‘WE’RE COMING FOR YOU’: WIS. LABOR LEADER CALLS FEMALE GOP SENATOR ‘PIG,‘ TELLS HER TO ’STAY HOME’

by doofiegirl POTL~PWCM~JLA Posted 2012/03/09 12:06:40

Related Topics: Liberals, GOP, Senate, Conservative, Pig, Labor, Suing, Hell, Union, Wisconsin, Secret

Read all 60 opinions

The name calling from the liberals is becoming commonplace. Let a conservative retaliate, and all hell breaks loose.
Sen. Pam Galloway of the Wisconsin State Senate has a not-so-secret admirer. “Admirer” in this case however, might mean “obsessed hater.” His name is John Spiegelhoff, and he’s a union boss with a real penchant for attacking anyone and everyone who he thinks might be an enemy of his union. In fact, his past exploits include suing an 86-year-old volunteer crossing guard for taking a job that he thought should have belonged only to union members.

U-Dog 2012/03/11 13:11:46

+3
It always amuses me how the media ignore the goony actions of their fellow progressive liberal and portray themselves as the "tollerant" "reasonable" ones in this country.
>> See Replies

More polls by doofiegirl POTL~PWCM~JLA

Soundstorm 2012/03/11 17:18:38

+2
Union boss John Spiegelhoff and his goons will likely hammer in the final nail for the labor movement the way Bull Conner did for Southern segregation.

reply
U-Dog 2012/03/11 13:11:46

+3
It always amuses me how the media ignore the goony actions of their fellow progressive liberal and portray themselves as the "tollerant" "reasonable" ones in this country.

reply
TKramar 2012/03/11 07:59:35

Women should stay in the kitchen.

reply
doofieg... to TKramar 2012/03/11 09:32:13

+3
And you need to stay in your padded cell and take your meds on schedule

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 09:45:30

Women need to know their role.

reply
doofieg... to TKramar 2012/03/11 10:32:33

+2

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 10:56:28

Traditional gender roles are set for a reason.

reply
U-Dog to TKramar 2012/03/11 13:03:05

+1

reply
TKramar to U-Dog 2012/03/11 13:29:49

Your little pictures don't disprove what I say, or prove your point.

reply
U-Dog to TKramar 2012/03/11 13:40:41

+1
Why would I or anyone else bother debating such an ignorant stone age world view... I simply showed my opinion of your ignorance and had your brain actually been capable of functioning at higher levels you would have at least figured that much out.

reply
TKramar to U-Dog 2012/03/11 13:45:19

because...you can't argue with truth.

reply
U-Dog to TKramar 2012/03/11 14:28:53

+1
The truth is that your Neanderthal world view is long outdated in the west pal, it is laughable, not debatable. Looks like you will have to move to Afghanistan or Pakistan or some other backazzwards place if you want to be taken seriously.

reply
TKramar to U-Dog 2012/03/11 14:37:57 (edited)

+1
Tradition is never out of date. There's a large population of people in America who believe the same.

reply
TKramar to TKramar 2012/03/11 14:44:12

For example...the Amish.

reply
doofieg... to TKramar 2012/03/11 14:44:32

+1

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 14:48:09

What about the Amish?

reply
doofieg... to TKramar 2012/03/11 14:53:53

+2
They are entitled to their beliefs. So am I. And I believe you are seriously in need of help

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 14:55:22

Well, I think you'll find that the Amish have a pretty good foothold in Wisconsin. And they believe as I do...so you think they're "in need of help" too?

reply
doofieg... to TKramar 2012/03/11 14:58:57

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 15:00:42

Because you have no valid counter. You can't argue with the truth.

reply
doofieg... to TKramar 2012/03/11 15:12:24 (edited)

This breaks down, by state, the Amish population.I Doubt that total number could elect a president..http://blogs.wsj.c...

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 15:13:16

It's not just a few.

reply
doofieg... to TKramar 2012/03/11 15:23:02

You could not use that link! You have No idea how many it said there were! There are Less than 2 million Amish in the US! Compared to the total population, it is a very small number

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 15:26:04

But even 1 million...is a LOT of people. Not just a few.

reply
doofieg... to TKramar 2012/03/11 15:29:48

It's time to stop feeding the troll.

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 15:32:12

No way to argue the truth...as I suspected.

reply
U-Dog to TKramar 2012/03/11 14:51:24

+1
Newsflash!!! A few religious back country KKK inbred's here and there is not a lot. And if there were so many people that think as you do then you would have a much larger political voice and general show of support in this country.

Now run along and quit playing my pathetic little knock down clown, I am getting bored and have already shown you more attention than your mama ever did.

reply
doofieg... to U-Dog 2012/03/11 14:55:12

+1
He is rather boring, isn't he?

reply
U-Dog to doofieg... 2012/03/11 15:19:02

+1
Pretty much a snoozer... the relatively micro population of Amish in this country got stuck in the stone age for a very good reason and they are welcome to it.

reply
doofieg... to U-Dog 2012/03/11 15:24:28

+1
I couldn't get the darned link to work! Less than 2 million in the total population of America

reply
TKramar to U-Dog 2012/03/11 15:26:30

Because their way is better.

reply
U-Dog to TKramar 2012/03/11 15:53:22

Better, eh? The Amish bubble way of life only exists because of their enlightened betters who provided a more politically tollerant system in America. Without the DEPENDENCE the Amish have on a liberal political climate -- which the Amish would have never allowed for others -- they would not exist as a formal group to be griping about it in the first place.

reply
TKramar to U-Dog 2012/03/11 15:54:37

The Amish don't depend on government and don't involve themselves in it. They want no part of it.

reply
U-Dog to TKramar 2012/03/11 16:02:12

+1
Good to hear... now respond to what I actually said genius.

reply
doofieg... to U-Dog 2012/03/11 16:13:55

+2
Only a small number of Amish cast ballots in presidential elections, perhaps 10-15%. Amish may be more likely to get involved when voting involves issues which directly affect them, such as zoning. Amish generally do not vote LMAO! He doesn't even know this!

reply
U-Dog to doofieg... 2012/03/11 16:31:49

+1
He clearly has trouble thinking straight, he wants to boost about the old virtues of an isolated little religious group and doesn't even realize that it would not even exist but its dependents on others. I guess he thinks that the political climate doesn't matter and that the Amish would simply be allowed to exist unmolested in countries like Russia, Iran, China or Afghanistan, etc, etc.

reply
TKramar to doofieg... 2012/03/11 16:48:15

Fewer! They don't want any part of government! Neither do I.

reply
TKramar to U-Dog 2012/03/11 16:47:49

I disagree that the Amish are dependent on the government, as you proposed.

reply
U-Dog to TKramar 2012/03/11 16:59:39

+1
You are free to disagree all you like, it doesn't change the fact that their political dependence on their protective betters is just as much a fact as the sun rising in the east every morning.

reply
TKramar to U-Dog 2012/03/11 20:31:03

They are completely indifferent to government, it does nothing for them.

No Social Security checks for them--are you going to draw one? I know I won't. If they send me money, I'll send it right back, because I'm going to work until the day I die.

reply