Quantcast

U.S. Military to Perform Same Sex Marriages. Do you approve?

dublin9 2011/05/10 14:52:59

Is the United States Military being transformed into a pornographic homosexual Bath House by Barack Obama? It appears so, since the Office of the Chief of Navy Chaplains has decided that same-sex couples in the Navy will be able to get married in Navy Chapels by federal employee Navy Chaplains.

Previously, homosexual “marriage” was not authorized on federal property, but this is being changed. Does this mean that sailors in confined close quarter warship bunk areas will be forced to endure homosexual couples hugging up or even having sex with each other? You never know, the way things are going.

I knew this would begin to happen when DADT (Don’t Ask Don’t Tell) was done away with. Barracks will still be segregated by sex, because you don’t want people who might want to have sex with each other sleeping in close quarters or showering together. But now, this will only apply to heterosexuals. Gays will be exempt and transformed into a military privileged class.

So what do you think of all this? How would YOU feel being exposed to such goings on in a confined environment you can’t escape from? Will warships soon offer homosexual marital suites, replete with K.Y. Jelly and Show Tune background music? Perhaps our soldiers and sailors will be eventually referred to as “The Boys in the Bunk.”

This certainly exposes heterosexual soldiers to the potential of lurid and some would say perverse sexual encounters they really shouldn’t be forced to endure. Do you think that Transgenders in the military is far behind?

Setting aside the fact that this Naval “PC gone Gay” ruling probably goes against the federal Defense of Marriage Act that Obama refuses to enforce, is the mission of our military that of national defense or for social engineering and alternative sexual experimentation? Maybe they can add a new chapter in the Navy Instructional Manual entitled “Fornicating with Flounders.”


Read More: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/navy-authorize...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Judy 2011/08/09 23:03:49
    Judy
    +2
    who cares what gays want to do its not youre life so why does it bother you. if they want to live their lives with the person they feel in love with who cares its not affecting your life. because even before gay marriage i bet they were living together. and people in the military i bet a couple or more are gay. and they are fighting for our country putting their life on the line. when youre sitting on the couch watching tv. all they are doing is their job. no one on barrack are having sex even heterosexuals because they are working and getting paid but i mean if people were then yeah they should be not able to represent the military. but i dont see the big deal who they marry they are just doing their job and also trying to have a personal life with the person they love and trying to be able to live near where the other is stationed instead of thousands of miles away.
    im happily in a relationship with my boyfriend for a year now and completely in love wanting to be married soon. but before i met gay people i was thinking just like you but what if you child was gay or someone you knew youre perspective might be different i know mine is. because im now friends with gay people and i didnt know they were before i met them. they are completely normal people. maybe some are strange but others are just like everyone else but feel in love with a person of the same sex.
  • dublin9 Judy 2011/08/09 23:10:53 (edited)
    dublin9
    You're missing the point of my post. Military chaplains are federal employees. By officiating in these marriages, they are giving de facto federal recognition of homosexual marriages. Marital laws are not a federal mandate under the Constitution. It's reserved for the States.
  • Katherine 2011/05/31 13:27:53
    Katherine
    +1
    It's the usual game with Obama. Force them to have personal preferences shoved down their throats or leave. And if they leave it won't be so bad because our military will be that much weaker. It works masterfully for destroying our military if one wants to get mean about it. Congrats.
  • Just Me 2011/05/25 04:44:33
    Just Me
    +2
    Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong! Did I say wrong?? And what a disgrace that this would EVEN come up as an issue!
    DADT should have remained in place. SOME THINGS SHOULD REMAIN IN THE CLOSET...
  • Shark 2011/05/15 19:04:54
    Shark
    +1
    Disapprove. IF they want to show the public what kind of sex they have, go to youtube.
    Gay marriage in the military is a promotion of anal sex.
  • out damned spot 2011/05/15 03:05:36
  • Cathy 2011/05/13 17:33:41
    Cathy
    +2
    "THIS IS VERY SICKEN" AND THE CHAPAINS GOD ISN'T MY GOD. THEIR GOD IS.....SATAN!
  • sjalan Cathy 2011/05/15 22:33:10
    sjalan
    Judgemental much?
  • Cathy sjalan 2011/05/16 13:53:09
    Cathy
    I am not judgemental, I only give the Word of God and it is His Words that does the "Judging", not mine!
  • sjalan Cathy 2011/05/16 13:55:55
    sjalan
    And I quote you "their God is ... Satan"

    Seems to me you are not only doing a knee jerk judging but assuming facts not in evidence.
  • Cathy sjalan 2011/05/18 12:55:52
    Cathy
    I am also a minister and we who are christians are suppose to follow the orders of God's Word. God will hold all preachers, ministers, leaders of the Gospel in accountability of His Word. If what we do and say doesn't line-up to what God Word says then we are none of His children, but of the devil.
  • sjalan Cathy 2011/05/18 13:06:56
    sjalan
    It is obvious from your comment that you do not understand the example that Christ set to his disciples during their discussion as to who was greatest. In the congregation all are equals. None has position one over the other.

    Your apparent outlook is haughty and selfserving. Sad that all of "christendom" has such self-important outlook and to so soon come to an end.
  • LTMeadows214 2011/05/13 14:33:01
    LTMeadows214
    +3
    just part of ovomits destuction plan for this country. Open gays (sick bastards) are destuctive to the miltary. A chaplains duty is to God first the military second.
  • Thor American EXPAT n New G... 2011/05/13 13:55:49 (edited)
    Thor American EXPAT n New Guinea
    +2
    So now the CNC's is a POLE SMOKIN QUEER. The U.S. is DOOMED.
  • Annette 2011/05/13 11:46:19
    Annette
    +3
    Absolutely NOT, and the Navy is taking steps to stop it. I would hope we will see all the other branches of service do the same.
  • Quazimoto 2011/05/12 23:13:03
    Quazimoto
    +3
    This is one reason we need a leader who has been in the military and respects the American Flag and Loves his country.

    reason leader military respects american flag loves country
  • sjalan Quazimoto 2011/05/15 22:34:24
    sjalan
    This photo has been proven to be a photoshopped cut and paste.
  • Quazimoto sjalan 2011/05/17 00:01:32
  • sjalan Quazimoto 2011/05/17 05:09:09
    sjalan
    In both cases, due and proper protocol respect shown another head of state within their own nation.
  • dublin9 sjalan 2011/05/17 12:32:24
    dublin9
    +1
    Pardon me for interfering, but Obama bowed to the Saudi King because he is protector of the Muslim Holy Places and Mecca. It was a sign of Islamic submission.
  • sjalan dublin9 2011/05/17 13:11:48
    sjalan
    LOL. You obviously do not know internatonal protocol.
  • dublin9 sjalan 2011/05/17 14:12:16
    dublin9
    +1
    Sorry, but you don't know international protocol when it comes to the President of the United States. What Obama did was an absolute first.
  • Rick 2011/05/12 05:53:26
    Rick
    +1
    Watch your six!!!
  • Nina 2011/05/12 04:32:07
    Nina
    +2
    They all worship the planet Saturn/Satan and we are living in there world at the moment, UNTIL we Change things and send all the tyrants to the bowels of hel! where they belong!
  • 2012 rick 2011/05/12 00:22:23
  • Thor Am... 2012 rick 2011/05/13 13:59:10
    Thor American EXPAT n New Guinea
    +3
    It's isn't the Navy it's the chaplins corps but just to be clear their are more queers in the AF & Army
  • 2012 rick Thor Am... 2011/05/13 23:13:45
  • Thor Am... 2012 rick 2011/05/14 14:58:57
    Thor American EXPAT n New Guinea
    +2
    Well I've been in both. So I don't wonder. Machinegunner (Grunt) here. Ten a Seabee for 17 years.
    The Airman Mag (AF version of Leatherneck/ or All Hands) Did an article called 'Navy Justice' It was a peice on Sailors beating an AF Queer who hit on then in a bar in Oki.
  • Andrew 2011/05/11 22:35:22
    Andrew
    +4
    Hell No! What is this Sodom and Gomorah. This is exactly one of the reasons this country is doomed.
  • Helmholtz 2011/05/11 20:45:38
    Helmholtz
    +1
    Doesn't bother me in the slightest.
  • dublin9 Helmholtz 2011/05/11 20:54:41
    dublin9
    +2
    Nobody asked you if it bothered you. I invited people to reply to my post and give an opinion, not display apathy.
  • Helmholtz dublin9 2011/05/11 22:37:44
  • dublin9 Helmholtz 2011/05/11 23:19:55
    dublin9
    +1
    This was your second nonsense post. I've already asked you not to do this. If you do it one more time, I will block you and ban you from any of my posts. If you don't believe me, please try. On the other hand, you're welcome to add your own views relative to the topic in your own words, or simply move on.
  • Thor Am... dublin9 2011/05/13 14:00:43
    Thor American EXPAT n New Guinea
    +2
    He's an agnostic. So he's already admitted he's stupid.
  • Nina Helmholtz 2011/05/12 04:29:45
    Nina
    +1
    No, Satans own it usually doesn't.
  • none 2011/05/11 19:38:28
  • Cliff 2011/05/11 19:30:04
    Cliff
    +2
    Only if guys have to go in drag
  • concerned2 2011/05/11 18:08:25
    concerned2
    +4
    I'm a divorce lawyer. The idea of "the sanctity of marriage" is troublesome to me - its hard to see how homosexuals could screw it up worse than heterosexuals have.

    The same rules would apply - no married couples in barracks, no sex in barracks, etc.

    So far as "sexual encounters" - you mean people making out, or people getting hit on? People making out is rude and uncomfortable regardless of their orientation, and people getting hit on is something that happens all the time now. I fail to see the difference.

    PS - I am an incredibly happily married heterosexual woman (just in case people think I'm picking "sides"). I'm satisfied and secure in my marriage and don't understand why anyone would feel threatened by the marriage of someone else. But that's just me.
  • dublin9 concerned2 2011/05/11 18:10:25 (edited)
    dublin9
    +2
    I'm not in fundamental disagreement with your points. But as for the misnomer of gay "marriage," I'm against it on the basis of semantics. For thousands of years, marriage has been defined as a union between a man and a woman. I'm against redefining words to make a few people happy. I might also add that gays are not discriminated against in marriage. A gay man or woman can marry someone of the opposite sex just like anyone else.
  • concerned2 dublin9 2011/05/11 18:23:42
    concerned2
    +2
    That's why I advocate for calling all civil marriages "civil unions" - the reaction people have to the word "marriage" and its connotations for many people.

    The discrimination argument is the same that was used in multiracial marriage arguments (I've read the cases, all of the arguments against gay marriage are basically the same). "There's no discrimination - you are free to get married, just not to each other"

    I just don't - and I mean I really DON'T - understand why anyone would object to two consenting adults who truly love each other making their commitment to each other permanent and public.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 18 Next » Last »

News & Politics

2013/05/20 17:52:33

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals