The UN is working on a Gun Ban Treaty in DC and Obama has said he will sign it as soon as The Senate approves it. Call your Senator and tell them they will be committing Treason if they sign it.

UN Gun Ban is back


Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and the international anti-gun gang are almost giddy.

The UN Programme Against Small Arms begins meeting in New York City tomorrow, August 27th. Unlike the “Small Arms Treaty,” the Programme doesn’t require a vote in Congress.

It’s the same radical anti-gun policy, only this can be directly implemented on U.S. citizens. Some of it is already being enforced.

Hillary’s State Department recently bragged that the corrupt “Fast & Furious” and “Gunwalker” operations were implementations of the Programme. They almost sounded proud of the murder and mayhem caused by Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

In the same report, Hillary also revealed that Obama’s ongoing efforts to destroy over one million historic M1 Garands, M1 Carbines and 1911 Colt .45’s is driven by the UN Programme’s global gun grab scheme.




“I just want you to know that we are working on it [gun control],” President Obama promised Sarah Brady in a recent meeting. “We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

As part of the UN Programme implementation during “Fast & Furious,” Obama worked to shut down gun and ammo sales anywhere near the border. He did it via executive fiat, without any action from Congress whatsoever.

This is EXACTLY the kind of “process” they are going through “under the radar,” only now they want to take it nationwide. Firearms registration is just one of the many anti-gun schemes that is on the table next week at the Programme in New York. And in the wake of the Colorado and Wisconsin tragedies, the left-leaning media is screaming for more.

Last month, NAGR’s 1.4 million members and supporters played a key role in stalling the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”

Despite Hillary’s vocal support for global gun control, she and her State Department bureaucrats were forced to back off the treaty negotiations in New York. Much to their chagrin, the conference ended without a completed treaty.

Thanks to your hard work, gun owners dodged a bullet.

But Hillary and the petty tyrants at the UN already had the next shot at the UN Gun Ban in the chamber and ready to fire.




The “Small Arms Treaty” is just one of the many tools they have in their gun-grabbing tool box. Next up is the UN Programme Against Small Arms, and it’s is a HUGE opportunity to push the UN Gun Ban.

The Programme will meet from August 27th through September 7th at UN Headquarters in New York City to push the very same anti-gun agenda:
*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL "unauthorized" civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
And the real danger is that after our temporary victory over the treaty in July, many gun owners will “go home” and stop standing up to Hillary, Obama and the UN tyrants.

Obama knows he must rally his anti-gun allies for November, and as already stated, he is pushing their defunct schemes “under the radar” to get the job done.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OBAMA TIMELINE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


2012 June 20, 2012 Uses position to withhold documents tied to gun smuggling probe
http://abcnews.go.com/Politic...
tempt-vote/story?id=16610613#...
May 10, 2012 Threatens to veto DOJ bill because it blocks gun control law
http://www.foxnews.com/politi...
fast-and-furious-gun/
April 22, 2012 Embraces executive orders to bypass Congress
http://www.infowars.com/we-ca...
February 21, 2012 At the U.N.: Pro-gun groups are stifled
http://www.heritage.org/resea...
treaty
February 17, 2012 Sneaks anti-gun measures into 2013 budget proposal
http://dailycaller.com/2012/0...
ment-freedoms/
February 13, 2012 Cuts funds in half for armed pilot counter-terrorism program
http://articles.cnn.com/2012-...
deck-officer-budget-cuts?_s=P...
obtiamemlinae
obtiamemlinae
2011 December 23, 2011 Says he won’t be bound by gun-control ban in omnibus
http://thehill.com/blogs/heal...
ban-in-spending-bill
July 11, 2011 Authorizes administration’s first major gun regulation
http://www.rightsidenews.com/...
for-gun-control-treaty-contin...
July 11, 2011 At the U.N.: Final Arms Trade Treaty talks under way
http://thenewamerican.com/usn...
July 7, 2011 Obama aide says gun legislation in “near future”
http://content.usatoday.com/c...
near-future/1?csp=34news
March 30, 2011 Says we’re working on gun control “under the radar”
http://www.washingtonpost.com...
steve-croley/2011/04/04/AFt9E...
March 15, 2011 Looks for ways around Congress on gun policy
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
March 13, 2011 Calls for gun reforms following Tucson tragedy
http://azstarnet.com/article_...
February 28, 2011 At the U.N.: Debate over scope of global gun restrictions
http://www.armscontrol.org/ac...
February 8, 2011 At the U.N.: Agreement signed with anti-gun group IANSA
http://en.iansa.org/node/1498
obtiamemlinae
2010 November 15, 2010 Nominates anti-gun Andrew Traver to head ATF
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/...
an-antigun-zealot
March 1, 2010 Busts plan to sell rifles to Americans
http://www.foxnews.com/politi...
antique-m-rifles/
September 15, 2010 Appoints anti-gun Greg Nickels to U.N. post
http://www.uscca.us/ccr/view_...
July 12, 2010 At the U.N.: Arms Treaty to include all conventional weapons
http://www.heritage.org/resea...
arms-trade-treaty-five-danger...
May 10, 2010 Nominates anti-gun Elena Kagan for Supreme Court Justice
http://www.washingtontimes.co...
2009 October 14, 2009 Reverses stance on treaty to regulate arm trade
http://www.reuters.com/articl...
May 26, 2009 Nominates anti-gun Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court Justice
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire...
April 22, 2009 Nominates anti-gun Cass Sunstein for top regulatory post
http://www.opposingviews.com/...
April 16, 2009 Says “90% of guns recovered in Mexico come from U.S.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politi...
April 16, 2009 Assures he hasn’t “backed off at all” on pledge to restore gun ban
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-...
immigrants?_s=PM:POLITICS
obtiamemlinae
2008 December 1, 2008 Nominates anti-gun Eric Holder for attorney general
http://www.examiner.com/conse...
December 1, 2008 Names anti-gun Hillary Clinton as secretary of state
http://www.issues2000.org/sen...
November 13, 2008 Weeds out gun owners from his White House staff
http://cnsnews.com/news/artic...
April 2, 2008 Says “I am not in favor of concealed weapons”
http://www.pittsburghlive.com...
February 16, 2008 Says right to bear arms “subject to common-sense regulation”
http://www.jsonline.com/news/...
February 15, 2008 Says microstamping is a “common-sense law”
http://www.buckeyestateblog.c...
January 15, 2008 Supports repealing the Tiarht Amendment
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2...
2007 April 22, 2007 Favors a ban on standard-capacity magazines
http://nraila.org/gun-laws/di...
2006 October 17, 2006 Says “I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities.”
http://usliberals.about.com/o...
January 31, 2006 Votes against Samuel Alito for Supreme Court Justice
http://www.washingtontimes.co...
2005 September 22, 2005 Votes against John Roberts for Supreme Court Justice
http://www.washingtontimes.co...
obtiamemlinae
July 29, 2005 Votes against prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers
http://www.issues2000.org/201...
July 29, 2005 Votes to ban common rifle ammunition
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2...
2004 October 21, 2004 Says it’s “a scandal” Bush didn’t renew assault weapons ban
http://www.issues2000.org/200...
April 27, 2004 Says he continues to oppose concealed carry
http://articles.chicagotribun...
obama/2
March 25, 2004 Votes against lowering FOID card age from 21 to 18
http://www.ilga.gov/legislati...
61&SessionID=3&GA=93
March 25, 2004 Votes to uphold local gun bans
http://www.ilga.gov/legislati...
61&SessionID=3&GA=93
March 25, 2004 Votes to uphold prosecution of people using guns in self-defense
http://www.ilga.gov/legislati...
61&SessionID=3&GA=93
2003 March 13, 2003 Votes to ban hundreds of common rifles & shotguns
http://www.ilga.gov/legislati...
4&SessionID=3&GA=93
obtiamemlinae
2001 July 5, 2001 Says he continues to favor handgun registration & licensing
http://www.guncite.com/gun_co...
February 20, 2001 Says “No reason why anybody should need an assault weapon”
http://www.guncite.com/gun_co...
2000 Co-sponsors bill to limit firearm purchases to one gun a month
http://civilliberty.about.com...
1999 December 13, 1999 Proposes banning gun stores within 5 mi. of schools & parks
http://michellemalkin.com/200...
and-parks/
December 13, 1999 Supports 500% tax increase on guns & ammo
http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-f...
December 13, 1999 Supports ban on resale of police-issued firearms
http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-f...
1998 Sits on Board of Directors for anti-gun Joyce Foundation
http://www.politico.com/news/...
July 2, 1998 Endorses a ban on sale or transfer of all semi-auto guns
http://www.issues2000.org/Bar...
1996 September 9, 1996 Supports ban on manufacture, sale & possession of handguns
http://www.thepoliticalguide....

http://www.knowthelies.com/?q...

