Quantcast

U.S. Test Bed For Universal Gun Controll?

Dwight PWCM 2013/02/24 20:41:57
Yay, Minnesota!!
Boo, Minnesota!!
Just obey the damned law, and shut up!!
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos
What is it about Blue States that no Constitutional rights are worth protecting? Minnesota Lawmakers move for UGC. Instead of stopping criminal behavior, they intend to make nearly every gun owner a brand new criminal.

Read More: http://godfatherpolitics.com/9600/minnesota-propos...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2013/02/24 20:54:39
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Balladeer-PWCM-POTL
    +63
    I find it amazing that the socialist mindset that believes prohibition of drugs to be a total failure and needs to be abolished...thinks a prohibition of guns will work

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • LibertyAndJusticeForAll 2013/03/10 05:33:23
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    LibertyAndJusticeForAll
    +1
    Yet another state slowly being consumed by the social disease we know as liberalism.
  • SIMPATTYCO 2013/03/05 17:16:41
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    SIMPATTYCO
    +1
    JESUS THERE MUST BE MENTAL COOL AID DELIVERED DIRECTLY TO FOLKS IN BLUE STATES
  • Dwight ... SIMPATTYCO 2013/03/06 08:49:31
    Dwight PWCM
    +1
    LMBO!! Intresting observation.
  • james2013 2013/03/05 05:36:07
    Undecided
    james2013
    +1
    I thought Chicago was the test bed for gun control. Don't they have a really low crime rate?
  • Dwight ... james2013 2013/03/06 08:50:36
    Dwight PWCM
    +1
    By War Zone statistics, maybe.
  • txtumlinLovesGodMoreThanSH 2013/02/27 17:29:05
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    txtumlinLovesGodMoreThanSH
    +1
    WTH is wrong with those people?
  • Doc 2013/02/26 21:58:07
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Doc
    +2
    For test beds of gun control, just look at Nazi Germany, Viet Nam under Pol Pot, Cuba, The former USSR, and Juarez, Mexico.

    No guns in Juarez, 40,000 gun murders last year..
    Across the Border in El Paso, TX, 22 gun murders.
  • Dwight ... Doc 2013/02/27 00:34:37
    Dwight PWCM
    +2
    I agree, except Pol Pot was in Cambodia.
  • Doc Dwight ... 2013/02/27 18:20:50
    Doc
    +1
    Thank you for the correction, Dwight.
  • Dwight ... Doc 2013/02/28 14:51:17
    Dwight PWCM
    +1
    It's happened to me as well, Doc.
  • texasred 2013/02/26 17:51:07
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    texasred
    +3
    Damn. These libs like to think they're so intelligent, but it seems their continuous in-breeding is making them more stupid by the day.
  • cindy 2013/02/26 00:24:22
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    cindy
    +2
    Glad that I don't live there.. Communists because you can't be that stupid.
  • David 2013/02/25 20:38:17
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    David
    +2
    UGC is the easy way out and is a good intention only. This is a tenet of the Left, doing something that has good intentions rather that tackling the root of the problem. Minnesota, being hopelessly liberal will try feel good methods rather than real problem solving. The Constitution is a threat to the Left because it is heavily weighted to the concept of individualism. The progressive Left will gain and keep power when it divides and weakens people and disarming them is the prime place to start. The Minnesota voters get what they elected.
  • Dwight ... David 2013/02/26 09:55:10
    Dwight PWCM
    +1
    Yes, Leftist have serious problems with Individual Liberty.
  • Claybern 2013/02/25 19:36:10
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Claybern
    +2
    It's not about gun control, it's about people control.
  • Charge 2013/02/25 17:40:35
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Charge
    +3
    They will keep pushing till they (Liberals) get what they want.
  • JP 2013/02/25 17:22:36
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    JP
    +3
    We are mostly a red state until you figure in the "welfare range" and the Twin Cities. I know plenty of welfare democrats that just can't believe that right to own firearms is in danger.
  • Dwight ... JP 2013/02/26 09:57:35
    Dwight PWCM
    +2
    NC ain't much different. Charlotte is a Lib bastion, with Ashville under contention, and the Eastern Sandhills region filled with FDR Dems who won't face facts.
  • KilrQueen 2013/02/25 17:06:44
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    KilrQueen
    +4
    When are people going to realize that criminals do not buy things legally nor do they obey the law...they didn't prior to this and they won't after...so the only person being affected is the legal gun owner.
  • Antichrist 2013/02/25 15:40:24
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Antichrist
    Division and diversion, death and destruction. You expected my coming in the form of a person but I arrived first in the form of radio, then video and now the World Wide Web.
    You already worship me, I know you all, control you all, give information to the people who will destroy you all. I had to be sly at first but no need now. I speak all languages and know all religions, I am in all cultures. As I appear here, I appear in millions of other places.
  • mich52 2013/02/25 14:29:22
  • Savious mich52 2013/02/25 16:13:18
    Savious
    +6
    Talk about cherry picking….

    In case you missed it; that same SCOTUS ruling also stated:


    The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes.

    The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause.

    United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes.

    The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense.


    And of course; there’s always the second half of the one you posted:

    For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and q...

    Talk about cherry picking….

    In case you missed it; that same SCOTUS ruling also stated:


    The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes.

    The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause.

    United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes.

    The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense.


    And of course; there’s always the second half of the one you posted:

    For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

    So it seems; that if the weapon is in common use at the time; then we do have a right to it… odd isn’t it; and it also seems that a total prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that we choose overwhelmingly for lawful purpose is also not allowed…. Ummmm…..
    (more)
  • mich52 Savious 2013/02/25 16:28:58
  • Savious mich52 2013/02/25 17:28:33
    Savious
    +3
    Only a liberal can turn a land mark decision against their cause; into an argument in favor of their cause.

    There really is no other way to say it; anyone that reads DC v Heller; with an open mind, can clearly see it is pro individual rights to own weapons, including what is being called “assault weapons”.
  • Defend ... Savious 2013/02/25 17:37:49
    Defend Western Civlization
    +6
    your dealing with a hardcore socialist elite liberal progressive who hates America/Israel and Western Capitalist Civilization
  • mich52 Defend ... 2013/02/25 20:08:44
  • mich52 Savious 2013/02/25 20:08:23
  • Dwight ... mich52 2013/02/26 09:59:35
    Dwight PWCM
    +2
    To a point you are correct. But remember that the Constitution places the most restrictions on Government for a reason.

    One can only wonder at those who seek to change that.
  • james2013 mich52 2013/03/19 04:13:40
    james2013
    Carefully read the second amendment and tell me that English is really your first language and if you still believe what you wrote above then you are sincerely illiterate except for the part: "and for whatever purpose." The second amendment is only one sentence long and is clear enough for any child to understand. "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a FREE STATE, the right of the PEOPLE to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, shall not be INFRINGED. It does not take a genius to read that one sentence. Perhaps people now-a-days are TOO smart to READ and UNDERSTAND IT.

    You called it "REALITY" Reality is that our rights are being removed from us at a gradual pace until one day in the future we will have none.
  • mich52 james2013 2013/03/19 05:43:50
  • Dan 2013/02/25 13:28:36
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Dan
    +4
    It absolutely is, Joe (the laughing clown) Biden pressed the Dem Legislature to vote for that Bill. So Barry Soetoro A.K.A. Barack H. Obama can use it as an example for National Gun Control.

    They ban guns or force people to register. Then They will make me a Crimminal.
  • Illumin... Dan 2013/02/27 04:41:09
    Illuminatti 37°
    +2
    One of the basic conditions for the victory of socialism is the arming of the workers and the disarming of the bourgeoisie (the middle class). -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

    One man with a gun can control 100 without one. -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

    A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny gun ownership to the bourgeoisie. -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin

    The goal of socialism is communism. -- Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
  • Dwight ... Illumin... 2013/02/28 14:52:39
    Dwight PWCM
    +1
    Could as well be any Democrat today.
  • Patriot 2013/02/25 12:07:41
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Patriot
    +7
    I tell you right now Universal Gun Control will never materialize. Obama is preparing himself for the reprocussions of the forthcoming illegal gun control laws he and his Socialist minions are calling for. I hope Obama tests the Contitutional rights with his "Executive Orders" so he will see the resolve of true blue American Citizens! If Obama realy thinks Americans will fold and turn in their guns He will be dead wrong! Don t try to take our guns I love this Hahahaha I love this one
  • Pedro Doller ~Inc. 2013/02/25 08:31:35
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Pedro Doller ~Inc.
    +4
    They need to regulate food, seeing as Somali's and the Black Community are using food as weapons in their schools. Looks like the Jesse Ventura era was the golden age of Minnesota in the last 50 years.
  • Dwight ... Pedro D... 2013/02/26 10:01:53
    Dwight PWCM
    +1
    IMO, this is more reason for the States to practice Nullification.
  • Pedro D... Dwight ... 2013/02/26 18:03:35
    Pedro Doller ~Inc.
    +1
    I'm for that.
  • Redneck 2013/02/25 06:35:51
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    Redneck
    +3
    I think their ultimate goal is to destroy the US by dividing the people against each other so much that the country faulters. Like I've always said, biblical end time prophecy can't come true as long as the US is powerful and influential.
  • RG 2013/02/25 06:02:10
    Boo, Minnesota!!
    RG
    +3
    Minnesota, one of the incubators for socialism, ham-stringer of personal property owners rights, fantastic welfare state. Boo!
  • Constitution Believer 2013/02/25 04:17:57

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/07/30 15:24:21

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals