Quantcast

Unions spend 4.4 billion over five years on POLITICS! so now who's trying to buy elections?

apachehellfire65 2012/07/10 17:07:02
unions are nothing but bloated corrupt political groups
unions are great! at least that's what they tell me to say!
All of the above
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos



By Chris Moody
July 10, 2012





A Wall Street Journal analysis of political spending unveiled Tuesday found that organized labor groups dropped a combined $4.4 billion on political activities between 2006 and 2011, about three times more than previously estimated.

The Journal cast a wide net to determine what counted as "political spending," including activities that range from traditional candidate donations to the cost of hot dogs for union demonstrators at political rallies.

To find the additional costs, the newspaper added spending reports filed with the Labor Department to Federal Election Commission spending data. From the report, which is partially behind a paywall at WSJ.com, but is available in full at FoxNews.com:

The usual measure of unions' clout encompasses chiefly what they spend supporting federal candidates through their political-action committees, which are funded with voluntary contributions, and lobbying Washington, which is a cost borne by the unions' own coffers.

These kinds of spending, which unions report to the Federal Election Commission and to Congress, totaled $1.1 billion from 2005 through 2011, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

The unions' reports to the Labor Department capture an additional $3.3 billion that unions spent over the same period on political activity.

The costs reported to the Labor Department range from polling fees, to money spent persuading union members to vote a certain way, to bratwursts to feed Wisconsin workers protesting at the state capitol last year. Much of this kind of spending comes not from members' contributions to a PAC but directly from unions' dues-funded coffers. There is no requirement that unions report all of this kind of spending to the Federal Election Commission, or FEC.

Union spending goes overwhelmingly to Democratic candidates and liberal causes. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks political spending, 92 percent of the $58.5 million in direct candidate donations from 1990 to 2012 went toward Democratic candidates.

Add a comment above

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • TuringsChild 2012/07/10 22:01:58
    unions are nothing but bloated corrupt political groups
    TuringsChild
    +1
    Is anyone really surprised?
  • Morningstar 2012/07/10 17:34:40
    None of the above
    Morningstar
    You've got to be joking here - you are bitching because unions are spending money to support obama???
  • apacheh... Morning... 2012/07/10 20:10:59
    apachehellfire65
    and why not? the left has no problem bitching about every single person who supports Romney! but the main point to my post is that it shows how the unions directly use union dues to fund their corrupt political machine.
  • NPC 2012/07/10 17:19:02
    All of the above
    NPC
    +1
    Ugly and attack is on the way folks. The Liberals are over. There are not any jobs now. Even Union workers have been laid off and fired. They have their unemployment, welfare and food stamps, which is the new norm. 8.2% unemployemnt is Barack's excuse to attack the rich and want new taxation of $85 Billion which will only solve the Ecnonomy less than 9 days !
  • Rusty Shackleford 2012/07/10 17:17:03
    unions are nothing but bloated corrupt political groups
    Rusty Shackleford
    +2
    Unions have become mostly corrupt.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/19 15:56:36

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals