyes, her hair, how tall she will grow to be - - was present at the moment of fertilization. It's not determined at birth.
Human beings reproduce with the female pregnancy. It's a temporary and necessary condition to sustain the species. Your arbitrary decree that this inconvenient temporary condition of the mother somehow trumps the childs right to exist is ludicrous. This kind of reasoning threatens everyone's right to life. Determining who lives and dies becomes completely arbitrary.
International Conference on Population and Development, RAMOS, UNFPA United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF- United Nations Children’s Fund,
UNPD United Nations Population Division etc and compare it to the US abortion rate. Netherlands 7 out of 1000 abortions, Germany 16, France 20 USA-44 out of 1000.
As for illegal abortions the stereotypical coat hanger in a alley isn't the only/preferred way. There are metal rods, blunt objects, an accidental fall, chemically induced abortions/pills, poisonous herbs (not sure how valid), and the most obvious one is doctors/"doctors" who no longer have a license who break the law.They simply continue what they were doing under the table. There's also the case of women going over the state border to more liberal states or groups like in the 60s-70s that set up home visits like "Alice" e...
International Conference on Population and Development, RAMOS, UNFPA United Nations Population Fund, UNICEF- United Nations Children’s Fund,
UNPD United Nations Population Division etc and compare it to the US abortion rate. Netherlands 7 out of 1000 abortions, Germany 16, France 20 USA-44 out of 1000.
As for illegal abortions the stereotypical coat hanger in a alley isn't the only/preferred way. There are metal rods, blunt objects, an accidental fall, chemically induced abortions/pills, poisonous herbs (not sure how valid), and the most obvious one is doctors/"doctors" who no longer have a license who break the law.They simply continue what they were doing under the table. There's also the case of women going over the state border to more liberal states or groups like in the 60s-70s that set up home visits like "Alice" etc etc.
As for deaths no, it was only the mortality rate of the persons having the abortion.
Lastly this "fake" "war on women" is a bit subjective. In the past year congress (103rd) has tried to push 430 women's healthcare/abortion restriction laws in 2011 even despite abortion being legal. 430!!! 86 state laws as opposed to the 23 the year before. Because they can't down right make it illegal, they will do everything in their power to circumvent the law and make it as uncomfortable/drawn out as possible. Transvaginal ultrasounds, no longer allowing private insurance plans to cover the procedure, States trying to dictate plan parenting's funding (which is federal mandated) etc. All i'm asking for is some common sense. Yes I get it you don't like the current abortion law, that doesn't mean try to be sly and claim a "transvaginal" ultrasound is for health reasons. It's simply ill intention.
Then you want to compare third world countries and their health conditions to countries more economically and technologically advanced? Taxpayers should not be paying for Planned Parenthood's abortion mill. It's nothing but black genocide. Let me give you one little fact that has been left out of that "transvaginal ultrasound" outrage. That's what they do the majority of the time BEFORE the abortion to determine fetal age. No outrage there, huh? You have to be told of some God awful complications before regular surgery, you have to have multiple testing done also, so to actually have to know you're killing a real baby, not a blob of tissue, you should have to see what it actually looks like.
I also have one more requirement...before you're FOR abortion, you should have to go see what it actually looks like. Then you should have to actually talk to women years after they've had one and determine what kind of psychological effects it has had on them. We never want to look at the aftermath of a "good intention".