US, NATO preparing for new cold war.
Fariborz-Zak
2012/05/07 05:36:07
|
|
|||||
|
14 votes
|
|
37% | |||
|
8 votes
|
|
21% | |||
|
16 votes
|
|
42% | |||
PRESSTV.com:A political analyst says the US and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are “expansionist and aggressive” forces that seek to continue the Cold War.
“The ever more extensive breakup of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, and the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia, correlated with - and more than correlated with - the development of NATO as an expansionist, aggressive and bellicose regional and global military force,” Rick Rozoff wrote on the Global Research website.
He said the 21 nations and five smaller breakaway states (including Kosovo), where earlier there had been only two, have created that many more opportunities for the West to “expand southward and eastward from Cold War-era NATO territory.”
Every one of the 21 former Soviet and Yugoslav federal republics is now either a full member of NATO or engaged in a partnership program. Thirteen of them have troops serving under NATO command in Afghanistan.
“The ever more extensive breakup of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, and the former Soviet Union and former Yugoslavia, correlated with - and more than correlated with - the development of NATO as an expansionist, aggressive and bellicose regional and global military force,” Rick Rozoff wrote on the Global Research website.
He said the 21 nations and five smaller breakaway states (including Kosovo), where earlier there had been only two, have created that many more opportunities for the West to “expand southward and eastward from Cold War-era NATO territory.”
Every one of the 21 former Soviet and Yugoslav federal republics is now either a full member of NATO or engaged in a partnership program. Thirteen of them have troops serving under NATO command in Afghanistan.
Top Opinion
-
cmdrbnd007 2012/05/07 13:12:38disagree
+3Ok the Soviet Union fell 21 years ago and I see no expansion. This guy seems to be an idiot. So they joined NATO what would you do if you had been them. It provides protection.
Brewing Conflict with China
http://personalliberty.com/20...
Is NATO expansionist? What a load of left wing crap. Most of the new members were all either part of the old Soviet Union or part of the Warsaw Pact. They now have their freedom and want to make bloody sure the Russians won't take them over again. To do so they joined NATO. Also if the want to join the European Union one of the prerequisites is that they are members of NATO.
Is NATO aggressive on its membership. NO in fact they have been trying to slow down some countries trying to get into NATO like the Ukraine and Georgia because they don't want the Russians to start thinking their being surrounded by NATO. But like other parts of the ex-Soviet Union they are worried about the Russians taking them over again.
NATO troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere. It seems NATO has agreed to be more or less the military force for the UN. Since the UN is totally useless and couldn't run an outhouse UN troops are only good for peace keeping. If they need actual combat troops fighting then they have to ask NATO to do the job.
Since the Communists took over in 1949, China has expanded aggressively... taking half of what was Turkestan, non-Chinese territory (the Soviet Union grabbed the rest)...
Then they invaded and occupied Tibet. Border wars with India and Vietnam, border skirmishes with Russia... Threats to invade democratic and free Taiwan. Massive expansion of the Chinese navy, to project power and enforce Chinese claims to disputed islands also claimed by the Philippines. Yes, if you want an expansionist and aggressive power, look at China, not America. Consider Iran too... the world's leading exporter of terrorism and violent Islamic revolution. Consider too, North Korea... and wonder why this small country ruled by loons letmillions of their people starve while they put all their efforts into acquiring nuclear weapons and long range missiles... and export this to unstable anti-Western states. So why is Obama disarming America?
or New World Order, call it what you like... with the UN running our lives.
Hussein Obama is... a clear and present danger to the existence of America.
You look at who Romney is, hardly the pure conservative you would think the right would have chosen. If anything, Romney is going to go with the Rothschilds that want globalization to accumulate all the wealth of the world easier than different countries with different ideas about government and economy
. If you think about that, it could be scarier than some ideas about the working class of our country having more rights with a few ideas that seem socialist to the conservatives of today in the US. What the hell, blame Obama if you like, vote for Romney, and in four years we can all still be complaining about the cost of living rising, working for low wage, the rich accumulating more wealth, gas prices continuing to be higher, and the threat of NWO bigger than ever.
Even if we could get someone like Ron PAul as President, his actions will still be limited by the same powers that dictate what is going to happen no matter who holds office.
"Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963."
NATO is part of the destabilization, globalization, and centralized control that is in the works now.
FORCES. THE GREAT MEN & WOMEN WHO HAVE SERVE D THEIR TIME ARE
99.99% (For/LOL; don't go CRAZY, creating your RECORD,)*****REPUBLICANS!
**OUR SON IS AN IRAQ VET**HIS MOM WAS AN ARMY/RANGER SOCIAL WORKER,
WHO ESCAPED VIET-CONG COMING TO THE USA WITH 25 ORPHANS & HER
TWO SONS ON ONE OF THE LAST BABY-LIFT-FLIGHTS.
SHE IS NO-JANE-HANOI!
CAPS LOCK: I'M LEGALLY BLIND: ZOOM-3X. SOMETIMES, I CAN SEE BETTER
THAN OTHER TIME/ HANDS CRIPPLED BY AGENT ORANGE DIOXIN, I HAVE
TWO DIGITS CAN TYPE.
THANKS TO YOUR SUGGESTIONS, WELL TAKEN. GOOD DAY!