Quantcast

The Height of Arrogance: Obama/Holder Rogue Department of (In)Justice Refuses to Enforce the Law, Refuses to Answer Questions of Senate Committee

Ken 2012/06/13 17:57:40
Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
Move along - Nothing to see here!
Undecided
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
CNSNews.com
Holder Refuses to Provide Testimony on Kagan’s
Involvement in Obamacare




By Terence
P. Jeffrey


June 12, 2012





(CNSNews.com) - Attorney General Eric Holder has refused to
provide written testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee in
response to "questions
for the record"
submitted to him by Sen. Jeff Sessions
(R.-Ala.) that focus on Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan's
involvement in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act--AKA
Obamacare--while she was President Barack Obama's solicitor
general.


Question: “Are you aware of any instances
during Justice Kagan’s tenure as Solicitor General of the United
States in which information related to the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act and/or litigation related thereto was relayed
or provided to her?”


Question: “When did your staff begin
‘removing’ Solicitor General Kagan from meetings in this
matter? On what basis did you take this action? In what other
matters was such action taken?”


Question: “Did you ever have a conversation
with Justice Kagan regarding her recusal from matters before the
Supreme Court related to the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act? If so, please describe the circumstances and substance
of those conversations.”


These are three of the eight questions that Sessions submitted
to Holder on Nov. 15, 2011 to be included as part of the official
record of Holder’s testimony in an oversight hearing that the
Senate Judiciary Committee held on Nov. 8, 2011. Sessions is a
senior member of the committee.


Holder did not provide the committee with a formal response to
Session's questions until June 7, 2012—seven months after
Sessions submitted them.


When he finally did officially respond, Holder did not answer
any of the questions.


Instead, in responding to each, he simply referred the
Judiciary Committee to a letter
Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich had sent to Sessions on
Feb. 24. This letter, in turn, responded to a letter
Sessions had sent to Holder on Jan. 31 noting that Holder had not
yet answered the questions that Session had submitted in November.


Weich’s February letter informed Sessions directly that the
Justice Department would decline to answer his questions to Holder
about Kagan’s involvement in Obamacare.
[On
what possible grounds? There's certainly no attorney-client or any
other privilege attaching to factual questions regarding Kagan's
involvement in the defense of Obamacare!]



Back in March 2010, on the same day that President Obama signed
his health care law, Florida and Virginia sued the administration
challenging the law in federal court. At that time, Elena Kagan
was Obama’s solicitor general, and her job was to defend his
administration’s position in federal court disputes.


Obama did not nominate Kagan to the Supreme Court until May 10,
2010--seven weeks after he had signed the health care law and
Florida and Virginia had filed their suits against it. Kagan
did not recuse herself from her duties as solicitor general until
after Obama nominated her to the court.





. . . .




A federal law, 28 USC 455, says that a
Supreme Court justice must recuse from “any proceeding in which his/[her]
impartiality might reasonably be questioned” or anytime he/[she] has
“expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case
in controversy” while he/[she] “served in governmental employment.”





Comment:
This is the height of arrogance – the Obama administration is in
blatant violation of the law! Elena Kagan was clearly involved in
the defense of lawsuits against the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (aka “Obamacare”) and was required by law to
recuse herself from hearings on those lawsuits. The language in 28
USC 455 is “must recuse” – that means recusal is not
permissive, it is mandatory – yet the the rogue Department of
Justice under this administration not only refuses to enforce the
law, it refuses to even respond to questions from the Senate
Judiciary Committee which has oversight in the matter.

Read the entire story here: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/holder-refuses-provide-testimony-kagan-s-involvement-obamacare

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • jean 2012/06/16 02:31:05
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    jean
    +1
    Where is Congress when we REALLY need them!?
  • Ken jean 2012/06/16 03:39:56
    Ken
    +1
    They are gun-shy after what happened to their attempt to impeach Clinton. Without an honest press and other news media to inform the people it's tough to go against the public opinion they would drum up. I heard some security experts tonight saying that the security leaks from the administration (they were credited to a "White House source" in the N.Y. Times) have done grave damage to our ability to collect "Humint", human intelligence from agents on the ground in foreign countries, because they have compromised them and they won't trust the U.S. anymore.
  • jean Ken 2012/06/16 20:23:31
    jean
    +2
    I am so disgusted Ken. Obama is worse that even I thought he would be. I can't believe a whole nation is taking this corruption with no public outcry. No way can we survive another our years of this. I am truly afraid that another civil war could erupt.
  • Ken jean 2012/06/16 23:15:51
    Ken
    +1
    When you add it up, the "Solyndra" paybacks amounting to over $10 billion, "Fast & Furious," the security leaks to pump up his image as a strong leader, etc., it adds up to a scandal much worse than even the Watergate coverup. Nixon was guilty of obstructing justice, nothing more. Along with Eric Holder, our president is literally thumbing his nose at the people.
  • jean Ken 2012/06/17 01:59:19
    jean
    +1
    BIG TIME! He knows his time is short so he is going to just do whatever he wants to do.
  • Ken jean 2012/06/17 05:36:18
    Ken
    +1
    That's what I'm afraid of. If Romney wins he will have a lot of Executive Orders to overturn!
  • jean Ken 2012/06/17 14:33:51 (edited)
    jean
    +1
    No "if"s but when! This joker has has GOT to go.
  • rknothead 2012/06/15 09:16:33
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    rknothead
    +2
    Yes, and Yes...nothing else to say, but good bye to Holder and Obama. And since that won't happen quick enough, Vote Romney in Nov. He would love to fire Holder!!
  • doofiegirl POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/06/14 19:03:03
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    doofiegirl  POTL~PWCM~JLA
    +3
    When will he realize people already know about Kagan and her views? Here we go again!
  • Groundskeeper Willy 2012/06/14 15:42:40 (edited)
    None of the above
    Groundskeeper Willy
    +3
    Holder's DOJ like other DOJ's are supposed to be independent of the executive branch.

    Personally I do think the AG should be an elected or Congressionally appointed position.



    I've had reservations about every AG going back as far as i can remember was LBJ's / RFK.

    AG's tend to bend to the political wind of the party / president that appoints them. The Names you don't remember, Meese, Thornbaugh, Barr stayed out of the limelight acting in ways that were best for the country.

    While I do believe Holder's arrogance and double standard make the DOJ look anything but independent, I don't believe impeachment would bode well.

    We need to vote them out of office, and the message need to clearly ring in a large way, liberalism IS Not an acceptable mode of governing.
  • Ken Grounds... 2012/06/14 20:31:55
    Ken
    +1
    Agreed - Voting Obama out will get rid of all of his leftist/socialist appointees as well!
  • mwg0735 2012/06/14 11:52:36
  • Fariborz-Zak 2012/06/14 07:52:10
    Undecided
    Fariborz-Zak
    that is how ./.1 run USA
  • TheTruth1313 2012/06/14 06:20:54
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    TheTruth1313
    +2
    Typical Obama/Holder SOP.
  • The Duke 2012/06/14 04:37:25
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    The Duke
    +3
    Obstructing justice in the DOJ? In other words, business as usual in the 0bama regime.
  • mac9 2012/06/14 02:51:35
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    mac9
    +1
    Both are underhanded douche bags!
  • ed 2012/06/13 23:42:03
  • Azrael-In GOD we trust 2012/06/13 22:43:45
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    Azrael-In GOD we trust
    +4
    Impeach and arrest.
  • Son Of ... Azrael-... 2012/06/15 23:41:04
    Son Of Anubis™
    +1
    More like impeach, arrest, try and then execute
  • Azrael-... Son Of ... 2012/06/16 01:05:45
    Azrael-In GOD we trust
    +1
    Well yes, try and convict and whatever the jury finds correct.
  • Kane Fernau 2012/06/13 22:18:53 (edited)
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    Kane Fernau
    +6
    DEMOCRATS ARE PRO VOTER FRAUD!
  • apachehellfire65 2012/06/13 21:54:03
    None of the above
    apachehellfire65
    +2
    you can't impeach holder. but you can fire and prosecute him! this is no big shock though. they have refused to uphold the law since taking office.
  • Ken apacheh... 2012/06/13 23:40:25 (edited)
    Ken
    +3
    Actually you can impeach an Attorney General or any other cabinet officer. Cabinet officers count as "civil officers of the United States" who according to the text of the constitution may be impeached for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
  • heirsoftheking 2012/06/13 21:30:24
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    heirsoftheking
    +4
    Impeach them and execute them!
    Looking into barrel gun
  • BoJay 2012/06/13 20:31:25
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    BoJay
    +6

    In Obama-Land they can get away with anything.
  • Son Of ... BoJay 2012/06/15 23:39:57
    Son Of Anubis™
    He makes a great FAIRY PRINCESS...it's a roll he loved to play with Rahm when he was back in Chicago
  • Ken Son Of ... 2012/06/16 01:29:22
  • Pamela Perkins 2012/06/13 20:01:37
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    Pamela Perkins
    +2
    Rebublicans plan to rein in the corrupt attorney general is long overdue. Eric holder before the fast and furious debacle was a crook, and since the administration is full of crooks, I guess this should not be a surprise. Obama and the Dem's got caught in their own spider web.
  • HOMBRE 2012/06/13 19:59:28
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    HOMBRE
  • Wayne 2012/06/13 19:55:05
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    Wayne
    +6
    Impeach Holder and his slime ball boss.
  • SoCalEx-Dem 2012/06/13 19:53:21
    Impeach Holder NOW! (And while you're at it, impeach Obama too!)
    SoCalEx-Dem
    +3
    Hopefully after the nest election we will have control of the senate and can proceed to have trials for the traitors, whether Obama wins or not.
  • gocar 2012/06/13 19:38:48
    Move along - Nothing to see here!
    gocar
    A witch hunt by any definition of the word. Republicans grandstanding for attention. Happens ever time they control the Congress. Waste of time and money.
  • Pamela ... gocar 2012/06/13 20:13:31 (edited)
    Pamela Perkins
    +3
    Are you all right in the head? Have you been watching the news lately? Your party has become the most corrupt administration of all time. You liberals just cannot handle the truth and will not acknowledge that people in your party are crooks.
  • Zorkon Pamela ... 2012/06/15 22:57:14
    Zorkon
    +1
    No, evidently s/he is NOT all right in the head. S/he very obviously drank the Kool-Aid.
  • Ken gocar 2012/06/13 23:44:24
    Ken
    +1
    So you see nothing wrong with a) Fast & Furious and refusing to release documents to house committee; b) Not prosecuting Black Panthers for intimidating voters; c) Refusing to enforce immigration laws and suing states that do (the Supreme Court is about to nail him on this one); and d) Refusing to provide evidence that a Supreme Court appointee should have recused herself because of involvement in a case that came before the Court?

    Why do I believe that if Bush and his AG had done anything like this you'd be calling for his head?
  • Zorkon Ken 2012/06/15 23:04:58
    Zorkon
    +2
    S/he's not gonna answer you, because that's the way liberal Obama Kool-Aid drinkers do; they "pop up" and post illogical, insane, liberal, in-your-face, knee-jerk, head-in-the-sand, politically correct, pro-Obama madness and then either:

    A. "Run away" and refuse to answer sane replies to their idiocies, pretending the conversation ended with their post, or...
    B. Hide behind the race card, calling people who question their lunacy "racist".

    Either way, their head is in the sand the whole time because they drank the Obama Kool-Aid.
  • ☆stillthe12c☆ 2012/06/13 19:28:15
    None of the above
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +5
    While The House can impeach Holder I doubt that the Senate would have enough votes to remove him from office. As much as I would like to see him removed and the same with the President. By the President giving authority over to the UN he has committed treason as far as I concerned, I doubt that the Senate would remove him and The House has not looked like they would impeach him. This make me think that they are as guilty as he is.
  • whitewulf--the unruly mobster 2012/06/13 19:25:39
  • Pamela ... whitewu... 2012/06/13 20:14:31
  • Azrael-... whitewu... 2012/06/13 22:46:38
    Azrael-In GOD we trust
    +3
    That's exactly how it is, too. We have proof of that from '08.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/24 04:06:27

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals