Troops Ordered To Kill All Americans Who Do Not Turn In Guns Under the UN Gun Ban Obama will sign July 27th

Paul Joseph Watson

Infowars.com

Monday, July 16, 2012

The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant
threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has
its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United
Nations will oversee "complete disarmament" of the American people
under the ruse of preventing war. The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much
controversy because it outlines a plan to target "all types of
conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,"
according to Forbes' Larry Bell.

Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement
"is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about
international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the
real agenda here is domestic firearms control."

A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama
argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the
"fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms". The letter
adds that "...the U.N.'s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely
to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic
interests as well as our constitutional rights."

Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and
"international crime syndicates," the UN is busy trying to imply that
all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and
should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

This is precisely the same language used in a 1961 U.S. State Department
briefing which outlined a long term agenda to carry out a "Program for
General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World."

Invoking the threat of nuclear warfare, the document spells out a plan to
create a "United Nations Peace Force" that would "enforce the
peace as the disarmament process proceeds."

While the document initially focuses on scrapping nuclear weapons, it later
makes it clear that the only groups allowed to own weapons of any kind would be
governing authorities, "for the purpose of maintaining internal
order," and the UN "peacekeeping" force itself, which would
require "agreed manpower."

"The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of
agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those
required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or
converted to peaceful purposes," states the document. While the memorandum
outlines a broader mandate to destroy national sovereignty, eviscerate national
armies and institute the UN as the planet's supreme authority with a world
army, the document serves as a stark reminder that the plan for the United
Nations to oversee the abolition of the second amendment has been in the works
for decades.

As Bell points out in his Forbes article, the threat of the Obama
administration relying on a UN treaty to do what successive administrations
have tried but failed to accomplish -- taking a huge bite out of the second
amendment -- is by no means far fetched.

After all, a plethora of UN treaties and international agreements have already
stripped the United States of its sovereignty and its
power to decide its own laws. The power to authorize U.S. involvement in wars and
conflicts has now been almost completely stripped from Congress and handed to
the United Nations.