Quantcast

Tribute To The Heroes Of Benghazi

doofiegirl BTO-t- BCRA-F ~PWCM~ 2012/12/03 23:50:42
A great musical tribute to the brave Americans that died in Benghazi and an indictment against those that let them die.

Read More: http://www.westernjournalism.com/tribute-to-the-he...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Patriot Unit 2012/12/04 22:30:31
    Patriot Unit
    +2
    All I have to say is that Obama Lied, and four Americans Died.
  • keeper 2012/12/04 17:06:34
    keeper
    +2
    Thank you so much, Doofie... may they never be forgotten!!!
  • rbeas 2012/12/04 15:44:06
    rbeas
    why is this a GREATmusical? Are you basing this on its musical merrits?
  • doofieg... rbeas 2012/12/04 15:51:42
  • rbeas doofieg... 2012/12/04 16:06:23
    rbeas
    There is always some bull headed individual showing his butt I guess you are no exception.
  • doofieg... rbeas 2012/12/04 17:24:03
    doofiegirl  BTO-t- BCRA-F ~PWCM~
    +2
    I echo the sentiment.
  • STU~PWCM~JLA~POTL~AFCL 2012/12/04 03:36:11
    STU~PWCM~JLA~POTL~AFCL
    +9
    Hi DG,

    The whole thing is just disgusting. We placed Ambassador Stevens on a very dangerous assignment with no military protection, and failed to support the three brave soldiers who saved 30 lives at the State Department mission, and later killed 50 attackers at the CIA safe house about a mile way. We have three major military bases within two hours of Benghazi; these men could have been saved were a special operations gunship sent in (the fighting lasted four hours). One very senior commander, General Carter Ham, decided to disobey Obama and send in the life-saving support - he was relieved of his command WITHIN 30 SECONDS, and his order to send support was rescinded by the "powers that be."

    The simple ugly truth is that if Obama sent in help, he would be admitting that his "nation building" in the Middle East led to Islamic theocracies, since the host nations of all the US consulates and embassies that were attacked in September didn't send in police when the attacks occurred. So Obama simply chose to let the victims die to protect his political reputation, falsely blaming the attacks on a cheap anti-Islamic film rather than what it really was - planned terror that the host governments approved of. I admit that in some cases, after the fact, the attackers were arrest...

    Hi DG,

    The whole thing is just disgusting. We placed Ambassador Stevens on a very dangerous assignment with no military protection, and failed to support the three brave soldiers who saved 30 lives at the State Department mission, and later killed 50 attackers at the CIA safe house about a mile way. We have three major military bases within two hours of Benghazi; these men could have been saved were a special operations gunship sent in (the fighting lasted four hours). One very senior commander, General Carter Ham, decided to disobey Obama and send in the life-saving support - he was relieved of his command WITHIN 30 SECONDS, and his order to send support was rescinded by the "powers that be."

    The simple ugly truth is that if Obama sent in help, he would be admitting that his "nation building" in the Middle East led to Islamic theocracies, since the host nations of all the US consulates and embassies that were attacked in September didn't send in police when the attacks occurred. So Obama simply chose to let the victims die to protect his political reputation, falsely blaming the attacks on a cheap anti-Islamic film rather than what it really was - planned terror that the host governments approved of. I admit that in some cases, after the fact, the attackers were arrested by the host governments, but never before they finished their assaults. Obama would rather see our overseas State Department officials and soldiers DIE before doing anything that might hurt his public image.

    Stu
    (more)
  • MIZ® ₱... STU~PWC... 2012/12/04 11:20:44
    MIZ®  ₱д₸Ɽ¡Ö₸ ₩дⱤⱤ¡ÖⱤ   †
    +7
    You are so right, Stu!

    This is just so sad in so many different ways..
  • rbeas STU~PWC... 2012/12/04 17:08:39
    rbeas
    Your statement is somewhat flawed. Ambassador Stevens joined the United States Foreign Service in 1991and knew full well the risk of his position and chose to take on the responsibility. He was paid to do so.

    There were no brave soldiers killed in melee. The other three people who died were CIA agents, all were members of his diplomatic mission, U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith and U.S. embassy security personnel Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods. Woods and Doherty were ex marines, hired specifically by the CIA, (hired guns) for Stevens security detail. They knew, after serving in the Marines, there were risk in that area of the world. They chose to get paid well for their job and assume all rish associated with their new found positions.

