Quantcast

Was Charles Darwin The First Nazi?

☆WILLIAM☆ 2010/06/11 01:45:02
Yes, He Was The First Nazi
No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
You!
Add Photos & Videos
http://ministries.tliquest.net/theology/evolution/Darwin%27s%...

Alright, lets get real folks. Darwin had many agendas. He was anti-religious, anti-capitalism, and a racist. And he used the veil of "science" to bolster his cult-like agendas into the mainstream of thought. It's high time we recognize "Evolution" for the junk science that it is.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Philo-Publius 2010/06/11 02:22:30
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    Philo-Publius
    +15
    In the broad sense, yes, Darwin's theories were the foundation not only for what became exoteric Nazism, but also for the Eugenics movements in America and around the Western world.

    Darwinism is indeed a cult; it's a religious movement not unlike all the others, masquerading as science... and probably, I dare say, there's more salvageable truth to be found in Scientology than there is in his crackpot theory he called 'Science'.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Helmholtz 2010/07/09 18:06:07
    No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
    Helmholtz
    That link is ridiculous. Anyone could take a book, cut out a few lines, and show them to the world out of context. As a Christian, it would seem like you would appreciate this (since people do it with the Bible all the time) and not engage in it yourself.
  • Sir Bud 2010/07/01 19:05:49
    No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
    Sir Bud
    LOL wrong again.And I personally give Adolf Hitler no credibility at all for his favorites and choices whatever they are,but we all are entitled to our own opinions of course.
  • La 2010/06/26 06:07:08
    No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
    La
    Darwin theorised about how nature used evolution to create increasingly superior creatures. Survival of the fittest, etc. Hitler didn't want survival of the fittest, he wanted to decide which people were superior and kill off everyone else. That's not Darwinism.
  • Master 2010/06/26 02:44:01
    No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
    Master
    Anyone who angers the Christian fruit loops is fine with me. Bonus points if they do it simply by stating truth and facts.
  • Ojos40 2010/06/19 19:08:30
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    Ojos40
    I wish you had provided more answers for your question. I'm not inclined to call him the first Nazi, but his doctrine certainly lent itself to Naziism. By the way, most Progressives of the last century were evolutionists, too. It also goes without saying that evolutionists in general oppose the free enterprise system.
  • J 2010/06/17 20:45:53
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    J
    I think he sold his soul to the devil for a name in history and the ole' devil knew that he could keep people ignorant and they'd just buy his garbage and keep it alive and festering.
  • La J 2010/06/26 06:08:50
    La
    ...what?

  • Dagon 2010/06/17 02:30:21
  • brutusin~ Proud Apetheist 2010/06/15 22:48:28
    No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
    brutusin~ Proud Apetheist
    +1
    Oh that good old propaganda spin on things. Hitler was way after Darwin. Hitler was some nut that spun his on hypothesis on a Scientific Theory to make it seem feasible. A modern day equivalent would be Scientology or Intelligent Design.
  • Ms Missy 2010/06/14 23:43:07 (edited)
    No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
    Ms Missy
    +3
    anyone who dose not believe in the religious mainstream is a NAZI?

    ok he may have been a racist, and maybe a socialist but that dose not make a person a Nazi.

    as the granddaughter of a Jew I do not throw around a word like Nazi lightly.

    and saying evolution is junk science is like saying gravity is just optional.
  • ☆WILLIAM☆ Ms Missy 2010/06/15 00:27:32
    ☆WILLIAM☆
    +1
    "anyone who dose not believe in the religious mainstream is a NAZI?"

    No. Anyone advocating for the extinction of races is a Nazi.

    "ok he may have been a racist, and maybe a socialist but that dose not make a person a Nazi. "

    No, it doesnt. However, he stated that "inferior races" should be brought to extinction by the "superior" races. That makes him a Nazi.

    "and saying evolution is junk science is like saying gravity is just optional"

    Gravity is a proven force that is a daily reality for everything. Evolution has been a THEORY for over 100 years. It has never come close to being proven.
  • Ms Missy ☆WILLIAM☆ 2010/06/15 16:49:39
    Ms Missy
    +1
    check out birds and dinosaurs sometime, evolution happens.
    Ive never seen anything proven that ties Charles Darwin to Nazis, so that is defiantly a theory as well.
    I do believe in natural selection and I do believe that everything seriously wrong (medically and genetically speaking) with the human race is do to the fact that we have stepped too far away from nature and pretty much eliminated the lifeguard for our gene pool.
  • Headhun... ☆WILLIAM☆ 2010/06/15 22:49:05
    Headhunter 13
    +1
    [...]want to document and show wheer Darwin advocated the extinction of any race or species? As a matter of fact Darwin never adress race specifically. But please show us your proof he did!



    PPPSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Evolution has been proven for a long time.
  • J ☆WILLIAM☆ 2010/06/17 20:48:27
    J
    How shallow a mind must be to not realize the difference in a theory and a proven science. And you know, I think some people might have evolved from apes and thier brains still haven't been able to measure up to those of us whom God created.
  • Headhun... Ms Missy 2010/06/15 22:46:22
    Headhunter 13
    A racist? Really wanty to explain that one?
  • Chris - The Rowdy One! #187 2010/06/14 19:24:58
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    Chris - The Rowdy One! #187
    It is no secret that Darwin and his "theories" have allowed the pro-death people to run amok in the world. His theories, which clearly showed that there were humans that were more "evolved" than others, have lead to some of the greatest mass murders in the history of mankind with Adolph Hitler and Margaret Sanger leading the way.

    The fact that some people want to teach this garbage as real science makes me sick to the core.
  • Headhun... Chris -... 2010/06/15 22:52:11
    Headhunter 13
    +1
    Oh com eon Chris, that is pure BS. Want to show where Darwin or his Theories ever showed there were more evolved races? Using his Theory has proven that there are early now extinct versions of human beings that evolved into you and me.

    BTW Hitler used religion specifically christian religion of which he was a member to spread his ideas. Not Evolution
  • Lorenzo 2010/06/14 16:18:58
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    Lorenzo
    +1
    Darwin would have been very comfortable in the Nazi Party.
  • texasred 2010/06/14 05:13:58
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    texasred
    +1
    Well, duh! Even Jesus knows that!
  • Legal in CT. ~ ***American ... 2010/06/13 22:28:46 (edited)
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    Legal in CT. ~ ***American Rebel*** ~
    +1
    ...and a racist.Of course Nazi Racism is a contradiction in terms.. Darwin was the inspiration for Nazism and Hitler's idol. Darwinism was largely responsible for the Nazi Race Holocaust. Leading Nazis, and early 1900 influential German biologists, revealed in their writings that Darwin’s theory and publications had a major influence upon Nazi race policies. Hitler believed that the human gene pool could be improved by using selective breeding similar to how farmers breed superior cattle strains. In the formulation of their racial policies, Hitler’s government relied heavily upon Darwinism, especially the elaborations by Spencer and Haeckel. As a result, a central policy of Hitler’s administration was the development and implementation of policies designed to protect the ‘superior race’. This required at the very least preventing the ‘inferior races’ from mixing with those judged superior, in order to reduce contamination of the latter’s gene pool. The ‘superior race’ belief was based on the theory of group inequality within each species, a major presumption and requirement of Darwin’s original ‘survival of the fittest’ theory. This philosophy culminated in the ‘final solution’, the extermination of approximately six million Jews and four million other people who belonged to ...







    ...and a racist.Of course Nazi Racism is a contradiction in terms.. Darwin was the inspiration for Nazism and Hitler's idol. Darwinism was largely responsible for the Nazi Race Holocaust. Leading Nazis, and early 1900 influential German biologists, revealed in their writings that Darwin’s theory and publications had a major influence upon Nazi race policies. Hitler believed that the human gene pool could be improved by using selective breeding similar to how farmers breed superior cattle strains. In the formulation of their racial policies, Hitler’s government relied heavily upon Darwinism, especially the elaborations by Spencer and Haeckel. As a result, a central policy of Hitler’s administration was the development and implementation of policies designed to protect the ‘superior race’. This required at the very least preventing the ‘inferior races’ from mixing with those judged superior, in order to reduce contamination of the latter’s gene pool. The ‘superior race’ belief was based on the theory of group inequality within each species, a major presumption and requirement of Darwin’s original ‘survival of the fittest’ theory. This philosophy culminated in the ‘final solution’, the extermination of approximately six million Jews and four million other people who belonged to what German scientists judged as ‘inferior races.



    The Importance of 'Race' in Darwinism; The theory of evolution is based on individuals acquiring unique traits that enable those possessing the new traits to better survive adverse conditions compared to those who don’t possess them. Superior individuals will be more likely to survive and pass on these traits to their offspring so such traits will increase in number, while the ‘weaker’ individuals will eventually die off. If every member of a species were fully equal, natural selection would have nothing to select from, and evolution would cease for that species. How much more 'racist' can it get?



    Note; the 'Darwin is a Legend' choice was unanimously chosen by 'liberals.' Does that really surprise anyone?
    (more)
  • Headhun... Legal i... 2010/06/15 22:52:58
    Headhunter 13
    Want to document you bs cliams
  • xcheshirecat 2010/06/13 14:35:33
    No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
    xcheshirecat
    and had the discriminatory and prejudice all people at his time had.

