Blogs gmanj77's
The Terrorist States-Of-Affairs and Affairs of State......
- September 04, 2008 16:29:26
- Read all 1 comments
- 0 raves
The Terrorist States-Of-Affairs and Affairs of State of the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus Affair ZOG Condoleezza Rice-Michelle Obama-Barack Obama Department of State Terrorist State of Israel, by Patrick M. Griffin
The anti-christ is judaism. Judaism is led by the ram bam, Moses Maimonides, a.k.a. Moshe Ben Maimon. However, I calculated the numerical value of the letters and I didn't get 666.
The ram bam has been having many puppets reign as "false messiahs” or “saviors” of various groups, having them be caricatures of the second coming.
First, it was the ram bam itself, as Adolf "Schicklgruber" Hitler: The ram bam had "Schicklgruber" descend from the clouds, imitating a descending from Heaven, in the infamous propaganda film "Triumph of the Will" (1). At the same time there was the moron Stalin, the leader of the communist "saving" of Russia with the USSR. Also, the beyond pathetic Mussolini in Italy, who, as the absurd return of a Roman Emperor and Empire, couldn't have been any more of a caricature. Here in the USA, we had the chain-smoking FDR and the New Deal, to “save us” from the Great Depression. In Britain, it was the drunkard Winston Churchill "saving" the Brits in WWII, a war Churchill helped start.
Later in the USA, it was JFK. The first Catholic President? No, but a ram bam inversion of that, with Kennedy being the first malakoi kouros boy in office. Also Ronald Reagan, the Hollywood actor who played the legendary George Gipp, “leading” America into astronomical deficits as he dissolved into Alzheimer shades. Then Clinton, the first openly malakois kouros boy office holder; and the third, after JFK and Nixon, although Clinton is the only one who is also a munchkin. And of course there is the malakoi transsexual George W., who is the "second coming" of Joseph Smith, Jr., the founder of Mormonism, and the "savior" of terrorism (2).
And then the ram bam concocted Barack Obama who, as the porn star Jake Steed (3) -- who was supposedly born Jason Anyiam Okezie, a mixed-race Brazilian-American, and who first appeared in 1990 and disappeared in 2001, after having been arrested June 7, 2000 on charges of corporal injury to a spouse and false imprisonment, and rumored to have AIDS -- made many porno films with none other than Condoleezza Rice, who had the "transsexual" identity Inari Vachs, supposedly a Serbian-American (4) from Michigan (5) , and appeared on the porn scene in November 1997 at the age of 23 (6).
Condoleezza Rice, as Inari Vachs (7), Inari being the Shinto kami of rice (8), “stole” the Phallus from Barack Obama in a porno scene in 2000 (9).
What does this mean? First, a little bit of information on Inari, and then on the Phallus.
Inari is one of the most mysterious deities of Japan. “He” is both male and female. Each year he/she descends from a mountain to the rice fields. The fox is Inari's messenger and it is believed that he/she can assume a fox's shape. Inari is sometimes conceived of as a collective of three or five individual kami. The deity may also assume the shape of a spider in order to teach wicked men a lesson. Inari is portrayed with a beard and carrying two bundles of rice.
As the symbolic version of the phallus, a phallic symbol is meant to represent male generative powers, especially male sexual power that is very healthy and potent. According to Sigmund Freud's theory of psychoanalysis, males, because they possess a penis, can possess the symbolic phallus as well; and are presumably powerful and potent in the other things they do, as fathers, leaders, etc., although Freud does not discuss this.
Freud claimed that women develop in childhood “penis envy”, and want to have a penis, while men suffer from “castration anxiety”, the fear of being castrated. In the symbolic understanding, women want the power men have, and men fear losing their status as men. Because the woman does not have a penis, she can never have the phallus. Later “Post-Freudian” psychoanalytic theory would posit that the symbolic phallus could be lost by a man, not by the man losing his penis in castration or with impotence, but because of power relations, especially as they exist in discourse and language and the media.
Condoleezza Rice, who I once nicknamed “the conned whore lesbo lice”, has penis envy all right, but not like you would think, that s/he wants the symbolic phallus in and as a powerful AIPACian political career and influence extending all the way to the White House and to the Presidency and beyond.
So how does Condoleezza Rice want to have the phallus then? S/he doesn’t want to be a man and actually have a penis, does s/he?
In the book “Gender Trouble”, published in 1990, and no doubt written in conjunction with Rice and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, the author, Judith Butler, a Professor in the Departments of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature at the University of California, Berkeley, starts to chip away at the Freudian conception of the symbolic phallus by pointing out that the connection between the phallus and the penis is not such that the penis is identical with the phallus: "The law requires conformity to its own notion of 'nature' (10). It gains its legitimacy through the binary and asymmetrical naturalization of bodies in which the phallus, though clearly not identical to the penis, deploys the penis as its naturalized instrument and sign" (11). In other words, according to the lesbian jew Butler, heterosexuality is only a cultural construction, and the penis is thought of as the phallus because of the heterosexual construction of sexuality.
The construction is, according to the tenured Berkeley professor Butler, a performative construction, where repetition of heterosexual sex acts results in the construction of what is then thought to be the natural, essential, “core” heterosexual genders of male and female. Therefore, according to the lesbian sodomite Butler, the heterosexual genders of male and female are not prior to the performances by which they are constructed, and only exist with the repetition of the performances of the heterosexual sex acts. For Butler, there is no natural, biological heterosexuality without the heterosexual sexual performances, the heterosexual sexual activity, which causes, s/he claims, People to mistakenly believe that heterosexuality is the natural and biological sexual identity prior to the performances that construct the heterosexual sexual identity.
But why does Butler do this? What is it that s/he and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, like Condoleezza Rice, really want?
In “Bodies that Matter”, published in 1993, and of course also written in conjunction with Rice and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, Butler further deconstructs psychoanalysis, and the goal of the "Professor" and h/er cronies is unveiled. If, according to Butler, “Freud enumerates a set of analogies and substitutions that rhetorically affirm the fundamental transferability of the phallus from the penis elsewhere, then any number of other things might come to stand in for the phallus” (12).
So what is it that the lesbian malakoi Butler and h/er cronies want to transfer the phallus from the penis to?
The transsexual Rice and h/er cronies seek to transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris, to construct what Butler terms a “lesbian phallus” (13). It is a long way from bra burning feminists like Gloria Steinem, although s/he, Steinem, is certainly part of the same group as Butler and Rice & Co.
If the transference is to be done, there would have to be, according to Butler’s theory, performances that would transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris. What performances would do this?
You would think that it would be performances like “the female superior position” (14), or “the woman has a whip and disciplines the man”, or some disgusting “69 position”, or some other nerdy understanding and performance. But it’s much more nerdy, and sociopathologically so, then even the nerdiest gynecological 70’s porno.
Let’s take a look at a scene, a performance, from a porno movie, and no doubt one of many performances by Condoleezza Rice – Inari Vachs was in over 300 porno movies -- in which Rice “steals”, in perhaps one of many ways, the phallus from Barack Obama.
In the scene, Inari Vachs, Vachs meaning “f---s”, and also “fox” (15), is lying on h/er side, looking back at Jake Steed with her head held up by one of h/er hands, and the other hand free. Steed has h/is penis inserted into Vach’s anus, and is performing a sort of anal missionary position sex on Vachs (16). Sounds like Steed the man, giving it to the hot babe Vachs, Steed the stud. So how did Rice, as Inari, the fox, steal the phallus from Steed?
Although Steed has a large and erect penis and a seemingly healthy muscular body –- Steed meaning “stud”, but also “seed”, as in sexual potency -- and is thrusting hard into the anus of Vachs (17), Vachs is not ecstatic and is lying still, giving instructions to the silent and struggling Steed, while staring intensely at the would be stud, and with very dirty, loud, and sexy language.
Steed the stud loses it, and pulls out to ejaculate the premature orgasm that is a part of h/is losing the phallus, because h/e lost control because Inari was so domineering in h/er control of the situation. Vachs grabs the penis, never blinking, and holds it firm while continuing to stare at Steed, even as semen is ejaculated onto h/er entire face; and even after Steed is done s/he continues to hold and fellate the penis and secure h/er possession of the phallus (18).
No doubt there were more “performances” to transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris. Vachs went on to do many lesbian scenes, running away with the “lesbian phallus” s/he had stole from Steed, and retired in the summer of 2002.
The performances in which the phallus is stolen are not just those on film, but also others that involve physically damaging the penis so that the penis can no longer get erect. This transference is done by then calling the “erect” clitoris the phallus. This mengele performance is done to those men from whom the phallus cannot be stolen with discourse or language or the media (19).
This “fox” or f--- hole x, or transference, is of course what Inari Vachs set out to do in 1997; and is why s/he chose the name Inari, the name of the Shinto kami that can appear as both sexes, and that has the fox as a messenger, and who can appear as a fox.
I have seen the phallus defined as the sexually undifferentiated tissue in an embryo that becomes the penis or clitoris once the gender is selected as the fetus develops (20). This is obviously an incorrect definition because once gender is selected, the body of the baby develops and the child will definitely have either a penis or a clitoris, but certainly not both. Everyone knows a boy is a boy and has a penis, and grows up to be a man with a penis; and a girl is a girl and has a clitoris, and grows up to be a woman with a clitoris.
So who, or what, is Barack Obama, and what does porno have to do with the political careers of Rice and Obama?
Barack and Michelle Obama are recombinant DNA abominations. They are sodomites from Hades who are the puppets of the jews and extra-terrestrial aliens like Condoleezza Rice, who are using the jews as a vehicle to colonize and destroy the Earth (21).
Does Condoleezza Rice control Barack Obama, or is s/he actually in the body of Barack Obama, or is s/he in the body of Michelle Obama, but really the one in charge, like Hillary was thought to be the brains of the Clinton Whitehouse?
I don’t know, but at the very least Barack and Michelle Obama are networked shit-for-brains whores to the jews. Is Condoleezza Rice? Yes, of course; and s/he even fancies h/erself an inverted sex goddess, a "naturalized", through the many “performances”, sadistic lesbian who has the phallus, h/er clitoris, and the backing of AIPAC (22)(23)(24).
I'm not sure what to make of the number 666 (25), but all of these "leaders" are certainly satanic, and the ram bam is their leader (26).
Notes:
(1). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.helmut-schmidt-onl...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
(2). If George W. Bush is the “second coming” of Joseph Smith, Jr. what might h/e do to restore the early Christian church as demonstrated in the New Testament, and to prepare the earth for the Second Coming of Jesus Christ? If you accept that Mormonism was created by jews and that it is a sect within judaism, then you know that George W. is an agent of the jews, and “the second coming” must be prepared by establishing the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus terrorist states-of-affairs and affairs of state of the ZOG Condoleezza Rice Department of State. This is the inversion of The Kingdom of God. When this is done, then the anti-christ may assume power.
So who is the anti-christ? As stated earlier it is the jews, who are led by the ram bam. Is Condoleezza Rice and Barack Obama in power sufficient for the jews being the “leaders” of the “Lost World” of Jaws and Jurassic Park horrors? I believe the jews think so, and it may be that George W. is Barack Obama (a), and Michelle Obama is Condoleezza Rice, and they are possibly each other; and the election of this abomination, it was hoped, would herald the triumph of the gates of Hades upon the Earth.
Notes:
(a). If Obama is not George W., I can’t think who it would be. I don’t think it’s just Jake Steed, and I don’t think it’s Joe Biden. And I don’t think it’s the ram bam, or Ari Fleisher, either.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(3). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Wha...
Jake Steed may be based on or derivative of the porn star Peter North, who may be the transsexual identity of Anthony Perkins of “Psycho” fame.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(4). This possibly has to do with the ethnic cleansing and genocide done by the whore Condoleezza Rice's pimp, the terrorist state of Israel and the jews, especially as Bosnia was a discourse way of justifying the terrorism being done by jews against The Palestinian People. Steed, supposedly a Brazilian-American, is the "Native Person" Rice is ethnically cleansing, if you will, with h/er emasculation of h/im.
(5). Why did Vachs appear from Michigan? I returned from NYC to Michigan in November 1997. I never gave Condoleezza Rice or any other sodomite permission to do anything via me, and Rice is not my nemesis. No one may violate the child of anyone for any reason, of course, even if a parent or the parents agree to the child being violated. Obviously all Human Beings have Human Rights protection, even if one or both of their parents are from Hades.
(6). Inari Vachs may be derivative of two porno starlets who preceded h/er: Isis Nile and Nicole Lace. Isis Nile was based on the Egyptian goddess Isis.
See:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm06...
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm04...
www.aomovies.com/explore/Nicole Lace/stars.html
www.torssexdvd.com/pages/debi...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Clock...
http://www.godado.it/engine.p...
(7). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://movie-tv-episode-datab...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
(8). See:
http://www.onmarkproductions....
http://www.pantheon.org/artic...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.answers.com/inari
(9). See:
http://www.game-port.com/back...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0...
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt02...
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm088...
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm082...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
(10). This is no doubt a claim that Nature must be rendered according to judaic law, the “law” of the Talmud. See: http://www.webshas.org/ishus/...
(11). Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York, Routledge, 1990), pg. 135.
(12) Butler, Judith (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". New York: Routledge, pg. 62.
(13). "The Lesbian Phallus and the Morphological Imaginary," pp.57-91, Chapter 2 in Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex" (1993).
(14). Not that there is anything wrong with the woman on top, there isn’t. But I suspect the jews think this position emasculates the man. However, I think that both men and women enjoy this position, and do this position at least some of the time, and in no way is the man's or the woman’s sexuality negated or changed. The thoughts of jew “experts”, such as Dr. Ruth Westheimer, on this position only further evidences the jews being nerdy and neutered; and shows that in no way should they be involved in the sex lives or in the sexual health of People. See: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/s...
(15). Ivana Humpalot, a character from the movie “Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me”, played by Kristen Johnston, is no doubt based on Inari Vachs, although her name also is a parody of Xenia Onatopp from the James Bond film “GoldenEye” and her character is a parody of Russian Female Agents Anya Amasova/XXX (James Bond film " The Spy Who Loved Me"), Tatiana Romanova (James Bond film " From Russia With Love") and Pola Ivanova (“A View To A Kill”). Ivana meets Austin during a photo shoot, following which they play an erotic game of chess. The scene is a spoof of the 1968 movie “The Thomas Crown Affair”. Ivana Trump may also have to do with Ivana Humpalot. Xenai Onatopp, played by Famke Janssen, emascualted men by crushing them to death with her legs while she was in the female superior position!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(16). This could be an abominable representation of Jesus Christ and John at the Last Supper:
In the Gospel of John, there are four verses (John 13:23; 19:26; 21:7; 21:20) which refer to the "disciple whom Jesus loved", generally interpreted to be John himself.
Several scholars have used these verses to argue that Jesus and John had a homosexual relationship, recently most notably by Jennings (2003). Jennings argues that these verses and the intimacy displayed between Jesus and John, especially at the Last Supper where John is described (John 13:23) as "reclining next to him" (TNIV) or "leaning on Jesus' bosom" (KJV), implies that they were in a homosexual relationship.
However, this interpretation is rejected by most Biblical scholars, who believe that the disciple "whom Jesus loved" refers to a deep friendship and non-sexual intimacy between Christ and his favorite apostle. For example, Vasey (pp.121-124) uses the "deepest intimacy" of the friendship of Jesus and John to affirm homosexual relationships (sick!), but rejects the idea that Jesus and John themselves were in a homosexual relationship.[2] It is also dismissed by Gagnon (2001) in his large-scale study The Bible and Homosexual Practice, not least as the word translated "loved" is the Greek word agape (used, for example, in John 3:16; "for God so loved the world"), rather than the Greek word referring to sexual love, eros.
Responding directly to Jennings' claims, Gagnon argued that Jennings misunderstood ancient culture, as people would recline while eating, so the man "leaning on Jesus' bosom" was simply "reclining next to" Jesus, with no homoerotic implication. Gagnon argued: "the idea that Jesus was a homosexual or engaged in homosexual acts is complete nonsense" that no "serious biblical scholar" had ever proposed (Ostling 2003).
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(17). The jews, who are cursed by God for doing sodomy, mistakenly believe that it was germs in the anus and rectum that caused them to become unhealthy. Because this scene involves anal sex, it is no doubt that Rice cons Obama into losing h/is sexual function by having h/im insert his penis into h/er anus and rectum. This is part of h/er being a spider, “sp” meaning to “flip” the m/an, stealing the phallus, by destroying h/is penis. How is Obama an evil man, deserving this punishment from the kami Inari? Perhaps Steed’s "disappearance" gives a clue: Steed was arrested June 7, 2000 on charges of corporal injury to a spouse and false imprisonment, and, although h/e posted the $500,000 bond, with $50,000 cash, h/e did not show up for h/is trial date in 2001.
(18). How exactly does this result in Obama “losing” the phallus? I don’t know, I think it’s just a very nerdy and indeed neutered conception of sexuality. Any guy would quickly recover from any ego damage, and get more practice. Yet in the Conned-Whore-Lesbo-Lice & Co.’s understanding, Condoleezza Rice now has the phallus, and can run with it, taking it to lesbian “performances” and thereby burying Barack in emasculation.
(19). The “burning” of the man’s penis is done by superimposing a clitoris or a penis onto the man’s penis. Other ways the man is victimized include “probing “the man’s anus, damaging the man’s testicles, harming the man’s body in other ways, having malakoi kouros “girls” give the man a venereal disease, etc.
(20). Dictionary: phallus (făl'əs)
n., pl. phal•li (făl'ī') or phal•lus•es.
1. Anatomy.
The penis.
The sexually undifferentiated tissue in an embryo that becomes the penis or clitoris.
