Quantcast

What Do You Call A Republican Who Wants To Smoke Pot? A Libertarian.

luvguins 2012/06/11 19:09:35
By Cagle Post's Michael Kindt:


As far as I can make out, Libertarians are just basically Republicans who are really for smaller government—no, like, REALLY—and who are unencumbered by the self-righteousness, love of telling others how to behave, and cosmic levels of hypocrisy found among the Religious Wrong. Libertarians talk a great game about personal liberty, about freedom, but really advocate an increased empowering of business and corporate interests at the expense of everything else.




The Libertarian Party is the third largest and fastest growing political party in the U.S. Its platform favors minimally, very minimally, regulated, laissez-faire markets, while tacking on an addendum of increased civil liberties.


What’s funny about this to me is that they don’t seem to realize just how much personal and private liberty would diminish if the corporate powers-that-be are allowed to run unchecked. Why, it would be just like things are now, only worse. Essentially, the state’s power and ability to serve as a regulatory and protective agency would be greatly reduced or even eliminated. In favor of what, though? Well, of business and corporate interests, of course. A vacuum is always filled.


Admittedly, this is the trajectory we’re on now, but why speed it up with a pretend philosophy of ‘liberty’?


Under Libertarianism, minimum wages would vanish and child labor would return. Instead of playing in the yard, little Tommy would be down at the factory earning a fair wage as determined entirely by the company he works for and without any input or support from anyone else. In other words, he would be earning a few nickels above slavery.


Protections for the environment would also vanish because, you know, they stand in the way of ‘freedom’. But what about me as an individual? What about my freedom to drink water that doesn’t poison me or breathe air that doesn’t sicken me? Too bad, so sad.


Businesses and corporations are already extremely powerful in the U.S. In fact, I would argue that at this point they rival the state itself. Increasing their power through radical deregulation will result in sure-fire corporate feudalism where the government is as toothless and symbolic as a Medieval king.


Don’t get me wrong. I do support many Libertarian ideas regarding personal freedom. If I want to smoke some pot, I should be able to. After all, it’s my home, lighter, lungs, and bong. The fact that marijuana is still illegal in this country is ridiculous. Everyone knows it, even you reading this. You just won’t admit it. The federal government flushes 7.7 billion dollars down the toilet every year battling the dreaded and quite pretty-to-look-at weed, resulting in unquestionable and utter failure. As an aside, you didn’t hear a word about that 7.7 billion dollars during the recent debt fiasco, did you? Nor did you hear about all of the subsidies given to the astronomically profitable oil industry by the federal government. Nope. All you heard was “How much money can we take away from the poor and needy without causing a riot?”


I even respect a lot of the Libertarians I know. They seem like honest Republicans, which is rare. They blessedly lack the empty god-talk while still doing everything in their power to force those in need to fend for themselves.


The reality of Libertarianism in America is that it is diametrically opposed liberty. It is the opposite of what it claims to be. It wants to remove the tyranny of the state, which is at least mitigated somewhat by the elective process, and give it over to private organizations who would then be completely unaccountable.


Libertarianism is simply anarchy for rich people—and rich people alone. Nothing more.

Read More: http://www.cagle.com/2011/08/what-do-you-call-a-re...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Pat 2012/06/11 19:33:06
    Pat
    +5
    I say, legalize pot. You will eliminate untold millions spent on trying to catch people using it and you'll be able to tax it for added income. Regulate it like we do liquor. It's no worse than alcohol.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • luvguins 2012/06/11 19:39:31
  • Næthan ... luvguins 2012/06/11 22:30:06
    Næthan Æterna
    +1
    That's a nice slogan, but it isn't true. Have you met very many Ron Paul people in real life? Not very many of them can say they're anywhere close to being rich.
  • Næthan ... Næthan ... 2012/06/11 22:30:37
    Næthan Æterna
    +1
    We're just smarter than Anarchists. We know that Government is a necessary evil, but we want as little evil as possible.
  • explorer1618 2012/06/11 19:35:57
    explorer1618
    +2
    Is there a point because the most of the people in the start " SMOKED POT AND DRANK WHISKEY LIKE CRAZY " tobacco " IS WHAT STARTED THE UNITED STATES !

    Look it up morons !
  • Pat 2012/06/11 19:33:06
    Pat
    +5
    I say, legalize pot. You will eliminate untold millions spent on trying to catch people using it and you'll be able to tax it for added income. Regulate it like we do liquor. It's no worse than alcohol.
  • Singerar Pat 2012/06/12 18:00:02
  • Kaleokualoha 2012/06/11 19:26:38
    Kaleokualoha
    +3
    The Libertarian economic plan seems to be just survival of the fittest. This is anarchy.
  • zbacku 2012/06/11 19:12:20
    zbacku
    +3
    What do you call a Democrat that smokes pot: Obama.
  • luvguins zbacku 2012/06/11 19:20:42 (edited)
    luvguins
    +3
    You living in the past again? More want pot legal nowdays except uptight RWNJs closet smoking it.
  • Kaleoku... zbacku 2012/06/11 19:24:34 (edited)
    Kaleokualoha
    +3
    I doubt that Obama still "smokes marijuana," although there is no doubt that he indulged when younger.

    Many of his supporters are enraged that the DEA has resumed its war against California medical marijuana despite Obama's earlier statements.
  • Warren ... zbacku 2012/06/11 19:53:16
    Warren - Novus Ordo Seclorum
    +1
    Good for him.
  • Singerar zbacku 2012/06/12 18:03:22
    Singerar
    No that was in College. Did you forget Bush was a lush! We had a self professed alcoholic in the war room next to the red button. That was fun....

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/11/26 12:53:58

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals