US Military To Stay In Afghanistan Far Beyond 'Exit'?
another indication has emerged via Wired’s Danger Room.
Noah Shachtman reports that even years after the conflict is officially over, palm-sized sensors which can be disguised as rocks may continue to monitor the movement of Afghans across the countryside.
These sensors will stay strewn across Afghanistan and will detect when anyone moves nearby them and then report the individual’s location to a remote headquarters. How exactly this doesn’t indicate an ongoing conflict is beyond me.
These surveillance apparatuses will be disguised in a myriad of ways ranging from being placed in imitation rocks with miniature solar-rechargeable batteries enabling the devices to last two decades or even possibly buried in order to even harder to detect.
This technology is known as an “unattended ground sensor” (UGS) and while it isn’t quite as bad as abandoned unmarked landmines or unexploded cluster bombs, it will give the Pentagon the power to keep tabs on Afghanistan for an indeterminate amount of time.
Of course even Shachtman has to point out that this is only after “regular American forces are supposed to have returned home,” a hint at the fact that Special Forces (or “special operators” as some prefer to call them) and contractors will remain regardless of any so-called deadline.
“Were going to leave behind a lot of special operators in Afghanistan. And they need the kind of capability that’s easy to put out so they can monitor a village without a lot of overt U.S.-made material on pathways and roadways,” said Matt Plyburn, a Lockheed Martin executive.
Keep in mind, Lockheed Martin is one of the world’s most prominent so-called defense contractors and is one of the few corporations in the United States that actually out-lobbies financial institutions.
Read More: http://theintelhub.com/2012/05/30/u-s-military-wil...
What you guys are surprised or something? I think the list of countries we have bases in is almost bigger than the list we dont have bases in.
This is just another case of military hardware being exported from the battlefield back here to the United States to be used against the American people.
Personally, I find this far from surprising given how insanely paranoid and surveillance obsessed our government has become as of late.
http://theintelhub.com/2012/0...
One instance, which began in January of 1968, is known as Operation Igloo White, wherein electronic sensors and other equipment were used in order to enable automated intelligence collection which would assist in the direction of strike aircraft.
The battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan are already littered with UGSs which form a kind of electronic perimeter around the many combat outposts in addition to monitoring out-of-the-way locations.
“You use them to cover up your dead space — the areas you’re concerned about but can’t cover with other ISR [intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance] assets,” explains Lieutenant Colonel Matt Russell, a program manager with the Army who oversees the deployment of UGSs.
“What we found in the field was significant under-usage,” Russell told Danger Room, referring to the fact that even recent UGS devices have been large, prone to providing inaccurate intelligence and had short life spans.
The military is hoping with these new devices – which Lockheed has dubbed “field and forget” systems enabling “persistent surveillance” – they will be able to keep much larger areas under their thumb for longer p...
One instance, which began in January of 1968, is known as Operation Igloo White, wherein electronic sensors and other equipment were used in order to enable automated intelligence collection which would assist in the direction of strike aircraft.
The battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan are already littered with UGSs which form a kind of electronic perimeter around the many combat outposts in addition to monitoring out-of-the-way locations.
“You use them to cover up your dead space — the areas you’re concerned about but can’t cover with other ISR [intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance] assets,” explains Lieutenant Colonel Matt Russell, a program manager with the Army who oversees the deployment of UGSs.
“What we found in the field was significant under-usage,” Russell told Danger Room, referring to the fact that even recent UGS devices have been large, prone to providing inaccurate intelligence and had short life spans.
The military is hoping with these new devices – which Lockheed has dubbed “field and forget” systems enabling “persistent surveillance” – they will be able to keep much larger areas under their thumb for longer periods.
http://theintelhub.com/2012/0...