VERDICT: Jerry Sandusky convicted 48 counts of sexually abusing young boys. Good. Appeal will not be prevailed. Goodbye, Jerry.

by Chi~Cat Posted 2012/06/23 02:37:25

Related Topics: Trial, Facebook, Family, Atmosphere, Football, Penn State, Boy, Sexual, Sex, Time, Email, Boys, Guilty

Read all 100 opinions

Welp, he is not smirking anymore, folks.

Jerry Sandusky convicted of sexually abusing young boys.

[edit: 45 of 48]

A jury has found former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky guilty of sexually abuse young boys, after a day and a half of deliberations.

Sandusky was convicted on 45 of 48 counts, including involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault and corruption of minors, FOX News Channel reported.

A crowd outside the courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa., cheered as news of the verdict was released about 10:10pm.

The 68-year-old was led away from the court in handcuffs wearing khaki trousers and a brown jacket, and did not speak to reporters as he was placed in a patrol car.

+10

Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 02:51:15

+8
Yo, Jerry, soap has no emotions, sickwad:

>> See Replies

More polls by Chi~Cat

Chi~Cat to SK-LIBE... 2012/06/23 03:31:51

+4

reply
Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 02:51:15

+8
Yo, Jerry, soap has no emotions, sickwad:

reply
SK-LIBE... to Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 03:31:36 (edited)

+5

OOOPS!

reply
Chi~Cat to SK-LIBE... 2012/06/23 03:40:00

+4

reply
jc 2012/06/23 02:47:18

+4

reply
Chi~Cat to jc 2012/06/23 02:49:21

+5
Exactly.

reply
Willy to jc 2012/06/23 17:19:10

+1
The problem with that is, he will probably enjoy it.

reply
Chi~Cat to Willy 2012/06/26 04:32:10

Ooohhhh!

reply
VICTORIA 2012/06/23 02:45:40

45 of 48.

reply
Chi~Cat to VICTORIA 2012/06/23 02:48:58

+5
I corrected that. Thank you. Either way, disgusting. And he gone.

reply
VICTORIA to Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 03:01:19

Funny- I was arguing for months with Conservatives who were so angry that he was accused by the liberal media.
I anticipate a sudden revision.,

reply
Chi~Cat to VICTORIA 2012/06/23 03:25:17

+6
It wasn't you that I made the revision. I was hanging out, came in and asked and was told, got the first article from NYPost and it was scrubbed. So don't compliment yourself. I just thanked you out of courtesy. You don't have to be so high and mighty and self-righteous. Wasn't you that I edited. So you can take that and take a hike. ; )

reply
VICTORIA to Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 03:34:19

Chi~Cat to VICTORIA 41 minutes ago
Add
+3
I corrected that. Thank you. Either way, disgusting. And he gone.

So why did you thank me then?

Are you one of those rightwingers that only allow people to parrot your own views to you?

I was just expressing my opinion.

If you don't want people to be honest- why ask?

No reason to be nasty about it.

reply
Chi~Cat to VICTORIA 2012/06/23 03:41:33

+2
Yes, that is right, not because of YOU, egomaniac. Get that straight. It was corrected prior to your comment. Duh. Get a life, you twit.

reply
SK-LIBE... to Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 03:44:05

+2

reply
USC Gam... to Chi~Cat 2012/06/24 01:49:18

You go girl. She knows the truth but as usual bring the conservatives into their crap

reply
USC Gam... to VICTORIA 2012/06/24 01:47:22

Wrong Victoria....the liberals were raising Cain because he was arrested and charged, I was on the poll

reply
SK-LIBE... to Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 03:30:08

+3
she's always just here for the violence and to insult, typical lib muzzy

reply
Chi~Cat to SK-LIBE... 2012/06/23 03:47:28

+3
Just have to love when a LWNJ twit says that they know all when the original article was scrubbed and I had to repost, then that nasty moossselalala mentions "cons" and how IT has argued with same. Like I GAF. Damn libbies always have to make themselves high and mighty when they are just a bunch of flatulating windbags.

give up, libbie

reply
SK-LIBE... to Chi~Cat 2012/06/23 03:50:45 (edited)

+2

reply