Quantcast

The real game-changer in "Obamacare". Good thing or bad thing?

Heptarch 2012/07/04 13:39:10
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Please read the entire article before commenting. It's just a couple of pages, but it's vital you understand why it's important before commenting. Thanks.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2011/12/02/the-bomb-bur...
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • ProudProgressive 2012/07/04 13:54:37
    Good thing (explain)
    ProudProgressive
    +10
    One of the biggest reasons the cost of health care in this nation has skyrocketed, and made the United States by far the most expensive industrialized nation in which to get health care, is corporate greed. Unlike every other country, which have outlawed the very concept of a for-profit primary care system, the American health care industry has been based on a fatally flawed model from the start - they are an industry which can only make a profit by denying its customers the very thing that they pay the industry for. By denying coverage, the industry profits.

    The Health Care Reform Law does not solve the problem. But it does force the industry to change their m.o. and actually spend most of their money on the service they are supposed to provide, and that is a very, very good thing. This year alone the American public will receive more than a billion dollars in rebates because of this provision.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Mj PINKYFINGERDOWN 2013/01/25 14:16:15
  • ButterflyEcho 2012/12/25 01:05:42
    Good thing (explain)
    ButterflyEcho
    I personally believe it will be a good thing. As someone who has dealt with health issues all of my life, medical care issues are important to me. I think that there are a lot of people who will benefit from it.
    However, I will continue to follow this topic closely, and I hope my opinion doesn't change.
  • Ken 2012/07/09 03:26:39
    Bad thing (explain)
    Ken
    We do not need Government health care, we partially have it now and it is costing most of us far too much. All of us except the ones receiving it for free and it is heading us into bankruptcy. The bottom line is that there are too many Americans who don't meet their personal obligations and expect others to do it for them. The Government is abiding bad habits for a large portion of our society, so much that there will not be enough people to pay for it all. The time to stop it is now.
  • Heptarch Ken 2012/07/09 17:00:31
    Heptarch
    So is it your argument that everyone who can't afford adequate health care are just lazy deadbeats?
  • Ken Heptarch 2012/07/09 19:26:10
    Ken
    No, just alot of them.
  • Heptarch Ken 2012/07/09 19:39:51
    Heptarch
    So everyone should be punished for the small percentage of deadbeats?
  • Ken Heptarch 2012/07/09 20:13:27
    Ken
    It is a high percentage of those on the need list.
  • Heptarch Ken 2012/07/09 20:19:00
    Heptarch
    What are you numbers based on?

    What is this "need list" you're talking about? People who don't have adequate healthcare and need it?
  • Ken Heptarch 2012/07/09 20:23:19
    Ken
    Numbers based on people I know receiving entitlement, especially Medicaid or disability.
  • Heptarch Ken 2012/07/09 20:25:34
    Heptarch
    Ah, ok. So in other words, you don't have solid numbers. You have anecdote.
  • Ken Heptarch 2012/07/09 20:29:06
    Ken
    Where would you get numbers from the Government to prove their aid in fraud. I get my information from the people receiving the aid and knowing their character.
  • Heptarch Ken 2012/07/09 20:39:06
    Heptarch
    You're taking a small sample and extrapolating it to the entire country. That's not a valid way to determine how many people who don't have adequate healthcare are deadbeats.

    If anything, it simply says what kind of people you hang out with.
  • Ken Heptarch 2012/07/09 21:22:55
    Ken
    No, I travel around the country, have meet people across the US, and it's pretty much the same in every state.
  • Heptarch Ken 2012/07/09 22:17:53
    Heptarch
    It's still a small sample filtered through your own personal prism.
  • Ken Heptarch 2012/07/09 22:53:55
    Ken
    What percentage do you think actually deserve help?
  • Heptarch Ken 2012/07/10 02:41:53
    Heptarch
    "Deserve" is the wrong word to use here. Because how does one define that in a legal sense?

    No, better to use "need", then present some easily defined, legally binding ways (such as time limits on benefits) of ensuring that the system can't be abused.
  • Ken Heptarch 2012/07/10 02:54:46
    Ken
    Something needs to be done and soon before we go bankrupt.
  • Heptarch Ken 2012/07/10 03:03:48
    Heptarch
    And it's your contention that Medicare is bankrupting us, is that it?
  • Ken Heptarch 2012/07/10 03:19:54
    Ken
    Medicaid is the culprit, but Medicare is helping it.
  • Dolly 2012/07/07 12:02:08
    Undecided
    Dolly
    I need healthcare that won't kill me but if they cut my benefits more then I will probably die from blood infections with no good dental care and be killed by cars I can't see because I can no longer afford my glasses thanks to my optical heath plan.
  • RicardoCabeza 2012/07/05 01:48:53
    Undecided
    RicardoCabeza
    Undoubtedly the best thing in the "Obamacare" is the fact that it will hold the insurer's feet to the fire and end many abuses commonly practised, but regardless of the reforms I am still opposed to the act, and while I have a health insurance policy I feel that save for a few antibiotics and dental care my primary policy is the best idea which consists of a case of Jim Beam green label whiskey and a colt 1911... I really hate drinking.
  • Don Leuty 2012/07/04 21:09:34
    Bad thing (explain)
    Don Leuty
    +2
    This is the move to put the government as the only game in town.
  • Heptarch Don Leuty 2012/07/05 00:51:23
    Heptarch
    +1
    That's speculation. I hope you're right, though.
  • Don Leuty Heptarch 2012/07/05 03:33:33
    Don Leuty
    With no competition, the government would have no incentive to constrain costs and merely increase the healthcare tax to make up shortfalls, or worse, increase borrowing.
    The Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch (TANSTAAFL)

    Single Payer Universal Coverage is code for YOU PAY through the nose
  • Heptarch Don Leuty 2012/07/05 03:54:15
    Heptarch
    And yet it works just fine in other countries. Somehow they've managed to avoid the pitfalls you're talking about.
  • Don Leuty Heptarch 2012/07/05 04:26:40
    Don Leuty
    Why are the Europeans backing out of national health care? Even England's Labour party is considering ending the NHS. Entitlements are going the opposite direction in EC. The US is the only one bucking that trend. Entitlements have seriously banged up the Euro.

    Do you honestly believe the dollar can stand against the same pressures when it is already under assault by Bernanke's printing presses?
  • Heptarch Don Leuty 2012/07/05 05:32:22
    Heptarch
    "Why are the Europeans backing out of national health care?"

    They're not. Most of them have universal health care and it's doing well.
  • Don Leuty Heptarch 2012/07/05 06:03:07
    Don Leuty
    Obviously you are not keeping up with current events.
  • Heptarch Don Leuty 2012/07/05 06:09:25
    Heptarch
    You mean like 8 of the top 10 happiest countries in the world having universal health care?
  • Don Leuty Heptarch 2012/07/05 06:13:58
    Don Leuty
    Like the EC is scrambling to get rid of entitlements to shore up the Euro.
  • LesWagg... Don Leuty 2012/07/09 02:25:25
    LesWaggoner BN 1
    Obviously you are the one not keeping up with current events. The cost of health care in the U.S. is currently 17% of GDP. That is the highest of any developed nation.
    Taiwan has a single payer health care system that costs 7% of GDP. The government pays and health care professionals run the system.
    I live in Costa Rica which has a single payer system that costs my wife and I just under $100 per month for BOTH of us. The U.S. will certainly not meet that cost but single payer should reduce the cost of health care in the U.S.by 40% as long as health care professionals run the system and start working instead of wasting time..
  • Don Leuty LesWagg... 2012/07/10 14:24:41
    Don Leuty
    A sizable portion of the cost of heathcare in the US could be reduced by tort reform. All those exorbitant malpractice premiums are passed on the the consumer. A substantial reduction in the number of CYA tests would also follow. Another issue that is very cloudy is trying to determine what the true cost of a procedure is.

    I could not get an answer from any hospital or clinic. With a little networking assistance, I got a peek at some of the billings distributed by a servicing firm. The same procedure performed by the same facility had as many as 6 different prices.

    I have experienced a few different healthcare systems. The worst was the UK and the best was German, with respect to service levels. Given the choice, I would still prefer the quality of care of our system.

    Quality is a lot like buying oats to feed your horse. If you wish to have pretty fair oats, you must expect to pay a pretty fair price. If you prefer oats that have already been through the horse, of course, that comes a little cheaper.
  • Dana Don Leuty 2012/07/05 03:16:47
    Dana
    How? Are the insurance companies owned by the govt? I think they are strictly for profit private enterprise.... never heard of Blue cross or Health Net or any of them being run by the Govt like veterans care or medicare is.
  • Don Leuty Dana 2012/07/05 03:39:21
    Don Leuty
    By driving costs up, premiums will be forced to rise making the government the insurance of choice. No competition provides no incentive for price restraint or cost containment. The only provider is the one that can tax you for any shortfall, or ration care. The choice is at their pleasure, not yours.
  • Dana Don Leuty 2012/07/05 04:27:19
    Dana
    Uhhhh guess you have not read or understood the bill. It does not allow for the insurance companies to jack up rates anymore. This is why the mandate.
  • Don Leuty Dana 2012/07/05 04:44:42
    Don Leuty
    Exactly what will drive out the competitors. It is called unfair competition and only benefits the government by providing them with a captive market. The pressure to increase premiums cannot be satiated.

    The mandate is in reality an unfair restraint of trade.
  • Dana Don Leuty 2012/07/05 04:53:18 (edited)
    Dana
    So, you feel that insurance companies should be allowed to just play games and jack people around? It is ok with you to have your rates increased by any amount at will, anytime, no matter what? Then when you get ill or injured... you feel it is the insurance companies rights to then decide to deny you care? This all ok with you?

    let me add in, your 69... so you are on medicare... a GOVERNMENT run health care program. You do not have to worry about getting sick or injured and not getting care, your covered already.

    So you just want to make sure that the "other guy" does not get medical care, because you've got yours?
  • Don Leuty Dana 2012/07/05 05:07:18
    Don Leuty
    +1
    If you though insurance companies are bad...You ain't seen nothing yet. I'm 69. I'm on Medicare. Trust me. United Healthcare was far better to deal with.

    Your day will come. Do not dare print this and keep it in your desk drawer. The words will scorch your desk before you know it, leaving an indelable mark.

    What you are, I once was. What I am, you will be.
  • Dana Don Leuty 2012/07/05 05:17:48
    Dana
    Then go back to United Health care! No one would stop you, surely they would gladly accept your $$! And since you have not, I have to ask you then, what is your legitimate bitch about medicare? I have 3 relatives on this who would not have any care if it was not for Medicare and they are thrilled to have it! One went without health care for years and finally was able to get medicare and she was so relieved. I have been without health care for years, and it is scary. But I have been denied and until 2014 when the provision goes into effect that will no longer allow me to be denied, I will then buy insurance. AND be damn grateful to get it! Until 2014... I will just continue to hold my breath and hope nothing happens that I would need care. Am used to it, been this way for years now. So again... you HAVE health care, be happy... you are one of the lucky ones. Millions are still without till 2014.
  • MadAsHEck Don Leuty 2012/07/07 22:06:38
    MadAsHEck
    Dana apparently has never had a major heart Quad bypass and followup care that costs $400,000 and seen what he will be left with after Medicare pays.

    Friend of mine lost everything, and finally had to declare bankruptcy to cover the residual costs and keep his home and one car. Over $150,000 as I remember.

