To the right winged homophobes... If a test could prove your baby will end up gay, would you start supporting abortion?
Kyra
2012/08/06 19:05:40
Top Opinion
-
PBUTTERBOY77 2012/08/06 19:44:26No+14No. But if there is ever a test to cure STUPID I'll be sure to put your name in for the first test






















The Chick-Fil-A protest was a dud because most gays aren't extremist.
"To the If a or would for a was in" . . . Would be stating MY ANSWER preceded by THE ORIGINAL QUESTION, with All Of The Political Ideology Removed.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former" - Albert Einstein
BTW, many of Al's teachers thought he was retarded.
That said, it's your choice what you do in the bedroom, but I have a personal bias in seeing the human race being successful. (It's called, natural instinct). Be as gay as you want, just make sure you have kids too =P (And lets hope it isn't nature but is in fact nurture o.o)
whassa matter...can't count???
you neglected to answer the question-
One gay couple = No children. One straight couple = children!
One gay couple + someone of the opposite gender = children!
1 + 1 + 1 = 3... and I can't count?
Anyway.... 7 milliard is certainly a successful number of people. However if all of these people were exclusively gay... lets say our numbers would halve over the course of twenty years...and continue decreasing until straight people were born. (Gay people wouldn't ordinarily think of copulating with the other gender in order to procreate...it just wouldn't occur, there's no reason for it to do so. It is actually unnatural for gay people to consider a third party for this very reason, they 'should' according to what we know about animals and humans and sexual intercourse believe that their sexual desire will produce offspring...that's not actually possible).
So I'll refer back to my point. I'm hoping it a) isn't genetic b) isn't hereditary... I don't give a damn whether it's curable or not. Technically the evidence points to both a) and b) due to the fact, we're here...
+
1 vagina[also loaded]
=
1 [or more] progeny
sexuality irrelevant-
no 3rd party required-
note to chef...
a turkey baster [loaded]...
may be substituted for penis-
are you under some delusion...
that gay folks come in melded pairs...
and must act in tandem???
you ain't too bright...eh???
[now that's hereditary]
on top of being an asswipe-
sucks to be you-
You missed the whole point. Being naturally gay from birth... and that being EVERYONE... the above solution just wouldn't 'occur'.
Sexuality does matter. Sexuality is our instinct to procreate. If it's aimed at the wrong gender, something is wrong. If animals refused to procreate with the opposite gender and preferred to procreate with their own gender... they wouldn't think to use turkey basters and neither would we.
As it is, most of the human race is thankfully straight, so it doesn't matter about those of us that aren't. After all, it's just natural selection and they can adopt anyway.
was married long ago...
and have two sons-
not in sex w/women-
tab A ...slot B-
i obviously managed-
Lets simplify things.
You have a bunch of gay mice (possible)... what are the chances of offspring to the nearest percent.
no planning...
no grasp of mechanics...
and no conscious desire for kids-
just hormone reactions-
and if sexuality is not hereditary...
there could be no gay mice-