Top Republican pours cold water on China yuan bill, Would this bill have helped the unemployed working class citizens?
A bill that would pressure China to let its currency rise in value ran into opposition on Tuesday from the top Republican in Congress, who called the proposal a "dangerous" overreach by lawmakers.
"I think it's pretty dangerous to be moving legislation through the United States Congress forcing someone to deal with the value of their currency," said U.S. House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner.
He was speaking a day after the Senate voted to open debate on a bill that calls for tariffs on exports from countries with deliberately undervalued currencies. Critics of the bill have said it would stoke trade tensions just as the world economy is facing a sharp slowdown in growth.
"While I've got concerns about how the Chinese have dealt with their currency, I'm not sure this is the way to fix it," Boehner said, calling the legislation "well beyond" what he saw as the proper scope of the Congress' work.
In a possible sign of misgivings about the legislation in the White House, a top U.S. official said the Obama administration has begun discussions with the Senate about whether the bill is "the right approach" to the long-running currency issue.
Acting Commerce Secretary Rebecca Blank told CNBC television the best solution to what American officials view as an undervalued Chinese currency remains "an open question," despite signs of bipartisan support for legislation that has raised angry warnings of a potential trade war from Beijing.
"The administration is talking with people in the Senate about whether this bill is the right approach or whether there are other approaches to take," she said. "Those conversations are under way."
Senators voted 79-19 on Monday to open a week of Senate debate on the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Reform Act of 2011, which would allow the government to slap countervailing duties on products from countries found to be subsidizing their exports by undervaluing their currencies.
The latest of almost annual attacks by the Congress on a core Chinese economic policy has drawn an angry response from Beijing. China's central bank and the ministries of commerce and foreign affairs accused Washington of "politicizing" currency issues and putting the global economy at risk of a trade war.
Despite Boehner's expressed doubts about the bill, backers of the legislation in the House said the measure now has 225 co-sponsors, including 61 Republicans.
Representative Sander Levin and other Democrats at a news conference urged House Republican leaders to drop their resistance to bringing up the bill, which is expected to face a Senate vote later in the week.
Many Democrats and some Republicans accuse Beijing of deliberately holding down the value of its yuan currency to give Chinese exporters an edge in global markets.
In an argument that has gained traction with unemployment stuck above 9 percent as 2012 elections draw near, supporters of the bill say that if the yuan was allowed to rise, Chinese imports would fall and U.S. exports would increase, cutting an annual trade gap of more than $250 billion and creating jobs for American workers.

















States.
If these fools exercise such half-witted options, then all the Chinese have to do is call in their loans. Then what? Good bye globalisation. There will be lots of little economic feudal states, instead. Then, inflation will shoot up faster than the next Chinese space launch.
1. deleveraging
2 deglobalization
3. liquidity crunch
= Great Depression.
We are deleveraging still, Ben is printing already too fast, so liquidity is treading water.
And someone wants to deglobalize the world in a trade war?
Now there is a recipe for disaster. YA, think they can wait until things are a tad better?
They do that to serve the Chinese market. If we didn't do it, other mfrs from other countries would get that business. Why does Japan have car plants here? Because the overheads of producing for the American market, on US soil are far lower than shipping cars here.
When demand increases in the US population, more jobs will be available for American workers.
Right now, everyone is saving their money because they're afraid their SS will be stolen away and have to plan for their retirement more than before. If we lose interest in a potentially huge green industry just because Solyndra failed, we'll see that industry grow abroad too.
Seville is BANKRUPT and it cost the Spanish tens of thousands of jobs...their workforce live in substandard housing and enjoy a substandard quality of life compared to the US...I know, I lived there. The Chinese have a slave labor establishment, so making the so called energy efficient NOT cost efficient panels give them a distinct advantage over the high cost UNION labor found in the US.
You really need to do your homework and stop drinking the Cool-Aid - it will eventually kill you...
For those of you who are not the brightest bulbs on the tree for whatever reason, a decent payback is 18-24 months...green energy is minimum 10-years go figure. When the cost comes down and the technology gets better than it is today, then we can make the investments.
By the way, some of you may know that a typical gasoline engine is 35% efficient - do you know what the solar power stats are??? Look at the number and that is the best money can buy out of Germany - NOT the US...