    Medicare is not free. right now they take $99 out of my SS checks, and my wifes as well for about $198 a month. And under Obamacare in 2013, it is going to be raised. Last I read to about $148 per month, which approaches $300 from our Social Security, That has not had but one COLA in about 4 years. .

    Right now we have an Advantage program that picks up our CoPays. But under Obamacare many of the Advantage programs are going to be put out of business. Some have already folded in anticipation of O'care.

    Here's some idea of how it worked in Massechusetts after 5 years.

    A new study by the Massachusetts Medical Society (MMS), which has 23,000 physicians and student members and publishes the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, takes an in-depth look at healthcare in Massachusetts under the state program, which is often regarded as a model for Obama’s 2010 healthcare reforms. Among its findings:

    • The average wait time for an appointment with an internist is 48 days...































    Dana apparently has never had a major heart Quad bypass and followup care that costs $400,000 and seen what he will be left with after Medicare pays.

    Friend of mine lost everything, and finally had to declare bankruptcy to cover the residual costs and keep his home and one car. Over $150,000 as I remember.

    Medicare is not free. right now they take $99 out of my SS checks, and my wifes as well for about $198 a month. And under Obamacare in 2013, it is going to be raised. Last I read to about $148 per month, which approaches $300 from our Social Security, That has not had but one COLA in about 4 years. .

    Right now we have an Advantage program that picks up our CoPays. But under Obamacare many of the Advantage programs are going to be put out of business. Some have already folded in anticipation of O'care.

    Here's some idea of how it worked in Massechusetts after 5 years.

    A new study by the Massachusetts Medical Society (MMS), which has 23,000 physicians and student members and publishes the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, takes an in-depth look at healthcare in Massachusetts under the state program, which is often regarded as a model for Obama’s 2010 healthcare reforms. Among its findings:

    • The average wait time for an appointment with an internist is 48 days, and the wait time to see a family physician is 36 days.

    • The average wait time for pediatricians is 24 days, according to the MMS’s “2011 Study of Patient Access to Health Care.”

    • Access to primary care physicians is becoming more restricted — 53 percent of family physicians and 51 percent of internists are not accepting new patients.

    • Patients wait an average of 43 days to see a gastroenterologist, and 41 days to see an obstetrician/gynecologist.

    • While 87 percent of family physicians accept Medicare, only 62 percent accept MassHealth, the state’s version of Medicaid.

    • Only 56 percent of family physicians and 43 percent of internists accept Commonwealth Care, an insurance program for adults who don’t have private health insurance and don’t qualify for Medicare. Just 44 percent of family physicians and 35 percent of internists accept Commonwealth Choice, a program for uninsured adults that offers unsubsidized health insurance to people who are not eligible for Medicaid or Commonwealth Care.

    • Due, in part, to a shortage of doctors participating in the program, the number of emergency room visits has actually risen under the Massachusetts plan.
    -----------------------------...
    And the expected cost savings??

    The BHI report states: “Now that the law has been in effect for more than five years, we can begin to assess its impact on the state of Massachusetts.”

    Among the findings:

    • State healthcare expenditures have risen by $414 million over the five-year period.

    • Private health insurance costs have risen by $4.31 billion.

    • The federal government has spent an additional $2.41 billion on Medicaid in Massachusetts.

    • Medicare expenditures increased by $1.42 billion.

    The total cumulative cost over the period is just over $8.5 billion.

    But the state has been able to shift the majority of the costs to the federal government, which continues to absorb a significant part of the cost of healthcare reform through enhanced Medicaid payments and the Medicare program — meaning Americans outside Massachusetts are helping to pay the bills for the healthcare plan.

    In analyzing the study’s results, the researchers observe: “Cost-containment is often a major goal of health reform plans. However, this particular healthcare reform legislation did not provide an effective means for containing costs.
    (more)

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 04:05:54

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals