The Media Turns A Blind Eye As The GOP Rigs Maine For Mitt Romney
The mainstream media has chosen to ignore it, but Mitt Romney’s win
in Maine demonstrated again that there is something shady going on with
the Republican primaries and caucuses.
Despite the facts that all of the state had caucused yet and the
margin separating Mitt Romney and Ron Paul was less than 200 votes,
state GOP Chairman Charie Webster told Washington County, who had to
postpone their caucus today because of an expected snowstorm, and anyone
else who didn’t caucus today that their votes will not count.
Only in a Republican caucus/primary is candidate able to be handed the victory without all of the results being counted.
The Paul campaign had been expecting something like this because the
Romney campaign has been involved in dirty tricks,including getting the
caucus in Washington County where Ron Paul was expected to do extremely
well was canceled. In a statement
the Paul campaign said, “Paul performed well throughout the state,
although his campaign’s stronghold of Washington County did not report
today for inexplicable reasons. Congressman Paul was barely bested by
Gov. Romney by about 194 votes, a margin the campaign is confident it
will make up with the 200 plus votes expected to come out of Washington
County’s caucus.”
Paul said, “I wish all the caucus had met today, because I was
disappointed. There was one caucus that I think we would have done very,
very well. But we won, we lost by I guess almost two hundred votes, a
hundred and ninety votes. It’s almost like we could call it a tie, but
anyway, the votes will be counted. All the caucuses will meet, but I do
want to make a prediction. If I were a betting man, and I do not have
ten thousand dollars to bet. If I were a betting man, I would bet that
we will control the Maine caucus when we go to Tampa.”
The mainstream media has chosen to ignore it, but there is something really wrong going on in the Republican nominating process.
If this whole situation is reminding anyone of Mitt Romney’s caucus
night “win” in Iowa, it should. Just as Rick Santorum won Iowa, it is
very possible that Ron Paul won Maine. The Republican establishment is
so desperate to get Mitt Romney nominated as soon as possible that they
have no qualms about rigging their own elections.
The GOP establishment wanted Mitt Romney to win Maine. They needed
Romney to win Maine, so they made sure that Mitt Romney won Maine.
The Republican establishment is rigging their own primary process to get the nominee that they want.
None of this would be necessary if Mitt Romney was a better
candidate, or if they listened to their own party’s rank and file. The
vast majority of Republican primary voters don’t want Mitt Romney as
their nominee. The 2012 fight between the GOP base and establishment is
an extension of the battle that began during the 2010 elections. After
the base nominated candidates like Christine O’Donnell, Sharron Angle,
and Joe Miller, the establishment decided that they were not going to
allow that to happen again.
The mainstream media doesn’t talk much about it, but there is
something fishy going on in these Republicans primaries and caucuses.
Ron Paul is running a campaign for delegates, so the victory or loss
doesn’t matter to him, but the narrative is everything for Mitt Romney.
The establishment wanted Mitt Romney to look like a winner again, so
they closed the voting and called the caucus over when he was ahead. If a
party would steal the presidency (Bush 2000), I guess rigging caucuses
is small potatoes.
Shouldn’t the Party wait until all the votes are counted before they declare a winner?
Video here: http://www.politicususa.com/en/gop-rigs-maine-romney
Top Opinion
-
Ben Rider 2012/02/12 05:38:39





















Until recently, the race seemed to be Paul's for the taking. Also, Romney also comtinually came under fire from hecklers who persisted in pestering him . Later, Romney said, " "It was a wonderful reception in Maine," It's unethical enough to declare a victor before all voters have cast ballots, but it's even worse when the result is still in question.
I am with Aaron Watterson, and will write him in!! I don't care that you think I'm wasting my vote. I won't be wasting it.
I am afraid, though, that Ron Paul will cave in, as the rest have, thinking that his son will come out ahead in the next elections. He will cave because the Republicans will convince him that if he doesn't, they won't support his son when he wants to run. BUT, when that time comes, they won't back his son, either. They don't back Ron Paul, so what makes you think they would back his son??!!
DON'T GIVE IN, RON PAUL!!! WE DIDN'T GIVE UP, SO YOU DON'T GIVE UP!!!
RON PAUL 2012!!!
Your trying to remove corruption by electing someone from a bankrupt party.
I keep wondering why the GOP is blowing the election.
I am a Ron Paul supporter. This election season, no candidate will get my vote for the Office of President of the United States of America except for Ron Paul. There will be no exceptions. If he does not win the nomination, I will write his name on the ballot.
No amount of slick talking, flip-flopping, wooing, cajoling, threatening, or condescending will persuade me to vote for any other contender for that office.
You don't want to admit it, but you know that the Republican Party cannot beat Obama without me, a Ron Paul supporter. It's long past time you admit it.
You and I have conflicting goals. I will only cast a vote for liberty, for peace, for small government, for fiscal sanity and respect for the Constitution of the United States and adherence to the oath of office of the Presidency. You however are content merely to vote for whatever Republican the GOP leadership and the media approve of.
I will not move. I cannot be persuaded. You cannot win without me.
I am not here to convince you that Ron Paul's positions are superior. I am not here to convince you that his foreign policy is in line with traditional conservatism. I am not here to convince you that his understanding of economics put everyone else in Washington to shame. I...
I am a Ron Paul supporter. This election season, no candidate will get my vote for the Office of President of the United States of America except for Ron Paul. There will be no exceptions. If he does not win the nomination, I will write his name on the ballot.
No amount of slick talking, flip-flopping, wooing, cajoling, threatening, or condescending will persuade me to vote for any other contender for that office.
You don't want to admit it, but you know that the Republican Party cannot beat Obama without me, a Ron Paul supporter. It's long past time you admit it.
You and I have conflicting goals. I will only cast a vote for liberty, for peace, for small government, for fiscal sanity and respect for the Constitution of the United States and adherence to the oath of office of the Presidency. You however are content merely to vote for whatever Republican the GOP leadership and the media approve of.
I will not move. I cannot be persuaded. You cannot win without me.
I am not here to convince you that Ron Paul's positions are superior. I am not here to convince you that his foreign policy is in line with traditional conservatism. I am not here to convince you that his understanding of economics put everyone else in Washington to shame. I am not even here to convince you that the positions of the other candidates are not materially different than Obama.
No, I don't need to do any of that. I only need to tell you that without me, you have lost. If you do not vote for Ron Paul in your Primary or Caucus, you are already defeated. If you fail to nominate Ron Paul to be the Republican candidate for President, Barack Hussein Obama will serve a second term.
This is not blackmail. This is not a threat. This is a simple statement of fact.
I stand firm and I will not accept anything less. You have been warned.
The Primaries might be rigged? Shocking.
You ought to read the President's signing statement.
"I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens. Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a Nation."
http://blogs.ajc.com/jamie-du...