2. A representation of the penis and testes as an embodiment of generative power.
3. The immature penis considered in psychoanalysis as the libidinal object of infantile sexuality in the male.
See: http://www.answers.com/phallus
(21). Why the jews? Because the jews are the only group that hate all the rest of those on the planet, and even hate the planet Earth, in the sense that they hate Mother Nature. Why do the aliens need a vehicle at all, why don’t they just take control of the Earth themselves? Because the jews are from the planet Earth, and if the aliens can use the jews to colonize the Earth, the colonization is held to be legitimate by the actions and beliefs of Human Beings.
The terrorist state of Israel is the condition for the possibility of the aliens colonizing Earth, because it is the colonization of a Native People's land by others of the Earth. If Human Beings accept this, then they can have their own land, anywhere on Earth, colonized by aliens. This colonization is with the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus Affair terrorist states-of-affairs and affairs of state of the Condoleezza Rice-Michelle Obama-Barack Obama ZOG Department of State.
(22). Condoleezza Rice may be based on Diana in the T.V. series V, which had a 4 and a 10 hour miniseries, and 19 weekly episodes which ran from 10/26/84 to 3/22/85. The series has several English actresses, including one who is superior to Diana (Diana might represent Princess Diana), the character Pamela, who might represent Queen Elizabeth II, who is played by Sarah Douglas, who might have something to do with Sarah Ferguson. Diana murders Pamela in the miniseries, for want of power.
See:
http://thevisitors.info/visit...
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3...
http://www.uar.com.au/uar/bad...
http://thevisitors.info/downl...
http://thevisitors.info/downl...
http://www.warnervideo.com/vd...
http://thevisitors.info/episo...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.prairieden.com/int...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(23). Does Barack Obama have to win the election for Condoleezza Rice to keep the phallus? Certainly the jews needed Condoleezza Rice to win to keep intact the delusion that the inverted “second coming” of the retard Joseph Smith, Jr., who prepared the inverted LDS/LSD (a) “Restoration” of the anti-christ, the abominable alien inversion of God, “Inari Vachs” Condoleezza Rice, with the “War on Terror”. With Condoleezza Rice finished, the jews lost all the power they had worldwide.
Notes:
(a). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(24). See: http://mearsheimer.uchicago.e...
(25). I calculated 612 for Maimonides. Subtracting this from 666, gives 54, the numerical value for the letter I. Because the ram bam is an aI, which means not an I, it may be that the “I Maimonides” means that Maimonides is not an I (a). In this case aI would mean not or without I, with a having the meaning un, which means not, non, opposite of, contrary to.
This is the inversion of 1, which is THE NUMBER OF UNITY. Father. Deuteronomy 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. Ephesians 4:5 "one Lord, one faith, one baptism."
Notes:
(a). In Isopsephia, I believe the second vowel of a dipthong is not given any value. In Maimonides, the second vowel of the dipthong ai is i.
Main Entry:
2a-
Pronunciation:
ā also a or ä
Variant(s):
or an- an
Function:
prefix
Etymology:
Latin & Greek; Latin, from Greek — more at UN-
: not : without —a- before consonants other than h and sometimes even before h, an- before vowels and usually before h
Main Entry:
1un-
Pronunciation:
ən, often ən before -stressed syllable
Function:
prefix
Etymology:
Middle English, from Old English; akin to Old High German un- un-, Latin in-, Greek a-, an-, Old English ne not — more at NO
1 : not : IN-, NON- —in adjectives formed from adjectives or participles, in nouns formed from nouns , and rarely in verbs formed from verbs —sometimes in words that have a meaning that merely negates that of the base word and are thereby distinguished from words that prefix in- or a variant of it (as im-) to the same base word and have a meaning positively opposite to that of the base word 2 : opposite of : contrary to —in adjectives formed from adjectives or participles and in nouns formed from nouns
This would also explain why Moses Maimonides gave itself the name “the ram bam”, from the initials of the words Rabbi Moses Ben Maimon. Maimonides hoped to be the aI of all aIs.
What exactly is that? M A I M O N I D E S: M A I, man’s a, or rectum, anus, and large intestine, is who Maimonides is; M O, an mo, because the a is an o, or hole; N, which is the 14th letter of the alphabet, F O U R T E E N, the ma is an fo, or f--- hole, I D, Maimonides is D, the fourth letter of the alphabet, F O U R; E S, E, the fifth letter of the alphabet, F I V E, Maimonides is F-ed “tu tu”, and S, which is the nineteenth letter of the alphabet, 19 or A I.
So, as you can see, Maimonides is the leader of the Pharisees, who are the leaders of the jews; and all the Pharisees lay (a) together in the temple, and the name Maimonides signifies this, the practice of sodomy.
Notes:
(a). See: http://web.ku.edu/~edit/lie.h...
(26). Why and how are the extra-terrestrial aliens under the control and direction of the ram bam? I only know of two extra-terrestrial aliens that are here on the Earth. They are Condoleezza Rice and Ari Fleisher. These two aliens were born here on the Earth, so as to make them “naturalized” “mixed-race” sodomite/aliens. Ari Fleisher was born and raised a jew, but I don’t know if it’s an In Vitro, as jews often are, or not. Same with Condoleezza Rice, although I’m not sure if this fact is widely known.
I’m not saying aliens can be “naturalized”, they cannot be. Because the jews are cursed by God, they are not members of the Human Race, and are instead correctly thought of as a cursed “race”. What if they got a hold of some uncursed genetic material and made a recombinant DNA body, like that of Inari Vachs? Still, because it is an alien, it cannot be thought to be Natural, or “naturalizeable”. What if a jew did this? Still, the jew is a sodomite, and cannot be thought to be Natural, or “naturalizeable”.
So, what is the place of the aliens within judaism? Because judaism is almost entirely run by a neural-network “system”, it is not as if the aliens have any autonomy. Furthermore, the network indicates the will of the jews, and this is largely controlled by the ram bam, who used the network to “thunk” the group mind of zombie shit-for-brains.
So, while you might think the aliens made provision for some superiority of those they wanted “naturalized”, it doesn’t appear to be the case.
The anti-christ is judaism. Judaism is led by the ram bam, Moses Maimonides, a.k.a. Moshe Ben Maimon. However, I calculated the numerical value of the letters and I didn't get 666.
The ram bam has been having many puppets reign as "false messiahs” or “saviors” of various groups, having them be caricatures of the second coming.
First, it was the ram bam itself, as Adolf "Schicklgruber" Hitler: The ram bam had "Schicklgruber" descend from the clouds, imitating a descending from Heaven, in the infamous propaganda film "Triumph of the Will" (1). At the same time there was the moron Stalin, the leader of the communist "saving" of Russia with the USSR. Also, the beyond pathetic Mussolini in Italy, who, as the absurd return of a Roman Emperor and Empire, couldn't have been any more of a caricature. Here in the USA, we had the chain-smoking FDR and the New Deal, to “save us” from the Great Depression. In Britain, it was the drunkard Winston Churchill "saving" the Brits in WWII, a war Churchill helped start.
Later in the USA, it was JFK. The first Catholic President? No, but a ram bam inversion of that, with Kennedy being the first malakoi kouros boy in office. Also Ronald Reagan, the Hollywood actor who played the legendary George Gipp, “leading” America into astronomical deficits as he dissolved into Alzheimer shades. Then Clinton, the first openly malakois kouros boy office holder; and the third, after JFK and Nixon, although Clinton is the only one who is also a munchkin. And of course there is the malakoi transsexual George W., who is the "second coming" of Joseph Smith, Jr., the founder of Mormonism, and the "savior" of terrorism (2).
And then the ram bam concocted Barack Obama who, as the porn star Jake Steed (3) -- who was supposedly born Jason Anyiam Okezie, a mixed-race Brazilian-American, and who first appeared in 1990 and disappeared in 2001, after having been arrested June 7, 2000 on charges of corporal injury to a spouse and false imprisonment, and rumored to have AIDS -- made many porno films with none other than Condoleezza Rice, who had the "transsexual" identity Inari Vachs, supposedly a Serbian-American (4) from Michigan (5) , and appeared on the porn scene in November 1997 at the age of 23 (6).
Condoleezza Rice, as Inari Vachs (7), Inari being the Shinto kami of rice (8), “stole” the Phallus from Barack Obama in a porno scene in 2000 (9).
What does this mean? First, a little bit of information on Inari, and then on the Phallus.
Inari is one of the most mysterious deities of Japan. “He” is both male and female. Each year he/she descends from a mountain to the rice fields. The fox is Inari's messenger and it is believed that he/she can assume a fox's shape. Inari is sometimes conceived of as a collective of three or five individual kami. The deity may also assume the shape of a spider in order to teach wicked men a lesson. Inari is portrayed with a beard and carrying two bundles of rice.
As the symbolic version of the phallus, a phallic symbol is meant to represent male generative powers, especially male sexual power that is very healthy and potent. According to Sigmund Freud's theory of psychoanalysis, males, because they possess a penis, can possess the symbolic phallus as well; and are presumably powerful and potent in the other things they do, as fathers, leaders, etc., although Freud does not discuss this.
Freud claimed that women develop in childhood “penis envy”, and want to have a penis, while men suffer from “castration anxiety”, the fear of being castrated. In the symbolic understanding, women want the power men have, and men fear losing their status as men. Because the woman does not have a penis, she can never have the phallus. Later “Post-Freudian” psychoanalytic theory would posit that the symbolic phallus could be lost by a man, not by the man losing his penis in castration or with impotence, but because of power relations, especially as they exist in discourse and language and the media.
Condoleezza Rice, who I once nicknamed “the conned whore lesbo lice”, has penis envy all right, but not like you would think, that s/he wants the symbolic phallus in and as a powerful AIPACian political career and influence extending all the way to the White House and to the Presidency and beyond.
So how does Condoleezza Rice want to have the phallus then? S/he doesn’t want to be a man and actually have a penis, does s/he?
In the book “Gender Trouble”, published in 1990, and no doubt written in conjunction with Rice and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, the author, Judith Butler, a Professor in the Departments of Rhetoric and Comparative Literature at the University of California, Berkeley, starts to chip away at the Freudian conception of the symbolic phallus by pointing out that the connection between the phallus and the penis is not such that the penis is identical with the phallus: "The law requires conformity to its own notion of 'nature' (10). It gains its legitimacy through the binary and asymmetrical naturalization of bodies in which the phallus, though clearly not identical to the penis, deploys the penis as its naturalized instrument and sign" (11). In other words, according to the lesbian jew Butler, heterosexuality is only a cultural construction, and the penis is thought of as the phallus because of the heterosexual construction of sexuality.
The construction is, according to the tenured Berkeley professor Butler, a performative construction, where repetition of heterosexual sex acts results in the construction of what is then thought to be the natural, essential, “core” heterosexual genders of male and female. Therefore, according to the lesbian sodomite Butler, the heterosexual genders of male and female are not prior to the performances by which they are constructed, and only exist with the repetition of the performances of the heterosexual sex acts. For Butler, there is no natural, biological heterosexuality without the heterosexual sexual performances, the heterosexual sexual activity, which causes, s/he claims, People to mistakenly believe that heterosexuality is the natural and biological sexual identity prior to the performances that construct the heterosexual sexual identity.
But why does Butler do this? What is it that s/he and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, like Condoleezza Rice, really want?
In “Bodies that Matter”, published in 1993, and of course also written in conjunction with Rice and other extra-terrestrial aliens and jews, Butler further deconstructs psychoanalysis, and the goal of the "Professor" and h/er cronies is unveiled. If, according to Butler, “Freud enumerates a set of analogies and substitutions that rhetorically affirm the fundamental transferability of the phallus from the penis elsewhere, then any number of other things might come to stand in for the phallus” (12).
So what is it that the lesbian malakoi Butler and h/er cronies want to transfer the phallus from the penis to?
The transsexual Rice and h/er cronies seek to transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris, to construct what Butler terms a “lesbian phallus” (13). It is a long way from bra burning feminists like Gloria Steinem, although s/he, Steinem, is certainly part of the same group as Butler and Rice & Co.
If the transference is to be done, there would have to be, according to Butler’s theory, performances that would transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris. What performances would do this?
You would think that it would be performances like “the female superior position” (14), or “the woman has a whip and disciplines the man”, or some disgusting “69 position”, or some other nerdy understanding and performance. But it’s much more nerdy, and sociopathologically so, then even the nerdiest gynecological 70’s porno.
Let’s take a look at a scene, a performance, from a porno movie, and no doubt one of many performances by Condoleezza Rice – Inari Vachs was in over 300 porno movies -- in which Rice “steals”, in perhaps one of many ways, the phallus from Barack Obama.
In the scene, Inari Vachs, Vachs meaning “f---s”, and also “fox” (15), is lying on h/er side, looking back at Jake Steed with her head held up by one of h/er hands, and the other hand free. Steed has h/is penis inserted into Vach’s anus, and is performing a sort of anal missionary position sex on Vachs (16). Sounds like Steed the man, giving it to the hot babe Vachs, Steed the stud. So how did Rice, as Inari, the fox, steal the phallus from Steed?
Although Steed has a large and erect penis and a seemingly healthy muscular body –- Steed meaning “stud”, but also “seed”, as in sexual potency -- and is thrusting hard into the anus of Vachs (17), Vachs is not ecstatic and is lying still, giving instructions to the silent and struggling Steed, while staring intensely at the would be stud, and with very dirty, loud, and sexy language.
Steed the stud loses it, and pulls out to ejaculate the premature orgasm that is a part of h/is losing the phallus, because h/e lost control because Inari was so domineering in h/er control of the situation. Vachs grabs the penis, never blinking, and holds it firm while continuing to stare at Steed, even as semen is ejaculated onto h/er entire face; and even after Steed is done s/he continues to hold and fellate the penis and secure h/er possession of the phallus (18).
No doubt there were more “performances” to transfer the phallus from the penis to the clitoris. Vachs went on to do many lesbian scenes, running away with the “lesbian phallus” s/he had stole from Steed, and retired in the summer of 2002.
The performances in which the phallus is stolen are not just those on film, but also others that involve physically damaging the penis so that the penis can no longer get erect. This transference is done by then calling the “erect” clitoris the phallus. This mengele performance is done to those men from whom the phallus cannot be stolen with discourse or language or the media (19).
This “fox” or f--- hole x, or transference, is of course what Inari Vachs set out to do in 1997; and is why s/he chose the name Inari, the name of the Shinto kami that can appear as both sexes, and that has the fox as a messenger, and who can appear as a fox.
I have seen the phallus defined as the sexually undifferentiated tissue in an embryo that becomes the penis or clitoris once the gender is selected as the fetus develops (20). This is obviously an incorrect definition because once gender is selected, the body of the baby develops and the child will definitely have either a penis or a clitoris, but certainly not both. Everyone knows a boy is a boy and has a penis, and grows up to be a man with a penis; and a girl is a girl and has a clitoris, and grows up to be a woman with a clitoris.
So who, or what, is Barack Obama, and what does porno have to do with the political careers of Rice and Obama?
Barack and Michelle Obama are recombinant DNA abominations. They are sodomites from Hades who are the puppets of the jews and extra-terrestrial aliens like Condoleezza Rice, who are using the jews as a vehicle to colonize and destroy the Earth (21).
Does Condoleezza Rice control Barack Obama, or is s/he actually in the body of Barack Obama, or is s/he in the body of Michelle Obama, but really the one in charge, like Hillary was thought to be the brains of the Clinton Whitehouse?
I don’t know, but at the very least Barack and Michelle Obama are networked shit-for-brains whores to the jews. Is Condoleezza Rice? Yes, of course; and s/he even fancies h/erself an inverted sex goddess, a "naturalized", through the many “performances”, sadistic lesbian who has the phallus, h/er clitoris, and the backing of AIPAC (22)(23)(24).
I'm not sure what to make of the number 666 (25), but all of these "leaders" are certainly satanic, and the ram bam is their leader (26).
Notes:
(1). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.helmut-schmidt-onl...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?...
(2). If George W. Bush is the “second coming” of Joseph Smith, Jr. what might h/e do to restore the early Christian church as demonstrated in the New Testament, and to prepare the earth for the Second Coming of Jesus Christ? If you accept that Mormonism was created by jews and that it is a sect within judaism, then you know that George W. is an agent of the jews, and “the second coming” must be prepared by establishing the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus terrorist states-of-affairs and affairs of state of the ZOG Condoleezza Rice Department of State. This is the inversion of The Kingdom of God. When this is done, then the anti-christ may assume power.
So who is the anti-christ? As stated earlier it is the jews, who are led by the ram bam. Is Condoleezza Rice and Barack Obama in power sufficient for the jews being the “leaders” of the “Lost World” of Jaws and Jurassic Park horrors? I believe the jews think so, and it may be that George W. is Barack Obama (a), and Michelle Obama is Condoleezza Rice, and they are possibly each other; and the election of this abomination, it was hoped, would herald the triumph of the gates of Hades upon the Earth.
Notes:
(a). If Obama is not George W., I can’t think who it would be. I don’t think it’s just Jake Steed, and I don’t think it’s Joe Biden. And I don’t think it’s the ram bam, or Ari Fleisher, either.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(3). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Wha...
Jake Steed may be based on or derivative of the porn star Peter North, who may be the transsexual identity of Anthony Perkins of “Psycho” fame.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(4). This possibly has to do with the ethnic cleansing and genocide done by the whore Condoleezza Rice's pimp, the terrorist state of Israel and the jews, especially as Bosnia was a discourse way of justifying the terrorism being done by jews against The Palestinian People. Steed, supposedly a Brazilian-American, is the "Native Person" Rice is ethnically cleansing, if you will, with h/er emasculation of h/im.
