Submit News News

Thousands rally in support of gay marriage ban

- Thousands of supporters of California's ban on same-sex marriage rallied in Fresno and San Diego on Sunday in what organizers described as a celebration of traditional wedlock and a thank-you to the California Supreme Court for upholding their voter-approved measure.

In Fresno, about 3,000 demonstrators -- the same number who turned out the day before on the other side -- were told not to accept being called bigots because they support traditional marriage.
... Read full article »
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Related Discussions
Top Comment
  • +13 raves Art June 02, 2009 17:55:00
    Art
    Democracy and free speech work both ways...good to see conservatives are shedding their anti-activist habits.
    View thread
Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Comments
  • Britt: ... cali June 05, 2009 14:51:41
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    LOL! I frequently vote against my own rights... That is ridiculous. But whatever floats their boats! You called me confused because I am attracted to both men and women and suggested that "confusion" applies to all life situations. Like I don't have the right to claim that straight people know nothing about being in a gay relationship because I don't know what I like and that renders me partially retarded or something...

    life situations claim straight people gay relationship renders partially retarded
  • cali Britt: ... June 05, 2009 18:50:19
    cali
    Was not trying to be insulting.....enough said.....goodbye
  • +2 raves
    Peaches Britt: ... June 02, 2009 22:40:02
    Peaches
    Do you actually eat with that potty-mouth of yours?
  • Britt: ... Peaches June 03, 2009 16:20:43
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    Obviously.
  • +4 raves
    NotWith... Britt: ... June 02, 2009 20:02:30
    NotWithoutAFight
    Go ahead and puke.

    Why do you have such trouble with an opinion that doesn't coincide with yours? Are you that thin skinned? You certainly have the right to rally. Why don't you get off your ass and rally for it then instead of bitching when others do?

    Seems all these people want is for 'marriage' to be defined as it always has. A union of a man and a woman. Something sacred for the traditional family.

    It's at the State level - where it should reside. The state decided.
  • Britt: ... NotWith... June 02, 2009 20:19:54
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    It's not your place (or mine for that matter) to decide who gets what rights. It has nothing to do with the thickness of my skin! I do protest and rally at every single local event and have been to a few hours away. Nice try. Cute how you assume that I don't though! It's not just about defining a union with a word, it's also about the rights that are attached to that word. It's not fair to ignore love because of gender. It's real and it has been happening since the begining of time. It won't go away because you close your eyes.
  • +4 raves
    NotWith... Britt: ... June 02, 2009 20:46:03
    NotWithoutAFight
    The state voted.
    Why does that bother you so much? It was at the level of government it should be at. I don't care who loves whom. Is it that much of a stretch to allow a State the right to hold an election and uphold it?

    It is exactly yours and mine - the right to decide in the state where you reside to vote for or against it. But you can't seem to take it as it is. Why shouldn't marriage be defined as a union between a man and a woman? What is wrong with civil unions? Same rights. Just a name change.
  • Britt: ... NotWith... June 02, 2009 20:52:28 (edited)
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    My point is that NO ONE should have their relationship up for vote if it's consentual and harmless. It's mob-rule, not democracy. And I never said that I had a problem with a civil union. Call it whatever the hell you want to call it if the rights are still the same!
  • +2 raves
    Whitese... Britt: ... June 02, 2009 20:39:10
    Whitese7en
    Sorry, but those who defy God's Word will be the ones going to Hell, not the ones who defend His Word.
  • -1 raves
    Britt: ... Whitese... June 02, 2009 20:49:14
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    So according to what you are saying we are all going to hell? We all defy God's word, not just homosexuals. What makes you any better? Or those people celebrating that the rights of others are being restricted, how are their sins better than homosexuality? It's hypocritical. It's not your place or anyone elses to decide what sins are okay to commit and what are reprehensible.
  • +4 raves
    Frank Britt: ... June 02, 2009 21:22:59
    Frank
    You're right, it's not our place to judge. But it is everyones right to vote, and voting like it or not is what makes this a free democracy. Majority rules and always has, so if the majority votes against then it should be accepted. I didn't like Obama being elected but the majority voted for him so I accepted it. Because we have a democracy in this Country Gays have a right to march and protest, and in time maybe it will come up for a vote again and this time it will pass. But, those against have the same right to protest, that's what a democracy is all about. Personally I'm indifferent about it either way.
  • -1 raves
    Britt: ... Frank June 02, 2009 21:35:37 (edited)
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    I just don't see why the morality police get to vote on other people's rights that are not harming them what-so-ever. No one took a vote on straight people's right to marry.
  • Whitese... Britt: ... June 02, 2009 21:25:48
    Whitese7en
    No, that's not what I'm saying at all.

    I'm not going to Hell and I know many more who aren't going to Hell either. We don't all defy God's Word. I don't defy God's Word and as I just stated, I know many more who also don't defy His Word. We uphold His Word, which is why we fight so hard to keep marriage defined as being between one man and one woman. God made no provision for same sex marriage period. As such, it is a perversion of God's plan for marriage and sex.

    Nothing makes me better because I'm not better but, I am forgiven.

    We're not celebrating the restriction of anyone's rights, we're celebrating the spiritual victory that God's Word is being upheld and His institution of marriage is being preserved and protected.

    No sin is "okay" to commit and ALL of it is "reprehensible". In fact, that is why Jesus went to the cross, to provide us a way, even in our sinful state, to be forgiven and go to Heaven.

    The gift of salvation is available to anyone who wishes to receive it.
  • -1 raves
    Britt: ... Whitese... June 02, 2009 21:47:21 (edited)
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    Our laws aren't based on religion. I don't impose my beliefs on the rights of others and I don't think anyone else should either. This is America and we are all suposed to be able to live freely regardless of our beliefs. If we can't then we are no more free than those countries oppressed by their faith. I get that it was voted on, but it was more of a mob-rule than an honest vote. Gay supporters are the minority.... of course they can't out-vote hypocrits.
  • +3 raves
    Whitese... Britt: ... June 02, 2009 23:08:31
    Whitese7en
    No one is wanting to outlaw homosexuality. I couldn't give a rip what people do in the privacy of their own homes. So, this whole notion that people are attempting to impose their beliefs on other people, is CRAP. All we are desirous of, is keeping marriage as it has always been since the foundations of this country were established.

    What is the purpose of voting, if its not about a majority ruling?

    LOL!! You only say it wasn't an "honest vote", because it didn't go your way. Isn't that the truth?

    Why are people "hypocrits" in your estimation for merely believing the way they do? The only way I would be a hypocrite in this situation, is if I was secretly married to someone of the same sex.

    Do you even know what the word "hypocrite" means?

    Btw, the vote wasn't about straights vs gays. It was about people who see nothing wrong with same sex marriage and wish to legalize it and those that do see it as wrong and want to keep it from being legalized. So, it's not that that the poor, oppressed gays were outvoted, it's that those who see nothing wrong with same sex marriage and wish to legalize it were outvoted.
  • Britt: ... Whitese... June 03, 2009 16:46:09 (edited)
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    I don't think that marriage is something that should be voted on in the first place. It's not an honest vote because no one voted on straight people's right to be married, nor do I think we should have. When two consenting adults are in love and intend to give over certain aspects of their lives and pledge their commitment legally they should be able to.

    I never said that anyone was a hypocrit for their belief that gay marriage shouldn't be legal. They are hypocrits because they gladly enjoy their legal sins on a daily basis and don't bring those to a vote because it would inconvenience their lifestyle. The only reason they vote against this particular sin being legal is because it doesn't pertain to them! It's hypocritical for someone to sin and think it's okay for them to do so but then want to OUTLAW a sin that is easy for them to resist.

    I never said that it was straights vs. gays. Nor did I say poor oppressed gays. Way to pull that outta left field! I never once implied that. I said that gay people are a minority. True statement.

    *And who ever keeps DRing me, get a life. I'm not voilating TOS.*
  • Whitese... Britt: ... June 05, 2009 02:19:18
    Whitese7en
    Well, whether you think it should or shouldn't be voted on, is completely irrelevant. Because, in accordance with California Law, "voter initiative", is one of the processes which must be followed to amend to the state Constitution in California.

    The reason no one has ever needed to vote on straight people being married, is because generally speaking, it has been around since the beginning of time and no one has objected to it.

    "I never said that anyone was a hypocrit for their belief that gay marriage shouldn't be legal."

    You most certainly did, when you said this "Gay supporters are the minority.... of course they can't out-vote hypocrits". The inference, is that anyone who voted in favor of Prop 8, is a hypocrite.

    Btw, their sins are irrelevant to how they voted. They would only be hypocrites as I pointed out previously, if they were secretly married to some one of the same sex and then voted in favor of Prop 8. That, would be hypocritical. The reason they vote against this sin being legalized, is because they are against same sex marriage period.

    We all sin from time to time as we are an imperfect and fallen race. However, just because we aren't sinless, it doesn't mean that we think it's ok. Nor, does it mean that anyone who votes against same sex marriage is hypocritical jus...

    Well, whether you think it should or shouldn't be voted on, is completely irrelevant. Because, in accordance with California Law, "voter initiative", is one of the processes which must be followed to amend to the state Constitution in California.

    The reason no one has ever needed to vote on straight people being married, is because generally speaking, it has been around since the beginning of time and no one has objected to it.

    "I never said that anyone was a hypocrit for their belief that gay marriage shouldn't be legal."

    You most certainly did, when you said this "Gay supporters are the minority.... of course they can't out-vote hypocrits". The inference, is that anyone who voted in favor of Prop 8, is a hypocrite.

    Btw, their sins are irrelevant to how they voted. They would only be hypocrites as I pointed out previously, if they were secretly married to some one of the same sex and then voted in favor of Prop 8. That, would be hypocritical. The reason they vote against this sin being legalized, is because they are against same sex marriage period.

    We all sin from time to time as we are an imperfect and fallen race. However, just because we aren't sinless, it doesn't mean that we think it's ok. Nor, does it mean that anyone who votes against same sex marriage is hypocritical just because they aren't sinless. Sin, in the life of a believer, is never ok and must always be dealt with swiftly.

    You made a comment about straights versus gays. I did not pull that out of the air. But, since then, you have edited your response so I can't prove what was said. I will definitely not make that mistake with you again.
    (more)
  • Britt: ... Whitese... June 05, 2009 15:14:26 (edited)
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    To me, if you think it's okay to legally enjoy your sins and then vote against something else BECAUSE it's a sin it's hypocritical, which is most people's "reasoning" behind voting no.

    In my eyes it's not fair to allow or deny rights to people based on religious beliefs here in America. I'm not a polygamist, but I haven't seen any reason to deny them the right to marry either. (Of course I don't agree with them marrying 14 year olds, but rather consenting adults that love each other.) Point being, I'm not just for gay marriage because I'm bi and it may be an advantage to me one day. It's about this being a free country. Imagine if it were your rights at stake. What if one day you become the minority and we started voting on things that would obstruct YOUR pursuit of happiness? Would you feel differently if it were a law enforcing a Muslim tadition or taking away a Christian right? I think that if marriage is a legal union it shouldn't be religion based and vice versa for the protection of not just the rights of others, but my own as well. It's not so much about the hypocrisy as it is me putting the shoe on the other foot.

    I'm not trying to argue and I really DO respect and appreciate the fact that we have the right to decide for ourselves. I just wish that people would stop...
    To me, if you think it's okay to legally enjoy your sins and then vote against something else BECAUSE it's a sin it's hypocritical, which is most people's "reasoning" behind voting no.

    In my eyes it's not fair to allow or deny rights to people based on religious beliefs here in America. I'm not a polygamist, but I haven't seen any reason to deny them the right to marry either. (Of course I don't agree with them marrying 14 year olds, but rather consenting adults that love each other.) Point being, I'm not just for gay marriage because I'm bi and it may be an advantage to me one day. It's about this being a free country. Imagine if it were your rights at stake. What if one day you become the minority and we started voting on things that would obstruct YOUR pursuit of happiness? Would you feel differently if it were a law enforcing a Muslim tadition or taking away a Christian right? I think that if marriage is a legal union it shouldn't be religion based and vice versa for the protection of not just the rights of others, but my own as well. It's not so much about the hypocrisy as it is me putting the shoe on the other foot.

    I'm not trying to argue and I really DO respect and appreciate the fact that we have the right to decide for ourselves. I just wish that people would stop looking out for their own interest and think of the big picture. I just want to make my case and hope that people can understand why I feel the way I do.
    (more)
  • Whitese... Britt: ... June 05, 2009 15:52:06
    Whitese7en
    For the most part, Christians don't enjoy their sins. Sins are not something to be enjoyed. They are something to be avoided at all costs. But, as humans, we still sin from time to time but, that doesn't necessarily mean we enjoy sinning.

    Again, no one cares or is attempting to oullaw homosexuality, bisexuality transgender etc... All we desire, is for marriage to be defined as being between one man and one woman, as it always has been. In other words, it is still a free country. Yes, I would be upset if our government all of sudden instituted Sharia Law(which btw, may not be too far off) taking away my right to worship whomever I please, I would be very upset. However, that is because a right which I previously had, has now been stripped from me, so, I would be furious. But, the difference between that scenario and keeping marriage defined as it always has been defined, is that gays NEVER had the right to marry. Ergo, they are not having a right stripped away from them, as they have never been granted that right in the first place.

    I understand why you feel the way you do, because you see nothing wrong with homosexuality. Based on that fact alone, I can fully understand your position but, I still respectfully have to disagree.
  • Britt: ... Whitese... June 05, 2009 16:39:08
    Britt: In Pixie Dust We Trust
    "Christians" would crap if sex before marriage were illegal, or if divorce procedings were done in accordance with the Bible. The fact that they have never had it doesn't mean that it is okay to continue denying them the right to be legally recognized as a couple. Ignoring homosexuality won't make it go away. Pretending that there aren't legitimate gay couples isn't going to do the trick either. It has little to nothing to do with me agreeing homosexuality, like I said before- I don't agree with nor do I practice poligamy but I would include them in the right to practice their faith without interference from the law. I think it's wrong and I don't share their belief that a bigger family will benifit them in heaven, but I support their rights.
or
Cancel