THE UN WANTS THE US TO GIVE MOUNT RUSHMORE BACK TO THE SIOUX INDIANS. DO YOU AGREE??

by Drue-AFCL Posted 2012/05/12 02:34:24

Related Topics: Indian, Mount Rushmore, US, Un

Read More

224 votes
Read all 400 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	YES	42 votes	19%
	NO	182 votes	81%

http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/182873/the-u-n-wants-the-u-s-...

+34

Add a comment above

abubincrazy 2012/05/12 02:37:56

NO

+22
We should give the UN back to Europe.
>> See Replies

More polls by Drue-AFCL

Monty 2012/12/24 20:00:20

NO

+1
the UN need not worry about what we do. is that all they could come up with?

reply
John Galt jr or Ron/jon 2012/05/22 04:40:03

YES

seems fair to me

reply
Dave 2012/05/16 14:32:26

NO

+1
Let's just give the UN to France and be done with it.

reply
wildcat 2012/05/16 01:48:50

NO

It's a little late for that.

reply
Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2012/05/16 01:05:05

NO

+1
I think we need to give the UN building back to NYC

reply
MichaelDillon 2012/05/16 01:04:12

NO

+2
The UN should go suck on an exhaust pipe!

reply
Bronar 2012/05/15 21:39:10

NO

+1
What a joke. Let's give that piece of Manhattan the UN is on back to the Mohecans (or whoever the heck they were)!

reply
Red_Horse 2012/05/15 07:53:08
Tedster 2012/05/15 03:40:06

NO

So, where was I when this happened? Or is this just another of those crackpot, anti Obama rt wing nut chain emails?

reply
Michaelene 2012/05/14 22:49:51

NO

+1
What a rediculous idea. Only Obama could consider such nonsense since he is a world citizen. Maybe he can be the head of the UN next year?

reply
DizziNY 2012/05/14 03:54:59

NO

+2
Tell The UN to piss off and keep their nose out of America's business.

reply
ConLibFraud 2012/05/14 03:54:25

NO

+1
Hey UN ... Phuck You!!!!

reply
The River Rat 2012/05/14 02:48:37 (edited)

NO

+1
The only group crazier than the current U. S. administration would have to be the U. N.

reply
Iamfree 2012/05/14 02:10:14

NO

+3
I want the UN to pound sand.

reply
Denny 2012/05/13 20:25:36

NO

+1
How about we give the UN back to the Indians. We could get half our beads back.

reply
Sgt Major B 2012/05/13 16:20:55

NO

+4

reply
Drue-AFCL to Sgt Maj... 2012/05/13 18:13:25

TELL US HOW YOU REALLY FEEL! JK LOVE IT!!

reply
sick'n'tired 2012/05/13 15:36:18

NO

+1
If the US government suggested it, it would be worth thinking about. The UN needs to stay out of American issues.

reply
Dogman 2012/05/13 11:43:02

YES

Honestly, who cares? It's in a part of the country that I wouldn't go to unless I was lost.

reply
ConLibF... to Dogman 2012/05/14 03:55:12

You completely missed the point.

reply
Dogman to ConLibF... 2012/05/14 08:52:16

Perhaps.

reply
Dave to Dogman 2012/05/16 14:32:59

Dude---you ARE lost !

reply
Dogman to Dave 2012/05/16 21:25:31

I'm trying to think of something less important than Mt. Rushmore, or something less likely than the US giving said mountain back to the Native Americans. . . . . . sorry, I got nothing.

reply
Radlad 2012/05/13 10:52:03

NO

+2
Matters not if the mount should be returned to the Sioux. What matters is the un has no business sticking its nose in America's business. Right there is another good argument to send the un packin'...............

reply
Drue-AFCL to Radlad 2012/05/13 18:14:06

+1
ABSOLUTELY

reply
metalma... to Radlad 2012/05/16 21:58:31

I partially agree. But that is also what America does to every other country in the world.

reply
Radlad to metalma... 2012/05/20 20:59:06

+1
How can you partially agree? The question had nothing to do with what we do in every other country in the world. Most of those countries have asked for some kinda aid from America be it security, military, financially and strings are attached. I see nothing the u n does that is beneficial to America in any way, I also see the u n as completely useless and impotent in doing anything unless the US that's us does all the heavy lifting ......

reply
Playerazzi 2012/05/13 07:42:08

YES

+2
Occupied Mt. Rushmore (and all of South Dakota) is a settlement that is illegal according to international law.

reply
Dave to Playerazzi 2012/05/16 14:33:24

Another idiot from Obamaland.

reply
Playerazzi to Dave 2012/05/16 19:14:46

Oh, I forgot to add the "sarcastic" font to my post.

My bad.

reply
Radlad to Playerazzi 2012/05/20 21:00:47

Why stop there? How about all of North and South America?

reply
Playerazzi to Radlad 2012/05/21 06:45:56

Goforit, dude.

reply
rknothead 2012/05/13 07:09:13

NO

+1
We should give/send the UN back to Europe....they deserve each other

reply
Lt. Fred 2012/05/13 06:50:32

YES

+1
It's not a question of 'giving' anything to anyone. First Americans own America; white America lives at their sufferance.

reply
DizziNY to Lt. Fred 2012/05/14 03:55:52

Look up Solutreans, lol. Your post is funny.

reply
Lt. Fred to DizziNY 2012/05/14 04:07:04

It's definitely good for a laugh, sure.

reply
Brandon 2012/05/13 06:42:17

YES

+2
Christians blather on about Israel having land ownership etc etc.

Let's see Republican apply their same Christian principles here...........

reply
ConLibF... to Brandon 2012/05/14 03:58:31

How about the dems?

reply
Brandon to ConLibF... 2012/05/14 04:26:12

In this situation? How about em....

reply
ConLibF... to Brandon 2012/05/14 13:03:24

You seem to think that 2 parties exist?

reply