The President To Romney "Good Luck Tonight", Your Thoughts On The CNN Video?

Romney is capable and learned / well prepared to highlight well with chronological oder in his oratory

He was gracious toward Romney. His further comments were eloquent and thoughtfully presented. I liked his response.

Mitt is the same clown we have now,nothing changes.

Thank goodness this eloquent man is our President.

I loved it!

Lol, that'll play with his and the Tea Party's heads.

Why did he ignore the reporter who asked if he was going to return Mahers 1 million donation? Rush used the word SLUT and Maher used the word C**T.

stupid questions are ignored . like yours . But hey i pity you heres a rave

Of course a 0WEbama drone such as yourself would approve of 0WEbama NOT being asked hard ball questions.

I found him to be, as usual, reasonable and his responses well thought out.

The man is an orator, we bombed Libya, an act of war, we are looking at engaging militarily in Syria, we have imposed sanctions on, and assasinated Iranians, all of wich are acts of war. For all his talk he is just as bad as bush. Down with corporate cronies, war mongers, and would be aristocrats. Vote Johnson.

Is there proof that we "assassinated" Iranians, or is this how you feel, your opinion?

It is my opinion that the government was involved in the deaths of Iranian scientists, it is obvious that our leaders have no issue with assassinations considering the assassination of an American citizen was written off as "standard operating procedure"

Are you referring to the Al-Qaeda guy? Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-born Muslim cleric who joined al Qaeda's Yemen affiliate and directed many attacks?

I am, his crimes are grievous I grant you, that doesn't change the fact that as an American citizen he was guaranteed a trial, and was innocent until proven guilty. If they had tried to arrest the man and he had been killed while resisting in a manner that endangered the lives of those arresting him, I would have no issue. However dropping a missile off at his front door, and then admitting to the world that "its no big deal, we have a kill list for this sort of thing" is a step to far. Murder is wrong, even if your murder an evil man.

I respect your opinion and partially agree with it. Murder is wrong. Would I do the "wrong" thing in certain situations? In a heartbeat. If some one was to threaten the life of my family, friends......heck, if your life was being threatened I would do something to stop it. If I had the option to simply take their legs out and sit on them I'd do that. If the only option I had was to shoot them from across the yard I'd do THAT. It doesn't change the wrongness of murder.
I understand that a basic distrust of government leads to suspecting their motives and their rational for what they do. On the surface it appears that our government killed al-Awlaki because they perceived an imminent threat to others if they did not. I understand why you would not believe or would suspect their rational, though.

Wikileaks points to the assassinations and the bombings at Iranian nuclear facilities being Israeli.

I haven't seen that, if it was Israel, then the us needs to voice its displeasure, and suspend aide, or even impose sanctions.

Highly unconfirmed (as wikileaks tend to be), but such is life in the 'Information Age' http://www.haaretz.com/news/d...

Actually it was the French that bombed Libya.

Actually it was a coalition of NATO forces including France and us bombers commanded by an American

It was French planes, not US.

Barry Soetoro is still a fake and liar.

Excellent points - the candidates aren't CIC and can therefore squander tough words and high rhetoric without the fear of having them become real.

I like Obama's cool nature. To wish a prospective opponent good luck after hearing that same person's jabs and stabs takes equanimity. Our president has it.

Ken Doll, Romney, is going to need more than luck as Super Tuesday isn't going as well as he thought. Gingrich has GA, Santorum has TN and OK, and so far Romney has VT, VA, and MA with OH to close to call. No big sweep means they can continue to carve each other up longer which bodes well for the president.

Classy as always.

Nothing shocking. It is good to see him speak. Not an Obama fan but I did not see much in it that would bother me. I still missed a few parts do to some one talking to much while it was on.

it was fine

He called out the entire GOP field to say if they want to go to war with Iran, they should be ready to explain to the American people the consequences of such an action. He was measured and sure of himself. He did not take the bait to attack Romney with goading by the reporters, very presidential.

Jimbo I have been siding more with Ron Paul, mostly on the war issue. I am not sure what to make of Obama and the wars.

What is your opinion on how he is handling it? I am 100% opposed to war. I can not support a president who wants war without approval of congress.

Has Obama done this, initiate a war without the approval of congress and without declaring it?

No he has not, congress failed to do it's job. Under the War Powers Act Lockerbie 103 allowed Libyan intervention. After the lawful time was up congress had to approve or disapprove of Libyan intervention. They instead had a vote on a criticism only resolution that did not authorize the action or not. Paul punked out not putting up the amendment that Rep. Kucinich did even when he had the first chance to offer it.

But who wanted to go into Libya? I am not clear as to why we went there and if Obama had anything to do with it.

Without the CIC the rebels could not have toppled Gadhafi and many would have been slaughtered. As in the post above Lockerbie 103 allowed lawful intervention. The GOP could have said no after the War Powers Act time was up. They took the spineless route playing a game of flinch with the president. The president did not flinch.