Quantcast

TRAIN WRECK OF THE WEEK > Is It OK to Handcuff a 7-Year-Old?

Travis J. Quibbert 2011/04/23 18:00:00
Related Topics: Police, School, Mom, New York
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Is it ever OK to handcuff a 7-year-old? That’s what New York City residents are asking after police were called to a primary school to handle a child’s temper tantrum.

Joseph Anderson, a Queens, N.Y., special needs student, became distraught when the Easter egg he was decorating in class turned out wrong. So distraught that the school called Joseph’s mom, Jessica, and told her he was misbehaving and she’d need to come get him. That was 12:30pm.

By 1:45 Jessica reached the school, but Joseph was gone: dragged away by the NYPD in handcuffs and taken to a local hospital. School officials claim they were unable to calm him and called the police when they were concerned that Joseph would harm himself or another child, but many are questioning what seems like an extreme response to an unruly grade schooler.

School chancellor Dennis Walcott vowed to look into the incident, but maintains that “there are occasions when [handcuffing] may need to be done.”

The NYPD also defends its action, saying Joseph was "acting in a threatening manner" and the handcuffs were needed to restrain him. The school has twice previously sent Joseph to the hospital after behavioral problems.

Jessica has pulled Joseph, who she says is traumatized from the incident, from the school and publicly called for the removal of the school’s principal, but Joseph would just like an apology.

"I want those cops to say sorry to me and the principal for calling the ambulance on me and handcuffing me," he told reporters.

Read More: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/04/21/201...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Elaine 2011/04/24 15:04:29
    Yes
    Elaine
    +13
    Ordinarily I would choose Other. We forget what schools are for and many public school children while they may not be beyond help certainly need way more than the schools should even be asked to provide.

    School is for teaching and quite frankly I'm tired of normal children who are capable of learning and who do pay attention having to deal with these kind of classmates. It's sad but children like this seven year old boy need help. Learning his ABCs and 123s is the least of his problems.

    Teachers cannot do it all no matter how good they are. Do you want your child's teacher spending time helping her class gain knowledge or do you want her spending most of their classroom time cow-tailing to the emotionally and mentally disturbed?

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • T. James H 2011/06/13 06:53:14
  • **Bessie** 2011/04/27 17:45:56
    Yes
    **Bessie**
  • Marshmellow 2011/04/27 02:47:42
    No
    Marshmellow
    why would you?? i mean in general, no. but if he committed this awful crime then maybe id have to reconsider... but a temper tantrum.. really needs handcuffs? I DONT THINK SO.
  • sick'n'tired 2011/04/27 01:03:00
    No
    sick'n'tired
    +1
    No, I don't but thanks to sorry parents and sleezy lawyers any disipline shown to the kid would have been a multi-million $$$ win for the sorry parents.
  • Deviant 2011/04/26 21:52:52
    Yes
    Deviant
    +1
    If it's for his own safety and that of others yes...otherwise NO
  • AndyWolf 2011/04/25 17:03:50
    Yes
    AndyWolf
    +1
    I remember a time when your parents could call the Police to put you in the back of the car and give you a stern talking to, in the name of teaching you a lesson.

    These Officers were called to handle the result of failed parenting, poor inter-school disciplinary action (or lack, thereof) and plain lack of common sense.

    How the hell do 45% of people disagree?
    poor inter-school disciplinary action plain common 45 people disagree implied facepalm
  • BrianD3 2011/04/25 16:46:46
    Yes
    BrianD3
    +1
    depending on how they act I believe it is appropriate to:

    1) handcuff them
    2) tase them
    3) beat them down with a night stick

    Kids have no respect these days, they seem to know ALL about their "rights" but know little about responsibility
  • Jammer 2011/04/25 14:00:25
    Yes
    Jammer
    +4
    In this case yes. Handcuffs are the most widely used form of restraint. And by law a teacher cannot strike or even hug a child. So scalping the authorities who have this right is understandable. It is sad it had to happen but it is better then someone else getting hurt because they can't by law touch a student. It may be different for a special needs school I'm not sure but if i were a teacher I would have done the same thing. Better to be safe then sorry.
  • David850 2011/04/25 13:50:33
    Yes
    David850
    +3
    If he was posing a danger to other students or himself, then yes.
  • Harry 2011/04/25 13:50:04
    Yes
    Harry
    +2
    If a child is completely out of control, what does his age have to do with anything?
  • EdWhiteSpace 2011/04/25 13:29:16
    Yes
    EdWhiteSpace
    +2
    Hopefully not often but you can't say it should never be done. If they cannot be talked to, have completely lost control and may hurt themselves or someone else, they have to be restrained. Maybe a gurney and straps would be better than cuffs, however.
  • Linda 2011/04/25 13:26:04
    Yes
    Linda
    +2
    Normally, I would say no that the teachers/admin should find a way to psychologically challenge this child to better behavior.

    HOWEVER, I read the child's comment, and my initial reaction says this child obviously has 1) never been made to pay for his mistakes, 2) doesn't understand HE is to blame for his behavior, and 3) it seems obvious the child has never been PROPERLY taught/disciplined at home.

    This child is 7 YO already with a "victim" mentality. Unless that behavior changes, he'll blame everyone for all of his problems all of his life, and that temper tantrum will only escalate into more violent behavior. Gotta look to the parent for that...maybe she's still a "victim" in her own mind, too...
  • American Nate 2011/04/25 12:58:48
    Yes
    American Nate
    +2
    It wasn't like they sent him to jail, I mean how else would you hold him down without hurting him? He just needs to learn how to calm himself down when something doesn't go your way and if he's mentally retarted then he needs to go to a special class or school.
  • SpyderX 2011/04/25 12:56:44
    Yes
    SpyderX
    +2
    The seven-year-olds of today are not the same as the seven-year-olds of fifty years ago. Today's seven-year-olds are capable of rape and murder and other heinous crimes, and society has a right to be protected from violence from people of ANY age.

    And having raised six kids of my own, I can assure you that if a seven-year-old doesn't want to be controlled, it is almost impossible to do so, so, yes, it may be appropriate to restrain him at times.
  • kate 2011/04/25 12:50:48
    No
    kate
    Handling children crudely and roughly is a common problem in public schools and it has a lot to do with public schools being underfunded and stretched to the max. Teachers and administrators are being asked to perform Herculean tasks of managing children from all types of backgrounds and keeping them engaged and educating them with little to nothing for resources from their supporting districts, the state or the feds.

    I think the way this child was handled was deplorable and I'm sure the child was traumatized by the incident. Even though what I said above stands, the fact is, that as long as we are willing to accept simplistic, cheap solutions to complex and difficult issues -- and degrade the importance of well funded educational institutions, we will have this and worse in the future.
  • FluffyCupcakespanker~PWCM~JLA 2011/04/25 12:45:37
    Yes
    FluffyCupcakespanker~PWCM~JLA
    +2
    In certain situations I can see it being necessary
  • buzzwald juneberry 2011/04/25 12:43:27
    No
    buzzwald juneberry
    Were they afraid he'd hurt them? What a bunch of douches. The funny thing is, if a parent locks a kid in his room to "restrain" him, it's child abuse,... cops do it, and it's the right thing to do.

    How is this different than a frustrated parent duct-taping their kid to a chair, or something similar?
  • earl 2011/04/25 12:27:46
    Yes
    earl
    +2
    stun gun him!
  • buzzwal... earl 2011/04/25 13:03:58
    buzzwald juneberry
    +1
    Lol, "release the hounds!"
  • Pedz 2011/04/25 11:22:18
    No
    Pedz
    seriously! it's a 7 year old and they claim they couldn't control him? a child with special needs should never be handcuffed, it would just make the situation worse! instead of actually being retard, the school should have contacted a proffessional in order to engage in the matter and sort things out calmly... not by mere amateurs. This poor child is being scarred by the school
  • Night71 Pedz 2011/04/25 11:51:51
    Night71
    Instead he manipulates the school. He's not really scared. Too many want to coddle him. He knows right from wrong at 7.
  • Pedz Night71 2011/04/25 13:40:45
    Pedz
    he knows right from wrong at the age of 7? wow, heartless much. are you aware that the child was one of special needs?? it was something, psychologically speaking, that maybe the child had no control over... police are there to prevent crime... if it's a child with special needs then you get help from people who know what they dealing with. P.S. manipulation involves influencing or controlling... was he controlling the school? was he influencing it due to an easter egg? you taking this matter out of proportion
  • The Mother ∞ God Loves You 2011/04/25 10:51:25
    No
    The Mother  ∞ God Loves You
    no, i don't think it is ok... i think it is wrong... i'd like to know what type of 'special need' does he have as well... the school my son goes to has special needs kids... they get along fine with the other children, and if a teacher needs to make some adjustments in her teaching then she/he does so.. they even teach the children to be mindful of the student...

    some people may have the view of "i don't want my 'normal' child around this 'stupid' one" ... and to me, that is complete disregard for anyone other than oneself/family... and not at all being kind to others (which is what Jesus told us to do, to love one another) .. which to me is bad bad bad! and if my child was a special needs child, i definitly would be in those type of peoples faces.. yup yup sure would
  • Andy_sixx_i_heart_u 2011/04/25 10:35:57
    Yes
    Andy_sixx_i_heart_u
    +1
    yes because...the law she come first! not the age
  • strawberry 2011/04/25 09:11:20
    Yes
    strawberry
    +2
    Too many kids in schools today are disrupting teachers and other students trying to learn. If they have such bad tantrums, so uncontrollable they don't belong in a regular school. Some are just undisciplined spoiled brats. I respect the NYPD they mean business, not like what goes on in CA schools. School officials did the right thing. If this boy was that out of control he could have caused harm to himself or other students.
  • Green 2011/04/25 09:09:51
    Yes
    Green
    +1
    I really wish there was an "other" option. I feel this is a little extreme, thus wonder what parts I'm not hearing.
  • BoJay 2011/04/25 09:06:57
    No
    BoJay
    +1
    There could have been other ways of handling this child without handcuffs. This child was a special needs student not a criminal.
  • strawberry BoJay 2011/04/25 09:17:09
    strawberry
    +2
    A boy like that does not belong in a regular school. We can't have such kids disrupting teachers and other students. If the boy needs special help he should be somewhere else. U.S. schools are going down hill. We have to cater to our intelligent children, not the undisciplined, or those with mental problems.
  • BoJay strawberry 2011/04/26 04:56:20
    BoJay
    I'm not arguing with you I agree, but why wasn't this kid in special ed?
  • ANGEL 2011/04/25 09:02:29
    No
    ANGEL
    but then your country REFUSED point blank to sign the International CHILDREN ACT which protects the rights of the child, what do you expect?

    america's children have no rights - how sad....
  • strawberry ANGEL 2011/04/25 09:19:11
    strawberry
    +2
    Excuse me, but by taking this boy away was protecting the rights of other children in the classroom. Kids like that don't belong in regular schools.
  • ANGEL strawberry 2011/04/25 09:22:34 (edited)
    ANGEL
    EXCUSE ME!!! And what about the rights of the child that was removed? or are you implying that if a child does something wrong; they lose all their rights?

    edit: at what age is child; legally or morally responsible for their own actions?
  • strawberry ANGEL 2011/04/25 10:12:32
    strawberry
    +3
    That child belongs in a school for children with special needs. You can't run a school for a few bad apples. You have to consider the rights of other students. That boy could have hurt someone.
  • ANGEL strawberry 2011/04/25 10:55:18 (edited)
    ANGEL
    In the UK we don't differenciate between children everyone has the same education special needs children do not go to special needs schools all children go to mainstream school (some extraordinary cases will go to private schools) we also employ 'special needs teachers' for those that require 1-1 tutoring, we here in the UK believe that everyone regardless of creed colour religion disabilities have the same rights as eac hother, we don't do UGENICS here....
  • strawberry ANGEL 2011/04/25 20:59:55
    strawberry
    Where were you born.?
  • ANGEL strawberry 2011/04/25 21:07:52
    ANGEL
    Born in Port Elizabeth South Africa
  • strawberry ANGEL 2011/04/25 21:23:56 (edited)
    strawberry
    I thought so. Why don't you even put if you are male or female on your profile.? You say nothing about yourself.
  • ANGEL strawberry 2011/04/25 21:25:14 (edited)
    ANGEL
    Thought so what? that I'm from white Dutch/German stock?
  • strawberry ANGEL 2011/04/25 21:07:56
    strawberry
    The United Kingdom also does not have the racial problems the United States has.
  • ANGEL strawberry 2011/04/25 21:10:34 (edited)
    ANGEL
    oh you have to be kidding... I live here I know very different, racism is rife in the UK the 1976 Race Relations Act didn't do much good, we still have serious racial problems for the size of the country... think again...

    Since the 1960’s to the present there’s been racial problems, white against black, black and white against mixed race, then came the Asians, black, white and mixed race against Asian then it got really complex, Britain moves into the EU Market and opened the floodgates to the Eastern European migrant worker and during the last 10 years religion has come into the equation, Bigoted Brits of all colours and creeds have taken to use religion as a vent for their cultural anger…. And you say the UK doesn’t have a problem?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 30 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/23 11:28:06

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals