Quantcast

UN Agenda 21: Republicans opposed?

Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/09/03 17:35:13
Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
Bad call! The GOP just threw in with the tinfoil hat crowd!
Undecided
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Twenty years ago, a Republican President (Bush Senior) signed on to UN Agenda 21. Now the Republicans stand opposed to it.

What happened? The Tea Party, that's what happened.

They pointed out that UN Agenda 21 is nothing more than a big land grab. It's about transferring vast tracts of US land to the wild. And about taking away what property rights people still have in this country.

Better late than never, if the Republicans are serious. And boy! They've accomplished something already. The greenies are squealing like stuck pigs! "Sh-h-h-h! Quiet! You're not supposed to mention that!" they scream, frantically waving their hands. Sorry, but the cat's out of the bag, and it's only fair that lovers of liberty should chase it.

Read More: http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2012/09/03...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • ReconMa... 56lady☆... 2012/09/04 03:21:38
  • 56lady☆... ReconMa... 2012/09/04 05:28:07
  • ReconMa... 56lady☆... 2012/09/07 02:08:29
  • 56lady☆... ReconMa... 2012/09/07 02:43:09
    56lady☆POTL JLA BTO-t- BCRA-F's
    +1
    YW ♥
  • ReconMa... 56lady☆... 2012/09/07 02:52:40
  • 56lady☆... ReconMa... 2012/09/07 03:08:55
    56lady☆POTL JLA BTO-t- BCRA-F's
    :)
  • ed 2012/09/03 19:22:10
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    ed
    +7
    Give them a thumbs up on that one.
  • teigan 2012/09/03 19:01:05
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    teigan
    +7
    Now to hold his feet to the fire. tea party patriots tea party patriots tea party patriots
  • 4570GOVT 2012/09/03 19:00:58
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    4570GOVT
    +9
    The U.N. is Dangerous and we should kick their sorry ass out of New York - And OFF American Soil ! Bush Sr. is and was a New World Order pusher ( as have been EVERY president since . He ( Bush Sr. was the former head of the CIA ) , what do you expect ?
  • Pedro D... 4570GOVT 2012/09/03 19:42:38 (edited)
    Pedro Doller ~Inc.
    +7
    Before he was Mr CIA, he was Ambassador to China (UN Ambassador too) and that is when they cut a deal to transfer our wealth and technology to China. Although most of that had to wait until the Clinton years. Before then China lost millions every year to famine. NWO all the way.
  • 4570GOVT Pedro D... 2012/09/03 19:51:16
    4570GOVT
    +4
    YUO GOT IT !
  • Elleryqueen 2012/09/03 19:00:42
    Undecided
    Elleryqueen
    +8
    First, let me expound on the U.N. IT SUCKS!!!!!!!!!! Been saying for more years than I like to think about, but have been say the U.N. should be run out of this country and that the U.S. should stop contributing monetarily.

    That being said, unfortunately there are some Republicans who will back Agenda 21, much to their dismay I hope come election day.

