All Americans including Ron Paul supporters care very much about this country. My fight is not with Liberitarians, Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Liberials or Conservatives nor moderates. My fight has always been with the PROGRESSIVE groups that choose who Americans get to vote for. CFR- Council Of Foreign Relations, TC- Trilaterial Commission and UN- United Nations. The CFR Council Of Foreign Relations wins every election and has been for over 80 years.
Many RP supporters are aware of this, as well as others. Who is Mitt Romney? What is his record during the time he was governor? What Progressive groups does Mitt Romney belong to? Are Mitt Romney's polices like Obama's? What issues did Romney flip flop on before? What were Romney's quotes in the past, that may not match what he says today? These are the questions Americans should be investigating, in-stead of fighting with each other.
REMEMBER when Obama ran for President? If Americans were paying attention and did some serious research and look up Obama's voting record they would have known when Obama ran for President he was against all of Bushes policies, but if you looked up his voting record he voted right along with Bush Jr. policies when he was a senator. Hummm. Imagine that. Americans would have known he was li...
Many RP supporters are aware of this, as well as others. Who is Mitt Romney? What is his record during the time he was governor? What Progressive groups does Mitt Romney belong to? Are Mitt Romney's polices like Obama's? What issues did Romney flip flop on before? What were Romney's quotes in the past, that may not match what he says today? These are the questions Americans should be investigating, in-stead of fighting with each other.
REMEMBER when Obama ran for President? If Americans were paying attention and did some serious research and look up Obama's voting record they would have known when Obama ran for President he was against all of Bushes policies, but if you looked up his voting record he voted right along with Bush Jr. policies when he was a senator. Hummm. Imagine that. Americans would have known he was li...
All Americans including Ron Paul supporters care very much about this country. My fight is not with Liberitarians, Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Liberials or Conservatives nor moderates. My fight has always been with the PROGRESSIVE groups that choose who Americans get to vote for. CFR- Council Of Foreign Relations, TC- Trilaterial Commission and UN- United Nations. The CFR Council Of Foreign Relations wins every election and has been for over 80 years.
Many RP supporters are aware of this, as well as others. Who is Mitt Romney? What is his record during the time he was governor? What Progressive groups does Mitt Romney belong to? Are Mitt Romney's polices like Obama's? What issues did Romney flip flop on before? What were Romney's quotes in the past, that may not match what he says today? These are the questions Americans should be investigating, in-stead of fighting with each other.
REMEMBER when Obama ran for President? If Americans were paying attention and did some serious research and look up Obama's voting record they would have known when Obama ran for President he was against all of Bushes policies, but if you looked up his voting record he voted right along with Bush Jr. policies when he was a senator. Hummm. Imagine that. Americans would have known he was lieing all along.
The CFR's Study No. 7, published November 25, 1959, openly declared its true purpose:..building a New International Order (which) must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, (and) for social and economic change...an International order (code for world government)...including states labeling themselves as "Socialist." One could safely say that a nutshell descriptor of the CFR is "to bring about the NWO through the manipulation of US foreign policy and relations and through international economic interdependence."
Does this sound like what is happening to America today? Hummm, and you thought it was just Obama and the Democrats. Obama is a CFR member and now has 11 out of 12 key power positions are controled by CFR members. When Americans vote for a CFR canidate and that canidate wins the election he or she appoints CFR members to the executive branch. I have some important info for those who want it, the CFR is in both parties and they have been taking turns at it. They create CFR legislation, pass it to CFR members in both parties and then present it to the public and if you follow the paper trail its amazing how they use taypayer money to enslave the Americans at the same time. CFR International and National corporations get rich, use your tax money and take your constitutional rights away at the same time. So the answer is keep voting them in and expect change? Is that logical? No more logical than throughing your vote away? So what is the difference? Either way freedom is lost and the CFR wins the election again.
The CFR's Annual Report in 1974 says the project for the CFR in the 80"s will be "The management of the International economy, global poverty, enviroment and the new "common"..oceans, the seabeds, and space,and interstate violence, including arms control.
What they are saying is the management of your money. your land, your grocries, and your guns.
My,my, it sounds as if the Sea Treaty has already passed, but the The Sea Treaty wasn't introduced to the public until the early 80's and the CFR report was written in 1974. Hummm
So if I don't jump on the band wagon and vote for, (less of two evils) and through away what I have learned and studied about these groups for years and learned how the system really works and vote for another CFR member like Mitt Romney Iam not a patriot? I don't care about my country? Hummm, and some people have the nerve to call that a choice?
Well lets take a look at Mitt Romney? Shall we. While Romney professed expertise in creating jobs Mass. ranked 47th in job growth during his time as governor.Job growth was 0.9%. Mass. suffered the second largest labor force decline in the nation- only Louisana, which was ravaged by Katrina in 2005 saw a bigger decline in its labor force than Mass during Romney's tenure as governor. The US. Census Bureau estimated that between July 2002 thru July 2006, 222,000 more residents left Mass, for other states than came to it. Romney left Mass residents with 10,504 in per capita bond debt the highest of any state in the nation when he left office in 2007. 14% of Maunfacturing jobs were lost in Mass. In 2004, Romney vetoed legislation that would have banned companies doing business with the state from out sourcing jobs to other countries. Romney said he was not a partison Republican "but rather a "moderate" with progressive views". No thanks, if RP is not on the ballot. I will vote for Gary Johnson. I will not vote for another CFR member again. But as far as Iam concerned, Campaign for Liberty will never die, maybe RP and Rand have had their set backs, but the message of true liberty will never die and shouldn't. Americans have gotten what they voted for, thats the problem the (less of two evils) and so the AGENDA continues. Funny, you get what you vote for, and sometimes others that know better suffer also because other voters didn't do their homework, they just get their info from the big 6 the 6 CFR corporations that own and control all media.
(more)Many RP supporters are aware of this, as well as others. Who is Mitt Romney? What is his record during the time he was governor? What Progressive groups does Mitt Romney belong to? Are Mitt Romney's polices like Obama's? What issues did Romney flip flop on before? What were Romney's quotes in the past, that may not match what he says today? These are the questions Americans should be investigating, in-stead of fighting with each other.
REMEMBER when Obama ran for President? If Americans were paying attention and did some serious research and look up Obama's voting record they would have known when Obama ran for President he was against all of Bushes policies, but if you looked up his voting record he voted right along with Bush Jr. policies when he was a senator. Hummm. Imagine that. Americans would have known he was lieing all along.
The CFR's Study No. 7, published November 25, 1959, openly declared its true purpose:..building a New International Order (which) must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, (and) for social and economic change...an International order (code for world government)...including states labeling themselves as "Socialist." One could safely say that a nutshell descriptor of the CFR is "to bring about the NWO through the manipulation of US foreign policy and relations and through international economic interdependence."
Does this sound like what is happening to America today? Hummm, and you thought it was just Obama and the Democrats. Obama is a CFR member and now has 11 out of 12 key power positions are controled by CFR members. When Americans vote for a CFR canidate and that canidate wins the election he or she appoints CFR members to the executive branch. I have some important info for those who want it, the CFR is in both parties and they have been taking turns at it. They create CFR legislation, pass it to CFR members in both parties and then present it to the public and if you follow the paper trail its amazing how they use taypayer money to enslave the Americans at the same time. CFR International and National corporations get rich, use your tax money and take your constitutional rights away at the same time. So the answer is keep voting them in and expect change? Is that logical? No more logical than throughing your vote away? So what is the difference? Either way freedom is lost and the CFR wins the election again.
The CFR's Annual Report in 1974 says the project for the CFR in the 80"s will be "The management of the International economy, global poverty, enviroment and the new "common"..oceans, the seabeds, and space,and interstate violence, including arms control.
What they are saying is the management of your money. your land, your grocries, and your guns.
My,my, it sounds as if the Sea Treaty has already passed, but the The Sea Treaty wasn't introduced to the public until the early 80's and the CFR report was written in 1974. Hummm
So if I don't jump on the band wagon and vote for, (less of two evils) and through away what I have learned and studied about these groups for years and learned how the system really works and vote for another CFR member like Mitt Romney Iam not a patriot? I don't care about my country? Hummm, and some people have the nerve to call that a choice?
