Utah passes 'too sexy' law, is this Constitutional?

SLIDESHOW: im too sexy

• Ramon 2011/08/01 10:19:28
  No

  

  I'm not going to Utah anytime soon.

  reply
• disclaimer 2011/08/01 01:11:56
  No

  

  +1

  The ultimate problem is this law is too subjective. What's the definition of "too sexy?"

  reply
• Pavi 2011/07/31 22:32:32
  No

  

  +1

  That's just stupid.

  reply
• Country Girl 2011/07/31 21:35:53
  No

  

  Ok seriously don't blame it on the mormons. 50% of Utah isn't mormon so it's not just us. The only reason why they did this is cause some idiot had a van with people having sex on it. Seriously people I'm sure if any other religion did wanted this no one would say a thing about it. Even if I wasn't mormon I wouldn't want my kids seeing that crap.

  reply
• schjaz 2011/07/31 16:54:25
  No

  

  i don't know....probably not...but....maybe they should be more concerned about all the kooky mormon sects that have a billion wives per one husband and collect welfare.

  reply
• KSolove 2011/07/31 00:31:20
  No

  

  For crying out loud people..... Grow up already and stop thinking that being sexy or anything that has to do with sex is bad.

  reply
• Smiji 2011/07/31 00:28:36
  No

  

  What's the next law? "To cheeky"? "To freely"? Stand up against the government that take your freedom little by little! Stand up and be heard! Say Enough!

  reply
• Goducks5 2011/07/30 23:57:07
  No

  

  Nothing is too sexy.

  reply
• Viper Two Six 2011/07/30 23:18:29
  No

  

  +1

  Don't you just love Mormon country?

  reply
• wolf sloan 2011/07/30 22:51:10
  No

  

  Who gets to judge such things?

  reply
• Lord of War 2011/07/30 22:43:53
  No

  

  I'm to sexy for my shirt on the cat walk

  reply
• iamthemob ~ the 444th Guru ~ 2011/07/30 22:15:02
  No

  

  Nanny state anyone?
  
  Anyone?
  
  Bueller?

  reply
• ParkMan 2011/07/30 22:04:05
  No

  

  I suspect that in the current climate of the Supreme Court, this will be ruled as against freedom of expression.

  reply
• mg's haven~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2011/07/06 23:57:11
  No

  

  there should be limits to things but there is nothing in writing anywhere ...Really i thought we were trying to teach people common senes If someone can call they were begging for it why push them into trying for it. I know its not the way its supposed to be but dont make it easier for them to get away with real crimes.

  reply
• Sumātogai 2011/06/29 05:08:02
  No

  

  Freedom of speech and expression is a right of the people and those who dismantle such right is not fit for public office.

  reply
• Beccy 2011/06/24 00:38:35
  Yes

  

  Seems like government just wants to control more and more behavior or is it themselves they are trying to control?

  reply
• Chamii 2011/06/15 22:17:13 (edited)
  No

  

  well i live in utah... screw that!!
  i hate utah im moving when im old enough

  reply
• Sumātogai to Chamii 2011/06/29 05:11:50
  

  welcome to japan.

  reply
• Jose 2011/06/15 19:39:40
• Recruit 2011/06/14 21:35:36
• princess_kelly 2011/06/14 18:04:57
  No

  

  +1

  There is no need to create a law against sexiness that is just an abuse of state power

  reply
• Mike Miller 2011/06/14 15:07:43
  Yes

  

  +1

  Not only is it un-Constitutional its the government intruding even further into our individual rights. Everyone says they want the government to minimize its impact on our lives and for me that INCLUDES our bedrooms!

  reply
• sorran 2011/06/14 10:48:08
  No

  

  +1

  it's juuuust Nooo grrrr

  reply
• GOD 2011/06/14 07:44:37
  Yes

  

  +3

  but then again do you want to see this acting sexy
  
  

  reply
• motherg... to GOD 2011/06/14 10:00:12
  

  +2

  Wow....I dont feel so old anymore........

  reply
• TimothyBrianFoley 2011/06/14 07:28:12
  No

  

  +1

  I mean yes Its unconsittiutional let thme dowhatever they ain't bothering you leave them alone.

  reply
• imsmarter 2011/06/14 06:13:45
  Yes

  

  +1

  GAHHHH! Ment to click no!

  reply
• sorran to imsmarter 2011/06/14 10:47:38
  

  +1

  hhh of cours it's not xd

  reply
• imsmarter to sorran 2011/06/14 14:33:26
  

  +2

  I hate when that happens =(
  Guess my opinion was too sexy for soda head... LOL.
  

  reply
• Felixthecate 2011/06/14 06:13:32
  No

  

  +1

  I know this is BAD WORDING - but how does this affect CHUBBY CHASERS - as they are not offended by this law.....

  reply
• FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX 2011/06/14 04:49:53
  No

  

  +1

  

  reply
• mike l k 2011/06/14 03:27:11
  No

  

  +1

  This crosses soooo many barriers on so many levels with so many different variables.
  So, let's start with one question..."Who legally decides what these legal borders are, and how can you even find a way to legally "measure sexy" so citizens know exactly where to draw the line between illegal and legal...
  Lawmakers need to think things out before they let their personal emotions and/or beliefs have them creating diseased ideas in to laws, where "foot in the mouth" seems to be one of the side effects.

  reply
• NhytFahl 2011/06/14 03:24:31
  No

  

  +1

  The Bill of Rights explicitly protects the right of free expression.
  
  There is no such thing as a right to not be offended.
  
  Don't like what you see? You're perfectly free to go look at something else, instead.

  reply
• Jason 2011/06/14 03:05:56
  Yes

  

  +1

  Well, I guess it depends what the law actually says.
  
  What should be unconstitutional is this video.

  reply
• ☥☽✪☾DAW... to Jason 2011/06/14 03:37:52
  

  +2

  whats wrong with the video you do realize that Utah is full of religious bible thumping mormons

  reply
• Jason to ☥☽✪☾DAW... 2011/06/14 14:58:40
  

  +1

  I'm actually just joking. I liked this song when it came out, (what?) some two decades ago? Now I'm like, "what the hell?!"

  reply
• ☥☽✪☾DAW... to Jason 2011/06/14 15:00:33
  

  +1

  Tennesse passed a law that makes it illegal to post offensive images
  whats offensive
  to one person is not to another

  reply
• Jason to ☥☽✪☾DAW... 2011/06/14 17:16:08
  

  Oh is this the old 'I can't describe obscenity but I know it when I see it' deal?

  reply
• steven.sutler 2011/06/14 02:44:57
  No

  

  +1

  No but there is a thin line between hot and indecent un wanted attention.

  reply
• D.C.Willis 2011/06/14 02:38:45
  No

  

  +2

  What standard do they intend to use. Sexy is a matter of perception. What I think is sexy others may not. You cannot leave it up to the Officers discretion.

  reply