    All scientific, philosopher, etc, had been influenced by their time or era.

    His theories are based at least on scientifical and logic deduction, even if there was lacks in them.

    We have to get better theories from that, but we can't discreditate it just because there was lack in it.

    Evolution is logical, even if what he called species is not right now

    But aren't we saying racism ? It's because people at some point though humans had differents races, not ethnicities.

    When you study the work of a man, you have to count how society and his subject of studies were at the time he lived
  • bloodred 2010/06/13 14:25:24
    No, Darwin Is A Legend!!!
    bloodred
    he is an icon for people to look up to darwin legend icon people
  • Chris -... bloodred 2010/06/14 19:26:44
    Chris - The Rowdy One! #187
    +1
    Pro-deathers love him.
  • ✿✿✿RoseD1st✿✿✿ 2010/06/13 06:09:36
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    ✿✿✿RoseD1st✿✿✿
    +1
    Yes and Mail-boat record ‘proves Darwin stole his original ideas from a Welsh scientist’ http://www.walesonline.co.uk/...
  • Xavier 2010/06/13 05:16:50
    Yes, He Was The First Nazi
    Xavier
    +1
    First of all, only an animal could come up with the "theory" that there is a "natural selection." It took a man with high intelligence to sit down and create the motor. It took a man of high intelligence to sit down and make the computer. It took a man with high intelligence to build a home. It took God to sit down, and write a book, and put it together from 66 different books, from 66 different regions, over 100,000 people, in 6,000 years, to get everyone of these books to collaborate with one another, when most of these 100,000 people knew nothing of the other books written, and confuse those that try to claim that there is a "natural selection."
  • xcheshi... Xavier 2010/06/13 14:31:49
    xcheshirecat
    it should take something to create a god then
  • Xavier xcheshi... 2010/06/14 08:52:29
    Xavier
    +1
    No. God was not "created." He is eternal. No beginning, and no end.

    "Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me."
  • xcheshi... Xavier 2010/06/14 21:38:39
    xcheshirecat
    Subjective supposed true quotes written by men aren't a proof of anything

    If a god needs no creation, universe could too
  • Xavier xcheshi... 2010/06/15 00:49:37
    Xavier
    God told Isaiah that. That wasn't "from man."
  • xcheshi... Xavier 2010/06/15 11:50:46
    xcheshirecat
    you think it is because you believe so. There's no proof it is so as long as it is like that, it's from men

    no gods are facts, they are belief
  • Xavier xcheshi... 2010/06/15 22:00:29
    Xavier
    No, I think it is, because all evidence and facts point to it. You people exclude science, and exclude archaeology whenever they dont agree with your evolution religion. Yes, evolution is a humanist (naturalist) religion. There are no scientific facts to evolution. Only theories. Science is based off of replicated facts. If it cannot be repeated, then it isnt science.
  • xcheshi... Xavier 2010/06/16 00:38:16
    xcheshirecat
    there's no evidence or facts that point to it. only circular reasoning and writing of humans
  • Xavier xcheshi... 2010/06/16 04:02:46
    Xavier
    You obviously are very ignorant of what facts are. Archaeology has found evidence dating back 6,000 years to Adam, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and the wilderness journey. You need to read the "Letter and the scroll." It's proven documentation that everything that occurred in the Bible is fact. And they found this through archaeology. Evolution is not fact. It's myth.
  • xcheshi... Xavier 2010/06/16 11:48:50
    xcheshirecat
    it's proof in the eye of believers who want it to be proven

    And even if some people supposely exist, it doesn't prove anything about a god
  • Xavier xcheshi... 2010/06/17 02:15:10
    Xavier
    You my friend are as ignorant as they come.
  • xcheshi... Xavier 2010/06/17 13:57:12
    xcheshirecat
    Yeah I'm ignorant cause I don't believe a book written by superstitious and non scientific individuals...

    yeah right lol
  • Xavier xcheshi... 2010/06/17 22:53:32
    Xavier
    Thats a lie in itself. Isaiah, Daniel, Ezekiel and Jeremiah were very scientific.
  • xcheshi... Xavier 2010/06/18 11:18:09
    xcheshirecat
    even if the humans were real, this is not a proof they weren't crazy or manipulators

    You're the average blind believer, nothing more. You agree with man-maded or so-called proof because you want them to be
  • Xavier xcheshi... 2010/06/18 23:56:08
    Xavier
    Lady, do a research on fricken archaeology, and it will prove our side. Your side has yet to be seen.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/18 06:32:07

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals