The Romneys: Animal Abusers - Con Artists

At least they didn't eat the horse...

What's even more dispicable is that they have no remorse in what they did to Seamus, and drugged a horse so that it's lameness wasn't apparent.

What's truely amazing is that those on the left are on drugs and their lameness is readily apparent.

Ah, condoning animal abuse- nice t know just how the cons actually feel. If we are on drugs, no one dosed us up without our consent- something that this poor horse didn't ask for.

You're right, no one forces you to take drugs, although, if I were a miserable liberal and saw my beloved messiah going swiftly down the crapper, I'd probably have to self medicate too.

Obama going down.....only in your dreams.

For your trip in denial.

Yet one more BS story from the left that not only will fail, but will backfire on them. Next week we'll see a story about how the Romney's actually swat flies and have a bug zapper on their porch.

And which candidate happily posed for pictures with that famous dog lover michael vick?

A true greedy scumbag!!!

Yeah, the Obama's are sooooo poor. What an idiot.

Do the math dumb azz! Now go play with your Romney doll.

I stopped counting OblameO's money after a few million.

Get the story straight, the left wing sites and blogs are pure lies... as usual.
Lawyers for Mrs. Romney and the Ebelings argued that the buyer was aware of the defect, a condition disclosed by a veterinarian who conducted a prepurchase exam, and denied any effort to deceive her. They pointed out that she continued to ride the horse, named Super Hit, for more than a year after the purchase in 2008.

Last September, on the eve of a jury trial, Mrs. Romney was dropped from the lawsuit before it was settled out of court, according to the Romney campaign. “The lawsuit was frivolous,” said Gail Gitcho, a Romney spokeswoman. Lawyers for the Ebelings did not return calls.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/0...

The man worships a pedophile. I don't expect him to have morals.

Not good... in fact troubling

At least the Romney's let their pets have good lives. Obama eats his pets.

So now who's worse?

Abusing an animal to the point of administering 4 painkillers at once is not a "good life"

The President never ate a pet. Dog is a common food source in Indonesia and he was 10.

Sure. I should believe what you post in reply after that lying piece of trash you posted?

You're so full of crap I can smell you over the internet.

I think your smelling yourself, put ashirt on so I can stop laughing.

I think you're jealous! I see you're over 50 like me. I bet you wished you looked half as good.

And you think this SOB and his gimp won't sell America down the river? There's a serious sickness about this family!

I would never vote for that piece of crap.

Why are you distorting the truth or is it in your nature to come out with an outright lie, the NY Times has an original article on this, something you choose to overlook.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/0...

The NYT article is hearsay written from interviews with the Romney Camp. I have the court documents.

I saw your documents, the NYT article even covers that, you freaking liar.

Yep. After reading it, that's the only conclusion that you can logically come to. This is just a lame hitpiece by Fawkes.

amazing! Got anymore good ones like this?

Why yes, here is the real story.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/0...

If he actually reads it, he won't comment on it. It destroys their argument.

Disgusting!

Hugs and kisses.

You really are having to sink low to come up with food for the Leftist Propaganda Machine. This is hilarious. It is also a load of horse manure (no pun intended).

Freaking hilarious how this story is putting you all in a panic.

LOL! a dog on a roof didnt get people MURDERED!

It's difficult to panic when I'm laughing so hard.

Exactly.

Who's panicking? You're the one trying to defend the indefensible.