Someone called and told me....Harry Reid once worked as a janitor at a school but was kicked out after only a couple months of employment because of lewd behavior.
I don't know the person that called me but i trust them very much..
The "word on the street" is that Harry Reid is a pedophile! Shouldn't he come forward and prove that he isn't???
Ken
2012/08/04 03:52:03
|
|
|||||
|
56 votes
|
|
60% | ||
|
13 votes
|
|
14% | ||
|
6 votes
|
|
6% | ||
|
18 votes
|
|
19% | ||
THE WORD ON THE STREET IS THAT
HARRY REID IS A PEDOPHILE
I heard a guy I was walking past on the street say that Harry Reid is a pedophile. I don't know the guy's name or where he got his information, but the word is out there on the street that Harry Reid is a pedophile, and he should come forward and prove that he isn't!
Top Opinion
-
Dandydon 2012/08/04 12:44:17
And so now - 10 years later - he's asking the country to just "Trust Me" - when it comes to the honesty and integrity of his tax returns?? A guy who has been caught in so many lies - he has been labeled "Flip-Flopper", "Well-Oiled Weathervane", and "Liar" by the senior people in his party?
No, Willard - Harry Reid isn't the issue here. It's you, Mitt. It's your lack of integrity. It's your track record of lies. If you had a clean record of speaking honestly about your taxes, or about your tenure at Bain Capital, or about your policies, or about...anything! - you MIGHT be able to skate by on your reputation. You might be able to say "Trust Me" - and have people do just that.
But alas - you do not. Your track record of honesty...does not exist. And so the burden of proof lies squarely with you, Willard Romney. The issue here is YOU and your unwillingess to release your tax returns. As your own father did 45 years ago. As you demanded of so many others - but would not do yourself.
Put up or shut up indeed, Willard Romney.
How Ironic that you would point this out yourself. Facts are "facts" to you - aren't they.
Of course - try to change topics to Obama. I'll show the 'original poster' the courtesy of sticking to the posted topic - and not engage in your attempted shell game, and a child's illogic of "another's (purported) wrong makes mine ok". Let's see if we can't stick to the subject of your blog - and without red herring argument attempts - shall we?
NOW - congratulations for doing that in your second paragraph (have to give positive reinforcement to you people...).
Google. It's a search engine. A pretty good one, at that. Try it sometime:
"Massachusetts Candidate Confirms Utah As Residence"
"Mr. Romney said he did not notice the mistake because the bill was sent to his wife. Ms. Kresser said Mr. Romney himself paid the bill in two of the three years he lived there." Yep. that's Mitt all over. Mitt the Twit. Mitt the Liar.
By FOX BUTTERFIELD
Published: June 07, 2002
NY Times
"Mitt Romney, the Republican candidate for governor, acknowledged today that he filed tax returns in 1999 and 2000 saying he was a part-time resident or nonresident of Massachusetts, while he lived full time in Utah running the Winter Olympics.
The Massachusetts Constitution requires a candidate for gover...
How Ironic that you would point this out yourself. Facts are "facts" to you - aren't they.
Of course - try to change topics to Obama. I'll show the 'original poster' the courtesy of sticking to the posted topic - and not engage in your attempted shell game, and a child's illogic of "another's (purported) wrong makes mine ok". Let's see if we can't stick to the subject of your blog - and without red herring argument attempts - shall we?
NOW - congratulations for doing that in your second paragraph (have to give positive reinforcement to you people...).
Google. It's a search engine. A pretty good one, at that. Try it sometime:
"Massachusetts Candidate Confirms Utah As Residence"
"Mr. Romney said he did not notice the mistake because the bill was sent to his wife. Ms. Kresser said Mr. Romney himself paid the bill in two of the three years he lived there." Yep. that's Mitt all over. Mitt the Twit. Mitt the Liar.
By FOX BUTTERFIELD
Published: June 07, 2002
NY Times
"Mitt Romney, the Republican candidate for governor, acknowledged today that he filed tax returns in 1999 and 2000 saying he was a part-time resident or nonresident of Massachusetts, while he lived full time in Utah running the Winter Olympics.
The Massachusetts Constitution requires a candidate for governor to have lived in the state for seven consecutive years before running, and Mr. Romney's admission raised new questions about his candidacy. On Wednesday, he acknowledged saving $54,000 in taxes by claiming his multimillion dollar Utah house as his primary residence.
James Roosevelt, the state Democratic Party's lawyer, said at a news conference today that the party was likely to challenge Mr. Romney's residency with the state Ballot Law Commission by the deadline, 5 p.m. on Friday.
At the same time, the leading candidate for the Democratic nomination for governor, Shannon O'Brien, the state treasurer, raised a further question about Mr. Romney's residency by pointing out that in April 2000 a leading newspaper in Utah, The Deseret News in Salt Lake City, reported that Mr. Romney had declared his house in the Deer Valley section of Park City to be his primary residence.
Over three years, Mr. Romney received a $54,000 tax break on the $3.8 million house by having it classified as his primary residence. In Utah, full-time residents pay taxes on only 55 percent of the assessed value of their homes, while part-time residents are taxed on the full value.
Mr. Romney said at a news conference on Wednesday that he had received the tax break because of a clerical error and that he had never said the Park City house was his primary residence.
Ms. O'Brien said The Deseret News article ''flatly contradicts'' Mr. Romney's explanation.
''It is clear that Mitt Romney is not being forthcoming with the people of Massachusetts,'' Ms. O'Brien said. ''Residents of Massachusetts are used to spending time near the ocean; we know when something smells fishy.''
Real estate agents in Park City say that it is very unusual for nonresidents of Utah to qualify for the discount and that anyone applying to have a house classified as a primary residence must provide proof of residence and fill out a document.
The tax assessor of Summit County, Utah, Barbara Kresser, said that someone in her office had made a clerical error and that Mr. Romney had not applied for a tax break. Ms. Kresser said the tax bill had listed the home as his ''primary property.''
Mr. Romney said he did not notice the mistake because the bill was sent to his wife. Ms. Kresser said Mr. Romney himself paid the bill in two of the three years he lived there.
At a news conference today, Mr. Romney said that in April, after he decided to return to Massachusetts and run for governor, he amended his 1999 and 2000 state tax returns to declare that he had always been a full-time resident of Massachusetts.
Mr. Romney said that where he filed his taxes should not determine whether he was qualified to run for governor because he and his family had owned a home in Belmont, a Boston suburb, for 30 years.
''The key is this: did you ever decide not to come back to Massachusetts?'' he said. ''I never, ever decided not to come back to Massachusetts.''
Challenging Mr. Romney's residency has risks for both sides. Mr. Romney could be knocked off the ballot. But the ballot commission has historically been lenient in interpreting residency, and the Democrats could end up looking petty.
Before it was clear that the Olympics would be a huge success, Mr. Romney had repeatedly said he would not challenge the incumbent Republican governor of Massachusetts and had indicated he was considering running for governor or senator in Utah.
But in April, with the Olympics over and Jane Swift, the Republican acting governor of Massachusetts, plummeting in the polls, Mr. Romney suddenly decided to return to Boston. Ms. Swift dropped out of the Republican primary on March 19. Mr. Romney announced his candidacy the same day.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/0...