Was it wrong to execute Japanese "war criminals" for waterboarding american prisoners?
lulzifer
2011/11/22 15:00:08
|
|
|||||
|
4 votes
|
|
80% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
20% | |||
Sort By
- XZQZQ 2011/11/23 09:30:41Yes, it was wrong, because Waterboarding is not torture and thus not a war cr...
Read ' Fly Boys ' by James Bradley. Goes into Japanese war crimes, especially cannibalism.reply - TheMadChameleon 2011/11/22 16:15:51Yes, it was wrong, because Waterboarding is not torture and thus not a war cr...Actually, IMO, yes it was wrong because executing people is wrong. But because waterboarding IS torture, it did merit some sort of punishment. In addition it makes us look TERRIBLY hypocritical now.reply
- GINGERBREAD 2011/11/22 15:45:53Yes, it was wrong, because Waterboarding is not torture and thus not a war cr...+1You don't even want to go there. Why don't you ask the surviving victims of the POW's that were held by these bastards, before you open your meally mouth again. You have no idea what these people went through, and the suffering they had to endure from these animals, that still call themselves humans. When you hear, personally, what these bastards did, it may convince you that whatever was done to them, doesn't compare to what they did, not by a long shot.reply
- largo1 2011/11/22 15:26:06No, it was right, because Waterboarding is torture and thus a war crime.+2The only problem with war crimes is the loser of the war is only considered a criminal. We did it and worse but nobody will ever be executed for it.reply
- themadhare ~IJM 2011/11/22 15:17:57Yes, it was wrong, because Waterboarding is not torture and thus not a war cr...+1it was correct to execute war criminals for torture and medical experimentation perpetrated on prisoners and civilians.reply
