
U.S. Cancels No-Bid Contract for Afghan Work to Democratic Donor
- January 31, 2010 05:34:53
- Read all 13 opinions
The U.S. canceled a $25 million federal contract for working in Afghanistan to a company owned by a Democratic campaign contributor that was awarded without entertaining competitive bids.
The cancellation comes after Fox News first reported on the details of the contract last week, prompting lawmakers to make inquiries into the deal. State Department Spokesman P.J. Crowley told Fox News that USAID terminated the award and is now working on an appropriate resolution.
The contract had been awarded on Jan. 4 to Checchi & Company Consulting, a Washington-based firm owned by economist and Democratic donor Vincent V. Checchi that was hired to provide "rule of law stabilization services" in war-torn Afghanistan.
A synopsis of the contract published on the USAID Web site said Checchi & Company would "train the next generation of legal professionals" throughout the Afghan provinces and thereby "develop the capacity of Afghanistan's justice system to be accessible, reliable, and fair."
The legality of the arrangement as a "sole source," or no-bid, contract was made possible by virtue of a waiver signed by the USAID administrator.
When Checchi was contacted by Fox News for its earlier report, he confirmed that his company had indeed received the nearly $25 million contract but declined to say why it had been awarded on a no-bid basis, referring a reporter to USAID.
Asked if he or his firm had been aware that the contract was awarded without competitive bids, Checchi replied: "After it was awarded to us, sure. Before, we had no idea."
Joseph A. Fredericks, director of public information at USAID, told Fox News the Checchi deal was actually a renewal of an existing contract, awarded in 2004 by the Bush administration after a competitive bid process.
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, told Fox News the no-bid contract in this case "disturbed" him.
Issa had written to USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah requesting that the agency "produce all documents related to the Checchi contract" on or before Feb. 5. Citing the waiver that enabled USAID to award the contract on a no-bid basis, Issa noted that the exemption was intended to speed up the provision of services in a crisis environment.
Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee's Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight, told Fox News she, too, was seeking answers about the Checchi contract.
As a candidate for president in 2008, Obama, then a senator, frequently derided the Bush administration for the awarding of federal contracts without competitive bidding.
Less than two months after he was sworn into office, President Obama signed a memorandum that he claimed would "dramatically reform the way we do business on contracts across the entire government."
"If you want to say this violates the basis on which this administration came into office and campaigned, fair enough," Crowley told Fox News.
Federal campaign records show Checchi has been a frequent contributor to liberal and Democratic causes and candidates in recent years, including to Obama's presidential campaign. The records show Checchi has given at least $4,400 to Obama dating back to March 2007, close to the maximum amount allowed.
Top Opinion
-
SickOfBigGov January 31, 2010 15:34:49
- wtw February 01, 2010 04:30:35
We need to keep calling out this progressive regime that seek to destroy the america we know!reply - crewzer1 February 01, 2010 02:45:27
WoWreply - madjack January 31, 2010 19:24:13
The no bid contract is a Chicago tradition of long standing,and has been used by Mayors,Ward Bosses,and the Cook County Board to insure their friends are taken care of.It's the way Obama and his cronies know,and they know no other.reply - biff January 31, 2010 19:07:01
+1hahahahareply - charles_1 January 31, 2010 17:47:35
+1This says more about the MSM than anything. As always, the MSM give democrats a pass. Had any republican been involved it would be on 24/7 news coverage for a week.reply - Malachi January 31, 2010 17:47:17 (edited)
Why should this surprise us?reply - Greywolf January 31, 2010 17:20:09
Great sadness that our hope for change is just more of the same tho this time its the progressives who stear this great nation onto the rocks.reply - SickOfBigGov January 31, 2010 15:34:49
+2Another "Change and Hope" pledge we can't depend on. Thanks Fox...We'd never hear it from MSM.
reply - apachehellfire65 January 31, 2010 14:37:12
obummers whole admin is nothing but political payback and political favors!
reply - SNIPER January 31, 2010 13:46:37
+1If Cheney had his name on any part of this it would have been all over the news,repeatedly !!!!!reply - hopfly January 31, 2010 12:00:55
+1This is open transparent Obama government at its best. We can't see the worst. Obama ran on NOT doing these things, if he had ran saying I will continue to do the things that are wrong in Washington, would he have been elected? I would think that all of those citizens and illegal aliens who contributed to his campaign would be a bit disappointed. Well that is what you get for shopping on line for a president.reply - Steve O January 31, 2010 07:49:39
Policy practices never really change from one party to the nextreply - flaca BN-0 January 31, 2010 06:35:46
OMG KBR all over again.reply
About Me
Recent Posts
- Lawyer Battling Prop 8 Says Ruling Not 'Activism,' Forecasts Supreme Court Fight
- Charges Dropped Against Man Arrested While Praying Outside Chicago Abortion Clinic
- Fox News Poll: Most Voters Unhappy with Health Care Law
- Magliocchetti Case Involving Late Dem Draws Less Coverage Than Abramoff Scandal
- 88 Days to Decide:Romanoff Accuses Bennet of Gambling With Children's Future
-
Who's the Hottest Male Actor Over 50?
-
What Was the Best Season Finale?
-
Who's the Meanest Reality TV Judge?
- View more slideshows »
News
-
Michelle Obama Would Trade Places With Beyonce: Who Would You Trade Places With?
In an interview with People magazine, Michelle Obama admitted that she would trade places with pop singer Beyonce if she could.
-
Bill Clinton Poses With Porn Stars: Acceptable or Unprofessional?
Bill Clinton has seen bigger scandals in his time, but a recent photograph of the former president is dragging him into a little bit of unwanted controversy.
Politics
-
Who Do You Think Will Ultimately Win the 2012 Election?
It's going to be a long, hard fight between Barack Obama and his likely GOP competitor, Mitt Romney. But who do you think will ultimately win?
-
Who Do You Think Currently Has the Upper Hand in the 2012 Election?
It's going to be a long, hard fight between Barack Obama and his likely GOP competitor, Mitt Romney. But who do you think currently has the upper hand?






