What Do You Call A Republican Who Wants To Smoke Pot? A Libertarian.
As far as I can make out, Libertarians are just basically Republicans who are really for smaller government—no, like, REALLY—and who are unencumbered by the self-righteousness, love of telling others how to behave, and cosmic levels of hypocrisy found among the Religious Wrong. Libertarians talk a great game about personal liberty, about freedom, but really advocate an increased empowering of business and corporate interests at the expense of everything else.
The Libertarian Party is the third largest and fastest growing political party in the U.S. Its platform favors minimally, very minimally, regulated, laissez-faire markets, while tacking on an addendum of increased civil liberties.
What’s funny about this to me is that they don’t seem to realize just how much personal and private liberty would diminish if the corporate powers-that-be are allowed to run unchecked. Why, it would be just like things are now, only worse. Essentially, the state’s power and ability to serve as a regulatory and protective agency would be greatly reduced or even eliminated. In favor of what, though? Well, of business and corporate interests, of course. A vacuum is always filled.
Admittedly, this is the trajectory we’re on now, but why speed it up with a pretend philosophy of ‘liberty’?
Under Libertarianism, minimum wages would vanish and child labor would return. Instead of playing in the yard, little Tommy would be down at the factory earning a fair wage as determined entirely by the company he works for and without any input or support from anyone else. In other words, he would be earning a few nickels above slavery.
Protections for the environment would also vanish because, you know, they stand in the way of ‘freedom’. But what about me as an individual? What about my freedom to drink water that doesn’t poison me or breathe air that doesn’t sicken me? Too bad, so sad.
Businesses and corporations are already extremely powerful in the U.S. In fact, I would argue that at this point they rival the state itself. Increasing their power through radical deregulation will result in sure-fire corporate feudalism where the government is as toothless and symbolic as a Medieval king.
Don’t get me wrong. I do support many Libertarian ideas regarding personal freedom. If I want to smoke some pot, I should be able to. After all, it’s my home, lighter, lungs, and bong. The fact that marijuana is still illegal in this country is ridiculous. Everyone knows it, even you reading this. You just won’t admit it. The federal government flushes 7.7 billion dollars down the toilet every year battling the dreaded and quite pretty-to-look-at weed, resulting in unquestionable and utter failure. As an aside, you didn’t hear a word about that 7.7 billion dollars during the recent debt fiasco, did you? Nor did you hear about all of the subsidies given to the astronomically profitable oil industry by the federal government. Nope. All you heard was “How much money can we take away from the poor and needy without causing a riot?”
I even respect a lot of the Libertarians I know. They seem like honest Republicans, which is rare. They blessedly lack the empty god-talk while still doing everything in their power to force those in need to fend for themselves.
The reality of Libertarianism in America is that it is diametrically opposed liberty. It is the opposite of what it claims to be. It wants to remove the tyranny of the state, which is at least mitigated somewhat by the elective process, and give it over to private organizations who would then be completely unaccountable.
Libertarianism is simply anarchy for rich people—and rich people alone. Nothing more.
Read More: http://www.cagle.com/2011/08/what-do-you-call-a-re...






















Mote generally, they tend to ignore the fact that if things went completely laissez-faire, the gross inequities of the current system, whether they're the result of the Market or of the State, would propagate forward---I doubt even Coates really believes that initial conditions don't matter....
And given current power imbalances, if we try to eliminate State favoritism toward the rich and the poor, the corporations and the employees...guess who will still get their goodies, and who the shaft?
All of the inequities that have been described above have been that of either government greed or corporatism--which has been in play as long as the Leviathan state, itself. Big government and big business go hand in hand. While Democrats vie for bigger government to oppose Wall Street, Wall Street uses the expanding power of bigger government to squeeze their competition out of the market with the regulations that were supposed to limit the power of big business.
"Anarchy" is the same smear word Edmond Burke used to characterize libertarians (then called "liberals" or "radical-republicans") of the 18th century. But the very same principles of the Declaration of Independence are the ones that classical liberals (libertarians) still stand for today. Self-ownership and freedom of choice.
I've seen the people that show up at LP conventions. They're self-employed and small, small business owners that are tired of jumping through hoops while their big competition waltzes through the bureaucracy like princes at a royal ball. They're mostly lower middle class business people and college students, with...
All of the inequities that have been described above have been that of either government greed or corporatism--which has been in play as long as the Leviathan state, itself. Big government and big business go hand in hand. While Democrats vie for bigger government to oppose Wall Street, Wall Street uses the expanding power of bigger government to squeeze their competition out of the market with the regulations that were supposed to limit the power of big business.
"Anarchy" is the same smear word Edmond Burke used to characterize libertarians (then called "liberals" or "radical-republicans") of the 18th century. But the very same principles of the Declaration of Independence are the ones that classical liberals (libertarians) still stand for today. Self-ownership and freedom of choice.
I've seen the people that show up at LP conventions. They're self-employed and small, small business owners that are tired of jumping through hoops while their big competition waltzes through the bureaucracy like princes at a royal ball. They're mostly lower middle class business people and college students, with an occasional rich guy like Kurt Russel.
If libertarians are so hot for big business, why doesn't the Libertarian party get the support of the Rand Corp, GE, Time/Warner, ADM and Microsoft like the Democrats and Republicans???
This is what i have been saying since i researched the Libertarian platform, i like the fact that they stand up for legalization, but the rest is just what was said in the last line.
A: A welfare recipient in a rapidly shrinking group of states.
Personally, I would be very careful about admitting to it in a public forum.
These two instances alone cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost production and medical bills. Had blood testing been in place, at that time, Those two people would have been immediately terminated. I know that now workman's comp. is considering dropping coverage, when safety rules are violated.
At that company, blood testing is now standard procedure for all industrial accidents and for all people who miss 3 or more consecutive days of work.
In either case, evidence of marijuana use would be in the bloodstream, long after its effects were gone. In some union companies, their medical insurance would pay for one "rehab". After that, the offender would be subject to frequent, random, testing.
Luvguins.
Maybe if the Federal Government didn't pay private companies to run prisons....
http://montanacorruption.org/...
Second contracting to the lowest bidder is a sure way to run up costs, prolong the job and realize inferior products.
Your statement to Privatize only makes greed people rich and in the long run hurts the taxpayer with shoddy and inferior products.
I don't know what cards your hiding or the actual "Real" reason that you hate Libertarians. And you should hate them more honestly and intelligently.
I'm not sure Darwinism is even the right term. More like dog-eat-dog - with the limits of corruption and ethical behavior getting tested every day.
I wonder if he really would want a country where only the strong survives? I really dont think he wants that, or anyone else. In fact i have not seen any refute what the blogger has said about Libertarian-ism, without using that tired old line of Civil Liberties, at least i have not seen it yet. I will keep looking.