The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.



** SPREAD THIS TO EVERYONE **

The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army.

The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion).

These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.

Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States."

The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada.

The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states.

Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.

Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states:

"The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States." In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it."

"This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose.

Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power."

The Honorable William Gordon

Congressional Record, House, Page 640 - 1917

For other Good Reading.
As for grounds for arrest: “The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” (Wharton’s Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197)

http://markmccoy.com/self-def...
Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest

http://www.constitution.org/u...


“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.
As for grounds for arrest: “The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” (Wharton’s Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197)

Don't let your elected & or appointed ban your rights here is how to put a very short chain on Obama anti 2nd fan Club


If you have the fortitude you FIGHT THE ELECTED POWERS OF THE LEAGUE OF COMMON DEFENSE YOUR SELF STUDY WHAT IS KNOWN AS? Propia Persona {Pro Se} , It is unconstitutional or direct constitutional contempt for the Elected to so disarm you Seek to understand the difference between the views of the paid common defense and Militia Reserve. Study the history of Writ of Mandamus & The Dick AcT 1902-1903 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654




study this to file such Civil Tort notices to file suits Pro Se Notice: The respondent in this action is a non-lawyer and is moving forward in propia persona. Hanes v. Kerner (92 S Ct 594) pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to? technicality; prose litigants" pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers
Case law for Pro Se , Jenkins v. McKeithen (456 US 411 421 (1969); Picking v. Penna Ry. Co (151 Fed 2nd 240); Pucket v. Cox (456 Fed 2nd 233); Haines v. Kerner, et.al. (429 F. 2d 71 (1972)); Conley v. Gibson? (355 US 41, 45-6 (1957)); Dioguardi v. During (139 F. 2d 774 (1948)).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
forma pauperis


Note Fight back for free in Indiana ,
, ARTICLE 1. Bill of Rights
Section 12. Openess of the courts, Speedy trial
Section 12. All courts shall be open; and every person, for injury done to him in his person, property, or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law. Justice shall be administered freely, and without purchase; completely, and without denial; speedily, and without delay

Learn the history of The Civil rights Acts & or The Force Act 1833-1871 google on {wikipedia} & {The Force Acts} --it is unconstitutional for officers of the states I e Elected & so appointed like Judges persons of the leadership of the league of the common defense to seek to deprive the rights of , you can submit Civil tort Claims, as such gives you the right to so hold your elected accountable in court Submit tort notice citing {wikipedia & Writ of Mandamus} Via U.S. Title 42 usc section 1983 , Learn the 7 Amendment & terms like compensatory damages for victims whose legal rights have been violated.

UN Gun Ban is back

Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and the international anti-gun gang are almost giddy.

The UN Programme Against Small Arms begins meeting in New York City tomorrow, August 27th. Unlike the “Small Arms Treaty,” the Programme doesn’t require a vote in Congress.

It’s the same radical anti-gun policy, only this can be directly implemented on U.S. citizens. Some of it is already being enforced.

Hillary’s State Department recently bragged that the corrupt “Fast & Furious” and “Gunwalker” operations were implementations of the Programme. They almost sounded proud of the murder and mayhem caused by Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

In the same report, Hillary also revealed that Obama’s ongoing efforts to destroy over one million historic M1 Garands, M1 Carbines and 1911 Colt .45’s is driven by the UN Programme’s global gun grab scheme.




“I just want you to know that we are working on it [gun control],” President Obama promised Sarah Brady in a recent meeting. “We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

As part of the UN Programme implementation during “Fast & Furious,” Obama worked to shut down gun and ammo sales anywhere near the border. He did it via executive fiat, without any action from Congress whatsoever.

This is EXACTLY the kind of “process” they are going through “under the radar,” only now they want to take it nationwide. Firearms registration is just one of the many anti-gun schemes that is on the table next week at the Programme in New York. And in the wake of the Colorado and Wisconsin tragedies, the left-leaning media is screaming for more.

Last month, NAGR’s 1.4 million members and supporters played a key role in stalling the UN “Small Arms Treaty.”

Despite Hillary’s vocal support for global gun control, she and her State Department bureaucrats were forced to back off the treaty negotiations in New York. Much to their chagrin, the conference ended without a completed treaty.

Thanks to your hard work, gun owners dodged a bullet.

But Hillary and the petty tyrants at the UN already had the next shot at the UN Gun Ban in the chamber and ready to fire.




The “Small Arms Treaty” is just one of the many tools they have in their gun-grabbing tool box. Next up is the UN Programme Against Small Arms, and it’s is a HUGE opportunity to push the UN Gun Ban.

The Programme will meet from August 27th through September 7th at UN Headquarters in New York City to push the very same anti-gun agenda:
*** Enact tougher licensing requirements, making law-abiding Americans cut through even more bureaucratic red tape just to own a firearm legally;

*** CONFISCATE and DESTROY ALL "unauthorized" civilian firearms (all firearms owned by the government are excluded, of course);

*** BAN the trade, sale and private ownership of ALL semi-automatic weapons;

*** Create an INTERNATIONAL gun registry, setting the stage for full-scale gun CONFISCATION.
And the real danger is that after our temporary victory over the treaty in July, many gun owners will “go home” and stop standing up to Hillary, Obama and the UN tyrants.

Obama knows he must rally his anti-gun allies for November, and as already stated, he is pushing their defunct schemes “under the radar” to get the job done.

LOL!! Politifact? Snoops? FactCheck?

None of them are reliable sources! They are Left-Wing funded sites! Try some Objective ones and I'll take what you have to say seriously!

"PolitiFact’s Bill Adair has a recurring fact-checking role on MSNBC’s “The Daily Rundown” hosted by Chuck Todd. I think yesterday’s (June 28) was the first one I’ve watched; while Adair does a pretty good job vocalizing the reasons for the rulings, he did say something (actually two things, one of which I’ll address in my next post) that merited this post."
ref: http://politi-psychotics.blog...

"Obviously, the Mikkelsons are not conservative. A conservative would have at least mentioned Fox News or a conservative site in this context and would have been proud to tout his conservatism. Liberals hide their views because they know they aren't popular."
ref: http://www.renewamerica.com/c...

"The fact is, the ANNENBERG Public Policy Center (APPC), the sponsoring agency behind FastCheck.org, is itself supported by the same foundation, the ANNENBERG FOUNDATION, that Bill Ayers secured the 49.2 million dollars from to create the Chicago ANNENBERG Challenge “philanthropic” organization in which Barack Obama was the founding Chairman of the Board for and Ayers served as the grant writer of and co-Chair of for its two operating arms."
ref: http://www.freerepublic.com/f...

I posted them already. I'm not going to make you read the links, nor am I going to paste the contents here. Your clicky finger won't break. I promise. Go ahead.

If you are too lazy to argue the facts presented therein, then you have stopped trying. Meh.

Basic points. In a way a 5 year old could understand...

The UN is working on a Gun Ban Treaty in DC and Obama has said he will sign it
This is a lie, or sheer ignorance. First of all, no treaty can become ratified without 2/3s Senate majority. Period. Obama can't 'sidestep' this one. If you think even one, let alone 2/3rds of Senators would vote for a treaty that curbed our 2nd Amendment, you are already nuts. No help for you. But even if that were to happen (LOL), Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that they wouldn’t support a treaty unless they were guaranteed that it wouldn’t “in any way regulate the domestic manufacture, possession or sales of firearms or ammunition”. They also required veto power by all member states (unanimous, or nada). Lastly, even if a Treaty to curb bad people from getting guns (terrorists, etc...) that also magically had powers to quell American law (no treaty does... ), were to get through this fantasy of a process that would never happen, it would still be struck down by the Supreme Court in 0 seconds flat, without question, not up for debate.

So.... this is STILL nothing more than a nonsensical, right-wing-spam, fear-riddled nonsense email blast from several years ago. It has been debunked so many times that seeing it pop up again once in a while gives me a chuckle. It is the gun-clutching maniac's that fear their own shadow enough to make up wild stories... that is the problem.

But, go ahead. Post off-topic nonsense about Bill Ayers again. (what? sigh) Hilarious.