(5). Why did Vachs appear from Michigan? I returned from NYC to Michigan in November 1997. I never gave Condoleezza Rice or any other sodomite permission to do anything via me, and Rice is not my nemesis. No one may violate the child of anyone for any reason, of course, even if a parent or the parents agree to the child being violated. Obviously all Human Beings have Human Rights protection, even if one or both of their parents are from Hades.
(6). Inari Vachs may be derivative of two porno starlets who preceded h/er: Isis Nile and Nicole Lace. Isis Nile was based on the Egyptian goddess Isis.
See:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm06...
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm04...
www.aomovies.com/explore/Nicole Lace/stars.html
www.torssexdvd.com/pages/debi...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Clock...
http://www.godado.it/engine.p...
(7). See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://movie-tv-episode-datab...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
(8). See:
http://www.onmarkproductions....
http://www.pantheon.org/artic...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.answers.com/inari
(9). See:
http://www.game-port.com/back...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0...
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt02...
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm088...
http://us.imdb.com/name/nm082...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
http://loadingvault.com/searc...
(10). This is no doubt a claim that Nature must be rendered according to judaic law, the “law” of the Talmud. See: http://www.webshas.org/ishus/...
(11). Judith Butler, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York, Routledge, 1990), pg. 135.
(12) Butler, Judith (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". New York: Routledge, pg. 62.
(13). "The Lesbian Phallus and the Morphological Imaginary," pp.57-91, Chapter 2 in Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex" (1993).
(14). Not that there is anything wrong with the woman on top, there isn’t. But I suspect the jews think this position emasculates the man. However, I think that both men and women enjoy this position, and do this position at least some of the time, and in no way is the man's or the woman’s sexuality negated or changed. The thoughts of jew “experts”, such as Dr. Ruth Westheimer, on this position only further evidences the jews being nerdy and neutered; and shows that in no way should they be involved in the sex lives or in the sexual health of People. See: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/s...
(15). Ivana Humpalot, a character from the movie “Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me”, played by Kristen Johnston, is no doubt based on Inari Vachs, although her name also is a parody of Xenia Onatopp from the James Bond film “GoldenEye” and her character is a parody of Russian Female Agents Anya Amasova/XXX (James Bond film " The Spy Who Loved Me"), Tatiana Romanova (James Bond film " From Russia With Love") and Pola Ivanova (“A View To A Kill”). Ivana meets Austin during a photo shoot, following which they play an erotic game of chess. The scene is a spoof of the 1968 movie “The Thomas Crown Affair”. Ivana Trump may also have to do with Ivana Humpalot. Xenai Onatopp, played by Famke Janssen, emascualted men by crushing them to death with her legs while she was in the female superior position!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(16). This could be an abominable representation of Jesus Christ and John at the Last Supper:
In the Gospel of John, there are four verses (John 13:23; 19:26; 21:7; 21:20) which refer to the "disciple whom Jesus loved", generally interpreted to be John himself.
Several scholars have used these verses to argue that Jesus and John had a homosexual relationship, recently most notably by Jennings (2003). Jennings argues that these verses and the intimacy displayed between Jesus and John, especially at the Last Supper where John is described (John 13:23) as "reclining next to him" (TNIV) or "leaning on Jesus' bosom" (KJV), implies that they were in a homosexual relationship.
However, this interpretation is rejected by most Biblical scholars, who believe that the disciple "whom Jesus loved" refers to a deep friendship and non-sexual intimacy between Christ and his favorite apostle. For example, Vasey (pp.121-124) uses the "deepest intimacy" of the friendship of Jesus and John to affirm homosexual relationships (sick!), but rejects the idea that Jesus and John themselves were in a homosexual relationship.[2] It is also dismissed by Gagnon (2001) in his large-scale study The Bible and Homosexual Practice, not least as the word translated "loved" is the Greek word agape (used, for example, in John 3:16; "for God so loved the world"), rather than the Greek word referring to sexual love, eros.
Responding directly to Jennings' claims, Gagnon argued that Jennings misunderstood ancient culture, as people would recline while eating, so the man "leaning on Jesus' bosom" was simply "reclining next to" Jesus, with no homoerotic implication. Gagnon argued: "the idea that Jesus was a homosexual or engaged in homosexual acts is complete nonsense" that no "serious biblical scholar" had ever proposed (Ostling 2003).
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(17). The jews, who are cursed by God for doing sodomy, mistakenly believe that it was germs in the anus and rectum that caused them to become unhealthy. Because this scene involves anal sex, it is no doubt that Rice cons Obama into losing h/is sexual function by having h/im insert his penis into h/er anus and rectum. This is part of h/er being a spider, “sp” meaning to “flip” the m/an, stealing the phallus, by destroying h/is penis. How is Obama an evil man, deserving this punishment from the kami Inari? Perhaps Steed’s "disappearance" gives a clue: Steed was arrested June 7, 2000 on charges of corporal injury to a spouse and false imprisonment, and, although h/e posted the $500,000 bond, with $50,000 cash, h/e did not show up for h/is trial date in 2001.
(18). How exactly does this result in Obama “losing” the phallus? I don’t know, I think it’s just a very nerdy and indeed neutered conception of sexuality. Any guy would quickly recover from any ego damage, and get more practice. Yet in the Conned-Whore-Lesbo-Lice & Co.’s understanding, Condoleezza Rice now has the phallus, and can run with it, taking it to lesbian “performances” and thereby burying Barack in emasculation.
(19). The “burning” of the man’s penis is done by superimposing a clitoris or a penis onto the man’s penis. Other ways the man is victimized include “probing “the man’s anus, damaging the man’s testicles, harming the man’s body in other ways, having malakoi kouros “girls” give the man a venereal disease, etc.
(20). Dictionary: phallus (făl'əs)
n., pl. phal•li (făl'ī') or phal•lus•es.
1. Anatomy.
The penis.
The sexually undifferentiated tissue in an embryo that becomes the penis or clitoris.
2. A representation of the penis and testes as an embodiment of generative power.
3. The immature penis considered in psychoanalysis as the libidinal object of infantile sexuality in the male.
See: http://www.answers.com/phallus
(21). Why the jews? Because the jews are the only group that hate all the rest of those on the planet, and even hate the planet Earth, in the sense that they hate Mother Nature. Why do the aliens need a vehicle at all, why don’t they just take control of the Earth themselves? Because the jews are from the planet Earth, and if the aliens can use the jews to colonize the Earth, the colonization is held to be legitimate by the actions and beliefs of Human Beings.
The terrorist state of Israel is the condition for the possibility of the aliens colonizing Earth, because it is the colonization of a Native People's land by others of the Earth. If Human Beings accept this, then they can have their own land, anywhere on Earth, colonized by aliens. This colonization is with the Julia-Lewis Dreyfus Affair terrorist states-of-affairs and affairs of state of the Condoleezza Rice-Michelle Obama-Barack Obama ZOG Department of State.
(22). Condoleezza Rice may be based on Diana in the T.V. series V, which had a 4 and a 10 hour miniseries, and 19 weekly episodes which ran from 10/26/84 to 3/22/85. The series has several English actresses, including one who is superior to Diana (Diana might represent Princess Diana), the character Pamela, who might represent Queen Elizabeth II, who is played by Sarah Douglas, who might have something to do with Sarah Ferguson. Diana murders Pamela in the miniseries, for want of power.
See:
http://thevisitors.info/visit...
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3...
http://www.uar.com.au/uar/bad...
http://thevisitors.info/downl...
http://thevisitors.info/downl...
http://www.warnervideo.com/vd...
http://thevisitors.info/episo...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.prairieden.com/int...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(23). Does Barack Obama have to win the election for Condoleezza Rice to keep the phallus? Certainly the jews needed Condoleezza Rice to win to keep intact the delusion that the inverted “second coming” of the retard Joseph Smith, Jr., who prepared the inverted LDS/LSD (a) “Restoration” of the anti-christ, the abominable alien inversion of God, “Inari Vachs” Condoleezza Rice, with the “War on Terror”. With Condoleezza Rice finished, the jews lost all the power they had worldwide.
Notes:
(a). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
(24). See: http://mearsheimer.uchicago.e...
(25). I calculated 612 for Maimonides. Subtracting this from 666, gives 54, the numerical value for the letter I. Because the ram bam is an aI, which means not an I, it may be that the “I Maimonides” means that Maimonides is not an I (a). In this case aI would mean not or without I, with a having the meaning un, which means not, non, opposite of, contrary to.
This is the inversion of 1, which is THE NUMBER OF UNITY. Father. Deuteronomy 6:4 "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. Ephesians 4:5 "one Lord, one faith, one baptism."
Notes:
(a). In Isopsephia, I believe the second vowel of a dipthong is not given any value. In Maimonides, the second vowel of the dipthong ai is i.
Main Entry:
2a-
Pronunciation:
ā also a or ä
Variant(s):
or an- an
Function:
prefix
Etymology:
Latin & Greek; Latin, from Greek — more at UN-
: not : without —a- before consonants other than h and sometimes even before h, an- before vowels and usually before h
Main Entry:
1un-
Pronunciation:
ən, often ən before -stressed syllable
Function:
prefix
Etymology:
Middle English, from Old English; akin to Old High German un- un-, Latin in-, Greek a-, an-, Old English ne not — more at NO
1 : not : IN-, NON- —in adjectives formed from adjectives or participles, in nouns formed from nouns , and rarely in verbs formed from verbs —sometimes in words that have a meaning that merely negates that of the base word and are thereby distinguished from words that prefix in- or a variant of it (as im-) to the same base word and have a meaning positively opposite to that of the base word 2 : opposite of : contrary to —in adjectives formed from adjectives or participles and in nouns formed from nouns
This would also explain why Moses Maimonides gave itself the name “the ram bam”, from the initials of the words Rabbi Moses Ben Maimon. Maimonides hoped to be the aI of all aIs.
What exactly is that? M A I M O N I D E S: M A I, man’s a, or rectum, anus, and large intestine, is who Maimonides is; M O, an mo, because the a is an o, or hole; N, which is the 14th letter of the alphabet, F O U R T E E N, the ma is an fo, or f--- hole, I D, Maimonides is D, the fourth letter of the alphabet, F O U R; E S, E, the fifth letter of the alphabet, F I V E, Maimonides is F-ed “tu tu”, and S, which is the nineteenth letter of the alphabet, 19 or A I.
So, as you can see, Maimonides is the leader of the Pharisees, who are the leaders of the jews; and all the Pharisees lay (a) together in the temple, and the name Maimonides signifies this, the practice of sodomy.
Notes:
(a). See: http://web.ku.edu/~edit/lie.h...
(26). Why and how are the extra-terrestrial aliens under the control and direction of the ram bam? I only know of two extra-terrestrial aliens that are here on the Earth. They are Condoleezza Rice and Ari Fleisher. These two aliens were born here on the Earth, so as to make them “naturalized” “mixed-race” sodomite/aliens. Ari Fleisher was born and raised a jew, but I don’t know if it’s an In Vitro, as jews often are, or not. Same with Condoleezza Rice, although I’m not sure if this fact is widely known.
I’m not saying aliens can be “naturalized”, they cannot be. Because the jews are cursed by God, they are not members of the Human Race, and are instead correctly thought of as a cursed “race”. What if they got a hold of some uncursed genetic material and made a recombinant DNA body, like that of Inari Vachs? Still, because it is an alien, it cannot be thought to be Natural, or “naturalizeable”. What if a jew did this? Still, the jew is a sodomite, and cannot be thought to be Natural, or “naturalizeable”.
So, what is the place of the aliens within judaism? Because judaism is almost entirely run by a neural-network “system”, it is not as if the aliens have any autonomy. Furthermore, the network indicates the will of the jews, and this is largely controlled by the ram bam, who used the network to “thunk” the group mind of zombie shit-for-brains.
So, while you might think the aliens made provision for some superiority of those they wanted “naturalized”, it doesn’t appear to be the case.
Sort By
- Not Einstein September 09, 2008 16:39:16
About Me
Recent Posts
SodaHead Hot Trends
