Quantcast

To the right winged homophobes... If a test could prove your baby will end up gay, would you start supporting abortion?

Kyra 2012/08/06 19:05:40
Related Topics: Abortion, Baby, Start, Gay, Test
Yes
No
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Diana dandies... 2012/08/07 01:50:18
    Diana
    I'm not familiar with that term.Please explain.
  • dandies... Diana 2012/08/07 01:55:16
    dandieselonian
    It means to paint a false picture .
  • Diana dandies... 2012/08/07 01:58:07
    Diana
    You never heard of cures?
  • dandies... Diana 2012/08/07 02:05:12
    dandieselonian
    yes that like tanning hides in taxidermy some people in my town did it with dead babies leather fetus
  • Diana dandies... 2012/08/07 02:11:47
    Diana
    I don't believe that.it would be against the law.
  • dandies... Diana 2012/08/07 02:18:44
    dandieselonian
    As long as everyone involved is a black christian it would be cool .
  • JackSchitt 2012/08/06 21:34:37
    No
    JackSchitt
    +3
    Sorry to disappoint you, but we're not the group who stones or hangs gays. In fact we don't want them dead at all.....before OR after birth.
  • gregaj7 2012/08/06 21:15:16
    No
    gregaj7
    +1
    IF a test was ever developed, it'd be as phony as the rest of the agenda.
  • Nam Era Vet #1 DNA TLC 2012/08/06 21:11:20
    No
    Nam Era Vet #1 DNA TLC
    +3
    All life is sacred.

    life sacred
  • Kiosk Kid 2012/08/06 21:06:32 (edited)
    No
    Kiosk Kid
    +2
    There is normally nothing wrong with gays. Most gays keep their love life in the bedroom. The problem is the extremist that flaunt their love life on the streets.

    The Chick-Fil-A protest was a dud because most gays aren't extremist.
  • scbluesman13 2012/08/06 20:56:44
    No
    scbluesman13
    +3
    Most republicans already secretly support abortion, they'd just never admit it to their rabidly nutty evangelical constituents.
  • Kerri 2012/08/06 20:51:45 (edited)
    No
    Kerri
    Many homosexuals were rooting for the humane genome project to turn up a gay gene....they didn't. I have always said be careful for what you wish ...thinking it would pretty much assure more abortions than ever....and fewer homosexuals.
  • Lerro DeHazel 2012/08/06 20:48:49
    No
    Lerro DeHazel
    Or would you vote for a Politician who was doing "something else" political, in yet, another political way? . . .
    "To the If a or would for a was in" . . . Would be stating MY ANSWER preceded by THE ORIGINAL QUESTION, with All Of The Political Ideology Removed.
  • Christopher Kirchen 2012/08/06 20:23:00
    No
    Christopher Kirchen
    There would still be adoption.
  • Iamfree 2012/08/06 20:19:00
    No
    Iamfree
    +3
    No, because unlike leftists, we believe EVERY human life (even those in the womb) has value.
  • Gabsters<3 Iamfree 2012/11/02 02:30:12
    Gabsters<3
    +2
    That's not true, I believe. Every human life has value too. But I feel that if the mother or baby could be killed during birth than they have the right for an abortion. It's the mothers body not mine and I have no right to tell her what to do with HER body.But To each his own, and I will not criticize your opinion. Have a nice night.
  • Striker 2012/08/06 20:04:30
    No
    Striker
    +2
    Pretty hard to fly with only one wing, whether right or left.
  • Bastion 2012/08/06 19:48:32
    No
    Bastion
    +1
    Never, ever abortion . . . but if they're BORN gay, stone 'em to death.
  • PBUTTERBOY77 2012/08/06 19:44:26
    No
    PBUTTERBOY77
    +14
    No. But if there is ever a test to cure STUPID I'll be sure to put your name in for the first test
  • Sport_G... PBUTTER... 2012/08/06 20:02:25
  • Nam Era... PBUTTER... 2012/08/06 21:08:17 (edited)
    Nam Era Vet #1 DNA TLC
    +1
    Okay I think I wet myself laughing. Great response!
  • PBUTTER... Nam Era... 2012/08/06 22:57:30
    PBUTTERBOY77
    +1
    THANK YOU
  • Vision ... PBUTTER... 2012/08/07 02:28:43
  • PBUTTER... Vision ... 2012/08/07 03:37:48
    PBUTTERBOY77
    Thank You very much
  • Kozmo PBUTTER... 2012/09/15 15:51:53 (edited)
    Kozmo
    Beware what you wish, for it may come true.

    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
    and I'm not sure about the former" - Albert Einstein

    BTW, many of Al's teachers thought he was retarded.
  • Cricket PBUTTER... 2012/09/15 17:05:10
    Cricket
    BRAVO!
  • Crypt_Heart 2012/08/06 19:43:30
    Yes
    Crypt_Heart
    +2
    I have to say that I would. (I already support pro-choice). If everyone was gay...we'd see a helluva lot smaller population. In fact, it'd be a dead end population >.>; It'd technically be more harmful to the human race than other mentally debilitating hereditary diseases.

    That said, it's your choice what you do in the bedroom, but I have a personal bias in seeing the human race being successful. (It's called, natural instinct). Be as gay as you want, just make sure you have kids too =P (And lets hope it isn't nature but is in fact nurture o.o)
  • rocat Crypt_H... 2012/08/07 05:12:01
    rocat
    +1
    you don't think 7 billion is plenty successful???
  • Crypt_H... rocat 2012/08/07 05:18:19
    Crypt_Heart
    +1
    We're not all gay are we? Last I checked gay people couldn't have kids naturally (without a third party).
  • rocat Crypt_H... 2012/08/07 05:21:48
    rocat
    a gay person only requires a second party-

    whassa matter...can't count???

    you neglected to answer the question-
  • Crypt_H... rocat 2012/08/07 05:34:08
    Crypt_Heart
    One gay person... for that matter, one straight person = no children.
    One gay couple = No children. One straight couple = children!
    One gay couple + someone of the opposite gender = children!

    1 + 1 + 1 = 3... and I can't count?

    Anyway.... 7 milliard is certainly a successful number of people. However if all of these people were exclusively gay... lets say our numbers would halve over the course of twenty years...and continue decreasing until straight people were born. (Gay people wouldn't ordinarily think of copulating with the other gender in order to procreate...it just wouldn't occur, there's no reason for it to do so. It is actually unnatural for gay people to consider a third party for this very reason, they 'should' according to what we know about animals and humans and sexual intercourse believe that their sexual desire will produce offspring...that's not actually possible).

    So I'll refer back to my point. I'm hoping it a) isn't genetic b) isn't hereditary... I don't give a damn whether it's curable or not. Technically the evidence points to both a) and b) due to the fact, we're here...
  • rocat Crypt_H... 2012/08/07 07:12:46
    rocat
    1 penis [loaded]
    +
    1 vagina[also loaded]
    =
    1 [or more] progeny

    sexuality irrelevant-
    no 3rd party required-

    note to chef...
    a turkey baster [loaded]...
    may be substituted for penis-

    are you under some delusion...
    that gay folks come in melded pairs...
    and must act in tandem???

    you ain't too bright...eh???
    [now that's hereditary]
    on top of being an asswipe-

    sucks to be you-
  • Crypt_H... rocat 2012/08/07 09:15:50
    Crypt_Heart
    -.-

    You missed the whole point. Being naturally gay from birth... and that being EVERYONE... the above solution just wouldn't 'occur'.

    Sexuality does matter. Sexuality is our instinct to procreate. If it's aimed at the wrong gender, something is wrong. If animals refused to procreate with the opposite gender and preferred to procreate with their own gender... they wouldn't think to use turkey basters and neither would we.

    As it is, most of the human race is thankfully straight, so it doesn't matter about those of us that aren't. After all, it's just natural selection and they can adopt anyway.
  • rocat Crypt_H... 2012/08/07 16:26:15
    rocat
    +1
    i am gay...

    was married long ago...
    and have two sons-
  • Crypt_H... rocat 2012/08/07 19:08:06
    Crypt_Heart
    Good for you. Now imagine you never had any interest in women whatsoever from day one. Imagine everyone else was the same.
  • rocat Crypt_H... 2012/08/07 20:09:00
    rocat
    +1
    i was interested in having kids...
    not in sex w/women-
  • Crypt_H... rocat 2012/08/07 22:02:20
    Crypt_Heart
    -.- disregarding science for the moment... how the hell do you expect to have kids otherwise with no interest in the opposite gender?
  • rocat Crypt_H... 2012/08/07 22:21:58
    rocat
    simple matter of mechanics-
    tab A ...slot B-

    i obviously managed-
  • Crypt_H... rocat 2012/08/07 22:24:03
    Crypt_Heart
    -.-

    Lets simplify things.

    You have a bunch of gay mice (possible)... what are the chances of offspring to the nearest percent.
  • rocat Crypt_H... 2012/08/07 22:31:15
    rocat
    mice perform on instinct alone...
    no planning...
    no grasp of mechanics...
    and no conscious desire for kids-
    just hormone reactions-

    and if sexuality is not hereditary...
    there could be no gay mice-

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 09:59:19

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals