They say man was made in god's image, does that mean he resembles the first humans such as the "homo erectus" ?? and not the modern evolved humans that are present today

by oh my science Posted 2009/10/22 22:51:32

Read More

Read all 164 opinions

lol the christian god is ugly

+21

Rusty Shackelford 2009/10/23 15:06:26

+8
Technically, wouldn't that make God a heterotrophic anaerobe?

Behold, the great I-AM!
>> See Replies

More polls by oh my science

Gothamjedi311 \m/ 2010/03/29 00:10:47

$Gothamjedi311 \m/$

+2
...that was us at the beginning of being shaped and molded...we're still not done yet.

reply
Kirby 2010/03/27 17:09:16

+3
You said homo. And then you said erectus....sorry....Beavis and Butt Head flashbacks there.

reply
Manuel 2010/03/25 10:29:18 (edited)

LOLROF.....O GOD

reply
Mckeags 2010/03/24 23:39:53

+1
lmao nice theory

reply
GOD 2010/03/24 18:37:57

+3
God was made in mans image to give a face for the weak minded to fear

reply
Crazy Bill 2010/03/24 18:06:25

+2
Home Erectus is probably the closest. Take it a bit further, and was God black or white?

reply
wombat 2010/03/24 16:24:47

+3
You are right about that. The last real "created" Christian died about 10.000 years ago.
All the other organic and inorganic things are evolutionarily developed.

reply
pH@3T ~ Fingon Celebrindal ... 2010/03/24 16:18:55

+5

reply
ThEtern... to pH@3T ~... 2010/03/29 00:11:24

+1
brilliant

reply
gfreeman BN-0 2010/03/24 13:32:45

+2
It would explain a lot. Smaller brain and all.

reply
lurx: the soda jerk 2010/03/24 13:20:35 (edited)

+2

...makes sense to me.

reply
iralarry 2010/03/24 03:08:27

+1
What I am gathering from your question is am ambiguity between evolution and creation. If you believe in evolution then you statement negates God's hand in it but if you believe in creation or intelligent design, then who we are now is what God's image is. Do not believe you can have both.

reply
Caroline - fan of Audubon 2010/03/24 03:05:34

+1
It's not the physical image that man was made after the likeness of God. Man was created as a reflection of Gods qualities of love and justice, which the lower animals do not possess.

reply
Kev316 2010/03/24 02:59:21

+1
Depends which of the two creation stories in Genesis that one believes. The story in chapter one or the story in chapter two.

It also depends on whether folks have noticed the words "be fruitful and multiply and REplenish the Earth." One cannot replenish something that was not plentiful prior.

reply
Kino 2010/03/24 02:43:53

+2
hah...you said "erectus".

Still, it makes as much sense as images of 6' tall white dude with a beard. I imagine he was something of an anomaly in Israel at the time.

reply
moomoof 2010/03/24 02:06:21

+3
hmm yes

reply
LinkX 2010/03/24 02:02:54

+4

Fred Flintstones is GOD!

Why do you think Wilma Flintstones yells "OH GOD" when Fred screws her?

reply
Algor. Mortis. - ҎԊǢɬ Physi... 2010/03/24 01:59:22

+5
Yes.

reply
Happy Face 2010/03/24 01:36:38

+5
That is a super interesting question.. =) I would have to think so if they were the first men on the planet.

reply
Gothamj... to Happy Face 2010/03/29 00:19:51

$Gothamjedi311 \m/$

...allow me the theorize for you.

Now let's say that our very own creation took thousands of years, as did all the other creations. I'm sure at some metaphysical chapter we did in fact look like an unfinished Blob, to a primate to what we are now. A True Artist takes his time to create a masterpiece.

reply
oh my s... to Gothamj... 2010/03/29 00:32:00

+1
i cannot take this comment seriously, i am assuming you are a believer of the christian god yeah? if so then by what you are saying you are merely implying that he is not all powerful

reply
Gothamj... to oh my s... 2010/03/29 00:40:20 (edited)

$Gothamjedi311 \m/$

All Powerful does not imply instantaneousness...Lol. My GOD is not from the "Q continuum"

reply
Happy Face to Gothamj... 2010/03/29 02:59:09

+1
I agree. At one point we may have looked like a blob.

reply
Lindasmind 2010/03/24 01:32:48

+3
They mean "We have no frocking clue so we gonna make up this crap cause we gotta say something."

reply
Philo-Publius 2010/03/24 01:30:41
Disko P... to Philo-P... 2010/03/24 01:32:38

+10
These are a pair of twins that lived in my neighborhood when I was in kindergarten.

reply
Philo-P... to Disko P... 2010/03/24 01:36:30

+8
Clearly the 'human'-looking child was an evolutionary throwback, a fortunate (or maybe unfortunate) recombination of recessive genes. I'm presuming the mother and father were apes?

reply
Disko P... to Philo-P... 2010/03/24 01:48:41

+8
Their parents were Nikifor and Helena Blavatsky.

reply
Philo-P... to Disko P... 2010/03/24 02:11:48

+6
Well, that explains her theory then. It wasn't a theory, she had firsthand knowledge. : )

reply
Queen B to Disko P... 2010/03/24 01:37:48

+7
Daddy was gettin' busy with a little hot monkey girl action....

reply
Dave In Cali 2010/03/24 01:20:31

+7
But him strong! Him make WHEEL!

reply
Oleander 2010/03/24 01:18:06

+3
"God's image" HA that would mean there would actually have to be one.

reply
Daniel 2010/02/27 18:45:32 (edited)

+1
I don't believe in evolution, but I will state that God is not flesh so it's not our physical appearance that's God's image. It's our spiritual body.

reply
Mejink 2009/11/02 16:33:15

+4
Hahahahah God is a caveman!

reply
oh my s... to Mejink 2009/11/02 23:47:12

+3
lol yep

reply
Time Remains 2009/10/28 19:36:45

+1
Have ye proof that man did in fact evolve? And i mean, actual solid proof that has not been blasted to umpteen pieces already.

reply
oh my s... to Time Re... 2009/10/28 21:44:29

+4
for the life of me i can't take your comment seriously

reply
Time Re... to oh my s... 2009/10/28 21:49:26

+1
And how so sir, they have yet to find good solid proof of the "missing links" that are requisite for evolution to be true.

reply
oh my s... to Time Re... 2009/10/28 21:59:13

+3
there is alot more proof to say that humans evolved as opposed to what christianity has lol, it's funny, because you talk about human evolution not having proof yet their is so very much like fossils,tools,living places etc and all you have for proof is a highly modified book from a few thousand years ago....im assuming you are in fact a christian and or a believer in some god

reply
Time Re... to oh my s... 2009/10/29 20:53:43

+1
How are fossils proof that we evolved. There have been found only remants of specific kinds of animals. No half-man/ half monkey has been found. As for the comment about tools, living places ect....what just proves that we have advanced technologically. The only proof that evolutionists have is a belief that everything evolved from something that they have no proof ever existed.

reply