    There were not 30 American lives in the compound only 7, including the now dead 4. There were not 3 military bases within 2 hours of Benghazi, only one which is in Italy and only that base could be included if a gunship was sitting on the tarmac ready to go with all personell on board and briefed with their engines running.

    Even if all the above had been in place and the guship was flying overhead two hours later it would have been too late. Stevens and the others were pronounced dead in the hospital they were taken to an hour and a half after the skirmish started.
  • doofieg... rbeas 2012/12/04 17:25:51
    doofiegirl  BTO-t- BCRA-F ~PWCM~
    +3
    Put a link up to prove your statements. And Not from Huff puff!
  • rbeas doofieg... 2012/12/04 17:53:48
    rbeas
    Which part or parts are you in disbelief of
  • Sheila rbeas 2012/12/04 19:58:10
    Sheila
    +2
    The number of people saved for one.
  • rbeas Sheila 2012/12/04 22:07:39 (edited)
    rbeas
    here is your time line. http://www.factcheck.org/2012...
  • Sheila rbeas 2012/12/05 15:36:29 (edited)
    Sheila
    +1
    NOT what I asked for proof on.
  • doofieg... rbeas 2012/12/04 20:02:11 (edited)
    doofiegirl  BTO-t- BCRA-F ~PWCM~
    +3
    Your whole incredible statement! Know what I think of it ? Bulldookie!
  • rbeas doofieg... 2012/12/04 22:15:55
    rbeas
    you are entitled to your opinion. Just read the links I gave you.
  • rbeas doofieg... 2012/12/04 22:15:05
  • STU~PWC... rbeas 2012/12/06 03:43:55
    STU~PWCM~JLA~POTL~AFCL
    +1
    It's true Ambassador Stevens was on a very risky mission, and of course he knew it. But he asked multiple times, both before and during the attack, for security. The mere fact that he was aware he was in a dangerous situation does not mean he's not entitled to proper security.

    Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were Navy Seals, and Sean Smith was a programmer in the military. They WERE brave soldiers killed in melee, and were not CIA agents. They did not work at the mission building where Ambassador Stevens was being attacked. They went to save him, but Stevens had already been kidnapped. The three soldiers did however save about 30 other people who were trapped in the building.

    The US absolutely could have protected Doherty, Woods, and Smith after they left the State Dept. mission building and went about a mile to the CIA safe house. At the safe house they killed about 50 attackers, but were simply outnumbered, and were being hit by mortar shells. Woods was on the roof of the CIA safe house, and had a laser pointer with a GPS connection to point at the mortars. Were the military to send in a Special Operations Spectre Gunship, the laser could communicate the exact coordinates of the mortars to the gunship via satellite, and the gunship could have taken the mortars out with ...



    It's true Ambassador Stevens was on a very risky mission, and of course he knew it. But he asked multiple times, both before and during the attack, for security. The mere fact that he was aware he was in a dangerous situation does not mean he's not entitled to proper security.

    Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were Navy Seals, and Sean Smith was a programmer in the military. They WERE brave soldiers killed in melee, and were not CIA agents. They did not work at the mission building where Ambassador Stevens was being attacked. They went to save him, but Stevens had already been kidnapped. The three soldiers did however save about 30 other people who were trapped in the building.

    The US absolutely could have protected Doherty, Woods, and Smith after they left the State Dept. mission building and went about a mile to the CIA safe house. At the safe house they killed about 50 attackers, but were simply outnumbered, and were being hit by mortar shells. Woods was on the roof of the CIA safe house, and had a laser pointer with a GPS connection to point at the mortars. Were the military to send in a Special Operations Spectre Gunship, the laser could communicate the exact coordinates of the mortars to the gunship via satellite, and the gunship could have taken the mortars out with missiles.

    I know Stevens could not have been saved once the attack started, but the three soldiers who were killed might have been. And had Stevens' numerous requests for security before the attack began been granted, he too might still be alive.

    The blood of Stevens, Doherty, Woods, and Smith are on Obama's hands.
    (more)
  • socokid 2012/12/04 03:00:49
    socokid
    +1
    "and an indictment against those that" planned the cowardly terrorist attack on our Embassy.
  • Pearlie Momi♥Patriot Warrior♥ 2012/12/04 02:54:52
    Pearlie Momi♥Patriot Warrior♥
    +6
    Bless the families of these great men. Those men are truly our Heroes and Patriots.
    Sad, the government put policies first, and refuse to help them..That is the saddest.
    The family want answers..I don't blame them.
    Thanks Doofie, Love the song....Keep this story alive...
  • Red Branch 2012/12/04 02:26:18
    Red Branch
    +5
    Let's call them the "Battling Bastards of Benghazi".

    Out of respect and because this links them to some heroes of another war.
    "Battling Bastards of Bataan" and the "Battling Bastards of Bastoge".

    "They are all mixed together". Those were my thoughts the first time I saw Arlington National Cemetery and I thought it very fitting.
  • Pearlie... Red Branch 2012/12/04 02:55:39
    Pearlie Momi♥Patriot Warrior♥
    +4
    Good , lets yell out that name...BB and B....LOL
  • Red Branch Pearlie... 2012/12/04 04:14:09
    Red Branch
    +2
    Let "Remember BB & B" be our battle cry".
  • JAR HEAD 2012/12/04 01:28:40
    JAR HEAD
    makes me sad how pathetic of a understanding people have of Benghazi .I wonder if any of you have any combat or military experience? because anyone who has would understand how foolish people that are making uneducated assumptions like the douchebag who started this post are idiotic. i was in two conflicts when I was a Marine so i have a understanding that most arm chair military teatards like this person does not.and there is no scandal .just a pathetic attempt to politicize this event. I wonder where all the out rage when eleven embassies were attacked during the Bush administration?More then any president . And on 9/11 when our country was attacked for the first time since pearl harbor. And sine the event is still under investigation there has not been anything released therefor no facts.so how is it that you know facts? stop watching Fox news and you might save yourself from sounding really dumb and ill informed as you are 3r5r34
  • doofieg... JAR HEAD 2012/12/04 01:30:54
    doofiegirl  BTO-t- BCRA-F ~PWCM~
    +5
    Oh, we understand Benghazi Perfectly! It's you liberals who can't see the forest for the trees.
  • Red Branch JAR HEAD 2012/12/04 02:17:16
    Red Branch
    +5
    For some reason I seriously doubt your claim to being a US Marine. You write like a hard-left, hard-core, anti-American Lib. As a matter of fact, you are the 2d one I've come across the past couple of hours, which I find highly suspicious.

    Skip the protestations and denials, it would be just like 0bama and his birth certificate.
  • Red Branch JAR HEAD 2012/12/04 02:18:49
    Red Branch
    +4
    BTW:
    Does no one left behind have a special meaning to you?
  • Sheila Red Branch 2012/12/04 20:01:26
    Sheila
    +1
    Only to a REAL Marine!!
  • doofieg... JAR HEAD 2012/12/04 02:36:59
    doofiegirl  BTO-t- BCRA-F ~PWCM~
    +5
    Oh, I forgot--------does name calling label you as a lib ? Probably! Oops! Of Course it does! A real man would Never call a woman what you did
  • Red Branch doofieg... 2012/12/04 04:14:56
    Red Branch
    +3
    I think you called it correctly.
  • JAR HEAD Red Branch 2012/12/04 10:20:17
    JAR HEAD
    +1
    drtyy5ry56 Republican base
  • Red Branch JAR HEAD 2012/12/04 15:16:44
    Red Branch
    +3
    What's this? Your before and after photos.

    You Before and After your sex change operation.
  • JAR HEAD Red Branch 2012/12/05 00:15:08
    JAR HEAD
    nice one. judging from how dumb your comment just was no wonder you vote Rep your retarded
  • doofieg... JAR HEAD 2012/12/05 00:40:00
  • JAR HEAD doofieg... 2012/12/05 00:21:04
    JAR HEAD
    you r756
  • Sheila JAR HEAD 2012/12/04 20:00:41 (edited)
    Sheila
    +2
    Really? YOU used the words teatard and douchebag about the author of the poll that is nothing but a tribute to the dead and you say she sounds dumb? Bless your pea pickingheart....
  • doofieg... Sheila 2012/12/04 20:04:07
    doofiegirl  BTO-t- BCRA-F ~PWCM~
    +2
    Libs can't talk if they can't do the namecalling thing!
  • Sheila doofieg... 2012/12/04 20:06:02
    Sheila
    +2
    Doofie this post is BEAUTIFUL, sorry you drew some scumsuckers to the wake!!
  • doofieg... Sheila 2012/12/04 20:09:50
    doofiegirl  BTO-t- BCRA-F ~PWCM~
    +2
    I found it by accident, The way I do most really good things!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/07/29 17:55:05

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals