What Do You Think of President Obama’s Plan to Curb Gun Violence?
ABC News U.S.
2013/01/17 00:16:04
- 2,821 votes
- Read all 44 opinions
- View Results and Demographics
|
|
|||||
|
1,301 votes
|
|
46% | |||
|
958 votes
|
|
34% | |||
|
562 votes
|
|
20% | |||
Remember, the shooters own mother called for help and was afraid of her own child. But did she remove or prevent him from being able to get the guns she owned. She did nothing, yet it is the fault of those whom legally own guns that this idiot shoot the teachers and students. Why is the media not talking about responsible gun ownership and holding those whom allow their firearms used in a illegal manner responsible.
Personally, sue the mother estate, hold the father responsible for his child's action. Turns out that he stop the authorities from removing his child from the mothers household.
As for all the school shootings. Oddly enough each time there was a democrat president in office the school shooting number almost if not double. As for what should have been done. Hold those whom knew of the treat responsible.
Example: Virginia Tech. Two of the school admins knew the shooter talked about a shooting. He wrote stories over and over again about how he would preform a shooting.
His psychologist heard him say he wanted to shoot. But nobody alert the authorities. WTF.
Virginia Tech: Two college admins and a few of his professors kept quite, did not say one thing. The shooter Head doc heard just day before of the plan. Now how do you tell the family of the victims, "I have a moral oath not to alert if my patient is DANGEROUS. "
If you heard or read Obama's proposal for gun control. The one question has to be asked. Would it have stopped Sandy Hook? The answer is a big NO.
The Bush Master even after the possible regulations is still legal today, even with the 30 round clips. You just can't buy a new clip and on his person he had 6 clips. So I don't think he was worried about running out.
He carried hand guns which per the Obama administration still have not banned.
They have only taken or made it harder for legal ownership, but there is nothing stopping you from purchasing out the US and importing for personal use..
If it was not for a legally owned gun, my co owner and I would be died today.
There is a big difference of legal and responsible firearm ownership and irresponsible ownership. Criminals laugh at regulation that limits bullet numbers and what you can own. Do you really think someone whom wants to own a illegal firearm is going to go to a local store and purchase it.
They will be purchasing in the black market. My firearm owners responsible for the ownership of their firearms. But to regulate what I can own or how many bullet I can carry is just wrong.
As for how to limit shootings. Well look back in history. Each time there is a Democrat is office (Oval Office) shooting death go up. SO maybe it is not to have a democrat president. I joke about that, but it is not the legal ownership of a firearm that is causing these shootings. In fact if you listen or watch the news you will find that a legally own firearm had protected a family. (Boy protect his two sister) (Mother protects her children while on the phone with her husband)
It is called responsible gun ownership. The media play off the death of a child that shot themselves with a gun in the household. First the question needs to be. Was that gun legally own? Why wasn't the gun locked up or have a disarming device (which by the way is required to be purchased if you put the check mark in the box that children line in the household)
Think about it. I mean really think about it.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_ne...
Further looking into this. Parent would charged with no crime, but nor were they legally gun owners.
Why? If you make those whom own a firearm responsible for the ownership, which include making it a crime if you are not responsible. These parents...
As for how to limit shootings. Well look back in history. Each time there is a Democrat is office (Oval Office) shooting death go up. SO maybe it is not to have a democrat president. I joke about that, but it is not the legal ownership of a firearm that is causing these shootings. In fact if you listen or watch the news you will find that a legally own firearm had protected a family. (Boy protect his two sister) (Mother protects her children while on the phone with her husband)
It is called responsible gun ownership. The media play off the death of a child that shot themselves with a gun in the household. First the question needs to be. Was that gun legally own? Why wasn't the gun locked up or have a disarming device (which by the way is required to be purchased if you put the check mark in the box that children line in the household)
Think about it. I mean really think about it.
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_ne...
Further looking into this. Parent would charged with no crime, but nor were they legally gun owners.
Why? If you make those whom own a firearm responsible for the ownership, which include making it a crime if you are not responsible. These parents should go to jail or at least the father. He SHOT his son. by not being responsible.
Remember, the theater shooting was in a gun free zone theater. Now it was not that long ago that another theater shooting happen in a theater that allowed for legal conceal weapons. That shooter came in, shot a few rounds and next was laying die after a legal own shot him dead. Not one innocent person was injuries.
Now the begs to question. Which would you rather be, sitting next to a legal gun owner whom could save your life. Or in a theater where the only thing you can do is hide, because if you run for an exit. You are just lighting yourself up as a target.
Are you aware that most Pro NFL players have protect on the sidelines? And most NFL owners have armed and in plain clothing guards?
Now you asked as a legal gun owner, what can our country do to stop the shooting.
Gun ownership responsibility. If you own it, you are responsible for that firearm. If you allow for your firearm to be used illegally or kill another by accident. As a responsible gun owner, your gun would not fall in illegal hands or cause an accidental shooting. There for, if you own it and it does cause a death (illegal or accidental). You should be be arrested with the criminal.
gun owners are responsible for the actions of their guns now.if a child gets your gun and does harm the gun owner is responsible.if you are robbed and weapons taken you must report it or you will be responsible for any incidents after the robbery.so you do agree about background checks?
If a gun crazy person wants to carry a firearm into a theater, there is nothing to stop them. Not one law can force that point. But understand this, if a shoot can only have 7 bullets per magazine. Do you have any idea how many magazines a single person can carry and be changed out.
Example
Did you see how a guy shot three round, change the mag and shot again another three. Now understand, under the Obama reform, he will have seven shot instead of three. If you did not catch the time, we are talk a second between changes. The law does not stop you from carrying 20 , 30 or 100 magazines. And if each only has 7 bullets they are legal.
" the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
is a to much already , and the Haters keep on coming .
Mr.ABC and the rest of the idiots that want to ban guns and large clips let me say now that obama wants me to only have seven cartridges in my gun "THERE WILL BE NO WARNING SHOTS".
what happened to ...."Plan is on the wrong track""