Well lets take a look at Mitt Romney? Shall we. While Romney professed expertise in creating jobs Mass. ranked 47th in job growth during his time as governor.Job growth was 0.9%. Mass. suffered the second largest labor force decline in the nation- only Louisana, which was ravaged by Katrina in 2005 saw a bigger decline in its labor force than Mass during Romney's tenure as governor. The US. Census Bureau estimated that between July 2002 thru July 2006, 222,000 more residents left Mass, for other states than came to it. Romney left Mass residents with 10,504 in per capita bond debt the highest of any state in the nation when he left office in 2007. 14% of Maunfacturing jobs were lost in Mass. In 2004, Romney vetoed legislation that would have banned companies doing business with the state from out sourcing jobs to other countries. Romney said he was not a partison Republican "but rather a "moderate" with progressive views". No thanks, if RP is not on the ballot. I will vote for Gary Johnson. I will not vote for another CFR member again. But as far as Iam concerned, Campaign for Liberty will never die, maybe RP and Rand have had their set backs, but the message of true liberty will never die and shouldn't. Americans have gotten what they voted for, thats the problem the (less of two evils) and so the AGENDA continues. Funny, you get what you vote for, and sometimes others that know better suffer also because other voters didn't do their homework, they just get their info from the big 6 the 6 CFR corporations that own and control all media.
It is true that there is too much at stake for the US. I ask you, then, how in good conscience, could ANYONE vote for either Obama OR Romney?
If there is a question of what is doing what is BEST for our country, then a vote for Ron Paul or anyone other than these two great sellouts is the answer.
At the end of the day, I will be able to look myself in the mirror and know I did what was best for this country, my family, and what I believe is the Christian thing to do.
You are right about one thing though, Romney is not a savior, he is a loyalist to the global crown. If he cared anything about Sovereignty and Independence, you would see him standing up against the Patriot Acts, FISA, NDAA, Militarism and other policies that are THE SAME policies Obama supports.
Just this ONCE, I intend to vote my principles, and Gary Johnson reflects my values better than Romney (Obama gets no possibility of my vote). If EVERYONE voted for his principles, hell, if everyone KNEW what their principles are, the major parties could be in big trouble - and THAT would benefit America immeasurably. I strongly suggest that instead of voting for/against "policies", vote instead for the ones who reflect YOUR values because that person will do well by you.
Either ABO will "elect"/appoint Romney, or it won't. Of the two, I prefer Obama for ONE reason: Obama has pushed more Sheeple to research what is really happening and why more than any other CEO of "United States" Inc. With an "R" in the WH, Folk tend to relax a bit.
Lindsay: Romney's neocon advisers and the prospect for interminable war
Read more: http://www.metrowestdailynews...
http://www.amazon.com/Collaps...
Hell, look at the democrats - the far, far left now controls that party and got Obama elected - the far far left could not win years ago but they wormed their way into the party and changed it from a noble party to what it is today.- a party dedicated to the down fall of America.
Now I do not think the Paul supporter wants the down fall of America or anything close to it but they will have to chose between their egos and the nation. One can only hope they care enough to make the right choice.
Take another look at Romney, Jackie. He is no less dangerous than Obama and has nearly the same identical financial backers to prove it. We were right about Obama and we are right about Romney. No matter which of these two candidates win the "election", America loses. That's not egotistical. That's a FACT.
No it is not a fact, it is what you think and there is no evidence to reach that decision at all. His record is excellent, not perfect, but excellent. Of course he (as would Paul if he were the nominee) will have similar donors from certain areas - the big corporations always donate to both sides - that is proof of nothing.
Obama must go and I will be working to that end
What on earth has Romney done to prove that he has a remotely excellent record at anything other than snowing the gullible?
You go right on ahead and spin your wheels. I don't want to see you bitching when you see Romney is just Obama's clone.
Not going over the same ground over and over - pointless with Paul supporters.
Have a good afternoon
I dot not play the "lesser of 2 evils" game and until the rest of the public does the same, the government will remain corporate controlled.