In the broad sense, yes, Darwin's theories were the foundation not only for what became exoteric Nazism, but also for the Eugenics movements in America and around the Western world.
Darwinism is indeed a cult; it's a religious movement not unlike all the others, masquerading as science... and probably, I dare say, there's more salvageable truth to be found in Scientology than there is in his crackpot theory he called 'Science'.
Was Charles Darwin The First Nazi?
☆WILLIAM☆
2010/06/11 01:45:02
http://ministries.tliquest.net/theology/evolution/Darwin%27s%...
Alright, lets get real folks. Darwin had many agendas. He was anti-religious, anti-capitalism, and a racist. And he used the veil of "science" to bolster his cult-like agendas into the mainstream of thought. It's high time we recognize "Evolution" for the junk science that it is.
Alright, lets get real folks. Darwin had many agendas. He was anti-religious, anti-capitalism, and a racist. And he used the veil of "science" to bolster his cult-like agendas into the mainstream of thought. It's high time we recognize "Evolution" for the junk science that it is.
Top Opinion
-
Philo-Publius 2010/06/11 02:22:30Yes, He Was The First Nazi





















ok he may have been a racist, and maybe a socialist but that dose not make a person a Nazi.
as the granddaughter of a Jew I do not throw around a word like Nazi lightly.
and saying evolution is junk science is like saying gravity is just optional.
No. Anyone advocating for the extinction of races is a Nazi.
"ok he may have been a racist, and maybe a socialist but that dose not make a person a Nazi. "
No, it doesnt. However, he stated that "inferior races" should be brought to extinction by the "superior" races. That makes him a Nazi.
"and saying evolution is junk science is like saying gravity is just optional"
Gravity is a proven force that is a daily reality for everything. Evolution has been a THEORY for over 100 years. It has never come close to being proven.
Ive never seen anything proven that ties Charles Darwin to Nazis, so that is defiantly a theory as well.
I do believe in natural selection and I do believe that everything seriously wrong (medically and genetically speaking) with the human race is do to the fact that we have stepped too far away from nature and pretty much eliminated the lifeguard for our gene pool.
PPPSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Evolution has been proven for a long time.
The fact that some people want to teach this garbage as real science makes me sick to the core.
BTW Hitler used religion specifically christian religion of which he was a member to spread his ideas. Not Evolution
The Importance of 'Race' in Darwinism; The theory of evolution is based on individuals acquiring unique traits that enable those possessing the new traits to better survive adverse conditions compared to those who don’t possess them. Superior individuals will be more likely to survive and pass on these traits to their offspring so such traits will increase in number, while the ‘weaker’ individuals will eventually die off. If every member of a species were fully equal, natural selection would have nothing to select from, and evolution would cease for that species. How much more 'racist' can it get?
Note; the 'Darwin is a Legend' choice was unanimously chosen by 'liberals.' Does that really surprise anyone?
All scientific, philosopher, etc, had been influenced by their time or era.
His theories are based at least on scientifical and logic deduction, even if there was lacks in them.
We have to get better theories from that, but we can't discreditate it just because there was lack in it.
Evolution is logical, even if what he called species is not right now
But aren't we saying racism ? It's because people at some point though humans had differents races, not ethnicities.
When you study the work of a man, you have to count how society and his subject of studies were at the time he lived
"Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me."
If a god needs no creation, universe could too
no gods are facts, they are belief
And even if some people supposely exist, it doesn't prove anything about a god
yeah right lol
You're the average blind believer, nothing more. You agree with man-maded or so-called proof because you want them to be