As a private individual, I can be in favor of whatever sentence and penalty I like against Holmes, but a judge is bound by the law. If I were the judge, I would have to follow due process, whatever that might include.
Part of the Verdict is NO lengthy appeals .. no delays ..
just sentencing right straight to the Line ..
tie him up to the post ..
line up the shooters ..
and Light him up with holes ..
(make sure he's dead and gone)
He should NEVER linger for decades in COMFORT .. coddled in a prison at TAXPAYER Expense .. all because this HEINOUS MONSTER would otherwise find his fate at the hands of the REAL Convicts ..
Who was guilty? OJ Twelve of his peers couldn't convict him. Why would you think you know more about it than they do. Were you assigned the task of deciding his guilt or innocence or are you just stating your opinion?
Im not one for eye for an eye justice but this matches. And technically as a law student I studied anywon can plead for insanity you just haveto pull of the right act. He studid demensia and schizoprenia and thats the look he is ppulling off.
If insane, locked in a psychiatric prison for life... if sane, locked in prison for life (forced to do labour, to pay for his living costs, of course).
just sentencing right straight to the Line ..
tie him up to the post ..
line up the shooters ..
and Light him up with holes ..
(make sure he's dead and gone)
He should NEVER linger for decades in COMFORT .. coddled in a prison at TAXPAYER Expense .. all because this HEINOUS MONSTER would otherwise find his fate at the hands of the REAL Convicts ..
He was guilty.
I would first have to hear and see all the presented evidence, and arguments.
(Git a rope!)