Quantcast

VP Biden's 'Good Friend,' Donor Receives $20M Federal Loan for Car Dealership in Ukraine: Should Taxpayers Subsidize Vice President's Friends?

Fef 2012/08/20 22:03:14
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Vice President Joe Biden's friend received a federal loan (taxpayer money) from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Documents show the loan goes to "LLC Winner Imports Ukraine, Ltd, a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of Ukraine." The $20.0 million loan will help “expand Winner Import Ukraine’s automobile business, [and] construct and operate ‘Winner Autocity,’ which will have two new, state-of-the-art dealership facilities for Porsche and Land Rover/Jaguar automobiles.” The document also states, "The project will have a negative five-year U.S. balance of payments impact."

John Hynansky, a "good friend" of Vice President Joe Biden, has regularly donated to Biden's political campaigns. Hynansky has donated over $60,000 to Biden and Obama.

President Obama and former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) promised America the "most honest, most open, most ethical" government in history. When politicians promise ethics, grab your wallet.

Has power corrupted Vice President Joe Biden and the administration? Rush Limbaugh suggested that the stimulus money has turned into a tool of political corruption for those in power. Rush described the stimulus money as "nothing more than a money laundering slush fund.” Lord Acton said, "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men."

What do you think? Should taxpayers help Joe Biden's political donor build a $20M auto-dealership in the Ukraine?

DAILYCALLER.COM reports:
In late July, John Hynansky --- a longtime friend and donor to Joe Biden --- was awarded a $20 million taxpayer loan to build a car dealership in Ukraine.


joe biden awarded 20 taxpayer loan build car dealership ukraine

Read More: http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/17/bidens-good-frie...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Rebel Yell 2012/08/20 22:12:10
    No
    Rebel Yell
    +5
    It is not tax payer subsidized. OPIC has been around since 1969 and has helped thousands of people world wide. I am surprised Fef did not research this before assuming that Joe Biden wielded influence.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Quazimoto 2012/08/24 16:05:54
    No
    Quazimoto
    This is another example of your tax dollars wasted.
  • frank 2012/08/21 17:19:48 (edited)
    No
    frank
    Let me get this stright. The obama/biden group fund $20 Million for overseas job and then bad other companies for doing it, I'm at a loss for words.
  • FanOreilly 2012/08/21 17:09:23
    No
    FanOreilly
    +1
    Yeah but Biden thinks the Ukraine is in Canada.
  • the fuze 2012/08/21 14:01:06
    No
    the fuze
    I'm so tired of politicians. The time for term limits and TRUE accountability is long overdue, and blood should be spilled on both sides, they're equally guilty.
  • mikeeonly 2012/08/21 04:00:57
    No
    mikeeonly
    no way
  • goatman112003 2012/08/21 02:46:52
    Yes
    goatman112003
    Why not, they have financed Obama's friends. Joe has a couple and the amounts are cheap
  • JCD aka "biz" 2012/08/20 22:42:05
    Yes
    JCD aka "biz"
    +1
    Actually, "none of the above".

    You forgot to mention two of the consequences listed in the "documents":

    "The project is not expected to have a negative impact on the US economy or employment..
    US PROCUREMENT IS EXPECTED TO HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON US EMPLOYMENT".
  • mal 2012/08/20 22:39:11
    No
    mal
    it's a criminal government......
  • Haightbear 2012/08/20 22:21:22
    No
    Haightbear
    +4
    “OPIC is living proof that private investment for the public good can work and does work.”
    -Elizabeth Littlefield
    http://www.opic.gov/

    It sounds like Daily caller is wrong....I went to the OPIC website and suddenly this quote was just sitting there. So to assume this is all taxpayer dollars must be skewed. I wonder if the poster looked anything up before posting?....or He in essence is blindly advancing the lie without checking the facts.

    Do Conservatives have a smell test for impropriety? They must not....'cause this doesn't even pass the smell test.
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/08/20 22:13:16
    No
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    Never. And if government stuck to its core functions, this would never be an issue.
  • Bob DiN 2012/08/20 22:13:10
    No
    Bob DiN
    This is just one example on cronism in the Obama/Biden administration. You have Solnydra, Evergreen Solar, Cash for Clunkers, the UAW, etc. etc. etc. It exisits to some degree in all administrations. However not to the degree of Obama/Biden. No one has come to what they gives their cromies.
  • Rebel Yell 2012/08/20 22:12:10
    No
    Rebel Yell
    +5
    It is not tax payer subsidized. OPIC has been around since 1969 and has helped thousands of people world wide. I am surprised Fef did not research this before assuming that Joe Biden wielded influence.
  • esi Rebel Yell 2012/08/21 14:52:24
    esi
    Lol... you're surprised? This might get me banned but have to say... Fef, clearly against "choice" all for 'control" doesn't give a crap about anyone's opinion. Left-right, or in between. What Fef cares about is MONEY! The more he can create controversy between those of us who utilize Soda Head, the more profits in his bank account. Fef has a following... to be sure... but the majority of those followers are clueless as to his ultimate motivations. I count myself as one who is informed. Anyone else?
  • Zuggi 2012/08/20 22:06:59
    Yes
    Zuggi
    +5
    [None of the Above]

    OPIC is a profit-making institution that provides a net surplus for the Treasury, cutting our deficit by $269 million in FY 2011. It gives loans to US companies investing money overseas and collects profit from them, using that profit to fund the next round of loans. It does not take political concerns into account when making loans. There is absolutely no evidence that any political skulduggery was involved in these loans.

    Complete and utter nonissue.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 15:28:39

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals