Holy Cr*ppola.........
If you remove the........ ("But Ryan’s") from this statement,
"Washington experience is also light, at least for a potential President—which, after all, is the main job description of a Vice-President. Ryan has worked as a think-tank staffer and Congressman, but he’s never been in charge of a large organization, and he has little experience with foreign policy. Given how Sarah Palin was criticized for her lack of such experience, I’m surprised that Romney would pick someone whose ability to immediately step into the top job is open to question."
You would swear the New Yorker was talking about 0bama. It is funny that suddenly
the New Yorker, and no doubt the NYT, focus upon "experience as a quality necessary
in a potential POTUS" and focus on "never being in charge of a large organization",
"has little experience with foreign policy", and has the "ability to immediately step into the top job is open to question." Wow, all of these characteristics they think are
so important now were not even considered when 0bama was the candidate.
The New Yorker and NYT used to be quality journalism........... but now they
are just a propaganda arm of the Progressive Liberal 0-bots!
Shame on you both, and shame on you 0-bots who are trying to use this to
promote the reelection of the most incompetent POTUS ever!
The New Yorker Magazine..here comes the anti-Ryan BS.. I thought they were taking about Obama!! What say you
Space Invader
2012/08/11 16:08:33
|
|
|||||
|
14 votes
|
|
70% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
10% | |||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
5% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
15% | |||
For one thing, Ryan has no significant private-sector experience.
Besides summer jobs working at McDonald’s or at his family’s
construction company, or waiting tables as a young Washington staffer,
Ryan has none of the business-world experience Romney frequently touts
as essential for governing. In the run-up to his first campaign for
Congress, in 1998, that gap was enough of a concern for Ryan that he
briefly became a “marketing consultant” at the family business, an
obvious bit of résumé puffing.
But Ryan’s Washington experience is also light, at least for a
potential President—which, after all, is the main job description of a
Vice-President. Ryan has worked as a think-tank staffer and Congressman,
but he’s never been in charge of a large organization, and he has
little experience with foreign policy. Given how Sarah Palin was
criticized for her lack of such experience, I’m surprised that Romney
would pick someone whose ability to immediately step into the top job is
open to question
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/08/looks-...
Top Opinion
-
No nonsense NanC...don't BS... 2012/08/11 16:35:29
VOTE FOR ROMNEY NOT THE COMMIE
Can we have an "Amen" for the East Coast liberal elite writer who was assigned the job of "crafting" the "insert Republican name here" article......I'm guessin' that Jayson Blair finally found a job.
"Researchers Find a 'Liberal Gene'
ScienceDaily (Oct. 28, 2010) — Liberals may owe their political outlook partly to their genetic make-up, according to new research from the University of California, San Diego, and Harvard University. Ideology is affected not just by social factors, but also by a dopamine receptor gene called DRD4. The study's authors say this is the first research to identify a specific gene that predisposes people to certain political views...."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/r...
If you remove the........ ("But Ryan’s") from this statement,
"Washington experience is also light, at least for a potential President—which, after all, is the main job description of a Vice-President. Ryan has worked as a think-tank staffer and Congressman, but he’s never been in charge of a large organization, and he has little experience with foreign policy. Given how Sarah Palin was criticized for her lack of such experience, I’m surprised that Romney would pick someone whose ability to immediately step into the top job is open to question."
You would swear the New Yorker was talking about 0bama. It is funny that suddenly
the New Yorker, and no doubt the NYT, focus upon "experience as a quality necessary
in a potential POTUS" and focus on "never being in charge of a large organization",
"has little experience with foreign policy", and has the "ability to immediately step into the top job is open to question." Wow, all of these characteristics they think are
so important now were not even considered when 0bama was the candidate.
The New Yorker and NYT used to be quality journalism........... but now they
are just a propaganda arm of the Progressive Liberal 0-bots!
Shame on you both, and shame on you 0-bots who are trying to use this to
promote the reelection of the most incompetent POTUS ever!
has a record........of incompetence. and dirty lying campaigning.
and we all should be scared about that!
there are some pretty stoooooooopid people out there.
0bama is a pathological liar and will do anything to win. It will
take all of us to keep up the good fight to try to inform people/
time she is on TV.......................She lies almost as well of 0bama.
to keep her honest..... he doesn't mince words with her about
her lies.
be this time. Maybe the GOP will give him the respect and
courtesy that they gave RINO Colin Powell and utilize some
of his experience and knowledge............
intelligent and well schooled in the dangers that
our country faces, and he does not let PC stop him
from talking. He is I think the most refreshing politician in
DC.
'Cause he's black?
That's all I see.....