    LSM will never run anything about Agenda 21 unless it is to say that it is a good thing, since most of the LSM are idiots.
  • goatman112003 2012/09/03 18:57:55
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    goatman112003
    +4
    Of course its a landgrab plus a collectivization of the people.
  • jeepster4 2012/09/03 18:51:40
    Bad call! The GOP just threw in with the tinfoil hat crowd!
    jeepster4
    +1
    Just one more reason the Republican party is dying.
  • dasimon1 jeepster4 2012/09/03 21:58:55
    dasimon1
    +2
    you must be a true communist and the Republicans will kick your sorry ass!~
  • jeepster4 dasimon1 2012/09/03 22:08:12
  • dasimon1 jeepster4 2012/09/03 23:22:46
    dasimon1
    +1
    I didn't see anything about the Republican party dying.That came from you because your a low class Atheist Liberal.Stop selling your garbage cause no ones buying your dribble!It figures juyst another fudge packer!
  • jeepster4 dasimon1 2012/09/03 23:43:47
    jeepster4
    Do demographics much? Ever read a book? http://www.amazon.com/The-Str... I thought not?
  • dasimon1 jeepster4 2012/09/04 03:20:08
    dasimon1
    +1
    Sidney Blumenthol is a biased Democratic author try again smartass!
  • jeepster4 dasimon1 2012/09/04 04:06:31
    jeepster4
    Any one that holds a different view than you is biased apparently. So I assume that you consider demographic information and education to be simply a Democratic plot. I suspect you are often considered an 'Ass' but rarely considered 'Smart.'
  • dasimon1 jeepster4 2012/09/04 10:44:01
    dasimon1
    you can take your Liberal/commie ass and follow Obama to the ends of the earth.Yoiu belong with "The Great Destroyer".
  • jeepster4 dasimon1 2012/09/04 19:23:26
    jeepster4
    That's cute and I particularly like the use of misspelling to prove you are just as stupid as you appear.
  • dasimon1 jeepster4 2012/09/04 22:30:31
    dasimon1
    No one could be as stupid as you are. you take the cake.You follow a liar,your a commie,you have no moral standards,you'll go with the flow because you couldn't get there on your own,and you couldn';t fight your way out of a wet paper bag!Drink that Kool aide and pack that fudge hahahaha!!~
  • jeepster4 dasimon1 2012/09/05 01:36:54
    jeepster4
    I'd be a bit more convinced if you could just settle on the punctuation to be used.
  • Alien Ramone 2012/09/03 18:50:18
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    Alien Ramone
    +5
    As an analogy, it's sort of like Romney and some of the other Republicans not really wanting a true audit of the Federal Reserve, but finally supporting an audit. They will only go as far public opinion forces them to in their stance, and don't try hard to accomplish it. They currently don't support ending Federal Reserve, since public opinion allows them to hold that stance. If we really want the NWO agenda stopped we are going to have to elect those who will go up against it, not those who will pretend, but not really push for the cause. Even as resistance mounts, efforts will continue behind the scenes at the local levels for Agenda 21 with programs under other names such as "sustainable", so people don't realize that the agenda is still being put in place.
  • Defendn... Alien R... 2012/09/03 18:55:44
    DefendnProtect
    +2
    well said!
  • Grandpa 2012/09/03 18:48:27
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    Grandpa
    +10
    The UN should be disbanded as they are worthless clowns who accomplish nothing >> They bad mouth this country and should be moved to any plant but ours >> Name just one war they have stopped ,or one dictator that they have stopped from killing thier own people ,or just made sure poor kids had a great meal and they free from prison those who are there because they want to live free ???>>> Un forces do very little but stand by and watch >> STOP LISTENING TO THEM THIS IS OUR COUNTRY >>
  • say what? 2012/09/03 18:47:30
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    say what?
    +6
    Just talk for votes. After the elections, regardless of who wins, it will be business as usual and we will be distracted by this or that while agenda 21 goes full speed ahead.
  • CHUCK 2012/09/03 18:25:56
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    CHUCK
    +4
    TEA 4 US
  • mk, Smartass Oracle 2012/09/03 18:20:24
  • Dwight 2012/09/03 18:11:34
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    Dwight
    +8
    Obviously, TEA is a healthy thing.

    We need more TEA.
  • DeborahLakeHelen 2012/09/03 18:10:34
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    DeborahLakeHelen
    +10
    Any sensible, freedom-loving American SHOULD see through the veneer of this agenda. I have no desire to live in a "camp" within a high population. If we become restricted to our use of land, because there is none available for private citizens, that's exactly what will happen.
  • Cal 2012/09/03 18:07:32
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    Cal
    +8
    The entire UN is dangerous as shown multiple times over the past year alone. America needs to detach from the bloated corrupt thing known as United Nations. It doesn't do anything anymore, and most of it's committees are lead by leaders who are the root of the very problem the committees we're meant to solve. What a joke.
  • DefendnProtect 2012/09/03 18:07:27
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    DefendnProtect
    +7
    More statism, more landgrab, more totalitarian gov, less freedom.

    Say NO WAY!
  • Always Right 2012/09/03 17:52:08
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    Always Right
    +9
    All Americans should be opposed to the UN Agenda 21, it will destroy America's sovereignty!
  • Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆ 2012/09/03 17:39:35
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    Temlakos~POTL~PWCM~JLA~☆
    +10
    The re-wilding of so much US territory is the worst part. And of course! The idea is to cut down on *our* territory! And you know where you're going to be living? In an apartment in a "mixed-use building." A "dingbat dorm" with "approved" shops on the ground floor, and a connection to a commuter shuttle of some kind. No private land, anywhere. That's not "socially just."

    Bush Senior was flat wrong to sign on to that program. Bush Junior should have pulled away from it. And now we're going to hold Mitt Romney's feet to the fire, to make sure *he* pulls out of it.
  • Steve B... Temlako... 2012/09/03 18:15:55
    Steve Boston
    +6
    I've always maintained we should pull funding from the UN. Then cut it loose and let it float off to a third world nation where it belongs. We'll do just fine without it. We can stand alone.
  • stevmackey 2012/09/03 17:37:32
    Good show! UN Agenda 21 is dangerous.
    stevmackey
    +5
    Everybody make a mistake once in a while.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/10/30 17:43:09

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals