What do you think of forced birth control for habitual welfare recipients?

by Assassin~ Badass Buzz Guru Posted 2012/06/11 13:10:19

Related Topics: Birth Control, Welfare, Birth, Forced

Read More

98 votes
Read all 154 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	We should do this.	44 votes	45%
	No WAY	35 votes	36%
	Hmmmmm Maybe.....	19 votes	19%

+10

Add a comment above

JMCC 2012/06/11 13:18:33

No WAY

+8
Did you know that this planet has the resources and space for 250 Billion people to live in luxury and free from hunger?

Much better that a few of us just keep it all to ourselves....
>> See Replies

More polls by Assassin~ Badass Buzz Guru

Brosia 2012/07/02 17:31:12

No WAY

Umm... Pretty sure it is illegal to forcibly sterilizing someone. And, what would be considered "habitually" on welfare? Just because you are on welfare does not mean that you have a large family. I am on welfare and have 2 kids. And we have been on welfare for 10 years, is that habitual? As someone who has gotten a tubal ligation, is that enough for you? Or would you require that I also take a pill that taxpayers would have to pay for because it is too expensive for me.

reply
*~Amelie~* 2012/06/13 21:01:50

No WAY

i don't even see how this is a question! the idea is just ridiculous

reply
David Hussey 2012/06/13 04:05:12

No WAY

I think it reeks of nazi-esque thinking. A cleverly disguised return of a eugenics agenda.

reply
James 2012/06/13 04:03:40

We should do this.

We spay and neuter stray animals as a way to reduce the populations. If they can't get their act together, maybe this might not be such a bad idea.

reply
beach bum 2012/06/12 04:07:47

Hmmmmm Maybe.....

+1
maybe

reply
the judgebigdogeagle 2012/06/11 23:32:09 (edited)

Hmmmmm Maybe.....

The minute you apply for welfare of any sort{Food Stamps} or such. You cannot reapply if you come in with one more kid.

reply
Lady Whitewolf 2012/06/11 22:38:08

We should do this.

+1
YES

reply
Nestofasssps 2012/06/11 21:54:39

No WAY

+2
Force?? In the land of the free ??? LOL seems not to be free for those who are different and hated for being not twue amerwicans
what a terrible thing to say.!!!!.

reply
D D to Nestofa... 2012/06/12 02:10:57

What about the government telling us what we can and cannot ingest, eat?

reply
Nestofa... to D D 2012/06/14 01:08:32

why not stick to the topic,

reply
D D to Nestofa... 2012/06/14 05:09:09

We were talking birth control pills, that is forcing you to ingest a drug.

reply
Ed 2012/06/11 20:52:08 (edited)

Hmmmmm Maybe.....

+1
I don't. Drug testing would filter out most of them.
(EDIT) I'm sick and tired of a central government mandating everything and interfering with our individual choices. So I guss my answer should have been a big

HELL NO!

reply
boneman1 2012/06/11 19:41:48

Hmmmmm Maybe.....

+3
I don't know about forced birth control, but there should be a limit to the amount and length of government assistance. I don't think you can force birth control, but I do think we should look at removing kids from homes where they're not being taken care of properly. If you're on government assistance and you keep having kids it might be best for the kids if they were put in a home that could provide for them.

reply
Katfish 2012/06/11 19:12:53

We should do this.

+4
Not "forced" but more of a stipulation required to receive benefits. They dont have to do it, they can support themselves instead.

reply
sbtbill 2012/06/11 19:06:07

No WAY

+2
Who should administer it? I know we can have the Catholic Church do it.

reply
The Duke 2012/06/11 19:00:10

Hmmmmm Maybe.....

Sounds like an excellent Socialist/Communist/Eugenics solution. To practice such? Totally unacceptable.

reply
firelooker 2012/06/11 18:55:36

We should do this.

+2
In the past welfare used young women as baby making factories so they could put the kid into a foster homew where the people paid the state for the kids./ If you are young enough to have kids but can't afford them don't ask us to pay for them.

reply
wutever 2012/06/11 18:51:22

Hmmmmm Maybe.....

+1
If you have a buttload of kids and cant pay for them maybe, but birth control messes with some girls. Also some religuons dont belive in that. Not everybody on welfare has too many kids. But if you cant take care of the kids you have than you probably shouldnt have anymore

reply
Diverbelo 2012/06/11 18:37:05

We should do this.

+6
Make it a choice. You ask the taxpayer to pay for you to live, then you must agree to not add any more mouths to feed to the rolls. You leave welfare, have as many as you want.

reply
j moraman 2012/06/11 18:36:51 (edited)

We should do this.

+4
Yes and make it hard for these anchor baby dropping fools to stop popping out so many kids because they know Americans will take care of them. And before a crybaby lib yells out racist, there is nothing racist about the problem we are in, people that abuse the system and hard working americans pay while someone sits on there ass. Then we get the law breaking illegals here to have baby after baby, and again the goal oriented have to pay.

reply
wutever to j moraman 2012/06/11 18:58:45

Your right about that. I bet if there werent so many illegal aliens, the unemployment rate would probably be lower, even there are so many people that dont want to work, or think they are too good to do whats out ther

reply
RogerCoppock 2012/06/11 18:33:01

No WAY

+1
How about forced sterilization and forced abortion for people who register Republican?

reply
j moraman to RogerCo... 2012/06/11 18:45:24

+2
How about a forced get off your lazy ass and cut people off so they are forced to pay for there own children , i guarantee they will be more carefull

reply
firelooker to RogerCo... 2012/06/11 18:57:27

+2
How about the same for dumb ass democrats who want to see this country turned into a socialist country.

reply
boneman1 to RogerCo... 2012/06/11 19:45:26

+1
That post was about as classless and unintelligent as most of your others.

reply
Lady Wh... to RogerCo... 2012/06/11 22:39:11

TRIPLE LOLZ!!!

reply
D D to Lady Wh... 2012/06/12 02:45:50

You are all scared of birth control being taken away from women. It could go to where it is required.

reply
John Galt jr or Ron/jon 2012/06/11 17:37:08

We should do this.

+2
but it's unconstitutional

reply
Tennyson James 2012/06/11 17:09:35

No WAY

+2
The government should not legislate regarding procreation.

reply
JCD aka "biz" 2012/06/11 16:54:11

No WAY

+2
Here in Europe, politicians are whining because women do not have enough children to pay for old people's pensions in the future. We in France have the highest fertility rate, partly because we encourage women to have babies, family allowances, free child care, paid maternity leave etc.
I understand that in America, you don't need children, pensions will be be paid anyway. Romney probably has a plan.

reply
Gloria to JCD aka... 2012/06/12 12:51:53

+1
Romney has a plan; poor people drop dead.

reply
JCD aka... to Gloria 2012/06/12 14:01:05

+1
Probably.

reply
frank 2012/06/11 16:41:01

We should do this.

+1
No that would be against the law. Instead it should be set up as regardless of the number of children then have they should only receive money for the first 2 or 3 max.

reply
TerryAgee 2012/06/11 16:39:54

We should do this.

+1
First, define the meaning of the word "Welfare". To my way of thinking, it means to subsidize. For example, a matching 401k, a biz tax credit, a political donation, etc. Yay or nay?

reply
Assassi... to TerryAgee 2012/06/11 16:43:54

+1
No.

reply
JCD aka... to TerryAgee 2012/06/11 16:57:26

+2
Corporate welfare recipients should clearly not be allowed to have sex. And do you really want Jamie Dimon to have kids?

reply
Farnsworth 2012/06/11 16:24:00

Hmmmmm Maybe.....

+3
I would LOVE to say hell yes, BUT.......constitutionally you can't do that.

Best thing is after 2 or whatever, no more bucks for welfare babies

reply
Th8nos 2012/06/11 16:22:26

Hmmmmm Maybe.....

+1
never given that any thought, but now that you mention it.....

reply
WankerBait 2012/06/11 16:13:05

No WAY

+3
I would agree to offering birth control to those in the system and every woman of birthing age in the USA. There are no habitual welfare recipients since the 1996 welfare reforms, just more working poor...

reply
BritPunk to WankerBait 2012/06/11 16:26:24

+1
Love the name, btw, I know the feeling !!

reply