No surprises here. Most of knew this was a fake long ago, and now that there is irrefutable proof, we have reached the end. NOTHING more will be done about it. Obama will not resign. Congress won't prosecute or impeach him. No D.A. is going to indict him. And if he decides to stay in the WH a few more years, he will get no authoratative reprisal.
Our nation has ceased to be a nation of laws except those that regulate us peons.
THEY FOUND HER. The Mysterious Registrar "U.K.E. Lee" Who Allegedly Signed Obama's Birth Certificate.
Yo'Adrienne..AFCL
2012/07/29 18:37:25
And Guess What She Had To Say?
Make no mistake, Obama's birth certificate is about as phony as a three dollar bill. Zullo went on to say:"The only legal authority which could have made the document [the Hawaii Department of Health], did not make it.”
According to a report filed by WND.com, after the press conference that was called on July 17 to present the new and shocking evidence:"Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo said the new information confirms the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent."
And just what was the incontrovertible proof?
It was actually staring us in the face the whole time.
When Barack Obama released his "digitally-altered" birth certificate back in April of 2011, people askedwhy did numbers, which appear to have been written in pencil (see the screen shot below), appear throughout the document, and what did these numbers signify?
Even Zullo admitted: "Nobody really knew what they were."
But now, we finally have answers.
The Cold Case Posse located and interviewed a number of individuals who had specific and firsthand knowledge of procedures in the Hawaii Department of Health;including Verna Lee, a.k.a., the mysteriousU.K.E. Lee, now 95 years old, the Registrar whose signature is reproduced on the so-called birth certificate that Obama released to the public over a year ago.
And all parties independently verified that the number "9" that appears in pencil in field 9,(see the screen shot), indicates thatthe information that should go in that field was UNKNOWN(keep reading and we'll explain why in just a bit).
Put another way, if the image above were a copy of an original birth certificate, that field would be BLANK and, quite obviously, IT IS NOT.
The fact that ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER now appears in field"9" (if anything would have gone in that field, it would have been the word "unknown") in the birth certificate indicates thatthe information was added later on and the document Obama presented to the public IS NOT A COPY of an original birth certificate.
This newest revelation, of course, is totally consistent with the Cold Case Posse's original finding, after subjecting the birth certificate to forensic examination, in March that the document Obama actually produced was not only"digitally doctored," but was also compiled using"two or three" different source documents.
Game over. As Zullo so plainly put it: “This proves the document has been tampered with and information has been placed on it.”
Make no mistake, Obama's birth certificate is about as phony as a three dollar bill. Zullo went on to say:"The only legal authority which could have made the document [the Hawaii Department of Health], did not make it.”
According to a report filed by WND.com, after the press conference that was called on July 17 to present the new and shocking evidence:"Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo said the new information confirms the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent."
And just what was the incontrovertible proof?
It was actually staring us in the face the whole time.
When Barack Obama released his "digitally-altered" birth certificate back in April of 2011, people askedwhy did numbers, which appear to have been written in pencil (see the screen shot below), appear throughout the document, and what did these numbers signify?
Even Zullo admitted: "Nobody really knew what they were."But now, we finally have answers.
The Cold Case Posse located and interviewed a number of individuals who had specific and firsthand knowledge of procedures in the Hawaii Department of Health;including Verna Lee, a.k.a., the mysteriousU.K.E. Lee, now 95 years old, the Registrar whose signature is reproduced on the so-called birth certificate that Obama released to the public over a year ago.
And all parties independently verified that the number "9" that appears in pencil in field 9,(see the screen shot), indicates thatthe information that should go in that field was UNKNOWN(keep reading and we'll explain why in just a bit).
Put another way, if the image above were a copy of an original birth certificate, that field would be BLANK and, quite obviously, IT IS NOT.
The fact that ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER now appears in field"9" (if anything would have gone in that field, it would have been the word "unknown") in the birth certificate indicates thatthe information was added later on and the document Obama presented to the public IS NOT A COPY of an original birth certificate.
This newest revelation, of course, is totally consistent with the Cold Case Posse's original finding, after subjecting the birth certificate to forensic examination, in March that the document Obama actually produced was not only"digitally doctored," but was also compiled using"two or three" different source documents.
Game over. As Zullo so plainly put it: “This proves the document has been tampered with and information has been placed on it.”
Top Opinion
-
Tasine 2012/07/29 18:48:37
Now, if we remove all the items with the number 9 next to them. (His father appears not to have been at the birth. ).... you're prepared to accept that it is a valid birth certificate?
The Birth Certificate was signed... IN THE US. It makes him a US Citizen. Information added later as it is found out is not actually that unusual. The truth is always the truth, it doesn't matter when the truth is discovered, the reality is, is that 'Truth' does not change. Just as 1 does not suddenly become 0.
I HAVE HAD MAJOR CASES IN FRONT OF GOVERNMENT OFFICES AND EVEN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, AND TO MY AMAZEMENT, THEY CAN AND DO PICK AND CHOOSE TO ALLOW PROOF OR NOT ALLOW PROOF. I HAVE PERSONALLY SEEN DOCUMENTS FROM OTHER FEDERAL CASES AND SWORN TESTIMONY IN THOSE COURT RECORDS BE EXCLUDED FROM A GOVERNMENT CASE THAT WOULD HAVE PROVEN THE PERSON INNOCENT AND THAT THE GOVERNMENT MADE UP FALSE STATEMENTS, EXPERTS AND EVEN EVIDENCE. I WATCHED THE FEDERAL JUDGE ACCEPT THESE FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE AND THE REAL DOCUMENTS, FROM ANOTHER FEDERAL TESTIMONY AND TRIAL EVIDENCE NOT ALLOWABLE AND THEREFORE REFUSED TO ALLOW THE REAL VERIFIED PROOF INTO EVIDENCE! EVEN THE LAWYERS IN COURT COMPLAINED TO THE JUDGE AND THE JUDGE TOLD THEM IT WAS HIS COURT AND HE COULD DO WHAT HE WANTED.
THERE WAS NO APPEAL PROCESS AVAILABLE BECAUSE IT WAS A TRIAL BY JUDGE AND NOT BY JURY. SO THE POOR MAN LOST AND THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WON WITH FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS THAT THE JUSTICE DEPT MADE UP ON PHOT...
I HAVE HAD MAJOR CASES IN FRONT OF GOVERNMENT OFFICES AND EVEN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, AND TO MY AMAZEMENT, THEY CAN AND DO PICK AND CHOOSE TO ALLOW PROOF OR NOT ALLOW PROOF. I HAVE PERSONALLY SEEN DOCUMENTS FROM OTHER FEDERAL CASES AND SWORN TESTIMONY IN THOSE COURT RECORDS BE EXCLUDED FROM A GOVERNMENT CASE THAT WOULD HAVE PROVEN THE PERSON INNOCENT AND THAT THE GOVERNMENT MADE UP FALSE STATEMENTS, EXPERTS AND EVEN EVIDENCE. I WATCHED THE FEDERAL JUDGE ACCEPT THESE FALSIFIED DOCUMENTS BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE AND THE REAL DOCUMENTS, FROM ANOTHER FEDERAL TESTIMONY AND TRIAL EVIDENCE NOT ALLOWABLE AND THEREFORE REFUSED TO ALLOW THE REAL VERIFIED PROOF INTO EVIDENCE! EVEN THE LAWYERS IN COURT COMPLAINED TO THE JUDGE AND THE JUDGE TOLD THEM IT WAS HIS COURT AND HE COULD DO WHAT HE WANTED.
THERE WAS NO APPEAL PROCESS AVAILABLE BECAUSE IT WAS A TRIAL BY JUDGE AND NOT BY JURY. SO THE POOR MAN LOST AND THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WON WITH FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS THAT THE JUSTICE DEPT MADE UP ON PHOTO SHOP.
HELL THEY (FEDS) EVEN ADMITTED THAT THEY ENHANCE THE PHOTOS OF THE DOCUMENTS. WHEN IN FACT THE DEFENDANT HAD THE ORIGINAL AND NOT SCANNED COPIES LIKE THE FEDS/PROSECUTORS DID.
BTW, THE SCANNED COPY WAS TAKEN FROM THE ORIGINAL THAT WAS FORCED TO BE PRODUCED DURING DISCOVERY AND THEN THE FEDS TOOK THE SCANNED COPY AND CHANGED / FORGED ITS DATES AND INVOICE NUMBERS. BUT COULD NOT PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL WAS THE ONE FORCED TO BE GIVEN TO THEM IN DISCOVERY AND WAS IN THE POSSESSION OF THE DEFENDANT. THE FEDERAL JUDGE WOULD NOT EVEN LOOK AT THE ORIGINAL OR ACCEPT IT AS EVIDENCE. THIS WAY HE COULD ALLOW THE FORGED COPY TO BE USED AS EVIDENCE BY THE GOVERNMENT! SO WHERE IS THE TRUTH AND JUSTICE IN THIS CASE?
THE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEFENDANT STOOD THERE AND VIDEO TAPED THE SCANNING OF THE DOCUMENTS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE ORIGINALS WERE RETURNED TO THE DEFENDANT. HE NEVER COUNTED ON THE FEDS SO CALLED ENHANCING THE PHOTO SHOPPED COPIES TO CHANGE THE DATES AND INVOICE NUMBERS.
THE JUDGE REFUSED THE ORIGINAL AND ALLOWED THE PHOTO SHOPPED COPY SO THE GOVERNMENT COULD WIN THE CASE. !!
SO WHERE IS THIS GOING! YES THE BC WAS FAKED AND YES THE DNC LIED AND COMMITTED TREASONOUS ACTIONS. BUT WHO THE HELL IS GOING TO STOP THEM ! THEY DO WHAT THEY WANT! FACTS !
storm troopers that all the local police departments are being turned into. DID YOU KNOW THAT ALL LOCAL POLICE DEPTS ARE UNDER UN CONTROL NOW!
Also why bother to investigate if nothing can be done about it.
Oh and how do they explain the birth announcements found in two news papers?
phony birth certificate from sending in birth announcements to the newspaper in Hawaii??
Why should we have to do all the investigation.....so you can dispute it anyway.....makes no sense.!
In other news, I've got a Bridge I can sell you.